This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

okclem said:

I've tried sounding the alarm, to various degrees, to people I think might listen about Mike Flynn. He is the most dangerous man in America, but almost nobody wants to hear it.

Just look at it like this. If the shit hits the fan to the point where Biden has to call in troops, the sales of anything worthwhile one might need to defend themselves will cease immediately, and you'll have what's in your house and that's it.

Everyone should get a few weeks worth of food, water, batteries, medicine, etc. (at bare minimum) for an emergency.

Target dates to know:
- Swing state certification dates starting in early December
- Jan 2, the day Congressional Republicans will attempt to force a govt shutdown by not passing a budget
- Jan 6, congressional certification day, mandated by law even in the event of a shutdown.
- Jan 20, inauguration day

I personally think things are going to get hot in early December, and stay hot a while. Thankfully, Biden has blanket immunity for any official acts. I hope he's prepared to use that power if necessary.

I also hope the pragmatists in the Biden administration are prepared to 25th amendment his ass if he isn't up to protecting us.

Lastly, we are at the 11th hour. The maga cult will not get another chance. This is it, it's all or nothing for them this time, and freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose.

Click to expand...

HOLY HELL this dude has lost his mind. How anyone could possibly say all of this and actually believe it is scary. Kevin O'Leary said it best when he said the reason that the American goverment is the greatest in the world is that when it gets to far left or right, it has the ability to correct itself. It corrected itself on November 5th. Someone should really check in on this dude and make sure he is okay.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

CUTiger1977 said:

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

Do you have an example of this to people outside of the church?

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

DW4_2016 said:

Lots of gibberish there to make yourself feel better. Real question; third trimester mothers life at risk. Kill the fetus or kill the mother. Which do you choose?

Click to expand...

There's no gibberish about it. To answer your question, in the event you can't save both, you kill the fetus.

There are states where abortion is legal at any stage during a pregnancy. Is your position that killing a fetus that would survive outside of the womb doesn't constitute murder? It's not merely a "clump of cells" at that point, nor is it fully dependent on the woman to surve. If it is, I'm sorry, I don't want to hear a single word about regard for human life, let alone women's lives. People have every right to be thoughtful and considerate about the status of women given history. I want my daughter to have the same opportunities as my son. What that doesn't imply is twisting legitimate concern for women into an excuse to justify murder committed by women. The cases of rape, incest, or a medical threat to the mother need to be handled with more care, but you're frankly out of your mind to link something like women's suffrage to a woman's ability to terminate a pregnancy that was the product of a consensual, mutual act. Is there any other context where agency over one's body is an excuse to harm someone else? We should by all means take reasonable steps to prevent unwanted pregnancies from occuring in the first place, yet at some point, somebody has to take responsbility for their own actions.

If it's not, great, but then I don't see how you can be so up in arms about someone else having the same opinion earlier in a pregnancy. You've already conceded that there's no absolute right for a woman to kill a fetus.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

TruePatriot said:

Beyond the consolidation of power and reclassifying federal employees so he can fire them and replace with loyalists? I didn’t know you guys wanted to elect a king.

Targeting immigrant communities through mass deportations and raids, ending birthright citizenship, separating families, and dismantling our nation’s asylum system.

Exploiting the executive branch’s vast and unprecedented powers to spy on Americans’ lives with warrantless surveillance of our data.

Violating the First Amendment by using federal law enforcement to target journalists and protestors.

Abusing executive power to interfere in our elections by criminalizing the voting process and damaging fair representation.

Censoring academic discussions about race, gender, and systemic oppression, in violation of the First Amendment, and promising to cut federal funding for schools with curricula that touch on these subjects.

Project 2025 proposes that the entire federal bureaucracy, including independent agencies such as the Department of Justice, be placed under direct presidential control - a controversial idea known as "unitary executive theory".

Under the proposals, pornography would be banned, and tech and telecoms companies that allow access to it would be shut down.

Click to expand...

Leftist claptrap. Can you cite a passage you disagree with?
For staters, here are its stated goals:

1. Secure the border, finish building the wall, and deport illegal aliens
2. De-weaponize the Federal Government by increasing accountability and oversight of the FBI and DOJ
3. Unleash American energy production to reduce energy prices
4. Cut the growth of government spending to reduce inflation
5. Make federal bureaucrats more accountable to the democratically elected President and Congress
6. Improve education by moving control and funding of education from DC bureaucrats directly to parents and state and local governments
7. Ban biological males from competing in women' s sports

Which ones do you disagree with? I'll go first. #7. This is none of the federal government's concern. They should stay completely out of it.

Until then, I'll attempt to dissect your copied and pasted comments in a later post.

dpic73 said:

Shouldn't the more relevant question be why didn't the deep state rig it again? We are now in power so it should have been easier to do. Why don't you look into who stole our votes? 🤔

Click to expand...

Login to view embedded media

She voted for Trump didn't she?

Login to view embedded media