HR1 Is the Democrat Party’s Coup de Grâce in Their Complete Takeover of the United States – Will Codify Their Election Fraud In Perpetuity

[TigerGrowls]

THIS IS THE BIGGEST CURRENT THREAT ON THE HORIZON AS IT WOULD CODIFY CHEATING!!

HR1 Is the Democrat Party's Coup de Grâce in Their Complete Takeover of the United States - Will Codify Their Election Fraud In Perpetuity | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

The Democrats announced they were going to table the horrible US ‘Build Back Broke’ bill yesterday. This news came as Senator Manchin continued to show his hesitation in supporting the economically suicidal legislation.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

By Joe Hoft
Published December 16, 2021 at 8:10am

The Democrats announced they were going to table the horrible US ‘Build Back Broke’ bill yesterday. This news came as Senator Manchin continued to show his hesitation in supporting the economically suicidal legislation.​

Instead, they are going to again focus on their national election bill – HR1. This is a complete communist takeover of America’s election system.
Steve Bannon noted this on the War Room:

BREAKING: BANNON GOES OFF -- After News Breaks that Dems will Shelve Build Back Better Bill - Will Move to Federalize Elections - Their Permanent Power Play | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

This is Breaking News– The Senate Democrats are expected to shelve their Build Back Better bill and move forward with their national elections bill that gives them permanent power.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

TRENDING: Doctor on CNN: Please Wear Your Mask at Christmas with Your Family Regardless of Vaccination Status (VIDEO)
Speaker Nancy Pelosi first pushed the HR1 bill soon after Joe Biden’s inauguration:

SHOCKING: The Democrats' First Bill of 2021 Is to Lock In Fraudulent Election Maneuvers and Steal Elections in Perpetuity | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

The fraud in this past election was massive, the worst ever in recorded history, but it is nothing when compared to what the Democrat (Communist) Party has in store for the future of the USA and the world.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Here is what we reported on the legislation back in January.
The Populist Press reported the first bill put together by this Pelosi-led Congress will eliminate free and fair elections forever. Fraud will be the mandate and Democrats, the kings of fraud, will win every election henceforth. The bill is labeled by the Communist Democrats – “For the People Act of 2021“.
Below are the key aspects of the bill as noted by the Populist Press:

Democrats introduce their first bill in the House: H.R.1 – The bill that will destroy America. Nationwide mail-in voting, banning restrictions on ballot harvesting, banning voter ID, criminal voters,DC Statehood roadwork, it’s all in here.
1) Internet-only registration with electronic signature submission.
“(a) Requiring Availability Of Internet For Online Registration.—Each State, acting through the chief State election official, shall ensure that the following services are available to the public at any time on the official public websites of the appropriate State and local election officials in the State, in the same manner and subject to the same terms and conditions as the services provided by voter registration agencies under section 7(a):
“(1) Online application for voter registration.
2) Banning the requirement to provide a full SSN for voter registration.
SEC. 1005. PROHIBITING STATE FROM REQUIRING APPLICANTS TO PROVIDE MORE THAN LAST 4 DIGITS OF SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER. (a) Form Included With Application For Motor Vehicle Driver’s License.—Section 5(c)(2)(B)(ii) of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20504(c)(2)(B)(ii)) is amended by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting the following: “, and to the extent that the application requires the applicant to provide a Social Security number, may not require the applicant to provide more than the last 4 digits of such number;”.
3) Nationwide ‘Motor Voter’ registration.
Note that motor voter registration is how thousands of illegal became registered voters in California and Nevada.
(2) DEFINITION.—The term “automatic registration” means a system that registers an individual to vote in elections for Federal office in a State, if eligible, by electronically transferring the information necessary for registration from government agencies to election officials of the State so that, unless the individual affirmatively declines to be registered, the individual will be registered to vote in such elections.
4) 16 year olds required to be registered to vote.
(d) Treatment Of Individuals Under 18 Years Of Age.—A State may not refuse to treat an individual as an eligible individual for purposes of this part on the grounds that the individual is less than 18 years of age at the time a contributing agency receives information with respect to the individual, so long as the individual is at least 16 years of age at such time. Nothing in the previous sentence may be construed to require a State to permit an individual who is under 18 years of age at the time of an election for Federal office to vote in the election.
5) Nationwide same-day registration.
“(1) REGISTRATION.—Each State shall permit any eligible individual on the day of a Federal election and on any day when voting, including early voting, is permitted for a Federal election—

“(A) to register to vote in such election at the polling place using a form that meets the requirements under section 9(b) of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (or, if the individual is already registered to vote, to revise any of the individual’s voter registration information); and

“(B) to cast a vote in such election.
6) Grants ($25M) for using minors in election activities.
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Election Assistance Commission (hereafter in this section referred to as the “Commission”) shall make grants to eligible States to enable such States to carry out a plan to increase the involvement of individuals under 18 years of age in public election activities in the State.
7) More children voters.
“(k) Acceptance Of Applications From Individuals Under 18 Years Of Age.—

“(1) IN GENERAL.—A State may not refuse to accept or process an individual’s application to register to vote in elections for Federal office on the grounds that the individual is under 18 years of age at the time the individual submits the application, so long as the individual is at least 16 years of age at such time.
8) Prohibiting attempts to clean voter rolls of non-residents.
It’s this whole section, but in particular, this part below basically says nobody is allowed to request voter rolls to be cleaned up. ie: making it illegal to do what Tom Fitton was doing.
“(1) REQUIREMENTS FOR CHALLENGES.—No person, other than a State or local election official, shall submit a formal challenge to an individual’s eligibility to register to vote in an election for Federal office or to vote in an election for Federal office unless that challenge is supported by personal knowledge regarding the grounds for ineligibility which is—
9) Murderers and rapists can vote.
(1) NOTIFICATION.—On the date determined under paragraph (2), each State shall notify in writing any individual who has been convicted of a criminal offense under the law of that State that such individual has the right to vote in an election for Federal office pursuant to the Democracy Restoration Act of 2021 and may register to vote in any such election and provide such individual with any materials that are necessary to register to vote in any such election.
10) Mandatory early voting.
Note that I personally like early voting in Florida, but putting it here anyway.
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Each State shall allow individuals to vote in an election for Federal office during an early voting period which occurs prior to the date of the election, in the same manner as voting is allowed on such date.

11) THE BIG ONE – NATIONWIDE VOTE BY MAIL, BAN ON BALLOT PROTECTION MEASURES, LEGALIZED LIMITLESS BALLOT HARVESTING.​

“SEC. 307. PROMOTING ABILITY OF VOTERS TO VOTE BY MAIL.

“(a) Uniform Availability Of Absentee Voting To All Voters.—

“(1) IN GENERAL.—If an individual in a State is eligible to cast a vote in an election for Federal office, the State may not impose any additional conditions or requirements on the eligibility of the individual to cast the vote in such election by absentee ballot by mail.

“(2) ADMINISTRATION OF VOTING BY MAIL.—

“(A) PROHIBITING IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT AS CONDITION OF OBTAINING BALLOT.—A State may not require an individual to provide any form of identification as a condition of obtaining an absentee ballot, except that nothing in this paragraph may be construed to prevent a State from requiring a signature of the individual or similar affirmation as a condition of obtaining an absentee ballot.

“(B) PROHIBITING REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE NOTARIZATION OR WITNESS SIGNATURE AS CONDITION OF OBTAINING OR CASTING BALLOT.—A State may not require notarization or witness signature or other formal authentication (other than voter attestation) as a condition of obtaining or casting an absentee ballot.
“(2) PERMITTING VOTERS TO DESIGNATE OTHER PERSON TO RETURN BALLOT.—The State—

“(A) shall permit a voter to designate any person to return a voted and sealed absentee ballot to the post office, a ballot drop-off location, tribally designated building, or election office so long as the person designated to return the ballot does not receive any form of compensation based on the number of ballots that the person has returned and no individual, group, or organization provides compensation on this basis; and

“(B) may not put any limit on how many voted and sealed absentee ballots any designated person can return to the post office, a ballot drop off location, tribally designated building, or election office.
12) Banning voter ID.
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection (c), if a State has in effect a requirement that an individual present identification as a condition of receiving and casting a ballot in an election for Federal office, the State shall permit the individual to meet the requirement—

“(A) in the case of an individual who desires to vote in person, by presenting the appropriate State or local election official with a sworn written statement, signed by the individual under penalty of perjury, attesting to the individual’s identity and attesting that the individual is eligible to vote in the election; or
13) Roadwork for DC statehood and territory statehood.
The whole subtitle.
Subtitle C—Findings Relating To District Of Columbia Statehood

Subtitle D—Territorial Voting Rights

14) COMPLETE CONGRESSIONAL TAKEOVER OF REDISTRICTING.​

Subtitle E—Redistricting Reform
(B) ENSURING DIVERSITY.—In appointing the 9 members pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), as well as in designating alternates pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3) and in appointing alternates to fill vacancies pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4), the first members of the independent redistricting commission shall ensure that the membership is representative of the demographic groups (including racial, ethnic, economic, and gender) and geographic regions of the State, and provides racial, ethnic, and language minorities protected under the Voting Rights Act of 1965 with a meaningful opportunity to participate in the development of the State’s redistricting plan.

---

I am running out of time and space, but please look at this section:
SEC. 3201. NATIONAL STRATEGY TO PROTECT UNITED STATES DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS. (a) In General.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President, acting through the Secretary, in consultation with the Chairman, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Education, the Director of National Intelligence, the Chairman of the Federal Election Commission, and the heads of any other appropriate Federal agencies, shall issue a national strategy to protect against cyber attacks, influence operations, disinformation campaigns, and other activities that could undermine the security and integrity of United States democratic institutions.

(b) Considerations.—The national strategy required under subsection (a) shall include consideration of the following:

(1) The threat of a foreign state actor, foreign terrorist organization (as designated pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189)), or a domestic actor carrying out a cyber attack, influence operation, disinformation campaign, or other activity aimed at undermining the security and integrity of United States democratic institutions.

(3) Potential consequences, such as an erosion of public trust or an undermining of the rule of law, that could result from a successful cyber attack, influence operation, disinformation campaign, or other activity aimed at undermining the security and integrity of United States democratic institutions.
Literally forming a commission to effectively freeze anyone who says that the election was rigged.

This is not America – this is a communist takeover by domestic enemies of the US Constitution.​

It will be end of the United States — The coup de grâce by Democrats in their final act of destroying this great nation.

 

[aiken_tiger]

Make sure to tune in for the televised Jan6 Commission's findings early next year.

I'm not sure it will be covered by Jim Hoft, but I hope you do actually tune in and perhaps come to the realization that you've been gaslighted for 5 years (maybe more).

 

[TigerGrowls]

Make sure to tune in for the televised Jan6 Commission's findings early next year.

I'm not sure it will be covered by Jim Hoft, but I hope you do actually tune in and perhaps come to the realization that you've been gaslighted for 5 years (maybe more).

TGP is covering the J6 commission. The whole affair is a joke and I am not wasting my time dropping that info on this board. If you think J6 was an insurrection then I dont know what to say to you but please tell me what you think about this proposed HR1.

 

[clemben]

Ah yes--noted nonpartisan STEVE BANNON says something, so it must be true...lol.

This is some seriously unhinged stuff growls.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Ah yes--noted nonpartisan STEVE BANNON says something, so it must be true...lol.

This is some seriously unhinged stuff growls.

Lets keep the focus on HR1 itself. What is your opinion on it?

 

[DW4_2016]

TGP is covering the J6 commission. The whole affair is a joke and I am not wasting my time dropping that info on this board. If you think J6 was an insurrection then I dont know what to say to you but please tell me what you think about this proposed HR1.

 

[aiken_tiger]

TGP is covering the J6 commission. The whole affair is a joke and I am not wasting my time dropping that info on this board. If you think J6 was an insurrection then I dont know what to say to you but please tell me what you think about this proposed HR1.

Sir, I don't think it's a productive conversation to have. Your method is clear - flood the zone with articles from a questionable source at best and ask others to justify/retort. Gish gallop - but you might want to mix in some other sites (I've got a feeling you've got ZeroHedge bookmarked as well).

More to the point is why you use this method. You've found a source that confirms everything you 'feel'. You 'feel' your singular vote is threatened in some way by providing others with the ease of access to that very same right. Nobody came to take your guns in '08, and Progressivism does not equal Communism. You've been lied to, again and again.

I refuse to come stand in the fire and rebut why you say 'it's cold'. Again, please do try to pay attention next quarter to what will come out.

 

[JoeBidenSniffsKids]

Sir, I don't think it's a productive conversation to have. Your method is clear - flood the zone with articles from a questionable source at best and ask others to justify/retort. Gish gallop - but you might want to mix in some other sites (I've got a feeling you've got ZeroHedge bookmarked as well).

More to the point is why you use this method. You've found a source that confirms everything you 'feel'. You 'feel' your singular vote is threatened in some way by providing others with the ease of access to that very same right. Nobody came to take your guns in '08, and Progressivism does not equal Communism. You've been lied to, again and again.

I refuse to come stand in the fire and rebut why you say 'it's cold'. Again, please do try to pay attention next quarter to what will come out.

“Nobody came to take your guns in 08”

Just stop the charade, you aren’t fooling anyone

 

[TigerGrowls]

None of you libs will even try to justify HR1. I guess part of why yall want to ignore is because it makes it plain and clear what the dems want to do with elections(grand theft).

 

[iceheart08]

None of you libs will even try to justify HR1. I guess part of why yall want to ignore is because it makes it plain and clear what the dems want to do with elections(grand theft).

Almost nothing that was written in the blog post above is accurate. Read the text they append to each "headline". Rarely does the text above match the idiotic scarebait they are using to "headline" each section.

Nor does the author make even a tiny attempt to understand the law. Plus, that's an analysis from almost a year ago designed to scare people. The bill has changed, significantly.

But, again, TGP made no effort to "report" anything. And you made no effort to "do your own research" as your team so often repeats.

Nobody's going to engage with you on this nonsense because your entire understanding of the bill comes from people who are intetionally misleading and lying to you to sell subscriptions.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Almost nothing that was written in the blog post above is accurate. Read the text they append to each "headline". Rarely does the text above match the idiotic scarebait they are using to "headline" each section.

Nor does the author make even a tiny attempt to understand the law. Plus, that's an analysis from almost a year ago designed to scare people. The bill has changed, significantly.

But, again, TGP made no effort to "report" anything. And you made no effort to "do your own research" as your team so often repeats.

Nobody's going to engage with you on this nonsense because your entire understanding of the bill comes from people who are intetionally misleading and lying to you to sell subscriptions.

Ok then please correct the info and/or send a link with what you see as the correct info.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Ok then please correct the info and/or send a link with what you see as the correct info.

Thats what I thought @iceheart08 no response when pressed.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Very disturbing. This is easy to decipher. The dems know they will be steamrolled in the midterms unless they ram through HR1 which would enable widespread election fraud to maintain power as they try transform the US into a communist colony of China.

"Whatever it Takes" - Biden Supports Senate Filibuster 'Exception' to Ram Through Voting Legislation - Says He Would Axe the Longstanding Senate Practice Without Hesitation (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Julian Conradson

During a trainwreck one-on-one interview on Wednesday with ABC’s David Muir, Joe Biden said that he was in favor of “whatever it takes” to force his radical agenda through the US legislature in order for it to become law, even if it means terminating the filibuster – which he said he would do...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

“Whatever it Takes” – Biden Supports Senate Filibuster ‘Exception’ to Ram Through Voting Legislation – Says He Would Axe the Longstanding Senate Practice Without Hesitation (VIDEO)​

By Julian Conradson
Published December 23, 2021 at 9:30pm

During a trainwreck one-on-one interview on Wednesday with ABC’s David Muir, Joe Biden said that he was in favor of “whatever it takes” to force his radical agenda through the US legislature in order for it to become law, even if it means terminating the filibuster – which he said he would do without hesitation if given the chance.
Biden made the comments when Muir asked him about the Democrat’s proposed changes to federal election procedures included in H.R.1, which includes a sweeping overhaul on voting rights that would enable countless illegal aliens to cast votes and allow for even more extensive fraud than there was in 2020.
The radical legislation – which is deceptively named the ‘for the people act’ – would essentially rig US elections for good if it is passed, but the resolution has been unable to make it through the Senate thanks to the 50-50 split and the longstanding filibuster – which requires legislation to achieve 60 votes in order to pass.
Unfortunately, trivial things and semantics – like, you know, having enough votes – isn’t a concern for the current dictator in chief.
TRENDING: EXCLUSIVE SMOKING GUN: Lawsuit Reveals Fulton County 2020 Absentee Ballot Results Were Physically Impossible and Files Were Modified
In response to Muir just flat-out asking if he supported “fundamental changes” to the longstanding rules of the US Senate to achieve his radical agenda, Biden immediately responded with a “yes.”
When asked “what that means,” Biden continued:

Biden: “It means whatever it takes – Change the Senate rules to accommodate major pieces of legislation without requiring 60 votes.”

Muir: “So you support a carve-out of the filibuster for voting rights?“
Biden: “The only thing standing between getting voting rights legislation passed and not getting passed is the filibuster.
I support making the exception of voting rights for the filibuster.”

Watch:


In case you were wondering if Biden was just more out of it than usual because someone scheduled an interview for him past his bedtime, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki confirmed the administration is setting its sights on the filibuster for a messy takedown on Thursday during her press briefing, also calling it the “only thing standing in the way” of the Democrats’ anti-American agenda.
Somehow, as she advocates to destroy the checks and balances of power in the US, she also claims that Biden “has always been committed to” the democratic process.”
Shameless.
Watch:


Like most other platforms Biden campaigned on, his stance on the filibuster has flip-flopped from what it was before he was fraudulently placed in office.
He was quoted several times as being in favor of keeping it, even calling its removal “a very dangerous thing to do” at one campaign stop.



And that’s the ol’ bait and switch.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Kamala Harris Insists Ballot Harvesting, Midnight Drop Boxes, Locking Out Election Observers, and No ID Laws Is About "Keeping Our Standing in the World" | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

The godless Marxists never sleep.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Kamala Harris Insists Ballot Harvesting, Midnight Drop Boxes, Locking Out Election Observers, and No ID Laws Is About “Keeping Our Standing in the World”​

By Jim Hoft
Published December 27, 2021 at 7:30am

The godless Marxists never sleep.
Unfortunately, the Republican party and a majority of our elected officials STILL do not understand this.
Kamala Harris was out on Face the Nation this weekend pushing the Democrats’ voting legislation.
The Democrats’ bill will cement into place all of the illegal activities they rely on to win elections including ballot harvesting, unattended midnight drop boxes, no voter ID laws, same day registration-voting, and blocking GOP election observers out of the counting rooms. These are just a few of the more notorious cheating tactics they have perfected. The Marxists know if they can’t cheat, they can’t win. That’s why Kamala, the most unpopular Vice President in US history is pushing the voting legislation. They must get this passed to control you and your children and grandchildren and to destroy this great nation with their anti-American destructive agenda.
From her interview today – Via Pam Key at Breitbart.
TRENDING: PART 1: EXCLUSIVE EXPOSING THE DEEP STATE TIES TO JAN 6: The Origin of the Russia Sham - Don Berlin's Original Russia Dossier

VICE PRESIDENT HARRIS: I- you may know I am a child of parents who met when they were active in the Civil Rights movement.
MARGARET BRENNAN:Mmhm.
HARRIS: I- there is so much about this fight for – justice and the ideals of our democracy that are part of my DNA and on the issue of voting, we have seen 18 at least states, over a dozen states that have passed, I’m told 33 laws that are making it difficult for the American people to vote. You know, I’ve been meeting with prime ministers and presidents from around the world. One of my favorite interactions was with the now past Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel. She came over for breakfast and we talked about everything that has to do with our relative security as nations and our priorities. And then she asked me about voting. She asked me about voting, and she knew what was going on here, and this is not a subject that was unique to my conversation with her, by the way, in terms of world leaders, because people around the world watch what we do as America, because we have held ourselves out to be a model of the efficacy of the- the ability of a democracy to coexist with an economic strength and power. We have been a role model saying, you can see this and aspire to this and reject autocracies and autocratic leadership. And right now, we’re about to take ourselves off the map as a role model, if we let- if we let people destroy one of the most important pillars of a democracy which is free and fair elections.
BRENNAN: You’re talking about what’s happening in state capitals around the country.
HARRIS: I am and- and but I’m talking about that, and I’m talking about what’s not happening in this Capitol in Washington, D.C., which is the passing of the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act and the Freedom to Vote Act. We have to- we have to agree- and this is not about saying you should vote for me or you should vote for Democrats. This is about everyone having unfettered access to their right to vote and- and agreeing that this is bigger than one election cycle. This is literally about our standing in the world, it’s about the integrity of our democracy. And I do believe of all the things that are on the headline news tonight, tomorrow, for the next week or months, when our kids look back five- ten years from now, at this moment it will be on our watch that we either stood for and fought for our democracy or not. And that I think that is all at stake right now.
BRENNAN: But you still have the reality of a 50-50 Senate–
HARRIS: Correct.
BRENNAN: –and you have two senators who say they’re not on board for changing the filibuster in order to try to push this through. So how do you overcome that democratic reality of not having the votes and not having a clear path forward?
HARRIS: And you’re right to talk about the- the structure and the rules of the Senate, and that is real. And we will do, and look at whatever is necessary to push for Congress to take this issue on. And we have to, we have to.
BRENNAN: A carve out to the filibuster?
HARRIS: I’m not saying that. What I’m saying is that we are going to urge the United States Congress, and we have been, to examine the tools they have available to do what is necessary to fight for and retain the integrity of our voting system in America.

Here’s the video: