ADVERTISEMENT

AOC accuses Capitol Police of 'opening the doors' on Jan. 6

TigerGrowls

Woodrush
Gold Member
Dec 21, 2001
20,759
12,079
113
Ok libs......this is your girl stating the obvious.


"There were actual officers working with this, and we never got to the bottom of that," Ocasio Cortez said

By Madeleine Hubbard
Updated: July 14, 2022 - 5:54pm

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) accused U.S. Capitol Police officers of "opening the doors wide open" for Jan. 6 rioters and said anyone who works in the Capitol is "not safe."
"There were actual officers working with this, and we never got to the bottom of that," Ocasio-Cortez said while clapping her hands for emphasis while discussing the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. "We never got any answers about that and to this day, we're supposed to pretend that this never happened?"
She told reporter Pablo Manríquez of Latino Rebels on Wednesday, "I have no idea what happened to the people on the inside who were very clearly sympathetic with what was going on and opening the doors wide open for that and we're– I'm supposed to sit here and pretend like none of that ever happened."

Ocasio-Cortez went on to criticize the increase in funding for Capitol Police after the riot.
"And then right afterwards, you have a massive– you know, you just have this idea that throwing money at that problem is gonna make it go away, without any accountability and so this is where these things are breaking down," she stressed.
"We're not safe. And it's not just about members of congress not being safe. The food staff workers aren't safe. The janitors aren't safe. Like, we need to get to the bottom of this, so that's all I gotta say," she concluded before walking away.
Manríquez posted the video of Ocasio-Cortez's rant on Twitter, which she then reposted with the caption: "Remember how there was tons of footage and evidence of officers & others inside on 1/6 supporting insurrectionists, but then everyone decided it was too politically risky to investigate thoroughly so they brushed under the rug and now we still have no idea who or what is safe?"
Seemingly on a roll complaining about Capitol police, AOC retweeted a reply to the video from Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.), who said, "Relatedly, months after 1/6, my Chief of Staff came across an antisemitic text in the possession of a Capitol Police officer at a checkpoint. We still have not been told why it was in his possession, what vetting was done before hiring him, and whether he got to keep his job."
She also retweeted a post from Politico reporter Sarah Ferris, who wrote, "Inside Capitol just now, Rep. AOC asked to speak with 'female and LGBT' reporters to warn us that the man who harassed her is affiliated with credentialed news outlet[.] She said her staff called Capitol police 5x to get them to do something."
Conservative commentator Mike Cernovich saw Ocasio-Cortez's rant differently.
"Did someone say J6 was an inside job?" he replied, including a GIF of Info Wars' Alex Jones.
 
Man… They’re gonna have a hard time with gymnastics explaining this away. Can’t attack the news source, can’t attack the person

They’ll just ignore it
 
Wait....they left her out of the loop? She needs to keep talking. At this point she looks like a conservative spy.
 
Wow! What a earth-shattering, game-changing smoking gun bombshell! How about we get a committee to investigate what happened on January 6th? With televised hearings, so that the American people can see it as well. Just brainstorming here…
 
Wow! What a earth-shattering, game-changing smoking gun bombshell! How about we get a committee to investigate what happened on January 6th? With televised hearings, so that the American people can see it as well. Just brainstorming here…
If it was a real committee with no ulterior motives then it would be fine. We all know thats not the case including libs and never trumpers even if they will not admit it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OleFastball
If it was a real committee with no ulterior motives then it would be fine. We all know thats not the case including libs and never trumpers even if they will not admit it.
Almost ALL of the witnesses have been former Pro-Trumpers and they have corroborated each other's testimony. This isn't about libs or never-Trumpers - it's Americans testifying to the facts. Believe it or not, even a lot of former Pro-Trumpers care about our democracy, even if you won't admit it.
 
Almost ALL of the witnesses have been former Pro-Trumpers and they have corroborated each other's testimony. This isn't about libs or never-Trumpers - it's Americans testifying to the facts. Believe it or not, even a lot of former Pro-Trumpers care about our democracy, even if you won't admit it.

Yeah the chick's testimony was totally corroborated. By no one. Sham hearing.

Peacefully protest!
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Yeah the chick's testimony was totally corroborated. By no one. Sham hearing.

Peacefully protest!
I understand they don't cover reality in the right wing sewer system where you engage but her testimony was corroborated. Just a reminder though - she was relaying something she was told - she didn't claim to be a first-hand witness.

 
I understand they don't cover reality in the right wing sewer system where you engage but her testimony was corroborated. Just a reminder though - she was relaying something she was told - she didn't claim to be a first-hand witness.


Relaying something she was told, also called hearsay. Her hearsay was riddled with qualifiers too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Relaying something she was told, also called hearsay. Her hearsay was riddled with qualifiers too.
I doubt you watched the hearing but if you did, she was a totally credible witness and had no motive to lie. But it was also the LEAST IMPORTANT part of her testimony. Pretty lame that that's the part you focus on.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TigerGrowls
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT