ADVERTISEMENT

Covid infusion treatment? Ivermectin?

So this is your proof? Holy shit, you are insane. This is obviously two different pictures cropped together. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

rothschild-patent-covid-19.jpg
You still have not debunked the existence of the actual patent... Stop beating around the bush and address the actual point that you don't have information to disprove this article.
 
You still have not debunked the existence of the actual patent... Stop beating around the bush and address the actual point that you don't have information to disprove this article.

In this case, Oct. 13, 2015 is when Rothschild first made a provisional application within this family of patents.

A series of regular, non-provisional patent applications were subsequently made for a “System and Method For Using, Processing, and Displaying Biometric Data” (here) .

These earlier patents are essentially the predecessors to ‘US20200279585A1’ - and as such share similar features, such as the use of biometric data (here) .

However, the patent for a system that analyses biometric data to determine whether the user is suffering from COVID-19 was not applied for until May 17, 2020 (here).
 

In this case, Oct. 13, 2015 is when Rothschild first made a provisional application within this family of patents.

A series of regular, non-provisional patent applications were subsequently made for a “System and Method For Using, Processing, and Displaying Biometric Data” (here) .

These earlier patents are essentially the predecessors to ‘US20200279585A1’ - and as such share similar features, such as the use of biometric data (here) .

However, the patent for a system that analyses biometric data to determine whether the user is suffering from COVID-19 was not applied for until May 17, 2020 (here).
Back to Reuters? Why not go direct to the governmental website? Whatever doesn’t matter it is only conjecture made to make you think... if you wanna trust fact checkers I could care less. Great job working Google
 
You still have not debunked the existence of the actual patent... Stop beating around the bush and address the actual point that you don't have information to disprove this article.
No, posting a link to a random website with a obviously cropped picture isn't something that requires debunking. Rational people don't take spliced together images as facts.
 
No, posting a link to a random website with a obviously cropped picture isn't something that requires debunking. Rational people don't take spliced together images as facts.
What does cropping pictures into an article have to do with the facts of the article. Disprove the message not the author and their cropping abilities.
 
Lot of clinical data that supports the use of ivermectin. The problem is that it doesn’t fit the political narrative. Joe Rogan says he took it along with several different vitamins and he was back to 100% in 3 days after really struggling for 24 hours.
joe Rogan ? lmao ...puleeeeezzee
 
  • Like
Reactions: Essolover4
He also got the monoclonal antibody treatment and a Z pack.
my wife got covid , had fever for two days , and was done. Didnt take a damn thing . Not even an aspirin. Meanwhile, i was down for the count for eleven days at least.
 
Last edited:
The feds are now saying they will regulate who and how much mc antibodies are allocated. I suppose this is a response to DeSantis' successes with it in FL. Nothing better than centralized planning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Essolover4
What does cropping pictures into an article have to do with the facts of the article. Disprove the message not the author and their cropping abilities.
Its your job to post a reasonable source with actual proof. It is not my job to have to disprove every bit of insanity that you produce on your keyboard. Keep trying.
 
Back to Reuters? Why not go direct to the governmental website? Whatever doesn’t matter it is only conjecture made to make you think... if you wanna trust fact checkers I could care less. Great job working Google
Jesus you are a simple person. Click on all the links titled “here” for further evidence supporting the claims made in the Reuters article. You are literally one of the stupidest posters on TI - and that’s an accomplishment considering some of the smooth brains on here.
 
The feds are now saying they will regulate who and how much mc antibodies are allocated. I suppose this is a response to DeSantis' successes with it in FL. Nothing better than centralized planning.
You do realize that monoclonal antibodies are providing you with the same immune resistance to Covid that you get from the vaccine. The vaccine gives you exposure to the spike protein so that you develop your own antibodies (B-cells) to recognize and fight Covid effectively. The monoclonal antibody gives you the antibodies via infusion.

Except it costs the government $1250 per dose for monoclonal antibodies and ~$40 for two doses of the vaccine. Seems like a genius plan to make this a first line treatment in comparison to the vaccine.

If DeSantis were seriously concerned about the people in his state, he'd do a better job of encouraging people to get the vaccine and not fight any sort of vaccine mandate. Same effectiveness + greatly reduced cost. Seems like a no-brainer to me.
 
