ADVERTISEMENT

Gonna leave this here....

Simply put- there is no simple here. Both of these things defy easy definition, but fascism is by far the more slippery to define.

Socialism is a spectrum of economic and social theories contending that matters of economic concern (means of production, etc) should be regulated or owned by society, in the public interest. There's a lot of disagreement among socialists about whether it should be owned or regulated by the public. Democratic socialism falls on the 'regulate' end of this spectrum- These folks are capitalists, and seek to use public power to regulate the excesses of capitalism.

Like socialism, fascism is also a spectrum of political/economic ideas that purport to organize society- but unlike socialism, fascism didn’t have anything like a set of founding documents or definitive source material until well after it achieved a sort of viral success in politics- which means that any documents purporting to be authoritative (such as this translation of Mussolini’s doctrine of fascism) only speak for one faction or aspect of what we consider to be fascism, per se.

Both Socialism and Fascism arose in the late-industrial-revolution period in Europe, a time and place in which the world order was fast-changing- Dynastic monarchies had fallen to republican governments in the space of a few generation’s time, there was a massive oversupply of productive capacity relative to the economy’s consumptive capacity, and this meant the regular guy would periodically find himself jobless, inflation would wipe out whatever savings he had… the days of traditional roles in life were strained, perhaps a distant memory. It was the Socialists who started pushing to regulate or overthrow the current order (in which new Barons of Industry were consolidating their fortunes and power), and in large part Fascism arose (with support from those new elites) as a bulwark to stop the Socialists.

Instead of emerging as coherent a set of philosophies (as socialism did via Marx and Engels), fascism emerged as a mass movement (of disparate groups who supported Italy’s intervention in WWI) and would mutate according to the political needs of those calling themselves fascists. Being an insurgent political movement, those included recruiting from very different political quarters, consolidating power, and then, extending influence elsewhere. Philosophically, fascism is the chameleon of politics; it will mutate and borrow aspects of anything from anywhere to suit itself.

During the period of its ascendancy in Italy in the early 1900s, it was purposefully vague and undefined- a quality that would allow it to appeal to different audiences that might otherwise find themselves un-unifiable. In this sense, it could proffer un-objectionable, meaningless vagaries- essentially, the “Make Italy Great Again” of its time.

Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, as well as strong regimentation of society and of the economy which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.

As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. ... Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society's economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners.

Marxism is a political and economic way of organizing society, where the workers own the means of production. Socialism is a way of organizing a society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the proletariat. Marx proposed that this was the next necessary step in the progress of history.

Marx himself did not use the term socialism to refer to this development. Instead, Marx called it a communist society that has not yet reached its higher-stage. ... Monetary relations in the form of exchange-value, profit, interest and wage labor would not operate and apply to Marxist socialism.

Socialism is at its core an economic philosophy, whereas Communism is economic and political in its requirement that government be the central owner and decision maker in all matters. Communism rejects any religion and in a true Communist state religion is effectively abolished.

"As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer."

You people who are socials and fascists do get ruffled feathers when a comparison is made. I don't know which one you are, but neither is good for this country. You vote for this (either), you are destroying any hope that your children or grandchild will ever have.
Its just inaccurate to say socialism/fascism. Definitionally inaccurate. Nothing ruffled and I didn’t express any opinion. I don’t plan on voting for either socialism or fascism, but you can’t just lump all ideologies you consider to be extreme together as if they are the same thing and expect to be taken seriously. For instance, some who dislike Trump might even say he has fascist tendencies, but would never label him a socialist. Likewise, those who dislike Bernie Sanders might call him a socialist (he might not even mind if you did), but would never call him a fascist.
 
I love the idea of players ideas bringing in the team and university leadership for a solid message that is not in anyway affiliated with the BLM organization.
This could be a huge platform to actually bring the awareness and unity needed without any political influences.

i am sure ESPN or someone else will politicize it. But this will be done in a good way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tigerswag91
I love the idea of players ideas bringing in the team and university leadership for a solid message that is not in anyway affiliated with the BLM organization.
This could be a huge platform to actually bring the awareness and unity needed without any political influences.

i am sure ESPN or someone else will politicize it. But this will be done in a good way.

 
This seems risky in several ways, no matter how well-intentioned. But, I guess we will have front row seats to see how whatever the hell this ends up being plays in 2020 - where the ESPN woke bubble is in no way aligned with the majority of the Clemson University Football fanbase.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ChicagoTiger85
You can declare that black lives matter without supporting the organization BLM.
I really wish a positive movement for the black community would come out that doesn’t share the same words and letters as a Marxist organization that operates behind a shield of anti-racism and a movement that picks and chooses what black lives get to matter.
 
Simply put- there is no simple here. Both of these things defy easy definition, but fascism is by far the more slippery to define.

Socialism is a spectrum of economic and social theories contending that matters of economic concern (means of production, etc) should be regulated or owned by society, in the public interest. There's a lot of disagreement among socialists about whether it should be owned or regulated by the public. Democratic socialism falls on the 'regulate' end of this spectrum- These folks are capitalists, and seek to use public power to regulate the excesses of capitalism.

Like socialism, fascism is also a spectrum of political/economic ideas that purport to organize society- but unlike socialism, fascism didn’t have anything like a set of founding documents or definitive source material until well after it achieved a sort of viral success in politics- which means that any documents purporting to be authoritative (such as this translation of Mussolini’s doctrine of fascism) only speak for one faction or aspect of what we consider to be fascism, per se.

Both Socialism and Fascism arose in the late-industrial-revolution period in Europe, a time and place in which the world order was fast-changing- Dynastic monarchies had fallen to republican governments in the space of a few generation’s time, there was a massive oversupply of productive capacity relative to the economy’s consumptive capacity, and this meant the regular guy would periodically find himself jobless, inflation would wipe out whatever savings he had… the days of traditional roles in life were strained, perhaps a distant memory. It was the Socialists who started pushing to regulate or overthrow the current order (in which new Barons of Industry were consolidating their fortunes and power), and in large part Fascism arose (with support from those new elites) as a bulwark to stop the Socialists.

Instead of emerging as coherent a set of philosophies (as socialism did via Marx and Engels), fascism emerged as a mass movement (of disparate groups who supported Italy’s intervention in WWI) and would mutate according to the political needs of those calling themselves fascists. Being an insurgent political movement, those included recruiting from very different political quarters, consolidating power, and then, extending influence elsewhere. Philosophically, fascism is the chameleon of politics; it will mutate and borrow aspects of anything from anywhere to suit itself.

During the period of its ascendancy in Italy in the early 1900s, it was purposefully vague and undefined- a quality that would allow it to appeal to different audiences that might otherwise find themselves un-unifiable. In this sense, it could proffer un-objectionable, meaningless vagaries- essentially, the “Make Italy Great Again” of its time.

Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, as well as strong regimentation of society and of the economy which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.

As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. ... Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society's economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners.

Marxism is a political and economic way of organizing society, where the workers own the means of production. Socialism is a way of organizing a society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the proletariat. Marx proposed that this was the next necessary step in the progress of history.

Marx himself did not use the term socialism to refer to this development. Instead, Marx called it a communist society that has not yet reached its higher-stage. ... Monetary relations in the form of exchange-value, profit, interest and wage labor would not operate and apply to Marxist socialism.

Socialism is at its core an economic philosophy, whereas Communism is economic and political in its requirement that government be the central owner and decision maker in all matters. Communism rejects any religion and in a true Communist state religion is effectively abolished.

"As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer."

You people who are socials and fascists do get ruffled feathers when a comparison is made. I don't know which one you are, but neither is good for this country. You vote for this (either), you are destroying any hope that your children or grandchild will ever have.
Somebody has been hitting up Wikipedia. 😂

All that somebody who reads @tothmaster 's post needs to know is he is technically correct, but don't let that confuse you. Socialists are and can be just as violent and authoritarian as any right-wing extremist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Earle36
I really wish a positive movement for the black community would come out that doesn’t share the same words and letters as a Marxist organization that operates behind a shield of anti-racism and a movement that picks and chooses what black lives get to matter.


I could definitely get behind this in a lot of ways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goodthinkful
I’d guess .5% of people even know the BLM org even exists when they stand for BLM the movement.

People need to drop this lazy argument.
 
Simply put- there is no simple here. Both of these things defy easy definition, but fascism is by far the more slippery to define.

Socialism is a spectrum of economic and social theories contending that matters of economic concern (means of production, etc) should be regulated or owned by society, in the public interest. There's a lot of disagreement among socialists about whether it should be owned or regulated by the public. Democratic socialism falls on the 'regulate' end of this spectrum- These folks are capitalists, and seek to use public power to regulate the excesses of capitalism.

Like socialism, fascism is also a spectrum of political/economic ideas that purport to organize society- but unlike socialism, fascism didn’t have anything like a set of founding documents or definitive source material until well after it achieved a sort of viral success in politics- which means that any documents purporting to be authoritative (such as this translation of Mussolini’s doctrine of fascism) only speak for one faction or aspect of what we consider to be fascism, per se.

Both Socialism and Fascism arose in the late-industrial-revolution period in Europe, a time and place in which the world order was fast-changing- Dynastic monarchies had fallen to republican governments in the space of a few generation’s time, there was a massive oversupply of productive capacity relative to the economy’s consumptive capacity, and this meant the regular guy would periodically find himself jobless, inflation would wipe out whatever savings he had… the days of traditional roles in life were strained, perhaps a distant memory. It was the Socialists who started pushing to regulate or overthrow the current order (in which new Barons of Industry were consolidating their fortunes and power), and in large part Fascism arose (with support from those new elites) as a bulwark to stop the Socialists.

Instead of emerging as coherent a set of philosophies (as socialism did via Marx and Engels), fascism emerged as a mass movement (of disparate groups who supported Italy’s intervention in WWI) and would mutate according to the political needs of those calling themselves fascists. Being an insurgent political movement, those included recruiting from very different political quarters, consolidating power, and then, extending influence elsewhere. Philosophically, fascism is the chameleon of politics; it will mutate and borrow aspects of anything from anywhere to suit itself.

During the period of its ascendancy in Italy in the early 1900s, it was purposefully vague and undefined- a quality that would allow it to appeal to different audiences that might otherwise find themselves un-unifiable. In this sense, it could proffer un-objectionable, meaningless vagaries- essentially, the “Make Italy Great Again” of its time.

Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, as well as strong regimentation of society and of the economy which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.

As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. ... Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society's economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners.

Marxism is a political and economic way of organizing society, where the workers own the means of production. Socialism is a way of organizing a society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the proletariat. Marx proposed that this was the next necessary step in the progress of history.

Marx himself did not use the term socialism to refer to this development. Instead, Marx called it a communist society that has not yet reached its higher-stage. ... Monetary relations in the form of exchange-value, profit, interest and wage labor would not operate and apply to Marxist socialism.

Socialism is at its core an economic philosophy, whereas Communism is economic and political in its requirement that government be the central owner and decision maker in all matters. Communism rejects any religion and in a true Communist state religion is effectively abolished.

"As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer."

You people who are socials and fascists do get ruffled feathers when a comparison is made. I don't know which one you are, but neither is good for this country. You vote for this (either), you are destroying any hope that your children or grandchild will ever have.
"You've got two coconuts and yer banging em' together"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goodthinkful
I’d guess .5% of people even know the BLM org even exists when they stand for BLM the movement.

People need to drop this lazy argument.

Doesn’t seem lazy, actually the opposite. Lazy is when companies kneejerk and send massive checks to an organization that is basically anti-American. Lazy is letting that slide.
 
Yeah...Clemson ain't winning sh*t this season. "No one can serve two masters". They'll be too much focus the BLM aspects of this and not enough on the CFP aspects.

I can't believe we fight to limit outside distractions like shutting down social media for these guys... only to invite this colossal distraction!
 
Last edited:
I’d guess .5% of people even know the BLM org even exists when they stand for BLM the movement.

People need to drop this lazy argument.
Could you summarize what the BLM movement is? How is it that nobody knows that the BLM organization exists, and yet its activists are leading the movement and are usually the ones quoted by reporters? If you can come up with some sort of non-controversial version of what the BLM movement is, then why is it they don’t repudiate the extremism of the official organization?

What you’re saying has all the hallmarks of a motte and bailey argument- extreme claims are made (the motte), but when those claims are attacked, instead of defending them you retreat back to more moderate claims (the bailey) as if that’s what was meant all along.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Steven15
Peace out Ol head... the fact that so many people on this board get all hyped up is so funny
I will and do stand with any group that emphatically states that Black Lives Matter and I will say I absolutely 100% support Law Enforcement reform (i.e the “War on Drugs” is a waste a a corrupt method to funnel money to politicians)

but

F the BLM organization and everything they stand for. Read their charter and what they stand for .... they have little interest in black lives
 
Simply put- there is no simple here. Both of these things defy easy definition, but fascism is by far the more slippery to define.

Socialism is a spectrum of economic and social theories contending that matters of economic concern (means of production, etc) should be regulated or owned by society, in the public interest. There's a lot of disagreement among socialists about whether it should be owned or regulated by the public. Democratic socialism falls on the 'regulate' end of this spectrum- These folks are capitalists, and seek to use public power to regulate the excesses of capitalism.

Like socialism, fascism is also a spectrum of political/economic ideas that purport to organize society- but unlike socialism, fascism didn’t have anything like a set of founding documents or definitive source material until well after it achieved a sort of viral success in politics- which means that any documents purporting to be authoritative (such as this translation of Mussolini’s doctrine of fascism) only speak for one faction or aspect of what we consider to be fascism, per se.

Both Socialism and Fascism arose in the late-industrial-revolution period in Europe, a time and place in which the world order was fast-changing- Dynastic monarchies had fallen to republican governments in the space of a few generation’s time, there was a massive oversupply of productive capacity relative to the economy’s consumptive capacity, and this meant the regular guy would periodically find himself jobless, inflation would wipe out whatever savings he had… the days of traditional roles in life were strained, perhaps a distant memory. It was the Socialists who started pushing to regulate or overthrow the current order (in which new Barons of Industry were consolidating their fortunes and power), and in large part Fascism arose (with support from those new elites) as a bulwark to stop the Socialists.

Instead of emerging as coherent a set of philosophies (as socialism did via Marx and Engels), fascism emerged as a mass movement (of disparate groups who supported Italy’s intervention in WWI) and would mutate according to the political needs of those calling themselves fascists. Being an insurgent political movement, those included recruiting from very different political quarters, consolidating power, and then, extending influence elsewhere. Philosophically, fascism is the chameleon of politics; it will mutate and borrow aspects of anything from anywhere to suit itself.

During the period of its ascendancy in Italy in the early 1900s, it was purposefully vague and undefined- a quality that would allow it to appeal to different audiences that might otherwise find themselves un-unifiable. In this sense, it could proffer un-objectionable, meaningless vagaries- essentially, the “Make Italy Great Again” of its time.

Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, as well as strong regimentation of society and of the economy which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.

As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. ... Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society's economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners.

Marxism is a political and economic way of organizing society, where the workers own the means of production. Socialism is a way of organizing a society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the proletariat. Marx proposed that this was the next necessary step in the progress of history.

Marx himself did not use the term socialism to refer to this development. Instead, Marx called it a communist society that has not yet reached its higher-stage. ... Monetary relations in the form of exchange-value, profit, interest and wage labor would not operate and apply to Marxist socialism.

Socialism is at its core an economic philosophy, whereas Communism is economic and political in its requirement that government be the central owner and decision maker in all matters. Communism rejects any religion and in a true Communist state religion is effectively abolished.

"As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer."

You people who are socials and fascists do get ruffled feathers when a comparison is made. I don't know which one you are, but neither is good for this country. You vote for this (either), you are destroying any hope that your children or grandchild will ever have.
Dude are you serious with these block paragraphs? We have google, calm down. It’s unnecessary, nobody really cares about anyone else’s opinions, and you aren’t changing minds. Go mutter to yourself with Hannity on in the background if it makes you feel better. FFS.
 
Its just inaccurate to say socialism/fascism. Definitionally inaccurate. Nothing ruffled and I didn’t express any opinion. I don’t plan on voting for either socialism or fascism, but you can’t just lump all ideologies you consider to be extreme together as if they are the same thing and expect to be taken seriously. For instance, some who dislike Trump might even say he has fascist tendencies, but would never label him a socialist. Likewise, those who dislike Bernie Sanders might call him a socialist (he might not even mind if you did), but would never call him a fascist.
Nobody said that so I guess you are arguing with yourself. I said fascism was an off shoot from socialism and I noted the Nazi's were the National Socialist German Workers Party. It simply allowed a lunatic, in Hitler, to hijack the movement into, instead of a ruling class(democrats like to say democratically elected, Putin says hello) controlling all the assets of a country, he would be in control of an entire country's assets. He just also happened to be a whack job so racism, the occult and a whole bunch of other cooky things became a part of it. His "Vitamin"" he took was crystal meth. Mussolini didn't particularly care about racism so that was not a major part of their platform. Whether you were ruled by Hitler or Stalin it was not much different. Either way the individual was not important and had very little power to change their existence. Both methods control citizens rights, ways of thought, economic choices and end in no middle class, but the rulers live like kings.
 
OMG guyz!!! Sports is my escape from this cold hard world. If I encounter any words or imagery during a game broadcast that's not explicitly related to the hut hut I'M GONNA BE SO TRIGGERED! How could Clemson violate my sacred safe space like this OMGGG!!!!!!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: KansasClemson215
Nobody said that so I guess you are arguing with yourself. I said fascism was an off shoot from socialism and I noted the Nazi's were the National Socialist German Workers Party. It simply allowed a lunatic, in Hitler, to hijack the movement into, instead of a ruling class(democrats like to say democratically elected, Putin says hello) controlling all the assets of a country, he would be in control of an entire country's assets. He just also happened to be a whack job so racism, the occult and a whole bunch of other cooky things became a part of it. His "Vitamin"" he took was crystal meth. Mussolini didn't particularly care about racism so that was not a major part of their platform. Whether you were ruled by Hitler or Stalin it was not much different. Either way the individual was not important and had very little power to change their existence. Both methods control citizens rights, ways of thought, economic choices and end in no middle class, but the rulers live like kings.
I wasn’t responding to you. Treetiger used “socialism/fascism” and then defended the use. And some other person said they are the same thing. They aren’t.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cuandcofcfan
BLACK LIVES MATTER’S(BLM) MISSION AND VISION

Black Lives Matter (BLM) is a decentralized non-profit making movement that seeks to engage society with the situations of violence and injustice that black people have been suffering in the US for thousands of years.

The GEORGE FLOYD video was so evident and revealing that it generated outrage throughout the population. The response was sustained and widespread as never before. Demonstrations (ACTUALLY DOMESTIC TERRORISM) occurred in all 50 states and DC of the United States even in predominantly white cities and rural communities.

The hashtag #BlackLivesMatter came to be used 17,000 times a day in all kinds of platforms like Instagram and Twitter, but also the fun ones like TikTok. Even celebrities supported the cause online under the hashtag #ShareTheMic.

This time it was different, the BLM movement was becoming globally relevant and more racially diverse. Thousands of white protesters as well as multi-ethnical protesters stood next to black activists.

THE BREEDING GROUND

Several times in the history of the US, African American citizens have suffered from violence and injustice from the state because of their skin color. Cases like Eric Garner and Michael Brown had also received mass media attention. However, Floyd’s was extreme and global, perhaps due to the context that created the breeding ground to make this explosion.

First, there was a video that made the crime very obvious and grotesque. It happened in the Covid-19 pandemic scenario with high levels of unemployment and popular dissatisfaction with the government’s poor reaction and hundreds of thousands of death due to the infection.

Also, George Floyd’s murder was the third of a series of three in a row: Ahmaud Arbery, a 25-year-old man was shot on 23 February in Georgia after a burglary suspect, while Breonna Taylor, a 26-year-old health worker was shot eight times by the police in her flat in Kentucky.

BLACK LIVES MATTER (BLM) MISSION AND VISION STATEMENTS

Its mission is to Eradicate white supremacy and build local power to intervene in violence inflicted on black communities by the state and vigilantes.

Components of the mission statements:

Eradicate white supremacy:

It means that they fight to end with the racist belief that white people are superior or better than the rest of the races justifying dominance over them.

Build local power to intervene in violence inflicted on black communities: By different actions and initiatives, they seek to create awareness among societies about the injustices that the black population goes through in everyday life.(IE DOMESTIC TERRORISM)

In addition to the programs that they hold, they have gained a high level of visibility among social networks and the online universe.

By the state and vigilantes:

Besides violence and racism is commonplace in the US, BLM is dedicated to unmasking the systemic violence against innocent black people. This includes working for the unearth of anti-black state violence and calling relevant authorities’ attention to act properly.

Black Lives Matter’s vision is to work for a world where black lives are no longer systematically targeted for demise. (THIS IS A STUPID STATEMENT)

This means that in the long term, their goal is to change the world and gain respect for black people so they stop being killed due to their skin color. In other words, they seek to end with racist violence.

GLOBAL PROMINENCE

The Black Lives Matter was created in the context of the historical legacy of the systemic mistreatment of black people. They have been suffering from violence and injustice from the police, criminal justice, and social institutions generally in America.


This movement has appeared as a reflection and a reaction to that legacy. There are dozens of organizations fighting for the civil rights of the black population in the US but BLM has gained unprecedented visibility due to the last events.

They have created a powerful message and took advantage of social networks to spread it all around the world.
 
This is sort of on topic with what this thread had turned into. Has anybody seen the Hodge twins latest video going after Kirk Herbstreit. It is pretty good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nsp1996
This is sort of on topic with what this thread had turned into. Has anybody seen the Hodge twins latest video going after Kirk Herbstreit. It is pretty good.

Those guys are spot on and they deliver with humor. It's not just Herbstreit they are going after.
 
bottom line

no other race on earth than those of european origin have treated peoples of african origin any better

to take a look at where many african americans are today in their careers, their families, and their communities


do you think i care if clemson cares?
Yo wassup with u? you really have issues.. EVERY post you in here talking crazy...It's almost like your obsessed.... If this topic bothers you so much, like I said come to Philly..Let's make a difference
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChicagoTiger85
Black lives matter. I have no problem saying that. Because they do. Blue lives matter. I respect the police and they have as much right at the end of the day to go home to their families as any of us and should act accordingly. White lives matter too. I'll be glad to say that out loud too (please don't send the cancel culture warriors after me). People matter. That's part of our culture.

One thing I've noticed over the years and it seems to cut across all racial, social, and economic lines. Most people are OK. I've met a ton of Black people, White people, Hispanics, and now that I live in Idaho, Native Americans. The vast majority of them are OK people. Not perfect, certainly, but they are just getting on with life as they know it and doing the best they can. And I like most of them.

BUT there's a minority (I'd say between 5 and 10% of the population... depending on the kind of day I'm having), that are just assholes. And that seems to cut across all boundaries as well. They make everything a little (and sometimes a LOT) worse. Work is a bit harder when you have an asshole working with you. Fun activities are less fun with an asshole ruining it. You get the picture... there always seem to be one or two in any large group that are going to f things up and cause trouble.

Unfortunately, assholes tend to be loud... and they tend to get noticed b/c they are screwing things up. You've a few police f'ing things up for the rest of them. And you've got a few BLM "protesters" f'ing things up by inciting violence. And you've got a few white folks that think that showing up with assault rifles to these situations is somehow going to "help". It's a GREAT time to carry an assault rifle and clean paint off walls during this protest. YEAH!! We are PROTESTING the police... let's start a fire and steal some shit... YEAH! I've got this black dude arrested and cuffed up ... now I'm going to keep applying the illegal choke hold... because I can... YEAH. You get the picture...

ASSHOLES!! It's so easy with the media covering this stuff to think that this is how normal people behave. It's not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChicagoTiger85
we can do that too...But you gotta get ya hands dirty first...see the environment, the conditions...I have a HUGE Social Media platform in Philly..Let's work..Let's prove that ALL LIVES MATTER

Well if you have a huge social media platform

First thing to do is make sure every kid under 16 is in class everyday.

Then make sure they do their homework everyday
After school.

So u need a bunch of tutors.

Getting to and from school.

Lots of armed crossing guards at every intersection. Mostly moms and dads armed to shoot any gang member that wants to mess with a child.

That's your
 
we can do that too...But you gotta get ya hands dirty first...see the environment, the conditions...I have a HUGE Social Media platform in Philly..Let's work..Let's prove that ALL LIVES MATTER

Ps

You also have to tell the children not to listen to any political views from your teacher

Anything outside the curriculum you tell your parents immediately.

They are to teach you English math science history

Not some bs leftwing nutshyt
 
ADVERTISEMENT