Lib Hypocrisy

TigerGrowls

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,983
4,962
113
For the 2020 election steal virtually no signature verification is totally fine and mail in voting is safe and fraud proof, but now watch the same groups selectively totally change their stance when it benefits them.


Joel Pollak at Breitbart.com reported:

Los Angeles County reported Monday that over 27% of the signatures submitted on petitions to recall District Attorney George Gascón were invalid — after reporting that less than 1% of mail-in ballots were invalid in the 2020 election.
The county reported that it rejected 195,783 of the 715,833 signatures submitted, roughly 27.3%. The reasons given included that some voters were found to be unregistered; incorrect addresses were given; or signatures did not match those on file.
However, in January 2021, the county reported that less than 1% of the 3,422,585 vote-by-mail ballots submitted were rejected. The test for the validity of ballots is similar to that of petitions, involving checking signatures and addresses.
Given that the State of California mailed ballots to every voter on the rolls, rather than just to those who had requested them as in years past, there was a high likelihood of error; some voters reported receiving multiple ballots, often for prior residents. (These problems persisted in the 2021 recall election for Gov. Gavin Newsom, as personally witness by this author.)


NBC News reported:

Starbucks is asking the federal labor board to suspend all mail-in ballot union elections nationwide, alleging misconduct in the voting process by the board’s personnel and the union organizing its baristas.
The Seattle-based coffee giant wrote in a letter to the chairman and general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board on Monday that the labor board’s officials acted inappropriately during an election in the Kansas City area and has likely acted similarly in other elections. Starbucks cited a career NLRB professional who approached the company as a whistleblower.
More than 220 Starbucks cafes in the U.S. have voted to unionize, according to an NLRB tally as of Friday. An additional 34 elections have been ordered or are in progress, and seven more stores are waiting to schedule elections.
Starbucks Workers United and the NLRB did not immediately respond to requests for comment from CNBC.
In addition to asking for a pause on all scheduled mail-in elections at its U.S. stores, Starbucks is requesting that all future elections be held in person while the allegations can be investigated.
 

jakefest

Lake Baikal
Gold Member
Aug 6, 2010
3,524
4,166
113
NJ
Oh TGP making up more stuff. Evidence? Anyone charged? Anyone convicted? No, no, and no. In other words just another Wednesday...
The Gascon recall isn't a TGP thing, it's out there much more broadly. They removed 30% of the signatures to drop the count just below the threshold to actually put the recall on the ballot.

Reasons stated:

-Duplicates
-Mismatched address
-Unregistered voter
-Registered in another district or state
-Out of town signature
-etc

The amount of rejected mail in ballots in 2020 were less than 1% .......if you want the benchmark.

I don't think anyone would suggest cheating but more around comparison of how the mail in ballots should have also been rigorously scrutinized in 2020. Some would even call this voter suppression.........(some meaning dems)
 

jakefest

Lake Baikal
Gold Member
Aug 6, 2010
3,524
4,166
113
NJ
The Gascon recall isn't a TGP thing, it's out there much more broadly. They removed 30% of the signatures to drop the count just below the threshold to actually put the recall on the ballot.

Reasons stated:

-Duplicates
-Mismatched address
-Unregistered voter
-Registered in another district or state
-Out of town signature
-etc

The amount of rejected mail in ballots in 2020 were less than 1% .......if you want the benchmark.

I don't think anyone would suggest cheating but more around comparison of how the mail in ballots should have also been rigorously scrutinized in 2020. Some would even call this voter suppression.........(some meaning dems)
For more reference......

 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

Allornothing

The Mariana Trench
Gold Member
Dec 21, 2001
2,175
1,052
113
Thank you for your reporting @jakefest. What this means to me, is we let Californians have it. They created it, they can solve it. They are too stupid for that, but it can't any worse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls