ADVERTISEMENT

EVIDENCE: Brennan and Clapper Hacked FISA Court Judge Reggie Walton; Comey Covered It Up

TigerGrowls

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Dec 21, 2001
19,945
11,718
113
Older story, but worth a read as a lot of this stuff will return to the forefront again soon. Deep State beatdown coming.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/evide...ourt-judge-reggie-walton-comey-covered-it-up/

Jan 3, 2019
By
Patrick Howley

Evidence is now circulating among lawmakers in Washington that makes the case that Obama administration intelligence officials John Brennan and James Clapper hacked then-FISA court judge Reggie Walton in addition to Supreme Court Justice John Roberts.

Big League Politics’ expose on the alleged Roberts hack has rocked the corridors of power. Now, we have more information coming to light about the FISA court — which infamously held no hearings regarding the fraudulent FISA warrant applications to surveil Carter Page and by extension other members of President Trump’s team. And there’s more: James Comey’s henchmen at the FBI are proven to have covered it up. (RELATED: How Deep State ‘Journalist’ Michael Isikoff Has Been Setting Up Mueller’s Enemies For Years).

Tapes released by Federal Judge G. Murray Snow — preserved on a Whistleblower Soundcloud page — show real estate billionaire Timothy Blixseth explaining Brennan and Clapper’s surveillance program to Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and detective Mike Zullo. The existence of this surveillance program has been corroborated by Wikileaks’ “Vault 7” release and by the public comments of former CIA and NSA contractor Dennis Montgomery, who says he worked on the program for Brennan and Clapper.

Montgomery has gone public with his claims exposing how the program was used to spy on President Donald Trump when he was a private citizen. Montgomery has gained immunity and desperately wants House Intelligence Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes or other lawmakers to call him to testify about what he knows.


Trending: EXCLUSIVE: Buttigieg Accuser Says He Was ‘Set Up’ By Hoaxer Jacob Wohl

On the explosive tapes, Blixseth walks Arpaio and Zullo through the details of the program on a computer screen. At one point, the three begin pulling up specific names of targeted individuals.

“You know who that guy is? That’s the head of the FISA court they hacked into, Reggie Walton,” Blixseth tells the investigators.

“John Roberts, the chief justice of the Supreme Court, was hacked,” Blixseth tells Arpaio and Zullo.

LISTEN TO THE TAPE HERE (18:00 Minute Mark)


Insiders have always been skeptical of Roberts’ motives for siding with President Obama on the 2012 Obamacare case. While there’s still no available evidence that Roberts was blackmailed, the allegation that he was “hacked” by Obama officials provides some more context into the justice’s controversial career.

As Big League Politics reported, former FBI director James Comey seized and buried volumes of information that demonstrated this wide-ranging government surveillance operation targeting Donald Trump before he became president.

Larry Klayman, attorney for former NSA and CIA contractor and whistleblower Dennis Montgomery, delivered to the FBI 47 hard drives and data amounting to more than 600 million pages of documentation on the surveillance scheme. Then-FBI director James Comey’s general counsel James Baker took the data into his possession, according to multiple sources. But despite possessing Montgomery’s bombshell whistleblower revelations, Comey never acted on or publicized the information.

Additionally, Comey’s former firm Lockheed Martin granted entry to Montgomery to one of its facilities to help him work on the alleged mass surveillance program, which was allegedly overseen by Obama administration officials John Brennan and James Clapper and specifically targeted Trump.

“This guy showed me 900 million phone calls. And I see myself in there. I see people I know. I see Donald Trump in there a zillion times, and Bloomberg is in there,” Blixseth said on the tape, referring to information that Montgomery allegedly showed him.

“We don’t have any comment,” the FBI told Big League Politics when questioned about the existence of the program.

“I provided to the FBI seventeen businesses of Donald Trump, including the Trump Tower, the Trump leasing programs, all of these different programs, and including Trump himself and the various family members that had been wiretapped under these programs,” Montgomery said in a recent interview. “There has been a wiretap on Trump for years.”

“I started by going to Maricopa County and showing that Sheriff Arpaio himself was wiretapped under the Obama administration,” the whistleblower said.

“I was a CIA contractor both under John Brennan and under James Clapper and these individuals were running domestic surveillance programs in the United States collecting information on Americans. This isn’t political. They were collecting information on Republicans and Democrats. But they collected everything they could find. Bank accounts, phone numbers, chats, emails, and they collected a massive amount of it under the Obama administration,” Montgomery said.

I reported on how Peter Strzok, an agent of Comey’s FBI, was the point man on every single aspect of Operation Crossfire Hurricane, the failed Deep State plot to target President Donald Trump for destruction.

WASHINGTON — More and more details are pouring out about the underhanded conspiracy to damage and impeach President Donald Trump by Obama operatives John Brennan, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Sally Yates and a few others. The effort even has a special code name: Operation Crossfire Hurricane.

They used Peter Strzok as their go-to guy, which is why their operation is now falling apart. Strzok’s massive illegal activities and incompetence could open up the entire Crossfire Hurricane team to numerous federal charges.

Both John Brennan and James Comey used Peter Strzok to damage President Donald Trump. Strzok is the disgraced FBI agent and fired Robert Mueller team member whose text messages with mistress Lisa Page form the biggest scandal in FBI history. The lovers conspired to illegally bring down Trump, all while the FBI was spying on the Trump campaign.

Strzok interviewed Hillary Clinton without putting her under oath, and granted immunity to Cheryl Mills and Clinton’s other associates right before he flew to London to meet with Christopher Steele to work on the anti-Trump dossier, which was sponsored by the Clinton-funded firm Fusion GPS. That dossier was used to fraudulently obtain FISA warrants to surveil Trump Tower. Barack Obama read bits of the dossier in his daily presidential briefings, courtesy of Brennan. Fusion GPS, meanwhile, sent operatives into Trump Tower to entrap Don Jr. and Jared Kushner in a meeting with planted Russians.

When it was time for the conspirators to focus on Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos, Strzok was there to run information about the adviser to the Australians. When it was time to take out Trump’s national security adviser General Michael Flynn, Strzok was there to stage an “ambush” interrogation of Flynn without Flynn’s lawyer present.

Let’s walk through Strzok’s amazing Zelig-like role in every facet of Operation Crossfire Hurricane:

Brennan hired Strzok to write the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January 2017.

graphic-1200x600.png


Big League Politics

This was an official document used to spur on the Robert Mueller investigation. But the document did not actually find any evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia, it merely said that Vladimir Putin “aspired” to help Trump and that Russia “developed a clear preference for Trump.” The Christopher Steele dossier was added as an “appendix” to the ICA report, even though Brennan lied and told Congress that it was never used.

Comey Sent Strzok To London To Meet With The Australians About George Papadopoulos

ComeyTrumpFinal-1200x628.png


BLP

George Papadopoulos was surveilled in real time by the FBI. Who set him up? Peter Strzok, whose meeting with the Australian ambassador in London provided key basis for the creation of Robert Mueller’s investigation, according to none other than the New York Times.

Tyler Durden Explains:

  • “The FBI sent counterintelligence agents, one of whom was Peter Strzok, to London in the summer of 2016 to meet with Australian ambassador, Alexander Downer, to describe his meeting with Trump campaign advisor, George Papadopoulos.
  • The meeting with Downer was described as “highly unusual,” and “helped provide the foundation for a case that, a year ago Thursday, became the special counsel investigation.”
  • The FBI kept details of the operation secret from most of the DOJ – with “only about five Justice Department officials” aware of the full scope of the case.”
Strzok Cleared Hillary Clinton Right Before He Left For London

Big League Politics called attention in July 2017 to the fact that Strzok was serving on the Mueller team after personally overseeing the Hillary Clinton email investigation at the FBI and personally conducting the interview with Hillary Clinton that was not under oath and which led to no incarceration for the Democrat candidate.

Strzok also withheld information about the Hillary case from Congress according to this text:

strzok.jpg


With the pressure on, Strzok’s wife Melissa Hodgman, Associate Director of the enforcement division of the Securities and Exchange Commission, is scrubbing herObama and Clinton links. Hodgman was promoted by Obama just two weeks before FBI director James Comey re-opened the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email scandal in 2016, leading political insiders to suspect that Hodgman might have been involved in the federal government’s cover-up.

Some of the Liked pages on her Facebook account on December 3 included “Thank You Obama” and “We Voted For Hillary.”

Strzok Sets Up Flynn

On January 24, 2017, Peter Strzok interviewed General Michael Flynn inside the White House alongside another agent. Flynn’s lawyer was not present. Flynn apparently did not tell the White House about his meeting. Guess who did? Sally Yates, the anti-Trump deputy attorney general whose underling told the FBI to shut down the Clinton Foundation case. Yates informed the White House on January 26 that Flynn met with the FBI.

That was the beginning of the end for the original Trump White House.

Strzok was close personal friends with the foreign intelligence judge Rudolph Contreras who accepted General Flynn’s guilty plea. Contreras recused himself after he already accepted Flynn’s guilty plea.

Strzok and Page detailed their plan to meet with Contreras in a July 25, 2016 series of texts:

PAGE: “Rudy is on the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]! Did you know that? Just appointed two months ago.”

STRZOK: “I did. I need to get together with him.”

PAGE: “said he’d gotten on a month or two ago at a graduation party we were both at.”

Strzok and Page’s Texts Revealed Their Anti-Trump Plot

It is well known that Strzok and Page discussed their anti-Trump conspiracy many thousands of times over text messages that have been mostly released. The lovers’ repeated references to “CF” refer to “Crossfire.” Here are Hot Air’s favorites:

“Strzok: God Hillary should win. 100,000,000-0.

Strzok: Just went to a southern Virginia Walmart. I could SMELL the Trump support…

Strzok: I am riled up. Trump is a f***ing idiot, is unable to provide a coherent answer.”

Clapper Tried To Use The Supreme Court To Block Trump’s Inauguration

In January, as Brennan was having Strzok write the fraudulent ICA report, Brennan’s partner in crime, Obama director of national intelligence James Clapper, was cooking up his own side plot to stop the Trump inauguration from happening. Clapper held a meeting in his office in January 2017 to discuss using a female Supreme Court justice to block Trump from becoming president due to the “Russia” conspiracy.

A high-level member of the intelligence community who witnessed the meeting said that Clapper discussed going to one of three female Supreme Court justices to make the case that alleged Russian interference could invalidate Trump’s claim to the presidency.

Another text the witness sent to BLP’s source around the same time described how the Deep State was making General Michael Flynn a “rising target” for his alleged involvement with Russians, and stating that House Speaker Paul Ryan is a “wild card” in the Deep State wars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orangelvis
I've said this before, but is worth repeating: Admiral Mike Rogers will go down in history as one of America's greatest modern heroes.
 
Oh no... yet another big story with the "facts". Big blue politics...started by a guy from Breitbart... sounds like honest folk to me. Here's your source critiqued.

Detailed Report
Factual Reporting: MIXEDCountry: USAWorld Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180

History

Big League Politics is an Alt-Right news and opinion blog founded by Patrick Howley, former writer for the far right Daily Caller and Breitbart. According to their about page “Big League Politics is a fast-paced news site led by a team of top-level investigative reporters, filmmakers, and citizen journalists all over the country. We challenge powerful politicians in both the Republican and Democratic Parties. We are not conservative. We are not liberal. We are road warriors fighting the good fight for journalism.” They further state that “All stories on Big League Politics are factually accurate.”

Funded by / Ownership

In early 2018, Big League Politics was acquired by Mustard Seed Media, a company run by a political consultant who previously worked for Moore’s campaign. Funding is not disclosed, but appears to be through online advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In reviewing articles on the Big League Politics website it is clear that the sole mission is to promote the agenda of President Trump. Essentially, this could be classified as a propaganda media arm for the President. While there are nice examples of well sourced journalism on this website there are also unproven conspiracy type stories. For example, in one article the author is making the claim that Justice John Roberts was hacked by Obama officials as evidence of a Deep State conspiracy. The source of this audio is from two discredited public figures. In other stories, there is the use of conspiracy theorists as sources of information. In this story, they are relying on Infowars’ Alex Jones and fellow conspiracy theorist Roger Stone for information and opinion. Overall, the blog is well written, but with a strong right wing bias in story selection. Many stories are factual or at the very least rooted in fact, but there are some stories that are unproven with conclusions being drawn by the authors. These stories are propaganda at best and conspiracy theories at worst.

A factual search reveals some failed fact checks.

Overall, we rate Big League Politics strongly Right Biased based on story selection that favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to use of poor sources and promotion of conspiracy theories. (D. Van Zandt 8/2/2017) Updated (6/22/2018)
 
Oh no... yet another big story with the "facts". Big blue politics...started by a guy from Breitbart... sounds like honest folk to me. Here's your source critiqued.

Detailed Report
Factual Reporting: MIXEDCountry: USAWorld Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180

History

Big League Politics is an Alt-Right news and opinion blog founded by Patrick Howley, former writer for the far right Daily Caller and Breitbart. According to their about page “Big League Politics is a fast-paced news site led by a team of top-level investigative reporters, filmmakers, and citizen journalists all over the country. We challenge powerful politicians in both the Republican and Democratic Parties. We are not conservative. We are not liberal. We are road warriors fighting the good fight for journalism.” They further state that “All stories on Big League Politics are factually accurate.”

Funded by / Ownership

In early 2018, Big League Politics was acquired by Mustard Seed Media, a company run by a political consultant who previously worked for Moore’s campaign. Funding is not disclosed, but appears to be through online advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In reviewing articles on the Big League Politics website it is clear that the sole mission is to promote the agenda of President Trump. Essentially, this could be classified as a propaganda media arm for the President. While there are nice examples of well sourced journalism on this website there are also unproven conspiracy type stories. For example, in one article the author is making the claim that Justice John Roberts was hacked by Obama officials as evidence of a Deep State conspiracy. The source of this audio is from two discredited public figures. In other stories, there is the use of conspiracy theorists as sources of information. In this story, they are relying on Infowars’ Alex Jones and fellow conspiracy theorist Roger Stone for information and opinion. Overall, the blog is well written, but with a strong right wing bias in story selection. Many stories are factual or at the very least rooted in fact, but there are some stories that are unproven with conclusions being drawn by the authors. These stories are propaganda at best and conspiracy theories at worst.

A factual search reveals some failed fact checks.

Overall, we rate Big League Politics strongly Right Biased based on story selection that favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to use of poor sources and promotion of conspiracy theories. (D. Van Zandt 8/2/2017) Updated (6/22/2018)

Some of you guys crack me up. For over two years you read and hear pure bullshit that makes you believe Trump is a Russian agent. BTW, who the hell is D.Van Zant and why should I give rat's ass what he thinks about anything?
If you go back two and half years and judge all the sources of information based on the truth of what has transpired, I'll stand with Breitbart, DailyCaller, Hannity, etc over anything else you can name.
 
Old heads just are so susceptible to hearing what they want to hear and taking it for gospel sad
 
Old heads just are so susceptible to hearing what they want to hear and taking it for gospel sad

All that is is someone fact checking and political checking sites. It's pretty objective. My point was that the title of this thread... the first word in fact is "evidence". The OP goes on to site as his source that has published conspiracy theories w/o any evidence as News. That's not to say that some of their stuff isn't accurate, but some of it is total bullshit. It's simply not a reliable source. There are plenty of sites on both sides of the aisle that are crap. There are also plenty that are factual and pretty non political ... apnews for example.

The argument that this site is fine b/c some other site publishes leftist crap is not a real argument. OP is a Trumpian, pure and simple. He has no desire to hear anything that might be against his Lord and Savior... Anything that critiques Trump is by definition "fake news". Logic or Facts have no effect on Trumpians... it's all about the Deep State. Because TRUMP told them it was real. Trump can lie to them all day long and they eat it up.
 
All that is is someone fact checking and political checking sites. It's pretty objective. My point was that the title of this thread... the first word in fact is "evidence". The OP goes on to site as his source that has published conspiracy theories w/o any evidence as News. That's not to say that some of their stuff isn't accurate, but some of it is total bullshit. It's simply not a reliable source. There are plenty of sites on both sides of the aisle that are crap. There are also plenty that are factual and pretty non political ... apnews for example.

The argument that this site is fine b/c some other site publishes leftist crap is not a real argument. OP is a Trumpian, pure and simple. He has no desire to hear anything that might be against his Lord and Savior... Anything that critiques Trump is by definition "fake news". Logic or Facts have no effect on Trumpians... it's all about the Deep State. Because TRUMP told them it was real. Trump can lie to them all day long and they eat it up.
This is my main beef. If you your sources aren't even journalists which actually have a code of ethics and are protected by law... then I don't have time to argue with it. Its so tiring explaining to people who should know better, not to trust commentators and their biased narratives.
 
A couple of our bloggers have never met a conspiracy they didn't fall for. Obama not born in the U.S. Yep, they fell for that one. Obama a Muslim. Yep they fell for that one too. If they read the Mueller report, they would learn
(1) Russia interfered in the election because it preferred Trump. (2) Russia thought it would benefit by helping Trump. (3) Trump campaign welcomed the help. Mueller did not find a conspiracy, which would have been illegal because he could not prove an agreement beyond a reasonable doubt between the Trump campaign and Russia. Hardly an exoneration.
They would further learn (1) there were 10 incidents of conduct by Trump which could be the basis of an obstruction case. However, Mueller knew under the justice department rules a sitting president could not be indicted. Therefore he chose not to charge obstruction because Trump would not have the chance to clear his name. Mueller did not rule out impeachment or charging Trump after he leaves office. Certainly not an exoneration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hopefultiger13
A couple of our bloggers have never met a conspiracy they didn't fall for. Obama not born in the U.S. Yep, they fell for that one. Obama a Muslim. Yep they fell for that one too. If they read the Mueller report, they would learn
(1) Russia interfered in the election because it preferred Trump. (2) Russia thought it would benefit by helping Trump. (3) Trump campaign welcomed the help. Mueller did not find a conspiracy, which would have been illegal because he could not prove an agreement beyond a reasonable doubt between the Trump campaign and Russia. Hardly an exoneration.
They would further learn (1) there were 10 incidents of conduct by Trump which could be the basis of an obstruction case. However, Mueller knew under the justice department rules a sitting president could not be indicted. Therefore he chose not to charge obstruction because Trump would not have the chance to clear his name. Mueller did not rule out impeachment or charging Trump after he leaves office. Certainly not an exoneration.

DUDE. Please. Don't you know that ANYTHING Trump does is OK. It's DONALD TRUMP for god's sake. He's above the law. Half the shiit Trump's done and said that the folks on here are peachy about would have them up in arms if a browner administration had said it... or a woman... or anyone that doesn't fit into the old white dude world view.

As an example: If the Russian Ambassador was in the oval office with Obama and Obama told him top secret info... then said "oh well, I can declassify top secret information if I want to". The folk on here would be calling for his impeachment (and rightfully so). It's fine when Trump does it though.

When Obama was entertaining opening talks with N. Korea, Fox News and Hannity in particular were making pee pee in their pants b/c it would legitimize N. Korea and make them look good. When Trump does it, folks on here and Fox were talking Nobel prize. FWIW, I'm with Trump on this one although it certainly has helped NK on the world stage.

I actually was present for this one: My wife is pretty liberal and we were over at a high school friend of hers house.with the friends parents. Elizabeth made a disparaging comment about then President George W Bush. And to be fair, it was pretty damn insulting. The father said that we should respect the office of President even when we don't agree with him (which to a certain extent, I agree with). Several years later I heard him call Obama and Michelle Obama "monkeys". i called him on it, and he didn't remember saying the first part. And this guy is a freaking Deacon at his church and never misses a Sunday.

As a Moderate and Independent, I feel free to praise and critique both sides. I don't consider myself a part of either political party, and frankly, I don't see how anyone with a freaking OUNCE of integrity can associate with either political party. Both are morally bankrupt and have been for years. Voting has come down to holding my nose and voting for the person that sucks the least.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT