ADVERTISEMENT

LeBron Showing His @ss Again

TMcGrady1

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Nov 5, 2003
7,309
32,718
113
This guy always has the absolute worst takes. He’s referring to Rittenhouse’s breakdown yesterday which at the very least appeared to be a legitimate reaction to a traumatic experience. There were tears and a panic attack from having to describe what happened. This is all LeBron has to offer? Pathetic.

 
Last edited:
I actually agree with Bron here.
Fair enough, your opinion. That reaction was as authentic as it gets and included tears. He had a panic attack the second he had to describe what happened and was collected the rest of the time. The court will decide his fate, but that was no fake reaction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Fair enough, your opinion. That reaction was as authentic as it gets and included tears. He had a panic attack the second he had to describe what happened and was collected the rest of the time. The court will decide his fate, but that was no fake reaction.
I hear you, but he’s practiced his testimony 100 plus times by this point. He’s not freshly revisiting the situation. That’s why I always ask how much prep has gone into it.
 
I haven’t. Rittenhouse is a murderer. He went out and killed protestors for sport. He should rot below the prison.
You making statements like this without any real investigation into what you are talking about is what is wrong with this country. Everyone has pre-made opinions without actually knowing anything about the subject. I now know to ignore everything you say, because you just admitted you have no clue what your talking about. So thanks for that, but do better…
 
He murdered people and is up on the witness stand destroying what little credibility he had left with that fake crying act.

****I take the murder part back. With the people chasing him in the first part of the shooting , someone fired a gun and he was attacked…that’s self defense IMO.
In the second, he was attacked and escalated the situation by firing his gun…not sure if that rises to the level of murder, but manslaughter would definitely fit there
 
Last edited:
… by the Prosecution’s Star witness own admission, Rittenhouse was defending himself. It’s on video that he was defending himself.

he did nothing wrong.
Fwiw, the guy that admitted to pointing a gun at him had just seen him kill two people.

It’s a complicated situation and I don’t want to jump to conclusions. But people jumping on the latest testimony as proof of innocence are either not up to speed on the details or deliberately ignoring them because they are not convenient.
 
You making statements like this without any real investigation into what you are talking about is what is wrong with this country. Everyone has pre-made opinions without actually knowing anything about the subject. I now know to ignore everything you say, because you just admitted you have no clue what your talking about. So thanks for that, but do better…
He is trolling … successfully I might add.

When the prosecution’s witness admitted to pulling a gun and pointing it at Rittenhouse’s face while Rittenhouse was on the ground on his back, the case should’ve been tossed.

the real story here, is that the Government prosecuting a innocent man
 
You making statements like this without any real investigation into what you are talking about is what is wrong with this country. Everyone has pre-made opinions without actually knowing anything about the subject. I now know to ignore everything you say, because you just admitted you have no clue what your talking about. So thanks for that, but do better…
Unfortunately the prosecution is hoping the jurors have the same perspective. Otherwise, I can’t understand the reason they pushed forward with the charges.
 
… by the Prosecution’s Star witness own admission, Rittenhouse was defending himself. It’s on video that he was defending himself.

he did nothing wrong.

we can agree that this was self-defense, but he absolutely did a fair bit wrong. carrying that weapon. showing up at the protest. being by himself. the list goes on. he might not be guilty of homicide, but "did nothing wrong" is a stretch, when multiple people were killed. lots of people did plenty wrong here, and hes one of them.
 
He murdered people and is up on the witness stand destroying what little credibility he had left with that fake crying act.
A skateboard to the skull multiple times, being kicked in the head multiple times, having a gun pointed at you from point blank range (other person who had the gun admitted that yesterday in court), and a mob chasing you down a road yelling “cranium him” is grounds for self defense by use of a firearm.

You and LeBron Hugh will be crying when it’s all said and done.
 
maybe we can agree that this was self defense, but he absolutely did a fair bit wrong. carrying that weapon. showing up at the protest. being by himself. the list goes on. he might not be guilty of homicide, but "did nothing wrong" is a stretch, when multiple people were killed. lots of people did plenty wrong here, and hes one of them.
Agreed. I have a CPL and am in favor of “castle” laws. I want to be able to protect my family. But when a kid takes a weapon that isn’t his, travels to another state, and plays police in the middle of a riot, I have no idea how that’s considered “nothing wrong”.
 
Fwiw, the guy that admitted to pointing a gun at him had just seen him kill two people.

It’s a complicated situation and I don’t want to jump to conclusions. But people jumping on the latest testimony as proof of innocence are either not up to speed on the details or deliberately ignoring them because they are not convenient.
Fwiw it’s on video that one of them attacked Rittenhouse and under Wisconsin law, he had the right to defend himself. The only one that is up for debate is Rosenbaum. The Prosecution alleges that he was shot in the back but provided ZERO testimony or evidence supporting that claim.

set him free ….
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Agreed. I have a CPL and am in favor of “castle” laws. I want to be able to protect my family. But when a kid takes a weapon that isn’t his, travels to another state, and plays police in the middle of a riot, I have no idea how that’s considered “nothing wrong”.
Definitely think the whole Lord of the Flies angle to it is strange. Rittenhouse deserves some punishment for sure. Some of these adults that Rittenhouse has referred to by saying things like “we went over to so and so’s dad’s house and hung out” need to be scrutinized a little more as well. Sounds like adults knew they were getting bullet proof vests and what not. Might want to interview those people!
 
we can agree that this was self-defense, but he absolutely did a fair bit wrong. carrying that weapon. showing up at the protest. being by himself. the list goes on. he might not be guilty of homicide, but "did nothing wrong" is a stretch, when multiple people were killed. lots of people did plenty wrong here, and hes one of them.
… fair … Legally he did nothing wrong.

by the above, I’m assuming you’d also agree that George Floyd was in the wrong for being high as a kite and resisting arrest, no?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
we can agree that this was self-defense, but he absolutely did a fair bit wrong. carrying that weapon. showing up at the protest. being by himself. the list goes on. he might not be guilty of homicide, but "did nothing wrong" is a stretch, when multiple people were killed. lots of people did plenty wrong here, and hes one of them.
"Protest". That place looked like a war zone that night
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnnyd2005
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT