ADVERTISEMENT

Trump supporters with teenage daughters

Lots of gibberish there to make yourself feel better. Real question; third trimester mothers life at risk. Kill the fetus or kill the mother. Which do you choose?
There's no gibberish about it. To answer your question, in the event you can't save both, you kill the fetus.

There are states where abortion is legal at any stage during a pregnancy. Is your position that killing a fetus that would survive outside of the womb doesn't constitute murder? It's not merely a "clump of cells" at that point, nor is it fully dependent on the woman to surve. If it is, I'm sorry, I don't want to hear a single word about regard for human life, let alone women's lives. People have every right to be thoughtful and considerate about the status of women given history. I want my daughter to have the same opportunities as my son. What that doesn't imply is twisting legitimate concern for women into an excuse to justify murder committed by women. The cases of rape, incest, or a medical threat to the mother need to be handled with more care, but you're frankly out of your mind to link something like women's suffrage to a woman's ability to terminate a pregnancy that was the product of a consensual, mutual act. Is there any other context where agency over one's body is an excuse to harm someone else? We should by all means take reasonable steps to prevent unwanted pregnancies from occuring in the first place, yet at some point, somebody has to take responsbility for their own actions.

If it's not, great, but then I don't see how you can be so up in arms about someone else having the same opinion earlier in a pregnancy. You've already conceded that there's no absolute right for a woman to kill a fetus.

Shocking - Project 2025 was real after all

Beyond the consolidation of power and reclassifying federal employees so he can fire them and replace with loyalists? I didn’t know you guys wanted to elect a king.

Targeting immigrant communities through mass deportations and raids, ending birthright citizenship, separating families, and dismantling our nation’s asylum system.

Exploiting the executive branch’s vast and unprecedented powers to spy on Americans’ lives with warrantless surveillance of our data.

Violating the First Amendment by using federal law enforcement to target journalists and protestors.

Abusing executive power to interfere in our elections by criminalizing the voting process and damaging fair representation.

Censoring academic discussions about race, gender, and systemic oppression, in violation of the First Amendment, and promising to cut federal funding for schools with curricula that touch on these subjects.

Project 2025 proposes that the entire federal bureaucracy, including independent agencies such as the Department of Justice, be placed under direct presidential control - a controversial idea known as "unitary executive theory".

Under the proposals, pornography would be banned, and tech and telecoms companies that allow access to it would be shut down.

Leftist claptrap. Can you cite a passage you disagree with?
For staters, here are its stated goals:
  1. Secure the border, finish building the wall, and deport illegal aliens
  2. De-weaponize the Federal Government by increasing accountability and oversight of the FBI and DOJ
  3. Unleash American energy production to reduce energy prices
  4. Cut the growth of government spending to reduce inflation
  5. Make federal bureaucrats more accountable to the democratically elected President and Congress
  6. Improve education by moving control and funding of education from DC bureaucrats directly to parents and state and local governments
  7. Ban biological males from competing in women' s sports
Which ones do you disagree with? I'll go first. #7. This is none of the federal government's concern. They should stay completely out of it.

Until then, I'll attempt to dissect your copied and pasted comments in a later post.
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing

NEVER FORGET: Not a Single Election Expert Has Been Able to Explain the “Drop and Roll” Phenomenon that Flipped the 2020 Election to Joe Biden

Shouldn't the more relevant question be why didn't the deep state rig it again? We are now in power so it should have been easier to do. Why don't you look into who stole our votes? 🤔
Login to view embedded media

Resident Libs and Never Trumpers GITT

I think those are very human responses and I get it. Just don't feel like what Jesus would do. But I'm not the person who decides what JC would do or not, so if you feel He would, that's cool.

Just know (and again, I wasn't like only calling you out), that when someone who half the time on social media (or forums) uses God's name, and identifies themselves as a Christian, then acts like the people I've seen on social media, they are 100% absolutely damaging their witness. And makes it seem pretty strongly that the faith they talk about the other days makes them no different from anyone else who doesn't have faith.
I get what you’re saying and I’ve been very careful with my words (believe it or not). I’ve only made it a point to call out those who have called me a racist and bigot!
  • Like
Reactions: amynhop
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT