BOOM! Maria Bartiromo: “Intel Source” Told Me Trump Did in Fact Win the Election – It’s Up to Supreme Court to Take the Cases and Stop the Clock

[TigerGrowls]

Maria Bartiromo dropped a bomb on her morning show. The award-winning journalist told viewers she was told by an intel source that Trump did win the 2020 election. And then she added that the Supreme Court must take the cases challenging the massive election fraud to stop the clock!

Maria Bartiromo: “An intel source told me President Trump did, in fact, win the election. He says that it is up to the Supreme Court to hear suits from other cases across the country to stop the clock. This follows the high court’s refusal to hear the lawsuit from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.”

Maria is amazing!

 

[dpic73]

View embedded media

Maria Bartiromo dropped a bomb on her morning show. The award-winning journalist told viewers she was told by an intel source that Trump did win the 2020 election. And then she added that the Supreme Court must take the cases challenging the massive election fraud to stop the clock!




Maria is amazing!

She is a complete psycho-loon. This is what she'll be watching on 1/20.

 

[nytigerfan]

View embedded media

Maria Bartiromo dropped a bomb on her morning show. The award-winning journalist told viewers she was told by an intel source that Trump did win the 2020 election. And then she added that the Supreme Court must take the cases challenging the massive election fraud to stop the clock!




Maria is amazing!

anonymous sources? Fake news. Maria is the enemy of the people.

 

[firegiver]

She must be auditioning for a pay raise at Newsmax. If this were a true story there would be actual proof. Where's the proof Maria?

 

[DW4_2016]

I’m actually becoming more and more pro trump as the days go on. He is absolutely going to splinter that party.

 

[ClemTigsCo]

BOOM! An intel source told me that @TigerGrowls is a batshit crazy cuck. Therefore, it's true, right?

 

[clemben]

Hey @TigerGrowls I accept your apology for being 100% wrong about Michigan.

 

[hopefultiger13]

Hey OP... anything even RESEMBLING evidence in that BOOM? No? Then maybe BOOM isn't the right word... more like a wet fart that leaves a brown stain on her thong...

But a quick question. I thought you didn't like anonymous sources? Asking for a friend...

 

[DW4_2016]

I’m actually becoming more and more pro trump as the days go on. He is absolutely going to splinter that party.

i literally did not see this coming

 

[yoshi121374]

i literally did not see this coming

View embedded media

His definition of "won" and "alot" differ from the standard dictonary.

 

[Jonada]

His definition of "won" and "alot" differ from the standard dictonary.

Actually it’s only the definition of won that differs. The “by a lot” part is accurate.

 

[DW4_2016]

Actually it’s only the definition of won that differs. The “by a lot” part is accurate.

 

[Elul77]

 

[ClemTigsCo]

View embedded media

Yeah, and if me and 8 buddies sent a slate of electors from CO for Dabo it’d have the same legal standing.

 

[HumasButthole]

anonymous sources? Fake news. Maria is the enemy of the people.

Here we go again picking and choosing when we listen to anonymous sources

LOL

 

[nytigerfan]

Here we go again picking and choosing when we listen to anonymous sources

LOL

that was the point I was making genius. Please just do the world a favor and don’t have kids. We are already heading to an idiocracy.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Hey @TigerGrowls I accept your apology for being 100% wrong about Michigan.

View embedded media

Fake news bro.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Yeah, and if me and 8 buddies sent a slate of electors from CO for Dabo it’d have the same legal standing.

LOL...and don't go fact checking the fact checker.

 

[clemsontiger02]

LOL...and don't go fact checking the fact checker.

View embedded media

Do you ever get tired of being wrong? All available evidence points to "no". But if some random unverified on Twitter says it, it must be true, right?

More than 257 million people in the U.S. are 18 or older, and nearly 240 million citizens are eligible to vote this year, according to Michael McDonald, a professor at the University of Florida who runs the U.S. Elections Project. Eligible voters include people living overseas but not noncitizens or people convicted of a felony, depending on state law.

It's possible that more than 160 million people may turn out this year, in total, McDonald said Sunday. That would mean an eligible voter turnout rate of 67%.

More than 99 million people have already voted. Here's how that compares with past elections.

On the eve of Election Day, here's how eligible voter turnout rate for the 2020 presidential election may compare to past cycles.

www.usatoday.com

 

[ClemTigsCo]

Here we go again picking and choosing when we listen to anonymous sources

LOL

someone isn’t bright enough to recognize sarcasm

 

[ClemTigsCo]

LOL...and don't go fact checking the fact checker.

View embedded media

You’re throwing made up voter registration numbers at a political pollster now. Not smart.

Final 2020 registration numbers aren’t available yet because most states haven’t released updated voter file data that will account for same day reg, but in 2018, there were 153 M registered voters. 20 million more than your bullshit source claims there are now.

do you ever tire of being so wrong, and so badly, easily proven wrong?

 

[clemben]

Fake news bro.

You need evidence to be able to say that though, bro.