Lancet Study confirms MRNA in breast milk
- Thread starter TigerGrowls
- Start date
Interpretation
Our findings demonstrate that the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA is not confined to the injection site but spreads systemically and is packaged into BM EVs. However, as only trace quantities are present and a clear translational activity is absent, we believe breastfeeding post-vaccination is safe, especially 48 h after vaccination. Nevertheless, since the minimum mRNA vaccine dose to elicit an immune reaction in infants <6 months is unknown, a dialogue between a breastfeeding mother and her healthcare provider should address the benefit/risk considerations of breastfeeding in the first two days after maternal vaccination.🤣imagine standing on a soapbox to demonstrate your trust in "experts" who lied to your face because there's a sentence that implies it wasn't that big of a lie. obviously "we believe" needs to be used, just in case that's also a lie that gets exposed at a later date. beginning to suspect there is no finite number of lies you can be told from any govt rep you politically identify with that would prompt you to even ask some questions.
can forget about realizing they don't give a flying fk about anyone but themselves and those that can help them expand their authority wealth.
Imagine taking the time to attack a poster who added context with an article in the Lancet (a respected journal) to a post implying that breastfeeding after vaccination is dangerous, when that's NOT what the study concluded.
You know who you didn't question? Some random journalist named Alex Gutentag, because you will choose to believe anyone who says something that aligns with your alt-right, conspiracy addled, tiny patch of neurons.
A
anon_5e8aassgcbjz1
Guest
Always good to have “beliefs” when it comes to science. Talk about a word that’s leveraged simply to absolve accountability and responsibility. What’s hilarious is that science is iterative, always has and will be but there are clowns spouting “beliefs” as like it matters.
I remember what GI JOE told us:
“And Beliefs, is half the battle.”
At the time of approval, FDA believed the controlled-release formulation of OxyContin would result in less abuse potential, since the drug would be absorbed slowly and there would not be an immediate “rush” or high that would promote abuse.
I remember what GI JOE told us:
“And Beliefs, is half the battle.”
At the time of approval, FDA believed the controlled-release formulation of OxyContin would result in less abuse potential, since the drug would be absorbed slowly and there would not be an immediate “rush” or high that would promote abuse.
Last edited:
Imagine GI Joe today:
“Hey kids, keeping it to 2 Cokes a day is A OK. And believing is half the battle.”
2 years later
“Hey kids, dancing like they do in the Jardiance commercial is great cardio vascular exercise. But don’t overdue it, managing your A1C is really swell with this little pill that got a great story to tell. And believing is half the battle.”
(May God have mercy on your FDA & Madison Ave Rx commercial souls.)
“Hey kids, keeping it to 2 Cokes a day is A OK. And believing is half the battle.”
2 years later
“Hey kids, dancing like they do in the Jardiance commercial is great cardio vascular exercise. But don’t overdue it, managing your A1C is really swell with this little pill that got a great story to tell. And believing is half the battle.”
(May God have mercy on your FDA & Madison Ave Rx commercial souls.)
As we've come to find out, they didn't actually believe this. Purdue was able to coerce them into approving that theory. And the FDA's failure directly led to the opioid epidemic.
And here we have big pharma and the FDA again. Perhaps everything is on the up and up, but we now know that duo can't be implicitly trusted.
Are you saying “BELIEFS” aren’t the primary recommended scientific value? 😂
I put that in there for that very specific reason. The intersection of FDA/private sector, US Attys offices/big time legal firms is as bad as Congress/stock moves.
At least the legal and stock arena isnt DIRECTLY invading our personal space. For fvckin FOOD and fvckin DRUGS, assholes are still fine poisoning people into their homes. And at best, not fully informing them.
NOBODY can be trusted without legit REDUNDANCY of data domestic and globally. And at least we can all survey the global landscape to get an honest ITERATIVE knowledge on food and drugs.
My MIL came at me with….. the FDA approved new vax…….STOP.
- Where did you hear it?
- Did you look at the data and dates and latest strain data? What strain is this targeting?
- Did they discuss at all for the mega millions who have had multiple shots and/or multiple infections of COVID prior?
No.
Then why does it matter? The entire medical community is built upon 1 common phrase. “We encourage you to get a 2nd opinion.”
How come this phrase has magically disappeared? Are the Swedes, Japanese, Germans, Australians, Croatians, Argentinians, Indians, Swiss all idiots? Shouldn’t we analyze AS MUCH information as possible globally to know what works best …….. in FVCKIN SCIENCE?
(I get it…. I’m no fun to talk to. Americans have a struggling and living with facts problem.)
I wish people would focus on the very real, proven harms from PFAs and PFOAs in plastics with the same militant level of concern that they do the perceived/potential harms of these mRNA vaccines.
These are some of the more hazardous chemicals that man produces, yet we have no knowledge how many are appearing in our foods, water, pesticides, drugs and children's toys. I don't get it.
www.bloomberg.com
www.theguardian.com
These are some of the more hazardous chemicals that man produces, yet we have no knowledge how many are appearing in our foods, water, pesticides, drugs and children's toys. I don't get it.
Got Plastic With a No. 2 Recycling Symbol? Beware a Toxic Problem
A little-known American company has been giving plastic a special touch called fluorination for 40 years. After the EPA discovered treated containers can leach “forever chemicals,” the company refused to stop.
www.bloomberg.com
Plastic containers can contain PFAS -- and it's getting into food
Researchers are adding to their list of consumer products that contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), a toxic class of fluorine compounds known as 'forever chemicals.' In a new study, fluorinated high-density polyethylene (HDPE) plastic containers -- used for household cleaners...
www.sciencedaily.com
Toxic ‘forever chemicals’ are contaminating plastic food containers
Harmful PFAS chemicals are being used to hold food, drink and cosmetics, with unknown consequences for human health
No, that's not quite correct. We do know that it leaches into foodstuffs from plastics. Fire suppressant foams, especially those used on military bases, are known sources of groundwater contamination.I wish people would focus on the very real, proven harms from PFAs and PFOAs in plastics with the same militant level of concern that they do the perceived/potential harms of these mRNA vaccines.
These are some of the more hazardous chemicals that man produces, yet we have no knowledge how many are appearing in our foods, water, pesticides, drugs and children's toys. I don't get it.
Got Plastic With a No. 2 Recycling Symbol? Beware a Toxic Problem
A little-known American company has been giving plastic a special touch called fluorination for 40 years. After the EPA discovered treated containers can leach “forever chemicals,” the company refused to stop.Plastic containers can contain PFAS -- and it's getting into food
Researchers are adding to their list of consumer products that contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), a toxic class of fluorine compounds known as 'forever chemicals.' In a new study, fluorinated high-density polyethylene (HDPE) plastic containers -- used for household cleaners...www.sciencedaily.comToxic ‘forever chemicals’ are contaminating plastic food containers
Harmful PFAS chemicals are being used to hold food, drink and cosmetics, with unknown consequences for human health
This isn't the correct forum to unpack this complex issue, but those of us who work in the environmental field know the history.
It's behind the paywall so I can't see it, but just curious what the "...little known American company..." is. Bet I can figure it out.
You are correct that we know the risks from PFAs in certain plastics, firefighting foams and treatments for nonstick pans. This was a new area of concern that I was not aware of prior to this article.
Inhance Technologies is the company behind the fluorination process of HDPE plastics.
As for the paywall, check out archive.today as an option for bypassing.
