ADVERTISEMENT

Audit in Arizona of the 2020 Election Results Is Turning Out to be the Most Important Election Audit in US History

TigerGrowls

Woodrush
Gold Member
Dec 21, 2001
20,744
12,077
113

By Joe Hoft
Published March 3, 2021 at 7:51pm
327 Comments
Share(509)TweetShare to GabTelegramShareEmail
arizona-flag-1.jpg

Say some prayers that the most honest and qualified auditors in the US perform the audit of the 2020 election results in Arizona’s Maricopa County.
The whole point of the November 30, 2020, Public Hearing on Election Integrity was to solicit evidence and testimony concerning the potential that election fraud might have altered the results of the various contests.
Most notable about the Public Hearing was the orderly and objective manner in which everyone involved was allowed to present whatever ever evidence they possessed. The design of the Public Hearing was to promote a forensic audit above reproach if probable cause justified such.
A few weeks later the Arizona Senate called for a hearing specifically addressing the Maricopa County elections. At the end of that hearing, the Senate issued subpoenas for the ballot images and machines that processed the ballots. Subsequent subpoenas called for the actual ballots as well.
TRENDING: Judge Orders Election Do-Over after 78% of Mail-in Ballots Proved Fraudulent -- Notary Arrested
During the long and contentious litigation between the Senate and the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, two important points arose, one was the legitimacy and enforceability of the Senate subpoenas. The second point, which seemed to be taken for granted in the legacy debate, was the need for a forensic audit with the process, people, and findings beyond reproach.
Thousands of emails have been sent to the AZ Legislature telling Senators and Representatives that, “the world is watching what you do.” Arizona clearly is the epicenter of election integrity investigations.
For operational security reasons, and to make certain that the resultant findings are above reproach, one Arizona politician reports that the Senate has worked very hard to construct a team that will be able to do their work and withstand the inevitable assaults upon the work product of the audit team.
It appears it is the intention of the Senate to have every mail-in ballot from Maricopa County examined. What the team will look at will be defined by the audit team, and the manner in which the ballots will be analyzed is up to them.
But ballots will not be the only factor examined. Questions about electronic access, reallocation, and reassignment persist. Such questions can only be put to rest with an examination of the software that operates the tabulation system to prove or refute such a movement of votes from one candidate to another as was done in Antrim County, Michigan.
The Gateway Pundit has recommended the Arizona Senate employ inventor Jovan Pulitzer to audit the Maricopa County ballots. Pulitzer has since been under massive attack by the left and perhaps others who wish for someone else to perform the Maricopa County audit. It’s difficult for many to look past these false accusations by the left against Pulitzer. One thing is for sure, the far-left and those who oversaw the 2020 election in Maricopa are scared to death of Pulitzer because if he can do what he claims, he will uncover fraudulent ballots in the state’s most populous county.
Rep. Mark Finchem (R-AZD11), who is not in the Arizona Senate, but is in the Arizona House, shared with us:
The priorities in this political battle are clear; free and fair elections depend on transparency, and the restoration of public confidence in the electoral process depends on a forensic audit, and the people engaged in it, that is beyond reproach.
General Mike Flynn shared with us what most Americans want:
If Maricopa County wants to regain the confidence of the people in Arizona, and help the rest of the country regain their trust in the voting system, they will ensure the best audit possible takes place in the state. If Maricopa County does the right thing, they will do a full forensic audit of all 2.1 million ballots, voting machines & servers. If they don’t they are doing a disservice to the citizens of Maricopa, Arizona, and this country, and frankly, the entire world is watching Maricopa County.
The audit of the 2020 election results in Maricopa County is potentially the greatest audit to be performed in US history. Let’s hope the Arizona Senate chooses the best auditors who in turn perform the most comprehensive and transparent audit possible. Americans want the truth.
 

By Joe Hoft
Published March 3, 2021 at 7:51pm
327 Comments
Share(509)TweetShare to GabTelegramShareEmail
arizona-flag-1.jpg

Say some prayers that the most honest and qualified auditors in the US perform the audit of the 2020 election results in Arizona’s Maricopa County.
The whole point of the November 30, 2020, Public Hearing on Election Integrity was to solicit evidence and testimony concerning the potential that election fraud might have altered the results of the various contests.
Most notable about the Public Hearing was the orderly and objective manner in which everyone involved was allowed to present whatever ever evidence they possessed. The design of the Public Hearing was to promote a forensic audit above reproach if probable cause justified such.
A few weeks later the Arizona Senate called for a hearing specifically addressing the Maricopa County elections. At the end of that hearing, the Senate issued subpoenas for the ballot images and machines that processed the ballots. Subsequent subpoenas called for the actual ballots as well.
TRENDING: Judge Orders Election Do-Over after 78% of Mail-in Ballots Proved Fraudulent -- Notary Arrested
During the long and contentious litigation between the Senate and the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, two important points arose, one was the legitimacy and enforceability of the Senate subpoenas. The second point, which seemed to be taken for granted in the legacy debate, was the need for a forensic audit with the process, people, and findings beyond reproach.
Thousands of emails have been sent to the AZ Legislature telling Senators and Representatives that, “the world is watching what you do.” Arizona clearly is the epicenter of election integrity investigations.
For operational security reasons, and to make certain that the resultant findings are above reproach, one Arizona politician reports that the Senate has worked very hard to construct a team that will be able to do their work and withstand the inevitable assaults upon the work product of the audit team.
It appears it is the intention of the Senate to have every mail-in ballot from Maricopa County examined. What the team will look at will be defined by the audit team, and the manner in which the ballots will be analyzed is up to them.
But ballots will not be the only factor examined. Questions about electronic access, reallocation, and reassignment persist. Such questions can only be put to rest with an examination of the software that operates the tabulation system to prove or refute such a movement of votes from one candidate to another as was done in Antrim County, Michigan.
The Gateway Pundit has recommended the Arizona Senate employ inventor Jovan Pulitzer to audit the Maricopa County ballots. Pulitzer has since been under massive attack by the left and perhaps others who wish for someone else to perform the Maricopa County audit. It’s difficult for many to look past these false accusations by the left against Pulitzer. One thing is for sure, the far-left and those who oversaw the 2020 election in Maricopa are scared to death of Pulitzer because if he can do what he claims, he will uncover fraudulent ballots in the state’s most populous county.
Rep. Mark Finchem (R-AZD11), who is not in the Arizona Senate, but is in the Arizona House, shared with us:

General Mike Flynn shared with us what most Americans want:

The audit of the 2020 election results in Maricopa County is potentially the greatest audit to be performed in US history. Let’s hope the Arizona Senate chooses the best auditors who in turn perform the most comprehensive and transparent audit possible. Americans want the truth.
You don't want anything that wont support the narrative you've been fed.
 
Gateway Pundit = straight up bullshit. @TigerGrowls should consider getting his GRE.
Since you are in Academia I’d be interested in reading your works, I personally like the Gateway Pundit. It’s not far right, it talks about moderate issues from a conservative standpoint. Conservative voices have been so muzzled it gets harder and harder to find content. Conservatives need to have a voice and so do liberals and I fight for both because all points of view deserve to be heard.
 
Since you are in Academia I’d be interested in reading your works, I personally like the Gateway Pundit. It’s not far right, it talks about moderate issues from a conservative standpoint. Conservative voices have been so muzzled it gets harder and harder to find content. Conservatives need to have a voice and so do liberals and I fight for both because all points of view deserve to be heard.

Politifact ranking

Wikipedia:

The Gateway Pundit is known as a source of viral falsehoods and hoaxes. It has been described by the Harvard Journal of Law & Technology as one of the websites that "primarily propagate fake news", by Newsweek as a fake news website, and by CNN as a website "prone to peddling conspiracy theories". In August 2019, journalism professors Erik P. Bucy and John E. Newhagen observed that "The most aggressive fake news sites and associated YouTube channels, such as InfoWars, The Gateway Pundit, and Daily Stormer, are routinely sued by victims of these published reports for libel and defamation." As a result of a number of lawsuits against The Gateway Pundit over its false stories, it was reported in March 2018 that Jim Hoft had told his writers to be more careful: "I don't want any more lawsuits so we have to be really careful with what we put up." Hoft stated that he believes the lawsuits "are part of a multi-pronged effort to attack media outlets on the right."

In late 2019, the English Wikipedia community deprecated The Gateway Pundit as a source for reporting "falsehoods, conspiracy theories, and intentionally misleading stories".

RationalWiki:

The Gateway Pundit tends to care primarily about riling up its right-wing base over actually doing any journalism, such as fact checking. As such, they have published a number of false stories. These include such claims as Hillary Clinton taking Algeria off the terror watch list, with their "proof" being a politifact story that debunks the claim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
Politifact ranking

Wikipedia:

The Gateway Pundit is known as a source of viral falsehoods and hoaxes. It has been described by the Harvard Journal of Law & Technology as one of the websites that "primarily propagate fake news", by Newsweek as a fake news website, and by CNN as a website "prone to peddling conspiracy theories". In August 2019, journalism professors Erik P. Bucy and John E. Newhagen observed that "The most aggressive fake news sites and associated YouTube channels, such as InfoWars, The Gateway Pundit, and Daily Stormer, are routinely sued by victims of these published reports for libel and defamation." As a result of a number of lawsuits against The Gateway Pundit over its false stories, it was reported in March 2018 that Jim Hoft had told his writers to be more careful: "I don't want any more lawsuits so we have to be really careful with what we put up." Hoft stated that he believes the lawsuits "are part of a multi-pronged effort to attack media outlets on the right."

In late 2019, the English Wikipedia community deprecated The Gateway Pundit as a source for reporting "falsehoods, conspiracy theories, and intentionally misleading stories".

RationalWiki:

The Gateway Pundit tends to care primarily about riling up its right-wing base over actually doing any journalism, such as fact checking. As such, they have published a number of false stories. These include such claims as Hillary Clinton taking Algeria off the terror watch list, with their "proof" being a politifact story that debunks the claim.
Again, it’s not owned by one of the big companies so it’s deemed a conspiracy site, bout right, crush the competition. Most people on the left actually parrot big company propaganda while claiming they are for equal distribution and competition. Big Tech is no different, these companies can literally condition masses with their reach and I’ve seen nothing to disprove their overreach. I’ve seen far worse conspiracy propaganda from CNN than I have from GP and they probably exist because of each other.
 
Again, it’s not owned by one of the big companies so it’s deemed a conspiracy site, bout right, crush the competition. Most people on the left actually parrot big company propaganda while claiming they are for equal distribution and competition. Big Tech is no different, these companies can literally condition masses with their reach and I’ve seen nothing to disprove their overreach. I’ve seen far worse conspiracy propaganda from CNN than I have from GP and they probably exist because of each other.
rtx2c9ws.jpg
 
Politifact ranking

Wikipedia:

The Gateway Pundit is known as a source of viral falsehoods and hoaxes. It has been described by the Harvard Journal of Law & Technology as one of the websites that "primarily propagate fake news", by Newsweek as a fake news website, and by CNN as a website "prone to peddling conspiracy theories". In August 2019, journalism professors Erik P. Bucy and John E. Newhagen observed that "The most aggressive fake news sites and associated YouTube channels, such as InfoWars, The Gateway Pundit, and Daily Stormer, are routinely sued by victims of these published reports for libel and defamation." As a result of a number of lawsuits against The Gateway Pundit over its false stories, it was reported in March 2018 that Jim Hoft had told his writers to be more careful: "I don't want any more lawsuits so we have to be really careful with what we put up." Hoft stated that he believes the lawsuits "are part of a multi-pronged effort to attack media outlets on the right."

In late 2019, the English Wikipedia community deprecated The Gateway Pundit as a source for reporting "falsehoods, conspiracy theories, and intentionally misleading stories".

RationalWiki:

The Gateway Pundit tends to care primarily about riling up its right-wing base over actually doing any journalism, such as fact checking. As such, they have published a number of false stories. These include such claims as Hillary Clinton taking Algeria off the terror watch list, with their "proof" being a politifact story that debunks the claim.

Opinion only! Just like buttholes..everyone has one.
 
Do you have a degree from an accredited 4-year American university?

None of your business and it doesnt matter at all btw. We are on here discussing issues and you stand up for yourself with your words now and I will do the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wallaceb
Perform an independent audit and let the chips fall where they may.

That statement is TOTAL BULLSHIT. Just like the Georgia audits or any other audits you've supported, you will not accept the results unless they say exactly what you want them too. IF there was an audit of these ballots and the audit came back clean, you would accuse the auditors of being part of the Deep State or some other infraction just like you always do.

You will NEVER accept the results of the election if they don't say Donald Trump won. Never. Better for you to say: Perform an independent audit and unless the audit says Donald Trump won we won't believe any Deep State chips.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
That statement is TOTAL BULLSHIT. Just like the Georgia audits or any other audits you've supported, you will not accept the results unless they say exactly what you want them too. IF there was an audit of these ballots and the audit came back clean, you would accuse the auditors of being part of the Deep State or some other infraction just like you always do.

You will NEVER accept the results of the election if they don't say Donald Trump won. Never. Better for you to say: Perform an independent audit and unless the audit says Donald Trump won we won't believe any Deep State chips.

Its not bullshit. Its the truth and you wouldnt know that if it hit you in the nose.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: AugTig and wallaceb
That statement is TOTAL BULLSHIT. Just like the Georgia audits or any other audits you've supported, you will not accept the results unless they say exactly what you want them too. IF there was an audit of these ballots and the audit came back clean, you would accuse the auditors of being part of the Deep State or some other infraction just like you always do.

You will NEVER accept the results of the election if they don't say Donald Trump won. Never. Better for you to say: Perform an independent audit and unless the audit says Donald Trump won we won't believe any Deep State chips.
Who cares if he won or not, honest elections are required in this country, the one I grew up in, and any ounce of dishonesty needs to be revealed so it never happens again. We just want full transparency and if Biden won let’s get back to the states blocking every decision he’s making cause I’m sure they are all dummies too
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Who cares if he won or not, honest elections are required in this country, the one I grew up in, and any ounce of dishonesty needs to be revealed so it never happens again. We just want full transparency and if Biden won let’s get back to the states blocking every decision he’s making cause I’m sure they are all dummies too

Lololololollollolololololo.

Every state in the country conducts post election audits. After those audits, every secretary of the state in the country certified the election. That's how this works.
 
Lololololollollolololololo.

Every state in the country conducts post election audits. After those audits, every secretary of the state in the country certified the election. That's how this works.
Bananas Republic
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT