ADVERTISEMENT

do we really do less with more? I don't think so

toasted8CU

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Jan 3, 2011
10,434
9,970
113
Listed below are the recruiting classes of our teams
(Number of guys in class) 5* 4* 3* {avg star} final rankings

2002
Chickens (26) 3- 5 stars 6- 4 stars16- 3 stars {3.42} final ranking = 11
Clemson (26) 0- 5 stars 9- 4 stars 9- 3 stars {3.04} final ranking = 22
Clemson Won 27-20

2003
Chickens (29) 1- 5 stars 4- 4 stars 18- 3 stars {3} final ranking = 8
Clemson (17) 0- 5 stars 2- 4 stars 10- 3 stars {2.82} final ranking = 67
Clemson 63-17

2004
Chickens (29) 0- 5 stars 3- 4 stars 11- 3 stars {2.48} final ranking = 37
Clemson (27) 0- 5 stars 1- 4 stars 7- 3 stars {2.33} final ranking = 61
Clemson 29-7

2005
Chickens (28) 0- 5 stars 6- 4 stars 15- 3 stars {2.96} final ranking = 23
Clemson (25) 0- 5 stars 6- 4 stars 15- 3 stars {3.08} final ranking = 17
Clemson 13-9

2006
Chickens (24) 0- 5 stars 6- 4 stars 14- 3 stars {3.08} final ranking = 24
Clemson (20) 2- 5 stars 6- 4 stars 10- 3 stars {3.4} final ranking = 16
Chickens 31-28

2007
Chickens (31) 1- 5 stars 14- 4 stars 14- 3 stars {3.42} final ranking = 6
Clemson (23) 0- 5 stars 8- 4 stars 12- 3 stars {3.22} final ranking = 16
Clemson 23-21

2008
Chickens (22) 0- 5 stars 6- 4 stars 14- 3 stars {3.18} final ranking = 22
Clemson (26) 1- 5 stars 13- 4 stars 8- 3 stars {3.42} final ranking = 12
Clemson 31-14

2009
Chickens (29) 0- 5 stars 14- 4 stars 11- 3 stars {3.34} final rankings = 12
Clemson (12) 0- 5 stars 7- 4 stars 4- 3 stars {3.5} final ranking = 37
Chickens 34-17

2010
Chickens (23) 1- 5 star 5- 4 stars 11- 3 stars {3.04} final ranking = 24
Clemson (23) 0- 5 star 9- 4 stars 13- 3 stars {3.35} final ranking = 19
Chickens 29-7

2011
Chickens (32) 1- 5 star 6- 4 stars 25- 3 stars {3.25} final ranking = 18
Clemson (29) 4- 5 stars 6- 4 stars 15- 3 stars {3.34} final ranking = 8
Chickens 34-13

2012
Chickens (25) 0- 5 stars 8- 4 stars 15- 3 stars {3.24} final ranking = 19
Clemson (20) 0- 5 stars 9- 4 stars 11- 3 stars {3.45} final ranking = 14
Chickens 27-17

2013
Chickens (21) 0- 5 stars 8- 4 stars 13- 3 stars {3.38} final ranking = 16
Clemson (23) 0- 5 stars 10- 4 stars 10- 3 stars {3.3} final ranking = 14
Chickens 31-17

2014
Chickens (21) 0- 5 stars 10- 4 stars 11- 3 stars {3.48} final ranking = 16
Clemson (23) 1- 5 stars 7- 4 stars 12- 3 stars {3.32} final ranking = 13
Clemson 35-17

2015
Chickens (30) 0- 5 stars 11- 4 stars 17- 3 stars {3.3} final ranking = 19
Clemson (23) 3- 5 stars 9- 4 stars 10- 3 stars {3.61} final ranking= 4

For giggles

2016
Chickens (7) 0- 5 stars 1- 4 stars 5- 3 stars {3} ranked 3
Clemson (11) 1- 5 stars 6- 4 stars 2- 3 stars {3.7} ranked 11

The reason I posted this was because we are always labeled doing less with more by their fans and other fans. But if you look at the early 2000s they have some really good classes but nothing to so for it. I know we had several 5 star guys late but it's more about the star average that stinks out. We are really starting to separate ourselves if we can keep it up. And they also seem to take a few more players than us a year but that isn't a shocker. I was shocked when I saw them having several 5 star guys in the early 2000s, don't remember a lot of them.

2011 class I really wish at worst had went 2-2 against them
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back