I don't think we're really disagreeing, but these stories of people being against homosexuality and having their own peccadilloes are notorious largely because they're cases of man bites dog, not because they're particularly numerous.
At any rate, I wasn't saying that any individual is better than any other individual, or that someone is more or less likely to be a perv based on their political philosophy. I was saying that what the other poster was calling "perversion" has, in fact, been turned into a politics of sexual liberation by the left. In some sense, then, I guess you could argue that the left is less sexually repressed, but on other hand, someone with a more restrictive sexual morality is going to see progressive sexual politics/the politics of sexual liberation as an "obsession with perversion." A major plank of left wing politics has been to obliterate the idea of "perversion" once two adults have consented, in part by turning what once might've been considered perverse into a political identity.
I just want to point out, again, that we're not talking about forcing anybody to agree with traditional or Christian morality anymore when we're talking about public schools having official "Pride Weeks" and the like. Instead, what we're now talking about is marginalization and privatization of traditional and Christian morality and public enshrinement of homosexual morality. Some probably think that's a good thing, but I see no reason why there can't be a liberal neutrality on issues like these.