ADVERTISEMENT

City of Charleston is this for real?

gardentiger

Lake Baikal
Gold Member
May 29, 2001
4,789
3,813
113
Your city. From Post and Courier….
-


Bailey: Reparations, defund police, critical race theory? Read all about it, Charleston.
By Steve Bailey
Published Sat Aug 14, 2021 2:30 PM EDT
On Tuesday, Charleston City Council will receive the recommendations that the Special Commission on Equity, Inclusion and Racial Conciliation spent more than a year developing. My question: Has anyone outside the commission actually read this stuff?


A $100 million reparations fund for descendants of slaves and a guaranteed income fund indexed to the cost of living to all black residents who have lived in Charleston for 10 years or were born in the city. Zero-interest, zero-collateral loans that borrowers can pay back if they’re ever able.


And it goes on: Defund the police. Critical race theory for the schools. A board of public art review — think Board of Architectural Review for the arts — to consider what is acceptable and what is not, and a “cultural reparations fund” to support works from black and brown artists. And then a permanent version of this runaway commission to ensure it all gets done.


Documents like this should be read from the back. Get past the first 16 pages of talk of process and timelines, the message from the mayor and the executive summary that outlines admirable goals of eradicating racial inequity, and the proposed remedies read like the loony left’s wish list come true. While Charleston is a proud oasis of blue in a sea of South Carolina red, many of the recommendations would be nonstarters in Berkeley, Calif., and Cambridge, Mass. Maybe Havana — but they’re going nowhere here.


Black people in Charleston, like practically everywhere in America, have been left behind by almost every measure: wealth, health, education, the justice system. To cite just one statistic from the report: Black Charlestonians earned just 60% of their white counterparts. Inequality is a cancer eating at the soul of America.


But the commission’s most radical ideas threaten to overshadow its good work and further divide Charleston, not bring us together.


Economic empowerment. A $100 million reparations fund, started with city dollars and grown over five years through matching private fundraising, would direct money to descendants of slaves and provide for guaranteed income for black residents who have lived in the city for 10 years or were born here. So those who had left, whether for North Charleston or for New York, could come home and qualify.
In addition, the city would allocate $15 million for 100 businesses — average loan $100,000 — at zero interest and zero collateral “until the borrower has the ability to start paying on the loan.” Another $11.3 million would be set aside for a 90% guarantee fund for “any type of real estate.”


Criminal justice reform. Examine Charleston’s police budget for “potential reallocation, savings, priorities and best practices in public safety and service delivery for example in areas of homelessness, addiction, mental health, victims’ services, school resource officers and re-entry.” Due date for defunding the police is January. The commission report didn’t note (but the police report did, at least until it’s defunded) that homicides doubled last year and violent crime spiked 24%. Both are up again this year.
Youth and education. No matter that the city has no role in running the schools, the commission recommends a “more robust programmatic partnership” with the Charleston County School District to help advance racial equity in local schools. “Support cultural competency work and changes in curriculum, i.e. Critical Race Theory and 1619 Project.” Implement racial equity training at all levels.
History and culture. Develop a board of public art review patterned on the BAR to consider all public art and monuments in the city. In addition, the commission recommends a cultural reparations fund to support under-represented groups, financed by a tax on either developers or tourists.
And there’s more. Fortunately, there is a process to sort the good from the bad. City Council will formally receive the commission’s report on Tuesday night and then assign the 125 or so recommendations to appropriate committees.


The city’s apology three years ago for its role in slavery was appropriate and overdue.


There is, in fact, much to be done and much of value in the work the commission did on everything from housing to health care to climate change.


However, advocates assembling wish lists are the easy part; elected officials representing diverse constituents face a far more challenging job of finding consensus, workable solutions and, by the way, the money.


The real work is just beginning. Let’s hope the mayor and City Council are up to the task.


Steve Bailey can be reached at sjbailey1060@yahoo.com. Follow on Twitter @sjbailey1060.
 
From what I remember going to public elementary school in Charleston in the late 80s/early 90s, we talked a lot about slavery and African American culture. I always thought it was cool when they’d have somebody come in to talk about Gullah culture or when they had one of the sweet-grass basket making ladies come in. So what is the need for Charleston to literally put CRT into practice? Why teach controversial historical interpretations like the 1619 Project?

If you think inequality is a problem, I wonder what would happen if you created a race-based reparations system that included poor non-blacks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tallulahtiger30319
Here’s a radical concept. Stay in school, get good grades, take advantage of affirmative action, get in a decent school, get a good job, stay with your wife and kids, stop being the victim, and be a positive role model for your kids and community
 
Here’s a radical concept. Stay in school, get good grades, take advantage of affirmative action, get in a decent school, get a good job, stay with your wife and kids, stop being the victim, and be a positive role model for your kids and community
i dont disagree with that on the surface, but i also have compassion for how easy all of that was for me to achieve compared to a black kid born in 1978 in Gonzales Gardens in Columbia.
 
Here’s a radical concept. Stay in school, get good grades, take advantage of affirmative action, get in a decent school, get a good job, stay with your wife and kids, stop being the victim, and be a positive role model for your kids and community

Let your flag fly bro
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheValley91
i dont disagree with that on the surface, but i also have compassion for how easy all of that was for me to achieve compared to a black kid born in 1978 in Gonzales Gardens in Columbia.
I’ve got one question for you. Why is it when a black person does all those things they are considered acting white or an Uncle Tom?
 
I’ve got one question for you. Why is it when a black person does all those things they are considered acting white or an Uncle Tom?
i dont disagree with that on the surface, but i also have compassion for how easy all of that was for me to achieve compared to a black kid born in 1978 in Gonzales Gardens in Columbia.
And for the record, I grew up in southeast queens in the 70s. Not exactly fun for a white kid. Have seen both sides of the story. The consistent element in the kids that grew up to be successful was they had involved parents that made sure they did the right thing and stayed out of trouble. The ones that were indoctrinated into victims and entitlement had the opposite result.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
And for the record, I grew up in southeast queens in the 70s. Not exactly fun for a white kid. Have seen both sides of the story. The consistent element in the kids that grew up to be successful was they had involved parents that made sure they did the right thing and stayed out of trouble. The ones that were indoctrinated into victims and entitlement had the opposite result.
correct so lets help a young generation of kids who were born in the ghetto in broken homes to a family on drugs on welfare with no education...why not ear mark some money for that and work like hell to make sure that's what the money goes to...give them a chance at least, otherwise we are gonna be having this conversation forever


ok im done
 
And for the record, I grew up in southeast queens in the 70s. Not exactly fun for a white kid. Have seen both sides of the story. The consistent element in the kids that grew up to be successful was they had involved parents that made sure they did the right thing and stayed out of trouble. The ones that were indoctrinated into victims and entitlement had the opposite result.
Absolutely, but concerted efforts to destroy the American family, particularly in the inner city, have been well documented. It's not as if one race is particularly disinclined to care about the family unit, its that payouts were made to financially incentivize single parent homes.
 
whats your point?
It’s a pretty simple question. My point is, that far too often when a black kid or family do the right things, they are considered being non black. That needs to change. Being successful should be admired and respected. More black leaders need to preach work hard and control your own destiny. Stop blaming and playing the victim card. Stop worshiping rappers, gangsters, basketball players, stop looking for hand outs, and strive to be lawyers and doctors
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Absolutely, but concerted efforts to destroy the American family, particularly in the inner city, have been well documented. It's not as if one race is particularly disinclined to care about the family unit, its that payouts were made to financially incentivize single parent homes.
And who did that???
 
I would largely blame LBJ for the destruction of the African American family, but I'd also blame Nixon for initiating the drug war (that many other presidents ramped up after he resigned). Clinton was bad for incarceration rates as well (on non violent drug offenses). All of the aforementioned had plenty of help and support, so I struggle to find one villain to scapegoat.

I find it interesting that when someone raises a point, it is often followed by the insinuation that they are taking the side of one party/ideology, instead of trying to think their way through the problem.
 
I would largely blame LBJ for the destruction of the African American family, but I'd also blame Nixon for initiating the drug war (that many other presidents ramped up after he resigned). Clinton was bad for incarceration rates as well (on non violent drug offenses). All of the aforementioned had plenty of help and support, so I struggle to find one villain to scapegoat.

I find it interesting that when someone raises a point, it is often followed by the insinuation that they are taking the side of one party/ideology, instead of trying to think their way through the problem.
It was an honest question. Our cities are mostly governed by Dems. They have been by and large the ones behind these policies. They play the race card, victim hood, handouts, pay offs. It keeps them in power.
 
I would largely blame LBJ for the destruction of the African American family, but I'd also blame Nixon for initiating the drug war (that many other presidents ramped up after he resigned). Clinton was bad for incarceration rates as well (on non violent drug offenses). All of the aforementioned had plenty of help and support, so I struggle to find one villain to scapegoat.

I find it interesting that when someone raises a point, it is often followed by the insinuation that they are taking the side of one party/ideology, instead of trying to think their way through the problem.

The liberals work hard to keep minorities on the Democratic plantation. If they can keep them down, they will earn their vote by promising handouts. And don't get me started on the hatred they foster and encourage for their own benefit.
 
Largely agree. I also think the victimhood mentality in their constituents was largely created by an immoral drug war, which is not an issue that the Democrats exactly have a chokehold on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Largely agree. I also think the victimhood mentality in their constituents was largely created by an immoral drug war, which is not an issue that the Democrats exactly have a chokehold on.
The drug war may have contributed to the problem, but it is far from the main issue in my opinion
 
  • Like
Reactions: SGTiger
I think the words of Booker T. Washington are appropriate here.

"There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs-partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.'
 
Check my math, city of Charleston has a population of 140k. 26% is African American.
Roughly 36,400 African Americans make up the population of the city of Charleston.

100,000,000/ 36,400 = 2,742.25 per citizen.

That seems like an incredible amount of taxpayer money for very little benefit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Amazingly absurd policies, but let’s see what actually comes of it. And thankfully it will probably be a while before that level of absurdity crosses the Cooper River.
 
correct so lets help a young generation of kids who were born in the ghetto in broken homes to a family on drugs on welfare with no education...why not ear mark some money for that and work like hell to make sure that's what the money goes to...give them a chance at least, otherwise we are gonna be having this conversation forever


ok im done
Will it work? Or does it just make you feel better?
 
I read it when they released it for public comment. Wouldn’t expect anything less idiotic from the leftist mayor and majority council running/ruining our city. He will face serious challenges in getting re elected in ‘23 so there’s hope for better. But our muni elections in Chas are strategically placed in odd calendar years and claim to be “non-partisan”. This helps a radical like the current guy hide his true agenda. Only took about 13k votes to put him in office last time. About 110k registered voters in the City. Pathetic!
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT