My post was for humor. By no means was I supporting or not supporting the ruling. Figured I should go ahead and state that so I don't get in a Larry nance jr situation later on in life.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Liberal minority got their way through corrupt judges. I don't think a single state had a majority vote for gay marriage. Liberals will still be miserable people whether they get way or not. They do love failure and moral decay.
How long before we push to allow marriage across species?
Gotcha. There are 25 countries who perform or recognize same sex marriages, and 4 who look like they are on deck. If you include "civil unions" there are a few more. So, technically folks who hate this law could move to any of the other 167 countries if they wanted to.Places where there are laws against homosexuality.
Would absolutely watch Gay Divorce Court. When you chuckle just hearing the title, you know the show would kill.Well, to be clear, I am completely against this...it's truly against my beliefs & against God's will...
But I do have an idea for a TV show now..."Gay Divorce Court" ...there's no way that wouldn't be funny
Wow...not a single state voted to allow regular marriages either. Should those all be voided?Liberal minority got their way through corrupt judges. I don't think a single state had a majority vote for gay marriage. Liberals will still be miserable people whether they get way or not. They do love failure and moral decay.
I'm curious about can of worms coming from this. Straights getting
Desparate people do desparate things. My question was purely hypothetical and not what I think nessecarily. That's why I asked. To see what others thought. I guess my question should be 'can gay marriage lead to a national insurance scandal?'. I'm a straight engineer not an insurance guy. It is just something I have wondered recently and this seemed like a good place to ask.
Call me ignorant but can gay spouses be on each others insurance at work? If so, what's to keep buddies, male or female, from getting "married" for insurance purposes? And finally, would that be insurance fraud if they did? Just curious.
You think someone would marry their buddy for benefits ?
It would put Judge Judy out of business!Would absolutely watch Gay Divorce Court. When you chuckle just hearing the title, you know the show would kill.
Show me one stat that the world is worse off today than it was 50 years ago (non-climate)...Since they approved that gay marriage is allowed, are Polygamists next? Seems like they have been sitting back in Mormon territory waiting for all the gays to fight this battle. Now that the gays and lesbians won, it seems like they have a pretty simple case to win. The Supreme Court just stated that marriage isn't defined by a man and a woman anymore. If marriage isn't a man and a woman anymore, then who knows what will pop up next?
On a different subject:
Sin is rampant throughout the world and it is because God followers are at an all time low and moving quickly in the wrong direction. They are under attack from terrorists, liberals, gays, atheists, etc. This has happened over and over in history with our ancestors. The more this country and the World moves away from God, the more bad things that will happen to this country and the World. Folks who read the Bible and the lessons understand what I am talking about.
Says the guy with a Jason avatarSince they approved that gay marriage is allowed, are Polygamists next? Seems like they have been sitting back in Mormon territory waiting for all the gays to fight this battle. Now that the gays and lesbians won, it seems like they have a pretty simple case to win. The Supreme Court just stated that marriage isn't defined by a man and a woman anymore. If marriage isn't a man and a woman anymore, then who knows what will pop up next?
On a different subject:
Sin is rampant throughout the world and it is because God followers are at an all time low and moving quickly in the wrong direction. They are under attack from terrorists, liberals, gays, atheists, etc. This has happened over and over in history with our ancestors. The more this country and the World moves away from God, the more bad things that will happen to this country and the World. Folks who read the Bible and the lessons understand what I am talking about.
Show me one stat that the world is worse off today than it was 50 years ago (non-climate)...
Where did you get this map from? Since when is legal to get married in Russia??are moving to another country. i know a bunch of you must have promised at some point that if same sex marriage gets legalized you'd move. how many of you can i count on to keep your word?
Choices would be highlighted in red.. Good luck
There is no stat that shows more individuals get entitlements than there are that work. You've either been misled or you are misquoting.Not enough time or space to address the world situation, but in 2013 there were more people on welfare than were people working in the U.S. I say this realizing that to some people, this is progress. I can also say beyond a shadow of a doubt that society as a whole in this country is in much worse shape because of a decline in the traditional family structure. My wife works in the public school system in S.C. and it is unbelievable how many kids have no support or structure in their lives. I have no statistics at hand; just know it's a lot different than when I was in school. She works in one of the best school districts in S.C., btw.
There is no stat that shows more individuals get entitlements than there are that work. You've either been misled or you are misquoting.
Also, just to point out, you listed no stats. Personal opinions backed up by vague anecdotes don't count here. I need to see some real world numbers...
I'll come up with it later. Still at work. SInce by your challenge to come up with a statistic that the world is in worse shape than 50 years ago, I can only assume that you have stats that the world is better off than it was 50 years ago.
are moving to another country. i know a bunch of you must have promised at some point that if same sex marriage gets legalized you'd move. how many of you can i count on to keep your word?
no, you wont. because its not factually accurate. Its only "correct" if you include within the category "people receiving entitlements" ANYONE receiving government money of any kind, including people taking tax deductions, or receiving credits, etc etc, and the overwhelming majority of those people are also working. And guess what, republicans have been using this unbelievably misleading number in the last few years, and its disingenuous and misleading, and you bought it.
Hang on pal, closing up for the day and heading home. get back to you later.
There are plenty of reason to believe the US/World is a better place now than 50-100 years ago.
- The US Violent Crime has dropped drastically since the mid-90s.
- Victimization of Children has declined in the US
- Worldwide people dying as a result of war as dropped significantly
- % of population that is living in poverty and/or starving has declined
- Worldwide life expectancy is growing
- % of enslaved people has decreased
The news just makes it seem like the world just gets worse and worse.
Not everything is better, but by a large the world is a better safer place now than it was in the past.
Pretty sure that a religious institution can kick out anyone they want from their church and they don't have to perform any marriages they don't want to. The ruling today doesn't affect them in any way other than they might be asked to perform one and they might choose to say no. Gays have no legal standing to sue them on this. The ruling today simply states that it's illegal for states to have laws that exclude gays from marriage.what does this mean for ministers and churches? Our Church has married gay couples before, so It doesnt really affect me, but Im curious what this means for churches who are little more Old Testament????
LMAO. You can't possibly be serious. No state had a majority vote? LOL. Mine did. Liberal minority? Corrupt judges? Where do you come up with this stuff?
My husband and I will be moving to Latvia.are moving to another country. i know a bunch of you must have promised at some point that if same sex marriage gets legalized you'd move. how many of you can i count on to keep your word?
no, you wont. because its not factually accurate. Its only "correct" if you include within the category "people receiving entitlements" ANYONE receiving government money of any kind, including people receiving food stamps and medicaid, etc etc, and the overwhelming majority of those people are also working. The referenced number also includes children and senior citizens, who cannot work or have retired. And guess what, republicans have been using this unbelievably misleading number in the last few years, and its disingenuous and misleading, and you bought it.
here is a politifact article on the misleading number
There are plenty of reason to believe the US/World is a better place now than 50-100 years ago.
- The US Violent Crime has dropped drastically since the mid-90s.
- Victimization of Children has declined in the US
- Worldwide people dying as a result of war as dropped significantly
- % of population that is living in poverty and/or starving has declined
- Worldwide life expectancy is growing
- % of enslaved people has decreased
The news just makes it seem like the world just gets worse and worse.
Not everything is better, but by a large the world is a better safer place now than it was in the past.
Wait...are you a female?My husband and I will be moving to Latvia.
no, you wont. because its not factually accurate. Its only "correct" if you include within the category "people receiving entitlements" ANYONE receiving government money of any kind, including people receiving food stamps and medicaid, etc etc, and the overwhelming majority of those people are also working. The referenced number also includes children and senior citizens, who cannot work or have retired. And guess what, republicans have been using this unbelievably misleading number in the last few years, and its disingenuous and misleading, and you bought it.
here is a politifact article on the misleading number
My husband and I will be moving to Latvia.
The current dependancy was created byYeah, I have already read that article. Of course politifact is a known liberal organization that solely exists to discredit Rebublicans. I am not a republican, btw/. The point was, and still is that welfare is growing in this country and not declining. Anyone with a brain can see how the family structure has been decimated by gov't dependency. It has not been used properly and has now created a gov't dependent voting class for dems. Read "Uncle Sam's Plantation", written by Starr Parker, a woman of color who grew up in it. Our current admin has actively marketed and advertised "welfare" in this country. They are seeking to enroll any and everyone. My middle son, an Aug, 2012 grad of Clemson has chosen where he will live over taking the first good paying job. He has lived in Charleston since early 2013. He makes just enough to live on while waiting on a better job, just because he loves Charleston so much. He called me back in February after doing his taxes on TurboTax. At the very end of submitting his forms, he began receiving pop up links from gov't sponsored sites wanting to enroll him in every kind of program you can think of. Anything from EBT card to free cell phone.
BTW, your analysis of the Politifact article is also misleading. When the article gets to the point about recipients that are working, it says nothing about working full time. I am sure there are are millions of people working part-time who are also recipients, as there are millions of people now having to work part-time so there employer doesn't have to provide healthcare.
Keep your head in the sand buddy. The fact is, our current fiscal situation is due to the conservative principles which have allowed the huge disparity in wealth in this country. Walmart is a great micro example of this problem. They pay their workers tiny wages which they can't afford to live on so that the rest of us can buy cheap garbage for next to nothing. The owners are some of the richest people in the country. But most of Walmarts workers are actually on the dole. Does that make any sense? How the hell can anyone live off seven dollars an hour? Conservatives like to say that this job should only be temporary and should eventually turn into higher-paying jobs. How is that supposed to happen when people are raised in poverty and can't afford to go to school? Yes, some people claw their way out. But not everyone can. If we continue down this path, we are eventually going to have two very distinct classes in this country, and it will be 1860 all over again.Yeah, I have already read that article. Of course politifact is a known liberal organization that solely exists to discredit Rebublicans. I am not a republican, btw/. The point was, and still is that welfare is growing in this country and not declining. Anyone with a brain can see how the family structure has been decimated by gov't dependency. It has not been used properly and has now created a gov't dependent voting class for dems. Read "Uncle Sam's Plantation", written by Starr Parker, a woman of color who grew up in it. Our current admin has actively marketed and advertised "welfare" in this country. They are seeking to enroll any and everyone. My middle son, an Aug, 2012 grad of Clemson has chosen where he will live over taking the first good paying job. He has lived in Charleston since early 2013. He makes just enough to live on while waiting on a better job, just because he loves Charleston so much. He called me back in February after doing his taxes on TurboTax. At the very end of submitting his forms, he began receiving pop up links from gov't sponsored sites wanting to enroll him in every kind of program you can think of. Anything from EBT card to free cell phone.
BTW, your analysis of the Politifact article is also misleading. When the article gets to the point about recipients that are working, it says nothing about working full time. I am sure there are are millions of people working part-time who are also recipients, as there are millions of people now having to work part-time so there employer doesn't have to provide healthcare.
The current dependancy was created by
Keep your head in the sand buddy. The fact is, our current fiscal situation is due to the conservative principles which have allowed the huge disparity in wealth in this country. Walmart is a great micro example of this problem. They pay their workers tiny wages which they can't afford to live on so that the rest of us can buy cheap garbage for next to nothing. The owners are some of the richest people in the country. But most of Walmarts workers are actually on the dole. Does that make any sense? How the hell can anyone live off seven dollars an hour? Conservatives like to say that this job should only be temporary and should eventually turn into higher-paying jobs. How is that supposed to happen when people are raised in poverty and can't afford to go to school? Yes, some people claw their way out. But not everyone can. If we continue down this path, we are eventually going to have two very distinct classes in this country, and it will be 1860 all over again.