Breaking Update from Attorney Lin Wood on SCOTUS Lawsuits – Supreme Court Set to Consider Whether Trump Voter Fraud Cases Can Proceed

[TigerGrowls]

Breaking Update from Attorney Lin Wood on SCOTUS Lawsuits - Supreme Court Set to Consider Whether Trump Voter Fraud Cases Can Proceed (thegatewaypundit.com)


By Jim Hoft
Published February 19, 2021 at 6:56pm
470 Comments
Share on Facebook(287)Share to GabShareShareEmail

The US Supreme Court was set to consider President Trump’s voter fraud cases in Pennsylvania, Georgia and Michigan on Friday.
These three cases are on the Supreme Court docket for Friday.


TRENDING: Happening Today: Supreme Court Set to Consider Whether Trump Voter Fraud Cases in Pennsylvania, Georgia and Michigan Can Proceed
Here is more on today’s Supreme Court cases.
As a reminder, Pennsylvania Democrat officials changed the election rules weeks before the election without consulting the legislative branch. This is unlawful in the state. It will be interesting to see if SCOTUS is the latest lawless branch of government following today’s decisions.
Case Number 20-542
Republican Party of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Veronica Degraffenreid, Acting Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al. It used to be Republican Party of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Kathy Boockvar, Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al.

Case Number 20-574
Jake Corman, et al., Petitioners v. Pennsylvania Democratic Party, et al.

Case Number 20-799
L. Lin Wood, Jr., Petitioner v. Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State, et al.

Case Number 20-815
Timothy King, et al., Petitioners v. Gretchen Whitmer, Governor of Michigan, et al.

Case Number 20-845
Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., Petitioner v. Veronica Degraffenreid, Acting Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al. – Used to be Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., Petitioner v. Kathy Boockvar, Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al.

Case Number 20-882
Donald J. Trump, et al., Petitioners v. Joseph R. Biden, et al.
Attorney Lin Wood, who is the attorney in the Georgia case, posted on Telegram today after he was banned, liked many other top Trump supporters, from Twitter

Attorney Lin Wood Releases Statement Before Supreme Court Ruling on Election Fraud Today -- UPDATED WITH NEW COMMENT | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Attorney Lin Wood released a statement on before the Supreme Court ruling today on Election Fraud.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

And minutes ago Lin Wood added this update–
Lin Wood, [19.02.21 18:43]

No word from SCOTUS yet on whether they will allow the election cases to proceed.
The cases were set for conference today and while I claim no firsthand knowledge of how the Court operates, I assume the Justices confer together in private.
Perhaps we will learn the decisions on Monday on whether the writs of certiorari will be granted. If so, the cases can proceed.
A grant of certiorari requires that a minimum of 4 Justices vote in favor of granting the review.
Hope that helps.

The Supreme Court is also expected to issue opinions next Thursday but this has nothing to do with the election cases on the docket today.

 

[Woody1405]

Your source is a Facebook post? Get a grip.

 

[iceheart08]

Another process that gateway pundit is deliberately misstating for clicks.

The cases weren't "heard", they won't issue a "decision" and they aren't on the "docket'. These are all words with real meaning that gateway pundit is using to mislead you. None of those things happened.

They met to decide if they'd hear the cases later this year. That's it. Lin wood, amazingly, summed up the meeting accurately, while the story as a whole, again, was deliberately misleading.

Of course growls are it up.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Another process that gateway pundit is deliberately misstating for clicks.

The cases weren't "heard", they won't issue a "decision" and they aren't on the "docket'. These are all words with real meaning that gateway pundit is using to mislead you. None of those things happened.

They met to decide if they'd hear the cases later this year. That's it. Lin wood, amazingly, summed up the meeting accurately, while the story as a whole, again, was deliberately misleading.

Of course growls are it up.

GWP story is correct.

 

[iceheart08]

GWP story is correct.

no. it objectively isnt.

you need help.

 

[TigerGrowls]

no. it objectively isnt.

you need help.

What's incorrect einstein?