Concise Description of Mass Election Fraud

TigerGrowls

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Dec 21, 2001
10,838
6,153
113
This is only one angle being used but its very impactful.


FINALLY, FINALLY, FINALLY – National Group Uncovers Real-Time Democrat Election Fraud – HERE’S HOW THEY DID IT​

By Joe Hoft
Published November 30, 2022 at 10:00am
Voter-Fraud-1.jpg


Here’s How They DID IT! Real-Time Election Fraud
Guest post by Jay Valentine – reprinted with permission from American Thinker
Database latency – geeky term, but it’s how they DID It!
TRENDING: FINALLY, FINALLY, FINALLY - National Group Uncovers Real-Time Democrat Election Fraud - HERE'S HOW THEY DID IT
A policeman pulls over a speeder. The police computer fortunately picks up that 3 hours ago a similar vehicle and person held up a liquor store – so the police are on alert.
No database latency.
County election managers change the zip code of 31,000 voters on September 3.
Ballots go out that week. Those 31,000 are undeliverable. Someone collects those valid ballots. On September 15th, those addresses are quietly changed back.
National Change of Address Database, NCOA, will not pick up those address changes. They didn’t happen because there is no history.
The 31,000 citizens were getting their mail just fine – except for ballots. Ballot addresses were driven by the county mail-in ballot database – the one that was changed – then changed back.
Many states send ballots to everyone; the recipient is none the wiser that they never received a mail-in ballot. They may vote in person. Oops! “You already voted!” Ever heard that?
Welcome to database latency.
Our bad guy pals know they can change voter rolls, take an action, then change them back. Who would know?
A thousand voters are changed from inactive, voted, then changed back and how would you ever know? With lots of complex footwork, you could eventually tell from their voter history file – months after the election.
What are you going to do about it? Reverse the election?
The new, and current “ballot gathering strategy” mandated by the almost universal mail-in ballots adds pretty cool database games – exploiting database latency.
Database latency, as you likely gathered, is when the database record lags current reality. We all experienced it in our electronic-driven society.
The ballot-gathering scammers know about latency – it’s their ground game!
To Republicans, election engineering is civics. To Democrats, it’s business – and they are great at it!

They know the Republicans have hundreds of diligent election sleuths working in basements and dining room tables checking voter rolls for the dead and the fakes.
They know those people rely on NCOA and Melissa and other batch, highly latent services as their baseline. If someone moved, it shows up in NCOA. Great. 2 months later!
A real voter moved. They want to keep getting their St. Jude’s donation cards. They fill in their NCOA form to get mail forwarded to their new address. Our fraud detectives find this person – and maybe someone voted for them. Cross out one phantom! One!
Our bad guys are happy to give up a few retail-level ballots to hide their wholesale-level ballot gathering apparatus. They count on it.
Here’s the fraud equation taking place across the country:
  • Count the in-person votes on election day.
  • Count the early, in-person votes.
  • Shut down the system (Atlanta water leak, Maricopa County everything).
  • Bring in undeliverable ballots gathered when you changed voters’ names, addresses, or zip codes, then changed them back.
  • Determine the votes you need to win. Press the “WIN” button.
  • Wait for the Republicans to file a lawsuit months later.
Floating ballots are the lifeblood Democrats need to win – and win they will. Win they do.
Ballot gatherers know Republicans use dumb technology – relational databases, SQL, NCOA, Melissa, all non-real-time, highly latent systems.
Bad guys are happy to watch Republicans waste time finding ones and twos, while the real action takes place by the thousands – invisible to these batch, latency-prone systems.
The RNC helps with its antiquated “big data” system equally invisible to anything that happens within a month.
Want to run for office? It’s uglier.
A latency-prone database, like the RNC, to pick one, tells you how your voter was prone to vote over the last 10 election cycles. She “leans” Republican.
Unfortunately, it does not tell you that while she leaned Republican for years, she donated, this week, to Greenpeace, enraged at the Dollar Store being built across her street. Real time means something: what is going on here, now, today.
Your Democrat opponent knows that – she is real time, you aren’t, you are RNC.
You, dear candidate, are using the RNC latency database to get out the voter for your opponent – because you are “latent.”
We explain this at www.Omega4America.com
Let’s take a short walk into the future of how we fight ballot gathering with technology – just a fun little peek.
We know an election commission is going to do anything possible to make the Democrat win. Wisconsin Election Commission, Arizona’s Maricopa County, 7 states in 2016, for instance.
Rather than wasting time on batch NCOA, we get a daily copy of the election roll.
Ouch! That’s expensive! The list in Wisconsin is $12,000!
Did you know your Democrat friends bought it 28 times before the 2016 election?
What is a governorship worth? How much does a contested Senate seat cost? Maybe $50 million? A presidential campaign?
Why would anyone spend $50 million on a Senate seat and let the other side own the election rolls? That is a question Ronna McDaniel may be asked by Mike Lindell!
We take that election roll, with perhaps 15 million voters, Florida for instance or Texas – compare every voter against every other voter and address, down to the cell level, and see any differences – every day!
What do we find?
In a real-life example, this month, we found a county that changed 31,500 zip codes, yet the voter remained at the same address. Curious?
That means the voter did not change their address, continued to receive all their mail, except one item – a ballot sent from a voter commission.
Our teams in Wisconsin and Florida are finding this scam by the truckload – do not email me that it is not real! And NCOA and Melissa? They are totally blind to this – because the addresses are changed back!
The Fractal team spent the last 20 months, with guidance from Mike Lindell, encouragement from the great Sheriff David Clarke – and over a dozen election integrity teams advancing voter integrity analysis from the ancient, batch, latent to the modern, current real-time.
We learned the core strategy to fight ballot gathering fraud is real time analysis of voter rolls and cast ballots. It is also real time analysis of ballot collection points – like large apartment complexes and dorms where ballots gather because there is not an APT number.
The question now is whether Republicans want to start leading with technology or continue to spend millions on “big data” “data driven” batch buzzwords.
We are about to find out.
Jay Valentine can be reached at Jay@ContingencySales.com. The Fractal micro site is www.Omega4America.com, @jayvalentine99 on the New Twitter
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016

iceheart08

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Sep 2, 2005
13,003
20,421
113
This is made up nonsense based on a total lack of understanding for how the process works. Changes to the voter rolls are published in almost real time in almost every state so that anyone with a subscription can monitor changes. There are organizations out there whose sole purpose is to monitor and report on changes to voter rolls in the aggregate as often as possible. This notion that nobody is watching or could be watching is absolutely nonsense, and it forms the basis of this ****ing stupid opinion piece by someone who has no understanding of whats going on. Again, it's either malpractice from the gateway pundit or malice. Either way, it's ****ing nonsense, as usual.
 

nytigerfan

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Dec 10, 2004
7,121
8,328
113
This is made up nonsense based on a total lack of understanding for how the process works. Changes to the voter rolls are published in almost real time in almost every state so that anyone with a subscription can monitor changes. There are organizations out there whose sole purpose is to monitor and report on changes to voter rolls in the aggregate as often as possible. This notion that nobody is watching or could be watching is absolutely nonsense, and it forms the basis of this ****ing stupid opinion piece by someone who has no understanding of whats going on. Again, it's either malpractice from the gateway pundit or malice. Either way, it's ****ing nonsense, as usual.

What I cant figure out is... if the dems are able to so easily commit mass election fraud in republican controlled states - where the republican controlled legislature changed election laws after 2020 - then why are they losing seats in CA and NY? Seems like massive election fraud would be much easier there.
 
Oct 1, 2012
357
798
93
This is made up nonsense based on a total lack of understanding for how the process works.
You saying this is hilarious after coming from the thread on Voter ID where you literally linked to a site that proved that 15 states and DC don't require ID to vote. Yet you claimed that link proved that everyone had to verify their identity to vote.

You guys need to stop simply repeating your talking points and actually think about what you are saying.
 
Oct 1, 2012
357
798
93
What I cant figure out is... if the dems are able to so easily commit mass election fraud in republican controlled states -
They cant. See Florida.

What dems CAN do is commit fraud in a few major cities like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta and Phoenix.

That is enough to swing an entire state blue. And added together it can steal an election.

This is no widespread fraud in the US that's stealing elections.

But you don't need widespread fraud to do that.
 
Feb 1, 2006
219
410
63
Dems like to use the term widespread even though it didn’t need to be widespread.

2020 hinged on 5 or 6 states out of 50. You don’t need “widespread” fraud. Targeted is all that’s needed.

Weird too, the 5 or 6 states needed? All counted, and counted, and counted.
 
Mar 6, 2021
174
372
63
Dems like to use the term widespread even though it didn’t need to be widespread.

2020 hinged on 5 or 6 states out of 50. You don’t need “widespread” fraud. Targeted is all that’s needed.

Weird too, the 5 or 6 states needed? All counted, and counted, and counted.
If I give you 20 counterfeit dollar bills, and you count them 5 times, how many bills will you likely count each time? ;)
 

dpic73

Lake Baikal
Gold Member
Jul 27, 2005
6,175
4,602
113
Atlanta
If I give you 20 counterfeit dollar bills, and you count them 5 times, how many bills will you likely count each time? ;)
If 20 dollar bills don't get counted because they know they're counterfeit, how many counterfeit bills will be counted?
 
  • Like
Reactions: flotiger

iceheart08

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Sep 2, 2005
13,003
20,421
113
You saying this is hilarious after coming from the thread on Voter ID where you literally linked to a site that proved that 15 states and DC don't require ID to vote. Yet you claimed that link proved that everyone had to verify their identity to vote.

You guys need to stop simply repeating your talking points and actually think about what you are saying.

I am 100% certain that you have no idea what you are talking about and that I'm right.

The nuance of how voter registration rolls are pushed out to subscribers to the voter file in any given state is a talking point you've seen somewhere before?

Quite literally, everyone has to verify their identity before their vote is counted. Voter id at a polling place or not. Again, nuance that you won't get. I understand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

iceheart08

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Sep 2, 2005
13,003
20,421
113
I know it's complicated, but you'll eventually figure it out.

Hilarious. Because it is incredibly complex and nuanced. But you bafoons literally wont ever figure it out.

None of you, including the author of the opinion piece linked above, have even a basic understanding of this process. It's not even close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
Mar 6, 2021
174
372
63
Hilarious. Because it is incredibly complex and nuanced. But you bafoons literally wont ever figure it out.

None of you, including the author of the opinion piece linked above, have even a basic understanding of this process. It's not even close.
* buffoons
It's simple really. My state doesn't have these issues. States that generate mail ballots indiscriminately without a request for such are fertilely ripe for fraud. It needs to end.
 

nytigerfan

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Dec 10, 2004
7,121
8,328
113
They cant. See Florida.

What dems CAN do is commit fraud in a few major cities like Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta and Phoenix.

That is enough to swing an entire state blue. And added together it can steal an election.

This is no widespread fraud in the US that's stealing elections.

But you don't need widespread fraud to do that.

In that case, I look forward to the evidence of said fraud being presented in a court of law. Its been 2 years since the last stolen election and that still has not happened.
 

nytigerfan

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Dec 10, 2004
7,121
8,328
113
Dems like to use the term widespread even though it didn’t need to be widespread.

2020 hinged on 5 or 6 states out of 50. You don’t need “widespread” fraud. Targeted is all that’s needed.

Weird too, the 5 or 6 states needed? All counted, and counted, and counted.

Fair enough, I have edited my post below:

What I cant figure out is... if the dems are able to so easily commit TARGETED election fraud in republican controlled states - where the republican controlled legislature changed election laws after 2020 - then why are they losing seats in CA and NY? Seems like TARGETED election fraud would be much easier there.
 
Mar 6, 2021
174
372
63
In that case, I look forward to the evidence of said fraud being presented in a court of law. Its been 2 years since the last stolen election and that still has not happened.
Evidence has been introduced hundreds of times and either not admitted for standing or just summarily dismissed. Do you people not read at all?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Mar 6, 2021
174
372
63
Fair enough, I have edited my post below:

What I cant figure out is... if the dems are able to so easily commit TARGETED election fraud in republican controlled states - where the republican controlled legislature changed election laws after 2020 - then why are they losing seats in CA and NY? Seems like TARGETED election fraud would be much easier there.
Why would the Democrats target states they already have in their pockets? For example, the DNC doesn't spend a dime on elections where their candidates basically run unopposed. The fraud is always perpetrated in purple states where the government is split, including their judges.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

nytigerfan

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Dec 10, 2004
7,121
8,328
113
Why would the Democrats target states they already have in their pockets? For example, the DNC doesn't spend a dime on elections where their candidates basically run unopposed. The fraud is always perpetrated in purple states where the government is split, including their judges.

I read months before the elections that the dems were not happy about their polling in certain districts in NY and CA. Why not pull out the big cheating guns and retain the house?
 
Oct 1, 2012
357
798
93
Dems like to use the term widespread even though it didn’t need to be widespread.

2020 hinged on 5 or 6 states out of 50. You don’t need “widespread” fraud. Targeted is all that’s needed.
Bingo. Dems always argue voter fraud in a way to try to cover up their cheating.

Just like libs here say it isn't fraud if it isn't heard in court. Cause they know lib judges in blue states wont allow it to be heard.

Cheaters gonna cheat.
 
Oct 1, 2012
357
798
93
I read months before the elections that the dems were not happy about their polling in certain districts in NY and CA. Why not pull out the big cheating guns and retain the house?
You mean their polling in red areas of those states that have secured election integrity?

Why not stop cheating? What are you afraid would happen, your side would never win another election?
 
Mar 6, 2021
174
372
63
I read months before the elections that the dems were not happy about their polling in certain districts in NY and CA. Why not pull out the big cheating guns and retain the house?
New York and CA shit their own beds with their insane policies, in NY, particularly crime and lack of enforcement. California has their own unique problems aside from crime, woke policies that most people are downright sick of, including Democrats and independents. Additionally, the DNC shot their $$ wad nationwide on certain Senate races like GA, PA, NV, FL and AZ. They'd written off the house long ago.
 

WapPride

Valles Marineris
Mar 17, 2021
1,172
1,441
113
New York and CA shit their own beds with their insane policies, in NY, particularly crime and lack of enforcement. California has their own unique problems aside from crime, woke policies that most people are downright sick of, including Democrats and independents. Additionally, the DNC shot their $$ wad nationwide on certain Senate races like GA, PA, NV, FL and AZ. They'd written off the house long ago.
ehh the NY "Crime" issue was admittedly a giant hoax that the media ran with to drum up views. They even said as much after the election. Articles about crime in NY spiked to ridiculous volumes leading up to the election, and immediately following the election the volume of articles plummeted.
 
Mar 6, 2021
174
372
63
ehh the NY "Crime" issue was admittedly a giant hoax that the media ran with to drum up views. They even said as much after the election. Articles about crime in NY spiked to ridiculous volumes leading up to the election, and immediately following the election the volume of articles plummeted.
Articles by the MSM drive bys? That media?

giphy.gif
 

iceheart08

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Sep 2, 2005
13,003
20,421
113
* buffoons
It's simple really. My state doesn't have these issues. States that generate mail ballots indiscriminately without a request for such are fertilely ripe for fraud. It needs to end.

Here's the thing. You think they are. But they really aren't. Signature verification procedures in all mail in ballot states are significant, and there is very little actual evidence of anyone anywhere picking up large numbers of ballots mailed to the wrong address or something like that and voting those ballots. And if they did, they'd get caught very quickly. Again, due to the stringent requirements of any signature verification process.


And herein lies the problem. Elections are VERY complex. That's just a fact. And you all are making assumptions and declarative statements about elections without even a basic understanding of the process. It's like watching a football game and getting upset that a touchdown is worth 6 points, because in baseball, a home run is only worth potentially 1 "point" or at most 4 "points". You are applying what you believe to be "common sense" to a process that you don't understand.
 
Oct 1, 2012
357
798
93
Here's the thing. You think they are. But they really aren't. Signature verification procedures in all mail in ballot states are significant, and there is very little actual evidence of anyone anywhere picking up large numbers of ballots mailed to the wrong address or something like that and voting those ballots. And if they did, they'd get caught very quickly. Again, due to the stringent requirements of any signature verification process.


And herein lies the problem. Elections are VERY complex. That's just a fact. And you all are making assumptions and declarative statements about elections without even a basic understanding of the process. It's like watching a football game and getting upset that a touchdown is worth 6 points, because in baseball, a home run is only worth potentially 1 "point" or at most 4 "points". You are applying what you believe to be "common sense" to a process that you don't understand.
Let's assume all of what you said is correct.

Your argument is, well that doesn't really lead to fraud, so there's no reason to treat it as if it does.

ALL honest Americans should be INSANELY proactive about wanting to protect election integrity. The stance of the libs is always always ALWAYS for LESS oversight, not more.

You guys are willingly creating an environment that makes it easier to commit voter fraud.

Only cheaters think that way. Thanks for confirming.
 
Mar 6, 2021
174
372
63
You guys are willingly creating an environment that makes it easier to commit voter fraud.

Only cheaters think that way. Thanks for confirming.
Rationally there's no other way for them to spin this. If they thought for one minute the GOP was defrauding elections there would be no mail in voting period, and the military would be posted at polling places. 😂
 

nytigerfan

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Dec 10, 2004
7,121
8,328
113
You mean their polling in red areas of those states that have secured election integrity?

Why not stop cheating? What are you afraid would happen, your side would never win another election?

No. Not red areas. Traditionally blue areas.
 
Feb 1, 2006
219
410
63
Let's assume all of what you said is correct.

Your argument is, well that doesn't really lead to fraud, so there's no reason to treat it as if it does.

ALL honest Americans should be INSANELY proactive about wanting to protect election integrity. The stance of the libs is always always ALWAYS for LESS oversight, not more.

You guys are willingly creating an environment that makes it easier to commit voter fraud.

Only cheaters think that way. Thanks for confirming.
The bad part, dems in the previous decade said the same thing. That mail in voting had a high risk of fraud. Man how power hungry politicians can change their tune. Now, they want to strip away security measures. I wonder why? No I don’t.

 
Oct 1, 2012
357
798
93
Rationally there's no other way for them to spin this. If they thought for one minute the GOP was defrauding elections there would be no mail in voting period, and the military would be posted at polling places. 😂
Precisely. The fact that they want nothing to do with election integrity proves that they don't believe the right is cheating at all, and know that their side is.

The right doesn't want EITHER side to cheat. Because we are the adults in the room that understand what it means for the nation if our elections are so corrupt that they can be stolen.
 

dpic73

Lake Baikal
Gold Member
Jul 27, 2005
6,175
4,602
113
Atlanta
Precisely. The fact that they want nothing to do with election integrity proves that they don't believe the right is cheating at all, and know that their side is.

The right doesn't want EITHER side to cheat. Because we are the adults in the room that understand what it means for the nation if our elections are so corrupt that they can be stolen.
Wrong! It's because we trust the process and believe in our hearts that this is a great country that will almost always get it right. And most importantly, we know that historically there has been an insignificant amount of election fraud. We don't believe there's a boogeyman behind every door looking for opportunities to destroy our ballots - or yours.

If you still believe there is significant voter fraud despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, it's simply because you want to. You'll never accept that you lose because you put up the most hateable candidates imaginable, that the majority of Americans will reject. In your mind, rude alpha dudes with nasty temperaments are the shit and you can't imagine why anyone could see it differently. If you love them simply because of how hard they own the libs, what do you think the libs think? What do you think moderate Republicans think of that kind of behavior? If you can't see that's where the problem lies, this country is in danger, because of people like you who would rather burn it all down if you can't win with assholes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flotiger

hopefultiger13

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Aug 20, 2008
7,997
11,679
113
54
Pocatello, ID
Still waiting for any of this shit to stand up in court... We have two years of "Proof" from OP, and yet nothing makes it to court even in the Republican controlled states.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ctcseb

iceheart08

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Sep 2, 2005
13,003
20,421
113
Still waiting for any of this shit to stand up in court... We have two years of "Proof" from OP, and yet nothing makes it to court even in the Republican controlled states.

Not only does non of this stand up in court, but if you go look at most of the lawsuits filed, they tend to start with a disclaimer about how the lawsuit is NOT ALLEGING FRAUD.
 

ctcseb

Valles Marineris
Gold Member
Nov 24, 2015
1,045
3,899
113
Michigan
Not only does non of this stand up in court, but if you go look at most of the lawsuits filed, they tend to start with a disclaimer about how the lawsuit is NOT ALLEGING FRAUD.
The lawsuits are so bullshit that some of the lawyers filing them are getting sanctioned


Anyone with an IQ over 80 and just one ounce of integrity knows these lawsuits are frivolous and just for show. They make the Growls of the world happy by giving them a cause to fight for.
 

Latest posts