Who cares what kind of Doctor he is if what he is saying is true?! What a shallow and desperate viewpoint. More and more Doctors every day are supporting the use of Ivermectin. I personally know three individuals in the upstate who have had three different doctors prescribe it to their Covid patients. I guess they are all F'n morons too and @firegiver is the enlightened brilliant one. Nah I don't think so. You are a clown.
 
Jesus you are a simple person. Click on all the links titled “here” for further evidence supporting the claims made in the Reuters article. You are literally one of the stupidest posters on TI - and that’s an accomplishment considering some of the smooth brains on here.
Bravo my elitist TI poster or poser. None of you would post your real name on here and call people dumbasses. You see.. the inability to also see other points of view makes you dense!!

i do not hide behind fact checkers like you. Ya see that is simple allowing someone else to do research for you. No big deal. At least I’ll win sucker of the year right? Most gullible?

At least I will live a long and fruitful life and not hasten it listening to others like you.

Funny we all get our brains from the same higher power, yet some consider theirs better than others.
 
Um, if we would have had a 90+% vaccine rate none of this would be an issue anymore. But here we are.

I, for one, won’t subscribe to and experimental medicine. Unless I am already on my death bed from refusing an FDA approved vaccine.
I assume you just recently got the vaccine since it just received FDA approval?
 
Who cares what kind of Doctor he is if what he is saying is true?! What a shallow and desperate viewpoint. More and more Doctors every day are supporting the use of Ivermectin. I personally know three individuals in the upstate who have had three different doctors prescribe it to their Covid patients. I guess they are all F'n morons too and @firegiver is the enlightened brilliant one. Nah I don't think so. You are a clown.
How many of those doctors think ivermectin treatment is better than being vaccinated? Genuinely interested.
 
I assume you just recently got the vaccine since it just received FDA approval?
Not a snowball's chance in hell that Faucciite just received his gene therapy. He rolled up the sleeve first chance he got and still won't come out of his basement. He's going to wait until the Mu variant runs its course and then reassess whether or not to do life.
 
How many of those doctors think ivermectin treatment is better than being vaccinated? Genuinely interested.
There are numerous doctors who are on the record stating that they believe that if Ivermectin would've been researched, promoted, and made readily available that there would never have been the need for the initial "emergency authorization" approval of the vaccine. They maintain that the hospitalizations and deaths would've been almost insignificant. They've mainly been censored off of YouTube etc. but you can still find it if you look.
 
How many of those doctors think ivermectin treatment is better than being vaccinated? Genuinely interested.
You are not interested in anything but getting everyone vaccinated whether it makes since or not. Its almost like you are so insecure in your choice that you have to bully everyone else into making the same decision that you made.
 
Not a snowball's chance in hell that Faucciite just received his gene therapy. He rolled up the sleeve first chance he got and still won't come out of his basement. He's going to wait until the Mu variant runs its course and then reassess whether or not to do life.
Sitting on an airplane in first class right now laughing out loud about this.
 
You do realize that monoclonal antibodies are providing you with the same immune resistance to Covid that you get from the vaccine. The vaccine gives you exposure to the spike protein so that you develop your own antibodies (B-cells) to recognize and fight Covid effectively. The monoclonal antibody gives you the antibodies via infusion.

Except it costs the government $1250 per dose for monoclonal antibodies and ~$40 for two doses of the vaccine. Seems like a genius plan to make this a first line treatment in comparison to the vaccine.

If DeSantis were seriously concerned about the people in his state, he'd do a better job of encouraging people to get the vaccine and not fight any sort of vaccine mandate. Same effectiveness + greatly reduced cost. Seems like a no-brainer to me.
I only know if two people who have received mca treatment. Both were vaccinated. Both have preexisting conditions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Essolover4
Bravo my elitist TI poster or poser. None of you would post your real name on here and call people dumbasses. You see.. the inability to also see other points of view makes you dense!!

i do not hide behind fact checkers like you. Ya see that is simple allowing someone else to do research for you. No big deal. At least I’ll win sucker of the year right? Most gullible?

At least I will live a long and fruitful life and not hasten it listening to others like you.

Funny we all get our brains from the same higher power, yet some consider theirs better than others.
that's a lot of words to try and justify your own stupidity and gullibility. you could've just said "yeah i'm a gullible person who only listens to data that supports my preconceived viewpoints regardless if my source that supports them is credible or not."

i have plenty of problems with the MSM, but when an outlet provides a fact checking, and backs it up with MULTIPLE factual sources confirming their position then i tend to believe it.
 
Who cares what kind of Doctor he is if what he is saying is true?! What a shallow and desperate viewpoint. More and more Doctors every day are supporting the use of Ivermectin. I personally know three individuals in the upstate who have had three different doctors prescribe it to their Covid patients. I guess they are all F'n morons too and @firegiver is the enlightened brilliant one. Nah I don't think so. You are a clown.
well you see, if someone is an expert on framing a house, their opinion on plumbing, while better than a laymen, is not in the same stratosphere as an actual plumber.
You are claiming what he says is true. I'm pointing out he's a clown for commenting on the matter because HE'S NOT EVEN TREATING COVID PATIENTS.
 
Since you are doing the same, what is your specific background in epidemiology/virology?
My background is a long history in pointing out and laughing at stupid takes on this website. I'm on the same level as any of you, but at least my reasoning isn't dog shit.
If the FDA, AMA, or CDC comes out and says Ivermectine is a good treatment for Covid, I will trust their take, read the report and consider it our society's best have weighed in on the matter and come to that conclusion.
What doofuses do, is invent a narrative: 'covid is fake', 'vax aint safe', 'masks don't work' and then, look for all information supporting that narrative and of course come to TI and post it. Please see the work of @TigerGrowls if you need a huge amount of examples.
 
My background is a long history in pointing out and laughing at stupid takes on this website. I'm on the same level as any of you, but at least my reasoning isn't dog shit.
If the FDA, AMA, or CDC comes out and says Ivermectine is a good treatment for Covid, I will trust their take, read the report and consider it our society's best have weighed in on the matter and come to that conclusion.
What doofuses do, is invent a narrative: 'covid is fake', 'vax aint safe', 'masks don't work' and then, look for all information supporting that narrative and of course come to TI and post it. Please see the work of @TigerGrowls if you need a huge amount of examples.
It is not going to be a big treatment alternative. It kills the virus in the laboratory, just like bleach. But it doesnt do anything to the virus in the human body is my layman's guess. Unless what Trump said is true, why cant we just inject some bleach into us ?
 
well you see, if someone is an expert on framing a house, their opinion on plumbing, while better than a laymen, is not in the same stratosphere as an actual plumber.
You are claiming what he says is true. I'm pointing out he's a clown for commenting on the matter because HE'S NOT EVEN TREATING COVID PATIENTS.
Your argument falls way short . He’s still a doctor. He is still stating the truth. If I am building a house and my electrician tells me the plumber is taking short cuts and doing shoddy work should I ignore him jut because plumbing is not his niche? No way I’m going to listen and check it out. What about the others doctors who have treated thousands of Covid patient who are convinced it is a game changer and who prescribe it? You just don’t want to believe it. So go get your booster and be on your way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Rogan had an interesting Covid experience using the “Cow Dewormer”. Interesting indeed.

If we can believe that knucklehead.. But that doesnt mean that it was an effective treatment, or had any relation to his outcome. It does prove that he took a dose that was non-fatal. Otherwise, just an anecdote. Unlike a few other unvaccinated right wing talk show hosts who never lived to tell of their experience with covid.
 
If we can believe that knucklehead.. But that doesnt mean that it was an effective treatment, or had any relation to his outcome. It does prove that he took a dose that was non-fatal. Otherwise, just an anecdote. Unlike a few other unvaccinated right wing talk show hosts who never lived to tell of their experience with covid.
Hahahah “a dose that was non-fatal”. My man you really need to look into the history of Ivermectin. He took it because that is exactly what his doctor prescribed. It has a better safety profile than Tylenol.

Edit: this “Cow Dewormer” as the mainstream media like to call it (and fleece people into believing that) received a Nobel Prize in 2015 for its effectiveness against infectious disease in humans.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT