She has altered the future of the country. For better or worse. However it all ends up, she stole a chunk of votes in Georgia, NC, and Wisconsin.
And drove us straight into socialism.She has altered the future of the country. For better or worse. However it all ends up, she stole a chunk of votes in Georgia, NC, and Wisconsin.
A Biden presidency would not result in socialism good god get a gripAnd drove us straight into socialism.
And drove us straight into socialism.
Kamala is your new President. Don’t you guys get it? Biden is a vegetable.What? Did Bernie win or something?
Kamala is your new President. Don’t you guys get it? Biden is a vegetable.
She didn’t steal any votes. I voted because I was voting for Jorgensen. If there wasn’t a candidate I agree with I wouldn’t vote. Luckily I’m in GA so my vote is important.She has altered the future of the country. For better or worse. However it all ends up, she stole a chunk of votes in Georgia, NC, and Wisconsin.
And? Neither one of them is a socialist. In fact, they’d both be considered rather conservative if they were running for office in places like Germany, Austria or the Netherlands. Take it from someone who has studied the subject and who has lived in a former Eastern Bloc country — the policies of Biden/Harris don’t even sniff socialism. Neither healthcare nor college will be made free for everyone, nor will our country suddenly start enforcing a one-car-per-family policy, with everyone having to purchase a black Trabant. But hey, hyperbole and fear of “the other” is all the rage these days, so don’t mind me.
Astute take and agree! Any votes for comrade Jorgenson is essentially a vote for Harris/Biden and serfdom. I can't believe how short-sighted these "principled" folk are. Their "principles" will ultimately strangle our freedom and suppress our voices. I wish I were wrong. But, I'm not.And drove us straight into socialism.
Astute take and agree! Any votes for comrade Jorgenson is essentially a vote for Harris/Biden and serfdom. I can't believe how short-sighted these "principled" folk are. Their "principles" will ultimately strangle our freedom and suppress our voices. I wish I were wrong. But, I'm not.
Astute take and agree! Any votes for comrade Jorgenson is essentially a vote for Harris/Biden and serfdom. I can't believe how short-sighted these "principled" folk are. Their "principles" will ultimately strangle our freedom and suppress our voices. I wish I were wrong. But, I'm not.
Yes, a legitimate question. Thanks for asking. There are meaningful short/near-term ways where Harris/Biden would suppress freedoms and voices of dissent through: expansion of hate speech to marginalize those with legitimate differences of opinion; severely restricting gun rights; encouraging further censorship of dissenting voices in media, social media platforms, and college campuses; levying significantly higher taxes on individuals, families, and businesses which ultimately abridge freedoms; expansion of picking winners based on skin color, sexual orientation at the expense of others who may be more economically challenged (affirmative action); encouraging more illegal immigration at the expense of law abiding legal US citizens, greencard holders, etc. I could go on.Legitimate question: How would a Biden/Harris win suppress our voices and strangle our freedom? What specifically is in danger?
Ha! Ask Venezuelans if they agree with that. Socialism means gas price is $3/gallon once they ban Fracking.
Did you miss the part where he said "Socialism is a scare word" here? We will never be a Socialist country no matter how much your side hollers about it. I know Trump has made it cool to be dumb but you'll realize soon enough that he was wrong about this. AGAIN
Ok. I’ll accept that if you’ll accept $3/gallon gas.
Biden IS NOT banning fracking - he's just banning it on public lands. But besides that, only a small percentage of natural gas is used for transportation purposes, so even if it fracking were banned, it wouldn't add to your gas bill. Having said that, I'd gladly pay $6.00 a gallon to get rid of that special needs cantaloupe.
no we just use natural gas for unimportant things like heating out homes, cooking food and generating electricity
Biden IS NOT banning fracking - he's just banning it on public lands. But besides that, only a small percentage of natural gas is used for transportation purposes, so even if it fracking were banned, it wouldn't add to your gas bill. Having said that, I'd gladly pay $6.00 a gallon to get rid of that special needs cantaloupe.
Biggest lie I have read this morning and I have already seen some whoppers. I mean, either you are dumb or brainwashed. Go back and look at the montage of video clips from the man's mouth. Unbelievable how so many people are easily manipulated.Biden IS NOT banning fracking - he's just banning it on public lands. But besides that, only a small percentage of natural gas is used for transportation purposes, so even if it fracking were banned, it wouldn't add to your gas bill. Having said that, I'd gladly pay $6.00 a gallon to get rid of that special needs cantaloupe.
That's your response?! Very weak.You'll still have it so what's your point?
Why would a man who has run for president 3 times and did not know Kamala Harris well before selecting her as Veep give up the presidency? You make no sense. Joe Biden is of sounder mind than our current president who has such an insufficient attention span that his presidential daily briefs have to be filled with pictures rather than the written word.If Biden does win, and if the Reps keep the Senate, then the only real question for the next 2 years will be how long until Biden is removed from office for Harris to take over. We all know it.
Is there any rule that the President has to be the person at some of the summits and such? Because I expect we will see one of the most active VPs in our history handling meetings that the Pres normally attends.
Yeah, Dems said the same thing about former Gov Gary Johnson in 2016. And about Ralph Nader in 2000. But when political scientists study third-party voting, they often find out that the major party loser would not have won all of the votes that went to the third party candidate. But if it makes you feel better, keep thinking that way.IF Jo Jorgensen voters had voted for Trump, he would almost assuredly have won the election. I hope they are happy with the outcome, smh.
The bad thing is that due to blatant ballot harvesting by the left we will see. The good thing is that due to illegal voting practices and voter suppression by the left we will see.Why would a man who has run for president 3 times and did not know Kamala Harris well before selecting her as Veep give up the presidency? You make no sense. Joe Biden is of sounder mind than our current president who has such an insufficient attention span that his presidential daily briefs have to be filled with pictures rather than the written word.
You think Trump is a good physical specimen? Let them race around a high school track ... Trump might win because his golf cart would go faster than Joe's legs - but that's the only way.
The bad thing is that due to blatant ballot harvesting by the left we will see. The good thing is that due to illegal voting practices and voter suppression by the left we will see.
There is a 100% certainty all of them would not have voted for Trump. I am aware of that.Yeah, Dems said the same thing about former Gov Gary Johnson in 2016. And about Ralph Nader in 2000. But when political scientists study third-party voting, they often find out that the major party loser would not have won all of the votes that went to the third party candidate. But if it makes you feel better, keep thinking that way.
At some point theories become facts. We passed that point years ago.There's more wrong things in this post than there are words in it. You literally don't have a clue what you're saying, you're just parroting right wing conspiracy theory.
At some point theories become facts. We passed that point years ago.
That is the Liberal mode of operation right?Just speak it into existence
Just speak it into existence
except that didn't happen. stop listening to fake newsJust to play devils advocate here, isn't it a little suspicious that R's outperformed D's almost across the board and the Presidential votes don't reflect that? I mean in MI there were 138K votes for Biden and 0 for Trump, while the R senator candidate is/was still winning. I get some R's aren't going to vote for Trump but not in those kind of numbers.
To be clear, it doesn't matter. The election is over, its just suspicious to me. I imagine Trump will take it to court but I doubt there is any way they can prove fraud, and if they get a re-count there aren't enough votes to overturn.
except that didn't happen. stop listening to fake news
![]()
No, Michigan didn't find thousands of Biden votes overnight
Widespread posts about vote tallies in Michigan are taking off online as conservatives ramp up their efforts to sow doubwww.politifact.com
Biggest lie I have read this morning and I have already seen some whoppers. I mean, either you are dumb or brainwashed. Go back and look at the montage of video clips from the man's mouth. Unbelievable how so many people are easily manipulated.
That's your response?! Very weak.
A Biden presidency would not result in socialism good god get a grip