100 % of my money is on Joe Biden pardoning Hunter if he is convicted
He is faking it
Has pardon ready say I
He is faking it
Has pardon ready say I
Does Joe Biden Pardon Hunter
- Thread starter PalmettoTiger1
- Start date
White House says ‘no’ possibility Biden would pardon his son
I hope he does it, and then does a line with Hunter off of the pardon papers
Ha, I actually laughed at this one. That would certainly top the trans lady that had her tiddies out on the white house lawn for sure.
You see one of my main problems with Trump is his absolute belief that any and everyone will do the wrong thing if it's in their best interest to do so. And he has passed that belief on to his supporters. So after the election, if Biden is reelected, there's no case where he could get punished for issuing a pardon for his son. His power to do that is pretty clear and he can't be reelected and his political career is over at this point. So there's no reason he WOULD NOT pardon his son (except that it would be wrong to do so). We'll see what happens.
So when Biden DOES NOT pardon his son... Maybe you could do some self refection on what reality is vs what you believe it is.
Let's just say for a second that the evidence that has been shared is real and that Hunter committed crimes (I know, quite the stretch for some despite new facts daily) . The biggest question that would arise is who else is implicated, ie did Obama know? What about John Kerry? Hillary? Judges? Etc?
Biden would almost have to drop out of 2024 and issue the pardon to protect the others that were either in on it or that knew about it and didn't do anything.
So either Biden is staring down a major investigation that potentially implicates him during his campaign/potentially after if he is elected or he drops out of the race and pardons his son to ensure the investigation isn't tied back to anyone else, including himself.
When you look at that way, it's not a far stretch to think he's pardoned.
Not sure if you saw what Sununu said but he doesn't believe Biden will be the nominee. 👀
Sununu says Biden won't be the Democrat nominee in 2024
New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu (R) stated Thursday that he does not believe President Joe Biden will be the Democratic Party's nominee for the 2024 presidential election, citing the recent
Saw some folks mention Hunter Biden was a private citizen but just wanted to share this to remind everyone that he isn't. He cost the taxpayers millions each year
He's the son of the President, and has been the target of 3+ years of hate from the right. It's been common practice for the adult children (as well as adolescent children) to have SS protection. They can decline it, like Nixon's family and Reagan's oldest son did during his 2nd term, but it's pretty common practice.
How does this make him "not" a private citizen. Just because he has right-wing notoriety doesn't make him a government employee.
We'll see... IMHO it's MUCH MUCH more likely that Biden pardons Trump than his son.
6 cars in the motorcade to and from his court hearing, a house of secret service living next door to him, flights on air force 1 and 2.....who pays for that? I mean, not you lower tax bracket contributor but the rest of us pay for it.
I'm not suggesting that's not warranted, he should have protection. I'm saying that means he's not exactly a private citizen as tax payer dollars fund it.
Are you saying he has to have it because of right wing hate? lolz.....dude, you can do so much better. Go read the transcript from his court hearing and tell me you don't think he's guilty as f*ck.
If it were you on trial for the same crimes, you would be wearing orange and not just on game day.
He is a private citizen, to say otherwise is pedantry for the sake of argument. Just like Trump, Clinton, bush, etc are all private citizens now (even though they are all former heads of state.)
Of course it’s different for us, we’re not related to the president. Being related to the head of our government comes with its perks - like not being held in prison while awaiting trial. He doesn’t need the protection bc of right wing hate, but because he’s the son of the POTUS and harming him is probably something many psychos would like to do.
Let’s also not forget innocent until proven guilty, which a lot of people (on both sides) have failed to recognize the last 8 years.
It’s a shame RFK Jr didn’t consult the SS FAQ page to determine why he hasn’t been given SS protection yet. Instead, he rushed to Twitter to rile up the unwashed masses.
The Secret Service has no role in determining who is to be considered a major candidate. The Secretary of the Homeland Security determines who qualifies as a major candidate and when such protection should commence under the authority of Title 18, United States Code, Section 3056. This determination is made in consultation with an advisory committee comprised of the following individuals:
www.secretservice.gov
Which candidates for President does the Secret Service protect?
In regard to presidential campaign, the Secret Service is authorized by law (18 United States Code § 3056) to protect:- Major presidential and vice presidential candidates and their spouses within 120 days of a general presidential election. As defined in statute, the term "major presidential and vice presidential candidates" means those individuals identified as such by the Secretary of Homeland Security after consultation with an advisory committee.
The Secret Service has no role in determining who is to be considered a major candidate. The Secretary of the Homeland Security determines who qualifies as a major candidate and when such protection should commence under the authority of Title 18, United States Code, Section 3056. This determination is made in consultation with an advisory committee comprised of the following individuals:
- Speaker of the House
- House Minority Whip
- Senate Majority Leader
- Senate Minority Leader
- One additional member chosen by the committee
Frequently Asked Questions About Us
The United States Secret Service, one of the nation's oldest federal investigative law enforcement agencies, was founded in 1865 as a branch of the U.S. Treasury Department.
www.secretservice.gov
Of course Joe will pardon Hunter. I’ll be honest I don’t even have a problem with it.
If I was president I would pardon my son. But I also would never let my son be the Grade A sh!tbag that Hunter is.
Hunters problems are due only to his actions, it’s not due to the “hate from the right.” The hate from the left towards Trumps children was 10x what Hunter recieves yet they are not scum humans like Hunter. Joe is a pathetic parent. Hunter is a pathetic human.
If I was president I would pardon my son. But I also would never let my son be the Grade A sh!tbag that Hunter is.
Hunters problems are due only to his actions, it’s not due to the “hate from the right.” The hate from the left towards Trumps children was 10x what Hunter recieves yet they are not scum humans like Hunter. Joe is a pathetic parent. Hunter is a pathetic human.
Don Jr. is a scum human being, the rest of them not so much.
He's scum as well. I do have the ability to call a spade a spade. However, I'm not a violent person but I'd love the opportunity to kick the shit out of don jr.!!! I f'n despise him.
Last edited:
He's still an asshole but you can continue to be his rally cat
Why Did Jack Smith ignore Biden family scandals when he was head of DOJs Public Integrity Section, tasked with investigating political corruption?
In May 2014, the Obama/Biden White House was scrambling to deflect questions related to Hunter Biden’s new gig as a board member at Burisma, the compromised Ukrainian energy conglomerate; the news came just a few weeks after Vice President Joe Biden visited Kiev and promised Ukrainian leaders that the U.S. was “ready to assist” the country’s efforts to accelerate natural gas exploration. (At the time, Burisma was Ukraine's biggest natural gas producer.)
The day after Burisma issued a public statement boasting about their latest hire, White House press secretary Jay Carney ducked questions about the younger Biden during a May 13, 2014 briefing:
Reporter: On another subject, Hunter Biden has now taken a position with the largest oil and gas company--holding company in Ukraine. Is there any concern about at least the appearance of a conflict there--for the Vice President’s son to take a-
Carney: I would refer you to the Vice President’s office. I saw those reports. Hunter Biden and other members of the Biden family are obviously private citizens and where they work does not reflect an endorsement by the administration or by the Vice President or President. But I would refer you to the Vice President’s office.
Kendra Barkoff, a Biden spokeswoman, offered the same talking points in a terse statement to the media. “Hunter Biden is a private citizen and a lawyer. The vice president does not endorse any particular company and has no involvement with this company."
During a State Department briefing later that day, Jen Psaki smirked away one question about the vice president's son, insisting it was of no concern to the agency.
Nevertheless, major news outlets here and around the world continued to raise the improper, if not brazenly pay-to-play, nature of the arrangement. “Vice President Joe Biden's youngest son Hunter Biden has joined the board of directors of Ukraine's largest oil company at a time that the U.S. is urging Ukraine to develop energy independence from Russia and just days after the vice president visited Ukraine,” ABC News reported in May 2014, noting the fortuitous timing of the announcement.
“The appointment of the vice president's son to a Ukrainian oil board looks nepotistic at best, nefarious at worst,” Adam Taylor, Washington Post foreign affairs reporter, surmised in a May 14, 2014 article. “No matter how qualified Biden is, it ties into the idea that U.S. foreign policy is self-interested. [You] have to wonder how big the salary has to be to put U.S. soft power at risk like this.”
And despite Psaki’s spin, State Department officials soon after expressed concern about the “perception of a conflict of interest,” even taking those concerns to Vice President Joe Biden’s office in early 2015.
But one person in official Washington seemed uninterested in the shady deal between a corrupt international gas company operating in a notoriously unstable country and America’s most troubled nepo-baby:
Jack Smith.
Smith—appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland last year to take over DOJs dual investigations into Donald Trump for alleged mishandling of classified documents and the events of January 6—was named chief of the Department of Justice’s Public Integrity Section, or PIN, in August 2010.
Operating within the criminal division, PIN maintains broad purview over public corruption investigations on the federal, state, and local level including cases tied to “a government official…or someone associated with such an official,” according to the office’s annual report.
Smith held that powerful position until February 2015—meaning Hunter Biden’s years-long board position with Burisma ultimately resulting in a $4 million windfall for the vice president’s son began right under Jack Smith’s nose.
This is certainly contrary to what the public has been told about Jack Smith. The news media, “legal experts” in particular, insist Jack Smith is a no-nonsense federal prosecutor with unmatched integrity and devotion to the rule of law. Smith, according to his former DOJ colleague Andrew Weissmann, is a “consummate professional” and a “skilled and fast prosecutor who does not let the grass grow under his feet."
So, what happened? How did the keen-eyed, apolitical Smith and his 30-plus lawyers miss what was happening just blocks from their DOJ offices?
Perhaps Smith truly bought Burisma’s spin that the company selected Hunter based on his “expertise” in foreign policy and the law. Or perhaps Smith believed Hunter Biden when he said he would consult Burisma on matters relating to “transparency, corporate governance, and responsibility.” 😂
Maybe Smith was too busy prosecuting Republican governor Bob McDonnell and his wife at the time—a case later overturned by the Supreme Court—that he missed the international headlines of how a British government agency had seized $23 million in assets belonging to Burisma’s owner amid suspicions of money laundering the very same month Hunter was appointed to the board.
Maybe Smith was just a tender heart who thought Hunter quickly turned over a new leaf. After all, Hunter had been discharged from the Naval reserves just three months before the Burisma appointment was announced. Hunter’s misadventures were among the worst kept secrets in Washington but maybe Smith was still reeling from his unsuccessful prosecution of former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards to pay attention to Biden family gossip.
And it wasn’t just the Burisma gig that somehow evaded Smith’s attention; Hunter made his overseas business dealings well known. He, along with fellow nepo-baby Christopher Heinz, stepson of then-Senator John Kerry, launched Rosemont Seneca in 2009.
“Over the next seven years, as both Joe Biden and John Kerry negotiated sensitive and high-stakes deals with foreign governments, Rosemont entities secured a series of exclusive deals often with those same foreign governments,” investigative reporter Peter Schweizer wrote in his 2018 book. (Schweizer also noted that the private-equity firm did not open an office in New York City, the financial capital of the world, but in Washington, D.C., “just two miles from both Joe Biden’s office in the White House and his residence at the Naval Observatory.”)
Multiple deals were cut as Smith led the government’s most powerful “public corruption” unit. And some of the most lucrative arrangements were with Chinese businesses tied to the Chinese Communist Party, partnerships that just happened to coincide with Hunter’s trips to China with his father. “[The 2013 trip to China] was a triumph for Hunter, who walked away with his first big deal in China—the Bohai Harvest Rosemont investment partnership,” Miranda Devine wrote in her 2021 book, “Laptop From Hell.” Devine explained the deal was consummated on December 16, 2013, “twelve days after he flew into Beijing on Air Force Two. Hunter officially became a shareholder and member of the BHR board.”
Smith probably missed the July 2014 article in the Wall Street Journal touting the private equity partnership with the vice president’s son aimed at enriching the CCP. “The funds are raising a combination of yuan and U.S. dollars. The effort is the latest example [of] private equity pushing boundaries in an area that China hopes will help drive the country's economic transformation.”
Now, perhaps there was nothing untoward about Hunter Biden’s sudden interest and success at global private equity. But surely the use of Air Force Two to conduct personal business—Hunter accompanied his father on 70 overseas trips including six trips to China on Smith’s watch—should have caught someone’s attention at DOJs “public integrity” unit, no?
The answer, of course, is no.
Was Smith asleep at the switch or intentionally ignorant or once again doing the dirty work of the Democratic Party? Smith have put a stop to the Biden family international shakedown nearly a decade ago--why didn't he?
At what risk did he put the country by turning a blind eye to this egregious level of influence peddling in nations hostile to American interests?
As Smith eagerly prepares to sign his name to another criminal indictment against Donald Trump for the events of January 6, Hunter Biden’s plea deal with Smith’s employer is falling apart along with further confirmation of how the younger Biden hauled in millions from countries such as China and Ukraine by leveraging his last name to support himself, his addictions, and his family—including, quite possibly, his father as well.
All of this could have been halted in its tracks long ago. And the person primarily responsible for letting it get to this point is none other than Jack Smith.
Last edited:
Latest posts
-
Biden admin spends $40 billion on electric car charges.
- Latest: PalmettoTiger1
