ADVERTISEMENT

Conservatives to NCAA - "You are NOT in Control Here!" Keep it Going

CRBAGS

Valles Marineris
Gold Member
Jan 20, 2002
668
518
93

Conservatives Score Big Against NCAA​

Tony Perkins / @tperkins / June 04, 2021;

COMMENTARY BY​

Tony Perkins@tperkins; Tony Perkins is president of the Family Research Council.

GettyImages-1321752710.jpg


Just two months ago, the NCAA had promised to boycott states that protected girls sports or banned gender experimentation on minors. That all fell apart just a few weeks later. Pictured: The NCAA logo is seen painted on the grass at the 2021 NCAA Division II Women's Golf Championship at TPC Michigan May 15, 2021, in Dearborn. (Photo: Justin Tafoya/NCAA Photos via Getty Images)

For the refused-to-be-canceled crowd, it was a headline to celebrate. “The NCAA threatened states over anti-transgender bills,” the big print of The Washington Post read. “But the games went on.”

It was the surest sign in a post-Georgia, Coke-boycotting world that fed-up conservatives were the newest force to be reckoned with. It’s also the most recent evidence—out of piles of examples—that the right side may be winning the woke wars.

For the far left, the retreat of a major sports league is a public defeat that it can’t seem to reconcile. After 2016, when the NCAA was the most powerful leverage liberals had in states like North Carolina, they’d begun to count on these hardcore allies to help them beat back local attacks on their often dangerous LGBT agenda.

It worked until recently, when Americans—sick of being force-fed transgender politics—suddenly decided to take the momentum from their stand on election reform and start applying it across the board. Their unofficial mantra—refuse to be intimidated—began working.

Want to keep up with the 24/7 news cycle? Want to know the most important stories of the day for conservatives? Need news you can trust? Subscribe to The Daily Signal’s email newsletter. Learn more >>
Suddenly, the tough talk about retaliation from corporations and other organizations was being exposed for what it was: empty threats from big-mouthed bullies.

Just two months ago, the NCAA had promised to boycott states that protected girls sports or banned gender experimentation on minors. That all fell apart just a few weeks later, when so many states had passed conservative legislation that the league finally realized it had nowhere to go. Suddenly, tournaments that weren’t supposed to be awarded to places like Arkansas, Alabama, and Tennessee got the news that they would still be hosts after all.

GLAAD and other LGBT groups, who are used to these leagues’ blind allegiance, have been hysterical ever since. They’ve accused the NCAA of “going back on its word” to choose locations that were “safe, healthy, and free of discrimination.”

Human Rights Campaign President Alphonso David had even harsher words, insisting that the “NCAA should be ashamed of themselves for violating their own policy … ” Their “failure to take action here,” he went on, “means that they are part of the problem.”

Internally, the hand-wringing at places like the Human Rights Campaign has to be even worse. For years, the LGBT crowd has relied on scare tactics to move its agenda forward since it’s always lacked broad public support. If the NCAA won’t do its bidding, then the damage—especially now, as the demand for these bills keeps growing—is severe.

In a letter from far-left activists to the NCAA, Athlete Ally asks, “What changed?” One thing did, The Washington Times points out: the states that are passing these laws “are no longer outliers.”
In Florida, the latest state to protect girls sports, the threat from the NCAA more than backfired. Instead of frightening leaders away, it motivated conservatives to pass a bill even faster.
The governor told one news anchor that he remembers the day the letter from the sports league was issued. “I called the speaker of the House in Florida and said, ‘Did you hear what they said?'” And he replied, “Now we’ve definitely got to get this done.” There, as in other states, the rally cry seemed to be, “We’ll show them!”

And to the delight of commonsense Americans all across this country, they have. Last week in Louisiana, despite the governor’s warnings, the Legislature passed another bill to save girls sports by bipartisan, veto-proof majorities: 29-6 in the Senate and 78-17 in the House.

Then, in a major punch to the left’s gut, Oklahoma—one of the few states that was openly worried about the NCAA’s threat—realized the league was bluffing, went back to the drawing board, and passed its proposal out of the House.

When Oklahoma state Rep. Justin Humphrey, R-Lane, realized that the NCAA was scheduling tournaments in states with policies based on biology, he said, “I kind of laughed.” LGBT activists were appalled. “It was really scary to know that so many lawmakers in Oklahoma [saw] this as a reversal to the NCAA’s earlier statement,” one said. “That had been the only thing that persuaded folks [to back off these] girls sports bills.”

When the NCAA announced that Florida would host a softball championship this spring, Republicans could barely contain their glee. “I guess the NCAA boycott of Florida is over after two weeks,” state Rep. Chris Latvala, R-Clearwater, tweeted. “Go Knights!”

The news for conservatives was even sweeter when the state’s bill became law on the first day of LGBT Pride Month. Turns out, the tug of the left may be strong, but so is the $730 million in revenue from the Southeastern Conference.

Our influence as red states, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, pointed out, is bigger than we think. “Will they even be able to have sports events anymore in the United States [if they boycott us]? I don’t think so.”

In the end, Beth Stelzer, president of Save Women’s Sports, says, most of these states would have moved forward even if it did cost them a few collegiate events. They, like the majority of Americans, had already made up their minds: “We need to do the right thing and stand up for females. People over profits. Facts over feelings.”

Who would have thought at the start of this legislative season that protecting girls sports would be the issue that separated the leaders who had courage and the leaders who are cowards? But it did.


Originally published in Tony Perkins’ “Washington Update,” which is written with the aid of Family Research Council senior writers.

 
It will be nice..... one day.... when things aren’t a liberal or conservative matter.

Just what’s best for society.

i hate libs and pubs. Most of you suck and don’t know it. Or you do and just enjoy spouting your bullshit over the populous. GFY, with peace and love. This isnt directed at you OP but we read 98% of news articles that ALWAYS have a conservative or lib spin. It’s because people are sheep and drawn to master click bate.
 
I'm fairly liberal, socially speaking, but the idea of allowing transgender women to compete against cisgender women is insane.

If the left wants to defend stances using science, they should have to justify their decisions scientifically as well. You can't justify this one scientifically. If anything, the science shows this is the anthesis of the right thing to do.
 
It will be nice..... one day.... when things aren’t a liberal or conservative matter.

Just what’s best for society.

i hate libs and pubs. Most of you suck and don’t know it. Or you do and just enjoy spouting your bullshit over the populous. GFY, with peace and love. This isnt directed at you OP but we read 98% of news articles that ALWAYS have a conservative or lib spin. It’s because people are sheep and drawn to master click bate.
Will that day ever come? I seriously doubt it.

It's just like the mouth breathing SEC fans. They didn't have to get everyone on their "my conference is better than your conference" train, they just had to get enough people to make enough noise so that it never went away...and here we are now, it's just part of the conversation now.

That's a perfect analogy, democrats are mouth breathing SEC fans. If you agree with them you're on their side, if you disagree with them but don't say or do anything about it, then you're also on their side. The only people who are truly against them are the ones who have the balls to stand up to them, refuse to be shouted down, and silenced.
 
instead of calling it an anti-transgender law, let's try calling it a pro traditional gender law, or a common sense law
What I can't wrap my head around is why there needs to be a law in the first place.

Physical sports are separated by age and/or weight classes within a given gender. This is to protect the athletes and create a modicum of fairness. Is that considered weight or age discrimination? No... And it doesn't feel asinine to ask the question nor answer it. Are there laws that dictate this? Maybe there are and I'm ignorant.

The other side of this coin is the consequences of choice. Whether you adhere to the argument of being born a certain way and it not being a choice, the stipulated outcome is what it is.

Either -
1. One chooses to identify as a different gender, and because of that they are choosing to adhere to transgender rules (i.e. a transgender girl can't compete in cisgender girls' sports)

-or-

2. One believe it isn't a choice and simply the cards they were dealt - they're still transgendered and not cisgendered. A boy that ends up being 6'2" and 350lbs in the 8th grade doesn't get to wrestle in the 145lb weight class just because he "sees himself as/feels skinny".

/soapbox
 
Incorrect, Conservatives uphold the laws of biology and marriage, they didn't create those laws, they just abide by them.
You're not even talking 'laws' here.....
Just the facts, ma'am.

(understand the use of laws of nature and all)

Ceptin......not sure who this Mother Nature is that people keep talkin' 'bout......
 
I think ideology is an issue on both sides of the aisle.

Conservatives create laws around one's gender and their right to marriage, among other things.
Yes, conservatives (really, everybody until about 15 years ago) recognized that marriage was based on sexual complementarity for pretty much all of history. This was more reflexive and historical than ideological. “Gender ideology” is the idea that there are many “genders,” and that one can simply identify as whatever gender one feels like, and that your self-identification should trump your biology, social norms, etc. Actually, it’s probably of a piece with the idea that one’s sex is irrelevant to marriage. After all, I think it was the day after Obergefell that a piece in the NYT declared that “transgender” was the next “civil rights” struggle.

At any rate, this is a really odd thing for the NCAA to be advocating. It was a completely fringe view just a few years ago, and much of it is still fringe now. They have no business trying to impose their controversial views on states.
 
What I can't wrap my head around is why there needs to be a law in the first place.

Physical sports are separated by age and/or weight classes within a given gender. This is to protect the athletes and create a modicum of fairness. Is that considered weight or age discrimination? No... And it doesn't feel asinine to ask the question nor answer it. Are there laws that dictate this? Maybe there are and I'm ignorant.

The other side of this coin is the consequences of choice. Whether you adhere to the argument of being born a certain way and it not being a choice, the stipulated outcome is what it is.

Either -
1. One chooses to identify as a different gender, and because of that they are choosing to adhere to transgender rules (i.e. a transgender girl can't compete in cisgender girls' sports)

-or-

2. One believe it isn't a choice and simply the cards they were dealt - they're still transgendered and not cisgendered. A boy that ends up being 6'2" and 350lbs in the 8th grade doesn't get to wrestle in the 145lb weight class just because he "sees himself as/feels skinny".

/soapbox
Laws are being made because boys are competing in girls sports, and men are encroaching in women’s private spaces, because some school districts/localities are allowing it (in fact, requiring it). In many places it is illegal to “misgender” (an Orwellian term for referring to a person by the correct gendered language) a “trans” person. In these places, the liberal accommodation of setting up special accommodations for those who consider themselves “trans” aren’t even allowed- “trans” has to be affirmed by treating the person as the sex they want to be. So, yes, laws are probably required in this environment, whereas they weren’t needed a few years ago.

It should also probably be noted that even the “trans” and “cis” language is thick with gender theory. We really don’t need an extra word to describe people who don’t have gender dysphoria in order to accommodate those who do have gender dysphoria. The term “trans” also implies that a person can actually be a different sex than their biology. The whole business of some sort of nebulous sexual reality determine what somebody truly is seems awfully mystical to me.
 
Last edited:
Left has been winning this war one inch at a time for decades.
You are correct but what I'm starting to see is more and more people finally waking up to the madness now that it's gotten so far as to start affecting regular Americans and their every day lives. Normal, hard working Americans have kept quiet for a while because we're the ones with jobs and responsibilities and pushing back has proven to come with consequences in the woke world we live in. What's now starting to happen is people are realizing if they don't stand up there's going to be nothing left for us to lose because the crazies are dead set on taking it all from us to give to someone they deem more socially worthy. I think Aaron Tippin said it best when he sang "you've got to stand for something or you'll fall for anything".
 
Not just transgender. My daughter played twice games against a soccer team with a boy goalie. Guess what, no one could score on him, any girl that ran into him while both were going for the ball was leveled, and he could punt 3/4 the distance of the field. Go figure.

Is that fair?

If so, what is the purpose of girls' sports?

I just don't get it sometimes...
 
Not just transgender. My daughter played twice games against a soccer team with a boy goalie. Guess what, no one could score on him, any girl that ran into him while both were going for the ball was leveled, and he could punt 3/4 the distance of the field. Go figure.

Is that fair?

If so, what is the purpose of girls' sports?

I just don't get it sometimes...
My son plays on a U8 travel soccer team here in Queen Annes County, MD. This Spring we played teams from Anne Arundel County (just across the Bay). The majority of the teams they played were all Boys U8, but there was one team they played that was coed. Our boys trounced that team 13-0 and that was because in the second half our coach didnt allow our strikers to line up past mid-field.

Ive said it before and I'll say it again.... there are two genders. Male and Female. Sex and Gender arent fluid and no matter what you believe or think, if you are male it doesnt matter what you identify as .... youre male.

With that said, Im polite, soooooooo if a dude in a dress wants to be called Sally and use they them this thus that pronouns, fine. But I'll be damned if anyone will get me to agree than men can menstruate, get pregnant, or that a boy has any business competing in girls sports.

It truly is amazing how quickly it went from "I just want to live my life and love who I want to love" to "Believe what I believe or else!!!"
 
You are correct but what I'm starting to see is more and more people finally waking up to the madness now that it's gotten so far as to start affecting regular Americans and their every day lives. Normal, hard working Americans have kept quiet for a while because we're the ones with jobs and responsibilities and pushing back has proven to come with consequences in the woke world we live in. What's now starting to happen is people are realizing if they don't stand up there's going to be nothing left for us to lose because the crazies are dead set on taking it all from us to give to someone they deem more socially worthy. I think Aaron Tippin said it best when he sang "you've got to stand for something or you'll fall for anything".
Lol. Ok. Simple man's take.
 
Lol. Ok. Simple man's take.
So you don't think there is serious push back against wokeness recently? Everywhere I look people are fed up and saying enough is enough. I think the left overplayed their hand and definitely overreached a bit. I think the 2022 elections will show that to be accurate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: harristeeter
So you don't think there is serious push back against wokeness recently? Everywhere I look people are fed up and saying enough is enough. I think the left overplayed their hand and definitely overreached a bit. I think the 2022 elections will show that to be accurate.
There is some, but not enough among people with any power in institutions outside of politics. Hopefully, but also unfortunately, we seem to be at a high water mark for woke institutional power.
 
Not just transgender. My daughter played twice games against a soccer team with a boy goalie. Guess what, no one could score on him, any girl that ran into him while both were going for the ball was leveled, and he could punt 3/4 the distance of the field. Go figure.

Is that fair?

If so, what is the purpose of girls' sports?

I just don't get it sometimes...
what age group?
 
You are correct but what I'm starting to see is more and more people finally waking up to the madness now that it's gotten so far as to start affecting regular Americans and their every day lives. Normal, hard working Americans have kept quiet for a while because we're the ones with jobs and responsibilities and pushing back has proven to come with consequences in the woke world we live in. What's now starting to happen is people are realizing if they don't stand up there's going to be nothing left for us to lose because the crazies are dead set on taking it all from us to give to someone they deem more socially worthy. I think Aaron Tippin said it best when he sang "you've got to stand for something or you'll fall for anything".
in the SC legislature, some repubs were pushing for transgender ban on sports legislation to protect girls sports but di not produce a single instance of the problem. so, there was no problem. the only reason this was an "issue" was repubs were engaging in culture war politics to stir up people like on this thread. regardless of your position, i would expect most decent people to have some empathy for a trans kid trying to figure their gender thing out and wanting to be able to participate in sports. However, some repubs, despite their being no problem, didnt have the decency to refrain from hurting a kid already going thru some issues by singling them out with the ban.

at the committee level, some decent repubs were able to strategically work over the other idiots and kill the legislation.

at the end of the day its extracurricular school sports at the high school level. maybe some team plays another team with a trans athlete and maybe that athlete's physical advantage is unfair to some degree, but WHO GIVES A SHIT. this aint the superbowl. in the scenario its one game and one player in the season. and professionals who treat these children will tell you that banning them is damaging to them.

if my kid complained about having to play against a trans kid i would tell them to harden the F up. that is life sometimes. and i might explain the harm banning that kid would do. i think my kid would have some compassion and roll with it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: iceheart08
It will be nice..... one day.... when things aren’t a liberal or conservative matter.

Just what’s best for society.

i hate libs and pubs. Most of you suck and don’t know it. Or you do and just enjoy spouting your bullshit over the populous. GFY, with peace and love. This isnt directed at you OP but we read 98% of news articles that ALWAYS have a conservative or lib spin. It’s because people are sheep and drawn to master click bate.
I don’t think it’s ever going to happen. I remember a time when I could meet someone new and have a solid back and forth even though we had very different backgrounds and opinions. We’d walk away having respect for the other person and understanding their viewpoint from their walk even if we thought it was wrong. Now it’s just hate. Plain and simple. No discourse. And it’s starting young. I’m watching my 14 year old hating people because they are liberal or democrat. I literally just told her the other day that just because they are liberal or democrat does not make them a bad person. They just see the world different from you. Not sure it stuck. Social media is making it impossible on both sides. People are sheep. And civil war is where we will end up. You may think that’s a silly statement. But it’s reality.
 
in the SC legislature, some repubs were pushing for transgender ban on sports legislation to protect girls sports but di not produce a single instance of the problem. so, there was no problem. the only reason this was an "issue" was repubs were engaging in culture war politics to stir up people like on this thread. regardless of your position, i would expect most decent people to have some empathy for a trans kid trying to figure their gender thing out and wanting to be able to participate in sports. However, some repubs, despite their being no problem, didnt have the decency to refrain from hurting a kid already going thru some issues by singling them out with the ban.

at the committee level, some decent repubs were able to strategically work over the other idiots and kill the legislation.

at the end of the day its extracurricular school sports at the high school level. maybe some team plays another team with a trans athlete and maybe that athlete's physical advantage is unfair to some degree, but WHO GIVES A SHIT. this aint the superbowl. in the scenario its one game and one player in the season. and professionals who treat these children will tell you that banning them is damaging to them.

if my kid complained about having to play against a trans kid i would tell them to harden the F up. that is life sometimes. and i might explain the harm banning that kid would do. i think my kid would have some compassion and roll with it.
While not the TI expert on this, I've been following what went down in Connecticut with the female sprinters.
I was with you until that 3rd paragraph. Do you mean to tell me it's OK for transgender athletes to take scholarship spots from true female athletes? If that's what your saying, then, hell no, I don't agree with you. Hardening the F up won't change that situation.
And while I do have some measure of sympathy for these athletes, it shouldn't come at the cost of others.
 
I have no problem with transgender people. However, I don't this it is right to have biological born boys play sports against girls.it is too bad the SC legislature didn't get their act together. Just like they need to legalize medical marijuana. On a personal level, I would like to see South Carolina pass a law on windmills. I have seen raptors (bald eagles, falcons, pelicans, and hawks come back in my lifetime after near extinction from DDT. It is bad enough that EVs are being subsidized without any plans for battery recycling. I wouldn't mind a little lithium in the water of California to mello out the bipolar radical left. :)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: southerncaltiger
in the SC legislature, some repubs were pushing for transgender ban on sports legislation to protect girls sports but di not produce a single instance of the problem. so, there was no problem. the only reason this was an "issue" was repubs were engaging in culture war politics to stir up people like on this thread. regardless of your position, i would expect most decent people to have some empathy for a trans kid trying to figure their gender thing out and wanting to be able to participate in sports. However, some repubs, despite their being no problem, didnt have the decency to refrain from hurting a kid already going thru some issues by singling them out with the ban.

at the committee level, some decent repubs were able to strategically work over the other idiots and kill the legislation.

at the end of the day its extracurricular school sports at the high school level. maybe some team plays another team with a trans athlete and maybe that athlete's physical advantage is unfair to some degree, but WHO GIVES A SHIT. this aint the superbowl. in the scenario its one game and one player in the season. and professionals who treat these children will tell you that banning them is damaging to them.

if my kid complained about having to play against a trans kid i would tell them to harden the F up. that is life sometimes. and i might explain the harm banning that kid would do. i think my kid would have some compassion and roll with it.
what the hell is wrong with stopping the problem before it starts? transgender athletes should not be allowed to compete with other girls or boys..there is no problem with stopping that before any single case happens, your reasoning is asinine and leads me to believe that you didnt work hard to compete in high school and give it your all...of course its not the superbowl but it could be some 17 year old's superbowl..and if high school sports dont matter much, then its no big deal that transgender boy girls cant play...after all its just high school sports...harden up
 
Last edited:
So you don't think there is serious push back against wokeness recently? Everywhere I look people are fed up and saying enough is enough. I think the left overplayed their hand and definitely overreached a bit. I think the 2022 elections will show that to be accurate.
I mean I definitely agree with this to an extent. It really depends on the actual subject.
Do college professors need to resign because college freshmen don't think anyone should ever dress up as Moana for halloween because its 'cultural appropriation'? No thats pretty crazy and way too far and wokeness is silly in that instance.
Is it silly wokeness to call out people for molesting people in the me too movement? nah i think thats actual progress and makes our society better.
Is it silly wokeness to call out people for using gender or racial stereotypes that hurt peoples feelings? Nah that again is educating people and helping society as a whole get better.
The white washing "Go woke go broke" narrative is pretty ignorant on its own and all subjects must be actually discussed. You have to be careful because a lot of people who would generalize all these things will use the extreme bad examples of wokeness to deny the humanity of some people. A lot of those that publish studies like the OP posted would pray the gay away and deny minorities or LGBTQ+ any recognition of who they are.
 
Will that day ever come? I seriously doubt it.

It's just like the mouth breathing SEC fans. They didn't have to get everyone on their "my conference is better than your conference" train, they just had to get enough people to make enough noise so that it never went away...and here we are now, it's just part of the conversation now.

That's a perfect analogy, democrats are mouth breathing SEC fans. If you agree with them you're on their side, if you disagree with them but don't say or do anything about it, then you're also on their side. The only people who are truly against them are the ones who have the balls to stand up to them, refuse to be shouted down, and silenced.
When will it come?

When people stop being obsessed with selecting narcissists for leadership roles in the myopic parties they align with. As if there is no other answer.

This country has been brainwashed that only 2 political parties(aka DUOPOLY) have all the answers. People are AFRAID to think for themselves.

Whether you agree with Cheney and her stance with Trump, a pub should be beaming with pride that someone is standing up for what she sees and believes.

Whether you agree with Bernie and his extreme social measures there are actual nuggets where society can benefit.

Tony Elliott and Venables are gonna call 140 plays over the course of a game. They aren’t gonna be perfect. We don’t spend 6 months roasting Brent for the OSU onslaught. In politics, Brent would be stripped of his DC position because his MASSIVE OSU failure. We have to cut this mentality out.

We also have to cut this COKE or PEPSI DUOPOLY. It only serves those in the jobs and the perceived winning and losing mentality. Remember the general attitudes people had whether they were a COKE or PEPSI drinker/family in the 80s? It was effin stupid but PEPSI made you think it mattered. FOX/MSNBC/CNN and the rest of the bullshit social media artists are the PEPSI marketers of today. They spew their collective hate against everyone and they make you PICK A SIDE supporting their BULLSHIT DUOPOLY.

I’ve been a socially liberal financially conservative person since I was a teen, 30 years now. I can’t tell you how much I despise anyone who aligns with a political party. Sacrificing beliefs for safety of a bumper sticker. It’s pathetic.

It’s OK to grab a Coke or a Pepsi and it’s OK to bury the lib or conservative assholes who are in it for their ideal attention or the rake they are making.

To BE CLEAR..... PEPSI AND COKE have no problem with each others position. They actually support each other. One is on sale one week, the other the next. Together, they own the market. Same with DC, they own the market. Making and moving money to each other every handful of years.

You want legit change? Hire me as a political strategist and get a polished open minded person who is not afraid to be honest. I think people are craving an honest leader. Not a bunch of hacks constantly spewing hate against the other.
 
Last edited:
I'm fairly liberal, socially speaking, but the idea of allowing transgender women to compete against cisgender women is insane.

If the left wants to defend stances using science, they should have to justify their decisions scientifically as well. You can't justify this one scientifically. If anything, the science shows this is the anthesis of the right thing to do.
Yah, I mean I don't think we can define the entire progressive movement with that one squishy issue. I agree men who transition shouldn't be showing up to women's sports to dominate. Seems not fair.
 
  • Like
Reactions: southerncaltiger
in the SC legislature, some repubs were pushing for transgender ban on sports legislation to protect girls sports but di not produce a single instance of the problem. so, there was no problem. the only reason this was an "issue" was repubs were engaging in culture war politics to stir up people like on this thread. regardless of your position, i would expect most decent people to have some empathy for a trans kid trying to figure their gender thing out and wanting to be able to participate in sports. However, some repubs, despite their being no problem, didnt have the decency to refrain from hurting a kid already going thru some issues by singling them out with the ban.

at the committee level, some decent repubs were able to strategically work over the other idiots and kill the legislation.

at the end of the day its extracurricular school sports at the high school level. maybe some team plays another team with a trans athlete and maybe that athlete's physical advantage is unfair to some degree, but WHO GIVES A SHIT. this aint the superbowl. in the scenario its one game and one player in the season. and professionals who treat these children will tell you that banning them is damaging to them.

if my kid complained about having to play against a trans kid i would tell them to harden the F up. that is life sometimes. and i might explain the harm banning that kid would do. i think my kid would have some compassion and roll with it.
What the hell is there to figure out? You are either male of female. There are easily discernable parts differences and there is scientific DNA evidence. Its undisputable, just like math.

If your kid has trouble with 6x6=36, you don't pass laws saying they can't fail math class, they have to learn that its the only answer. You don't want kids to be confused, don't be inconsistent.

The world isn't being overly "mean" to a male by calling him a he.
 
When will it come?

When people stop being obsessed with selecting narcissists for leadership roles in the myopic parties they align with. As if there is no other answer.

This country has been brainwashed that only 2 political parties(aka DUOPOLY) have all the answers. People are AFRAID to think for themselves.

Whether you agree with Cheney and her stance with Trump, a pub should be beaming with pride that someone is standing up for what she sees and believes.

Whether you agree with Bernie and his extreme social measures there are actual nuggets where society can benefit.

Tony Elliott and Venables are gonna call 140 plays over the course of a game. They aren’t gonna be perfect. We don’t spend 6 months roasting Brent for the OSU onslaught. In politics, Brent would be stripped of his DC position because his MASSIVE OSU failure. We have to cut this mentality out.

We also have to cut this COKE or PEPSI DUOPOLY. It only serves those in the jobs and the perceived winning and losing mentality. Remember the general attitudes people had whether they were a COKE or PEPSI drinker/family in the 80s? It was effin stupid but PEPSI made you think it mattered. FOX/MSNBC/CNN and the rest of the bullshit social media artists are the PEPSI marketers of today. They spew their collective hate against everyone and they make you PICK A SIDE supporting their BULLSHIT DUOPOLY.

I’ve been a socially liberal financially conservative person since I was a teen, 30 years now. I can’t tell you how much I despise anyone who aligns with a political party. Sacrificing beliefs for safety of a bumper sticker. It’s pathetic.

It’s OK to grab a Coke or a Pepsi and it’s OK to bury the lib or conservative assholes who are in it for their ideal attention or the rake they are making.

To BE CLEAR..... PEPSI AND COKE have no problem with each others position. They actually support each other. One is on sale one week, the other the next. Together, they own the market. Same with DC, they own the market. Making and moving money to each other every handful of years.

You want legit change? Hire me as a political strategist and get a polished open minded person who is not afraid to be honest. I think people are craving an honest leader. Not a bunch of hacks constantly spewing hate against the other.

Go find yourself a candidate man. You've got a year and a half.
 
I think ideology is an issue on both sides of the aisle.

Conservatives create laws around one's gender and their right to marriage, among other things.

This 100%, rights to marry who you want and be covered under health insurance should be a “right” of every American. I agree with protecting female athletics because it goes against nature and is unfair.

LGBTQ has come a long way and I am extremely happy about their progress. Like all people they deserve freedom, and if cisgender is now real and will continue to grow in population sports should start another level. The nCAA should come up with something to be inclusive for them without alienating a whole other group of people who are only using their biological gifts not medically enhanced gifts.
 
It will be nice..... one day.... when things aren’t a liberal or conservative matter.

Just what’s best for society.

i hate libs and pubs. Most of you suck and don’t know it. Or you do and just enjoy spouting your bullshit over the populous. GFY, with peace and love. This isnt directed at you OP but we read 98% of news articles that ALWAYS have a conservative or lib spin. It’s because people are sheep and drawn to master click bate.

Isn't that the entire basis for liberal and conservative politicians? To figure out what's best for society?

I think it would be nice someday if people just told government to go away and stop trying to figure out what's best for society. People can decide for themselves what they want.

Please tell us more about what Bernie has to offer. Communism? LOL. I can tell what side influences you most.
 
Last edited:
Isn't that the entire basis for liberal and conservative politicians? To figure out what's best for society?

I think it would be nice someday if people just told government to go away and stop trying to figure out what's best for society. People can decide for themselves what they want.

Please tell us more about what Bernie has to offer. Communism? LOL. I can tell what side influences you most.
Good lord..... one day, one day intelligent HONEST folks will deliver free, zero agenda opinions not bent on garbage angles and signaling.

Politicians that rule by fear(which is 90% of them) can all burn 🔥. This is what dictating religious zealots, Big Ten administrators, shitty parents do.

Obsessed with control and influence over people. I can’t state it more clearly, I despise “liberal” and “conservatives”, it sets us up for failure as a duopoly ruling/dictating class.

You want 32 teams in NFL or just Green Bay and New England?

You want Bama and Clemson owning CFB or provide access to others?

You want Amazon and Target owning retail or do you want others to succeed?

You want just vanilla and chocolate at Baskin Robbins or 31 flavors?

If people don’t realize that you’ve been duped into thinking that these 2 mega power hungry inflated ego, choose the opposite side of the other parties are terrible for our country, I don’t know what to tell you. We literally have multiple to infinite options in everything of our lives but EVEN SMART PEOPLE are BRAINWASHED that the Republican or Democratic Party alignment means something. It doesn’t. It only means you aren’t strong enough to think for yourself.

I can give a shit about Sanders, Marjorie Green, Pelosi, AOC or Trump. These people are so polarizing and drive us apart. You know who I do respect? Those willing to govern by their convictions like Romney, Boehner, DeSantis, Cheney, Manchin, Biden. These people don’t always get it right but they actually think freely not roped into party line BS.

It’s abundantly clear that only having “2 choices” ruins people ability to think. We have to start embracing those with actually care about the US and not driven by mega party obsession.
 
Good lord..... one day, one day intelligent HONEST folks will deliver free, zero agenda opinions not bent on garbage angles and signaling.

Politicians that rule by fear(which is 90% of them) can all burn 🔥. This is what dictating religious zealots, Big Ten administrators, shitty parents do.

Obsessed with control and influence over people. I can’t state it more clearly, I despise “liberal” and “conservatives”, it sets us up for failure as a duopoly ruling/dictating class.

You want 32 teams in NFL or just Green Bay and New England?

You want Bama and Clemson owning CFB or provide access to others?

You want Amazon and Target owning retail or do you want others to succeed?

You want just vanilla and chocolate at Baskin Robbins or 31 flavors?

If people don’t realize that you’ve been duped into thinking that these 2 mega power hungry inflated ego, choose the opposite side of the other parties are terrible for our country, I don’t know what to tell you. We literally have multiple to infinite options in everything of our lives but EVEN SMART PEOPLE are BRAINWASHED that the Republican or Democratic Party alignment means something. It doesn’t. It only means you aren’t strong enough to think for yourself.

I can give a shit about Sanders, Marjorie Green, Pelosi, AOC or Trump. These people are so polarizing and drive us apart. You know who I do respect? Those willing to govern by their convictions like Romney, Boehner, DeSantis, Cheney, Manchin, Biden. These people don’t always get it right but they actually think freely not roped into party line BS.

It’s abundantly clear that only having “2 choices” ruins people ability to think. We have to start embracing those with actually care about the US and not driven by mega party obsession.

I'll settle for any politician willing to go back to the Constitution. The 6 that you mentioned are actually the types you are screaming about although I do love DeSantis. I think you meant to say Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Thomas Massie and the beautiful lady who governs the state of South Dakota Kristi Lynn Noem who refused to shut down her state.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT