ADVERTISEMENT

Arguments against Made Made Climate Change

92TigerME

Lake Baikal
Aug 5, 2018
4,179
4,144
113
I have five augments against anthropogenic climate change


1. Global Temperatures are not going up. I have checked. Our lake cooled by 1°F over the past 5 years. Because of where I work, I have access to many local lakes and ambient temperatures which is more reliable than manipulated NASA GISS data.
2. Carbon Dioxide absorbs infrared heat in the same frequency spectrum as water vapor so the additional greenhouse effect on temperature is logarithmic (Doesn't increase much with increasing CO2). What's more, most of the warming by CO2 has already taken effect in the first 300 ppm in the atmosphere. Adding more CO2 is like adding another coat of red paint to your car. It's not going to get any more red with each additional coat. This is known as CO2 spectrum saturation. Dr William Happer pointed this out.
3. Estimates of 15% reduction in global CO2 output from covid lockdowns had no effect on rising CO2 levels. Not even a blip. This suggest that recent trend is due to respiration and or deforestation.
4. Precambrian CO2 levels were 20 times higher when fossil life was living on the surface. Similarly before the Biblical flood. Whichever version you believe in, there was approximately 8000 gigatons of additional carbon in our atmosphere when the fossils were living. If you believe in the Flood, then all those living were buried and new life would have drawn down the carbon levels to what they are now.
5. Number 5 is basically an extension of my number 4 argument which has to do with carbon cycle balance. Anthropogenic climate changes assumes the atmospheric is sensitive to CO2 concentration and that the 100 million year old steady state process of carbon cycle balance must not be disturbed. The basis stems from the belief in evolution and sedimentation theories that life evolved over 100 million years and thus, we must not upset the balance. The Biblical flood blows that out of the water. According to the Bible the flood occurred 2400 BC. All life was wiped from the face of the earth. New life would have needed carbon. Where did that new life get the carbon? From plants and where do plants get carbon? From the atmosphere.

anthropogenic
[ˌanTHrəpōˈjenik]

ADJECTIVE
  1. originating in human activity.
    "anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide"
To point number 1. The GISS data doesn't show what I see in our data from Lakes in SC and NC.

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/station_data_v4/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
I have five augments against anthropogenic climate change


1. Global Temperatures are not going up. I have checked. Our lake cooled by 1°F over the past 5 years. Because of where I work, I have access to many local lakes and ambient temperatures which is more reliable than manipulated NASA GISS data.
2. Carbon Dioxide absorbs infrared heat in the same frequency spectrum as water vapor so the additional greenhouse effect on temperature is logarithmic (Doesn't increase much with increasing CO2). What's more, most of the warming by CO2 has already taken effect in the first 300 ppm in the atmosphere. Adding more CO2 is like adding another coat of red paint to your car. It's not going to get any more red with each additional coat. This is known as CO2 spectrum saturation. Dr William Happer pointed this out.
3. Estimates of 15% reduction in global CO2 output from covid lockdowns had no effect on rising CO2 levels. Not even a blip. This suggest that recent trend is due to respiration and or deforestation.
4. Precambrian CO2 levels were 20 times higher when fossil life was living on the surface. Similarly before the Biblical flood. Whichever version you believe in, there was approximately 8000 gigatons of additional carbon in our atmosphere when the fossils were living. If you believe in the Flood, then all those living were buried and new life would have drawn down the carbon levels to what they are now.

I agree with you. The climate scam industry has been crying wolf for a long time and continually been wrong. It was the hole in the ozone layer going out of control way back and they have built on it since.

I do believe in climate change for sure, but not man made until proven otherwise. Would I put it past this deep state entity from engineering some climate issues in order to use it to gain more power? NO!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 92TigerME
tbt.gif

0eZh24w.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TigerGrowls
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT