Clemson is depending on one first year player (no 3 rated HS OT prospect) to help a newly tooled OL which is probably the biggest ? on the team and this fact is projected, understandably by most, to be a concern. All other freshman will supplement proven players. SC is depending on multiple first year players mostly from JUCO ranks where competition is not on par with 6A Ga HS football, and they consider this to be a strength to assuredly make their defense better. Am I missing something?
Irony of first year players
- Thread starter orange87
- Start date
