Here are the revenue numbers per EADA after the 2023-2024 season for the ACC
Stanford (Pac 12) 200M (14th National)/Stanford is 49th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting way less winning percentage in comparison to their revenue numbers
1. Miami 182M (20th National) /Miami is 21st nationally in wins from 2000-2023 so they are even in revenue and winning percentage
2. CL 171M (23rd National) / CL is 7th nationally in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting way more winning percentage in comparison to their revenue
3. FSU 170M (26th National) / FSU is 15th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are also getting more winning percentage in comparison to their revenue numbers
4. Duke 167M (27th National) / Duke is 114th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting way less winning percentage in comparison to their revenue numbers
5. Louisville 165M (28th National) / Louisville is 26th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are even in revenue and winning percentage
6. UNC 157M (32nd National)/ UNC is 80th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting way less winning percentage in comparison to their revenue numbers
CAL (P12) 147M (38th National)/ CAL is 74th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting way less winning percentage in comparison to their revenue numbers
7. VT 139M (43rd National)/ VT is 18th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting more winning percentage than they are in comparison to their revenue numbers
8. Pitt 138M (45th National) / Pitt is 40th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are even in terms of winning percentage and revenue
9. BC 137M (46th National)/ BC is 47th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are even in terms of winning percentage and revenue
10. UVA 135M (48th National) / UVA is 85th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting way less winning percentage in comparison to revenue numbers
11. NC ST. 133M (49th National)/NC ST is 42nd in wins from 2000-2023 so they are even in terms of winning percentage and revenue
12. GT 128M (53rd National) / GT is 48th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are even in terms of winning percentage and revenue
13. Cuse 112M (60th National) Syracuse is 98th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting way less winning percentage in comparison to revenue numbers
14. WF 102M (63rd National)/ WF is 76th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting less winning percentage in comparison to revenue numbers
SMU (AAC) 100M (65th National)/SMU is 97th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting less winning percentage in comparison to revenue numbers
AVG - 146M (ACC ONLY)
Teams getting much better winning percentage in comparison to their revenue (These teams need to be rewarded for their accomplishments) - CL, FSU, and VT
Teams getting similar winning percentage as revenue rankings (These teams seem to be paid about right for their production) - Miami, Louisville, Pitt, BC, NC ST, GT
Teams getting way less winning percentage in comparison to revenue (These teams need to be penalized for their lack of accomplishments) - Stanford, Duke, UNC, CAL, UVA, Cuse, WF, SMU** These teams are the are part of the reason why the ACC continues to get crappy TV contracts. Stanford is the only one that is in the top 50 in winning percentage the rest range from 74th to 114th. That is unacceptable to have 7 teams over 74th in winning percentage making this much money.
Others with ties to the ACC:
ND - 235M Well above the best of the ACC, 6th in country/ ND is 22nd in winning percentage so they are getting less wins in comparison to their revenue, but they are top 25.
Stanford - 199M (P12 numbers, now in the ACC) - Tops in the ACC. However, they are taking 30% TV shares for a while so their numbers could go down. 49th in winning percentage/14th in Revenue
CAL - 147M just above the average. However, they are taking 30% TV shares for a while so their numbers could go down. 74th in winning percentage/38th in revenue
SMU - 100M (AAC numbers) - This will be interesting as they aren't taking any ACC TV money for 9 years. There number could go down over those 9 years, but I suspect it will go up and have a huge increase when they start getting TV money as well. Not sure how the football success initiatives will affect them or not during those 9 years. 97th in winning percentage/65th in Revenue
MD (Former ACC member) - 133M good for 12th in the ACC even though they have been in the Big 10 for A LONG time. 68th in winning percentage/50th in revenue
SC (Former ACC founding member) - 184M in the SEC. They are making more money than anyone in the ACC and they SUCK. This hurts a lot. 43rd winning percentage/19th in revenue
Possible ACC future expansion candidates:
ND - 235M IND 6th in revenue/22nd in winning percentage (YES, top 22 in both)
KS - 215M Big 12 11th in Revenue/122nd in winning percentage (NO)
Baylor - 148M Big 12 36th in Revenue/79th in winning percentage (NO)
CO - 147M P12 37th in Revenue/106th in winning percentage (NO)
TCU - 142M Big 12 41st in Revenue/10th in winning percentage (YES, top 41 in both)
AZ - 139M P12 44th in Revenue/91st in winning percentage (NO)
Ok St - 132M Big 12 51st in Revenue/20th in winning percentage (YES, top 51 in both)
BYU - 130M 1/2 share of Big 12 TV money 52nd in Revenue/28th in winning percentage (YES, top 52 in both)
AZ ST - 127M P12 54th in Revenue/55th in winning percentage (Probably not, above 50 in both)
OR ST - 120M P12 57th in Revenue/61st in winning percentage (Probably not, above 50 in both)
TT - 115M Big12 58th in Revenue/41st in winning percentage (Probably not, close to 60th in revenue and above 40 in winning percentage)
Utah - 112M P12 59th in Revenue/15th in winning percentage (YES, below 60 in revenue, but top 15 in winning percentage)
K STate - 106M Big12 61st in Revenue/30th in winning percentage (Maybe 30th in winning percentage, but revenue is a concern)
WVU - 106M Big 12 62nd in Revenue/29th in winning percentage (Maybe 29th in winning percentage, but revenue is a concern)
Ia ST - 101M Big 12 64th in revenue/90th in winning percentage (NO)
Houston - 97M 1/2 share of Big 12 TV money 66th in revenue/46th in winning percentage (NO)
USF - 95M AAC 67th in revenue/63rd in winning percentage (NO)
UCF 93M 1/2 share of Big 12 TV money 68th in revenue, 35th in winning percentage (Possibly) (Would be a great replacement if Miami of FSU is lost)
Uconn - 92M AAC 69th in revenue/107th in winning percentage (NO)
Cincy 90M 1/2 share of Big 12 TV money 70th in revenue/27th in winning percentage (Maybe, revenue is a concern)
WA ST 89M P12 71st in revenue/78th in winning percentage (NO)
S Diego St. 84M MW 72nd in revenue/56th in winning percentage (NO)
The only ones that increase the money AVG are ND, KS, Baylor and CO. Stanford and CAL did as well, but SMU did not. However, SMU has the potential to shoot up to the top with their donors and after the ACC TV money starts rolling in. Stanford was #2 in revenue in the former P12 behind USC. CAL was #7 just behind CO. The issue is finding teams that have the revenue and the winning percentage history to go along with it. ND, TCU, OK ST., BYU and Utah are the only ones that would make sense from a revenue and winning percentage.
Stanford (Pac 12) 200M (14th National)/Stanford is 49th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting way less winning percentage in comparison to their revenue numbers
1. Miami 182M (20th National) /Miami is 21st nationally in wins from 2000-2023 so they are even in revenue and winning percentage
2. CL 171M (23rd National) / CL is 7th nationally in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting way more winning percentage in comparison to their revenue
3. FSU 170M (26th National) / FSU is 15th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are also getting more winning percentage in comparison to their revenue numbers
4. Duke 167M (27th National) / Duke is 114th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting way less winning percentage in comparison to their revenue numbers
5. Louisville 165M (28th National) / Louisville is 26th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are even in revenue and winning percentage
6. UNC 157M (32nd National)/ UNC is 80th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting way less winning percentage in comparison to their revenue numbers
CAL (P12) 147M (38th National)/ CAL is 74th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting way less winning percentage in comparison to their revenue numbers
7. VT 139M (43rd National)/ VT is 18th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting more winning percentage than they are in comparison to their revenue numbers
8. Pitt 138M (45th National) / Pitt is 40th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are even in terms of winning percentage and revenue
9. BC 137M (46th National)/ BC is 47th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are even in terms of winning percentage and revenue
10. UVA 135M (48th National) / UVA is 85th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting way less winning percentage in comparison to revenue numbers
11. NC ST. 133M (49th National)/NC ST is 42nd in wins from 2000-2023 so they are even in terms of winning percentage and revenue
12. GT 128M (53rd National) / GT is 48th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are even in terms of winning percentage and revenue
13. Cuse 112M (60th National) Syracuse is 98th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting way less winning percentage in comparison to revenue numbers
14. WF 102M (63rd National)/ WF is 76th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting less winning percentage in comparison to revenue numbers
SMU (AAC) 100M (65th National)/SMU is 97th in wins from 2000-2023 so they are getting less winning percentage in comparison to revenue numbers
AVG - 146M (ACC ONLY)
Teams getting much better winning percentage in comparison to their revenue (These teams need to be rewarded for their accomplishments) - CL, FSU, and VT
Teams getting similar winning percentage as revenue rankings (These teams seem to be paid about right for their production) - Miami, Louisville, Pitt, BC, NC ST, GT
Teams getting way less winning percentage in comparison to revenue (These teams need to be penalized for their lack of accomplishments) - Stanford, Duke, UNC, CAL, UVA, Cuse, WF, SMU** These teams are the are part of the reason why the ACC continues to get crappy TV contracts. Stanford is the only one that is in the top 50 in winning percentage the rest range from 74th to 114th. That is unacceptable to have 7 teams over 74th in winning percentage making this much money.
Others with ties to the ACC:
ND - 235M Well above the best of the ACC, 6th in country/ ND is 22nd in winning percentage so they are getting less wins in comparison to their revenue, but they are top 25.
Stanford - 199M (P12 numbers, now in the ACC) - Tops in the ACC. However, they are taking 30% TV shares for a while so their numbers could go down. 49th in winning percentage/14th in Revenue
CAL - 147M just above the average. However, they are taking 30% TV shares for a while so their numbers could go down. 74th in winning percentage/38th in revenue
SMU - 100M (AAC numbers) - This will be interesting as they aren't taking any ACC TV money for 9 years. There number could go down over those 9 years, but I suspect it will go up and have a huge increase when they start getting TV money as well. Not sure how the football success initiatives will affect them or not during those 9 years. 97th in winning percentage/65th in Revenue
MD (Former ACC member) - 133M good for 12th in the ACC even though they have been in the Big 10 for A LONG time. 68th in winning percentage/50th in revenue
SC (Former ACC founding member) - 184M in the SEC. They are making more money than anyone in the ACC and they SUCK. This hurts a lot. 43rd winning percentage/19th in revenue
Possible ACC future expansion candidates:
ND - 235M IND 6th in revenue/22nd in winning percentage (YES, top 22 in both)
KS - 215M Big 12 11th in Revenue/122nd in winning percentage (NO)
Baylor - 148M Big 12 36th in Revenue/79th in winning percentage (NO)
CO - 147M P12 37th in Revenue/106th in winning percentage (NO)
TCU - 142M Big 12 41st in Revenue/10th in winning percentage (YES, top 41 in both)
AZ - 139M P12 44th in Revenue/91st in winning percentage (NO)
Ok St - 132M Big 12 51st in Revenue/20th in winning percentage (YES, top 51 in both)
BYU - 130M 1/2 share of Big 12 TV money 52nd in Revenue/28th in winning percentage (YES, top 52 in both)
AZ ST - 127M P12 54th in Revenue/55th in winning percentage (Probably not, above 50 in both)
OR ST - 120M P12 57th in Revenue/61st in winning percentage (Probably not, above 50 in both)
TT - 115M Big12 58th in Revenue/41st in winning percentage (Probably not, close to 60th in revenue and above 40 in winning percentage)
Utah - 112M P12 59th in Revenue/15th in winning percentage (YES, below 60 in revenue, but top 15 in winning percentage)
K STate - 106M Big12 61st in Revenue/30th in winning percentage (Maybe 30th in winning percentage, but revenue is a concern)
WVU - 106M Big 12 62nd in Revenue/29th in winning percentage (Maybe 29th in winning percentage, but revenue is a concern)
Ia ST - 101M Big 12 64th in revenue/90th in winning percentage (NO)
Houston - 97M 1/2 share of Big 12 TV money 66th in revenue/46th in winning percentage (NO)
USF - 95M AAC 67th in revenue/63rd in winning percentage (NO)
UCF 93M 1/2 share of Big 12 TV money 68th in revenue, 35th in winning percentage (Possibly) (Would be a great replacement if Miami of FSU is lost)
Uconn - 92M AAC 69th in revenue/107th in winning percentage (NO)
Cincy 90M 1/2 share of Big 12 TV money 70th in revenue/27th in winning percentage (Maybe, revenue is a concern)
WA ST 89M P12 71st in revenue/78th in winning percentage (NO)
S Diego St. 84M MW 72nd in revenue/56th in winning percentage (NO)
The only ones that increase the money AVG are ND, KS, Baylor and CO. Stanford and CAL did as well, but SMU did not. However, SMU has the potential to shoot up to the top with their donors and after the ACC TV money starts rolling in. Stanford was #2 in revenue in the former P12 behind USC. CAL was #7 just behind CO. The issue is finding teams that have the revenue and the winning percentage history to go along with it. ND, TCU, OK ST., BYU and Utah are the only ones that would make sense from a revenue and winning percentage.
