ADVERTISEMENT

Detailed Discussion of Mass Election Fraud

TigerGrowls

Woodrush
Gold Member
Dec 21, 2001
30,194
20,529
113
You lib deniers asked for it so here you go. Jeff ODonnell is a computer professional with over 20 years experience in database and programming and was able to get ahold of the data in Mesa CO.

@iceheart08 This is your home area. Do you want to brag about what you did to help the steal? Its over with now so why not?

 
giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: DW4_2016
This guy calls himself - are you ready for this? - the "Lone Raccoon of the Apocalypse". And nothing he presents anywhere is evidence.



Instead of discussing the topic, you guys immediately move to trying to destroy the source. Very adult move....NOT! The guy is a subject matter expert and he has looked at the Dominion machines on a firsthand level. Discuss what he says.
 
Instead of discussing the topic, you guys immediately move to trying to destroy the source. Very adult move....NOT! The guy is a subject matter expert and he has looked at the Dominion machines on a firsthand level. Discuss what he says.

Actually, I know his nickname because I looked him up to see what he says. I spent about 5 minutes reading about his "Polaris" project where he wants volunteers to scan ballot images. He's a nutjob.
 
Actually, I know his nickname because I looked him up to see what he says. I spent about 5 minutes reading about his "Polaris" project where he wants volunteers to scan ballot images. He's a nutjob.
Disagree. He is a subject matter expert and smarter than you on the subject unless you want to provide some info showing that you know more and how.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73
Ok in the shadowy murky world of @DW4_2016 please tell us what constitutes evidence.
i think you're getting confused between bullshit used to confuse nincompoops like you and actual facts. read the bold parts real slow.

ev·i·dence
/ˈevədəns/
information given personally, drawn from a document, or in the form of material objects, used to establish facts in a legal investigation or admissible as testimony in court.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TigerGrowls
i think you're getting confused between bullshit used to confuse nincompoops like you and actual facts. read the bold parts real slow.

ev·i·dence
/ˈevədəns/
information given personally, drawn from a document, or in the form of material objects, used to establish facts in a legal investigation or admissible as testimony in court.
Quit trying to play smart brocefus. Its not working. LOL!!
 
Come on libs. Refute what the man said. You asked for evidence.
I'll be honest... I didn't even look at what he said. There's no point. For the last year and a half you've been on here daily, posting bullshit post after bullshit post on the "stolen" election. And time after time, your posts have been debunked (remember that server in Europe that was seized... with the "evidence". Wonder what happened to it? Remember the "bombshell" in Ga with those ballots in suitcases? where the "suitcases" were actually the containers that Ga uses to store ballots in before counting. The list goes on and on and on. And no matter how many times folks on here have debunked your posts, you just keep posting the next bit of bullshit. If someone were to take the time and show you that the above guy is full of shit, it wouldn't make the slightest bit of difference.

Point being that Jesus himself could come down and show you that the election was real and you wouldn't believe it. So tell you what. Why don't YOU show US where these folks go to court and convinces a judge and jury that "yep these ballot boxes were stuffed" or "yep, these voting machines are rigged". It's been a year and a half of smoking guns, bombshells, and game changers. At what point do these make it to court and not get laughed out of the room? Because when it comes time to appear there... all these theories seem to be shooting blanks, fizzling out, and false starts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
I'll be honest... I didn't even look at what he said. There's no point. For the last year and a half you've been on here daily, posting bullshit post after bullshit post on the "stolen" election. And time after time, your posts have been debunked (remember that server in Europe that was seized... with the "evidence". Wonder what happened to it? Remember the "bombshell" in Ga with those ballots in suitcases? where the "suitcases" were actually the containers that Ga uses to store ballots in before counting. The list goes on and on and on. And no matter how many times folks on here have debunked your posts, you just keep posting the next bit of bullshit. If someone were to take the time and show you that the above guy is full of shit, it wouldn't make the slightest bit of difference.

Point being that Jesus himself could come down and show you that the election was real and you wouldn't believe it. So tell you what. Why don't YOU show US where these folks go to court and convinces a judge and jury that "yep these ballot boxes were stuffed" or "yep, these voting machines are rigged". It's been a year and a half of smoking guns, bombshells, and game changers. At what point do these make it to court and not get laughed out of the room? Because when it comes time to appear there... all these theories seem to be shooting blanks, fizzling out, and false starts.
In other words you got nothing.
 
Disagree. He is a subject matter expert and smarter than you on the subject unless you want to provide some info showing that you know more and how.

Ok. He knows more than me about IT and computer systems. So do you. But that doesn't mean that either of you knows what you're talking about when it comes to election systems.

And given how this guy talks on message boards I think it actually could be you.

But I did listen to him - for you - and never once did I hear him talk about anything that actually happened. All he talked about was what "could" happen in theory. That is not evidence.

But if it is proof of mass fraud, they should get it in front of a judge asap. We already know of plenty of Trump-appointed federal judges who could review the case.

But I think you know that it will stay right where it is. Let me know when it hits a courtroom.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
In other words you got nothing.
You are absolutely correct. I'm not a content expert in that, so I have absolutely no idea whether he is making sense or not. My point was that I doubt that anyone here is going to bother either, b/c if they did prove that this guy is full of shit, it won't make any difference. I mean go back and look at your posts over the last year and a half. How many times have have you posted "absolute proof" only to have that post debunked? Then you just post the next BS post. There's nothing that can change your mind, no evidence that anyone can offer that would convince you, so there's no point to debunking anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT