ADVERTISEMENT

How come only 2 sides to politics and numerous sides to religion?

SDTiger9

Woodrush
Gold Member
Jan 27, 2005
23,481
39,660
113
San Diego
Religion and Politics drive so much emotion that discussing honestly seems impossible for most. To me, they are just other topics.

Why are we accepting of many religions opposed to it’s only Catholicism and Islam and everything is dismissed? We still respect the Sikh, Judaism, Buddhism, Protestants.

There are many political parties in this country and world yet everyone speaks to “2 sides” of an argument. Are there not at least 10s of sides of a political argument? Obviously there is. The question becomes are people conditioned to think there are only “2 sides” of an argument Vs the multifaceted elements of any topic?

- Are people that weak to realize/coerced that there are more opinions? (Basically, just lack awareness or suppressed by the Dems/Pubs.)
- Are people willing to suppress other voices and just keep their angst toward a “supposed other majority” in order to keep their large position at the table? (Think Catholicism and how they murdered any potential dissenting voices for centuries. All Protestant faiths were/are “minority” voices but now have proper rights.)

- colas used to be more diverse, until the Pepsi Challenge. Pepsi actually helped Coke gain market share but grew larger itself by killing all the smaller cola voices at the perception that only 2 options mattered and then absorbed their competitors. However, we have grown diverse in beer. The number of microbrews exploded over the past 2+ decades. What has this diversity done? Allowed an easy destruction of a classic beer brand because there are legit diverse and BETTER alternatives.

- all of us are bound to Apple and Android. ALL OF US. The service is relatively diverse because of the apps but these 2 gatekeepers could/can profound impact on society at any moment.

- you walk into Baskin Robbins today and they’ve made a change. They took all 31 flavors and just dump them into 1 of 2 buckets based upon some perceived alignment of vanilla or chocolate. It’s still diverse, right? You get 15 flavors in 1 bite. But over time, Baskin eventually recognizes it doesn’t need 31 flavors. Strips out the alt flavors, cutting production down 93% and just serves 2 bizarre flavors going forward. You happy with that? Probably not and to ColdStone you’ll go. Don’t have that alternative option in US politics as it’s deemed extreme to support anything other than Dem/Pub.

So, do you believe in diversity of political opinion or are there just 2?
 
Well, you can say whatever you want, but right now there are two political parties in this country. There's what... 3 independent Senators and no independents in the HoR. So the fact that there's no other relevant political parties drives that argument.

So I agree with your premise, but on voting day, only the Dems and Republicans matter.
 
Well, you can say whatever you want, but right now there are two political parties in this country. There's what... 3 independent Senators and no independents in the HoR. So the fact that there's no other relevant political parties drives that argument.

So I agree with your premise, but on voting day, only the Dems and Republicans matter.
Right now? Been that way forever.
They only matter cause they make it that way.

Only way it changes is by tuning the hate groups out. Turning off MSM is the simplest way to do that.
 
Religion and Politics drive so much emotion that discussing honestly seems impossible for most. To me, they are just other topics.

Why are we accepting of many religions opposed to it’s only Catholicism and Islam and everything is dismissed? We still respect the Sikh, Judaism, Buddhism, Protestants.

There are many political parties in this country and world yet everyone speaks to “2 sides” of an argument. Are there not at least 10s of sides of a political argument? Obviously there is. The question becomes are people conditioned to think there are only “2 sides” of an argument Vs the multifaceted elements of any topic?

- Are people that weak to realize/coerced that there are more opinions? (Basically, just lack awareness or suppressed by the Dems/Pubs.)
- Are people willing to suppress other voices and just keep their angst toward a “supposed other majority” in order to keep their large position at the table? (Think Catholicism and how they murdered any potential dissenting voices for centuries. All Protestant faiths were/are “minority” voices but now have proper rights.)

- colas used to be more diverse, until the Pepsi Challenge. Pepsi actually helped Coke gain market share but grew larger itself by killing all the smaller cola voices at the perception that only 2 options mattered and then absorbed their competitors. However, we have grown diverse in beer. The number of microbrews exploded over the past 2+ decades. What has this diversity done? Allowed an easy destruction of a classic beer brand because there are legit diverse and BETTER alternatives.

- all of us are bound to Apple and Android. ALL OF US. The service is relatively diverse because of the apps but these 2 gatekeepers could/can profound impact on society at any moment.

- you walk into Baskin Robbins today and they’ve made a change. They took all 31 flavors and just dump them into 1 of 2 buckets based upon some perceived alignment of vanilla or chocolate. It’s still diverse, right? You get 15 flavors in 1 bite. But over time, Baskin eventually recognizes it doesn’t need 31 flavors. Strips out the alt flavors, cutting production down 93% and just serves 2 bizarre flavors going forward. You happy with that? Probably not and to ColdStone you’ll go. Don’t have that alternative option in US politics as it’s deemed extreme to support anything other than Dem/Pub.

So, do you believe in diversity of political opinion or are there just 2?
The two sides thing is how the simple minded think. There are many layers to politics the only constant is the far-right and far-left. Both are authoritarian and assholes that should never be in power. The only time they agree is when all the groups in the middle are fighting them. Thats why you see the neo-con far right siding with the far-left atm. Liberals, Libertarian, and Conservatives agree on way more things than they dont and that scares the establishment extremes on the right and left...
 
The two sides thing is how the simple minded think. There are many layers to politics the only constant is the far-right and far-left. Both are authoritarian and assholes that should never be in power. The only time they agree is when all the groups in the middle are fighting them. Thats why you see the neo-con far right siding with the far-left atm. Liberals, Libertarian, and Conservatives agree on way more things than they dont and that scares the establishment extremes on the right and left...
So it begs the question? If you know that Liberals, Libertarians, Conservatives are in general agreement, why don’t they stand up for the country and fight for the proper position?

I know you are gonna tell me is for the votes they bring. That’s the same argument addicts use. Hence, they are hate groups as they actually do not stand for what they claim they do.

This cycle has to stop. Dropping party assignment will help.
 
So it begs the question? If you know that Liberals, Libertarians, Conservatives are in general agreement, why don’t they stand up for the country and fight for the proper position?

I know you are gonna tell me is for the votes they bring. That’s the same argument addicts use. Hence, they are hate groups as they actually do not stand for what they claim they do.

This cycle has to stop. Dropping party assignment will help.
They agree on most things but not everything People are tribal and will defend a side no matter what. The ones that arent tribal will call out their own thus you are starting to see conservatives call out neo-cons and liberals call out the leftist. This is why Jimmy Dore, Tim Pool, and even Anna Kasperian are called right-wing now by leftist. You have to agree with the extreme or your on the other side. The moderates are starting to unite and fight back...
 
  • Like
Reactions: SDTiger9
They agree on most things but not everything People are tribal and will defend a side no matter what. The ones that arent tribal will call out their own thus you are starting to see conservatives call out neo-cons and liberals call out the leftist. This is why Jimmy Dore, Tim Pool, and even Anna Kasperian are called right-wing now by leftist. You have to agree with the extreme or your on the other side. The moderates are starting to unite and fight back...
Holy smokes…. I haven’t seen TYT in quite a while. How in the hell is Ana Kasparian considered right wing? She was never as insane as Cenk but WTF.

That’s like saying Glenn Beck is a liberal.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT