ADVERTISEMENT

Male Rally Cat

In my book, the liberty of the individual outweighs your moral contempt for cross-dressing homosexuals. Simple as that. Free market. Homos win. You lose.
So if the guy fancies himself a one-eyed, 700 pound, yellow walrus, do we let him express himself as that? Or is just the total opposite sex you can emulate?
 
One day, when someone like him runs across you, having been left for dead on the road to Damascus, I pray they follow the Lord’s way and not the path you follow.
@clemsonfan3 meant to say:

I really don’t know what the crap I’m talking about since Paul was on the road to Damascus and the Good Samaritan story I was trying to allude to was a guy on a road to Jericho but it’s convenient for me to bring God and the Bible into what my preferences are
 
So if the guy fancies himself a one-eyed, 700 pound, yellow walrus, do we let him express himself as that? Or is just the total opposite sex you can emulate?
Yes, if it’s on his own time. And we’d all properly recognize he was nuts. We also wouldn’t want to reform culture around people believing they’re yellow walruses.

These folks sort of want to have their cake and eat it too, though: sex differences and sex complementarity are supposed to be unimportant, but they’re also so important that we absolutely have to affirm people in whatever sex they perceive themselves. Also, gender roles are unimportant, unless they’re the gender roles chosen by “trans” people based on their own stereotypes of the opposite sex.

And then there’s the whole problem with people who are supposedly homosexual being attracted to, or unattracted to, a “trans” person. Figure that one out (in fact, some “trans” activists have figured it out by calling people “TERFS”).
 
Last edited:
Well, unless anybody doesn’t want to affirm someone’s delusions about their sex, or if a parent doesn’t want to facilitate their childrens’ “transition,” or if a school wants to have sex separate sports, or if anywhere wants to have sex separate locker rooms or bathrooms, or if a doctor doesn’t want to facilitate a “transition,” or if a doctor doesn’t want to help affirm “trans” status, or if a teacher wants to teach that sex is immutable, or unless anybody thinks sexual complimentary matters for marriage, or unless somebody doesn’t want to help celebrate a “gay wedding.” Or if a leader doesn’t want to have a guy dressed in a womens uniform on the band flag team.

The liberty of the individual trumps all, except in these insignificant cases.
You’re simply arguing that a Clemson student cross-dressing on the flag team is some kind of imagined slippery slope that will ultimately impinge your personal liberty. My advice is to go home and refile your case when you have some actual damages to pursue. Until then, you have no standing. The kid gets to dress however he wants.
 
@clemsonfan3 meant to say:

I really don’t know what the crap I’m talking about since Paul was on the road to Damascus and the Good Samaritan story I was trying to allude to was a guy on a road to Jericho but it’s convenient for me to bring God and the Bible into what my preferences are
Yo. It’s midnight after a game. Give me a break.
 
You’re simply arguing that a Clemson student cross-dressing on the flag team is some kind of imagined slippery slope that will ultimately impinge your personal liberty. My advice is to go home and refile your case when you have some actual damages to pursue. Until then, you have no standing. The kid gets to dress however he wants.
We’re not talking about legalities. We’re talking about how Clemson ought to be represented, and how alumni ought to feel about certain representations. My suspicion is that considerations of legalities entered into the decision to let him dress as a woman on the flag team, though.
 
Last edited:
We’re not talking about legalities. We’re talking about how Clemson ought to be represented, and now alumni ought to feel about certain representations. My suspicion is that considerations of legalities entered into the decision to let him dress as a woman on the flag team, though.
I am an alumnus - class of 87 - and my son is class of ‘19 and my oldest daughter is a senior and my youngest is a sophomore. I and my kids denounce the close- mindedness of you and others in this thread
 
  • Haha
Reactions: unkle rico
I’ll allow it. I mess crap up all the time. Where you went wrong was citing the “Lord’s Way” and a Bible story when in fact the Bible goes for the jugular on this topic.
Oh now. Let’s not get too far into Leviticus. He rose for all our sins.
 
I am an alumnus - class of 87 - and my son is class of ‘19 and my oldest daughter is a senior and my youngest is a sophomore. I and my kids denounce the close- mindedness of you and others in this thread
I’m going to guess your kids don’t feel as strongly as you do. And I could list quite a few fellow alums who denounce your desire to impose your gender ideology on everyone else, in addition to the ideology itself (which you still haven’t explained how it makes believing that men can only be men, and women can only be women, bigoted).
 
Nah I’m strictly New Testament
This is an important discussion, but it’s also not necessary to this topic. That particular poster doesn’t really care, he’s just doing the whole, “this is really just a religious thing, and anyway you religious people are hypocrites who don’t understand your own religion” thing.
 
Kept judging and parsing… and speaking things that are not said
Just to be clear, you donate so that literally anyone will be out there representing Clemson? How about an anti- trans ideology activist? How about someone who insists on not wearing any clothes? Or someone who insists on advocating for a political candidate?
 
tumblr_mjzsjq99Ec1qcj7k0o8_r1_250.gifv

😂
 
Ah, well, then they are the people I was talking about. Thanks for instantiating what I said above about intolerance. Maybe consider whether being horrified that you’ve even engaged a dialogue is closed minded.
Just wondering… Did your panties get all wadded up the first time you heard the woo-hoo? Because I really hate it, but I’m not sure it’s going to destroy the Clemson culture any more so than our three cross-dressing flag girls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Terrynater
Don’t talk about my girls you ****ing Neanderthal
Don’t talk about your girls on here as an example of what people ought to be like if you don’t want others to respond to what you say about them. Once again, maybe be a little more self-reflective when calling other people “****ing Neanderthal.” Usually, that kind of irrational emotion is associated with Neanderthals.
 
Don’t talk about your girls on here as an example of what people ought to be like if you don’t want others to respond to what you say about them. Once again, maybe be a little more self-reflective when calling other people “****ing Neanderthal.” Usually, that kind of irrational emotion is associated with Neanderthals.
I agree. No need to call names.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChicagoTiger85
I don’t, because I’m a good bit younger than you. But I would suggest that you not try to illustrate your points by talking about what your daughters think, and how mortified they’d be to even know that anybody disagrees with them, if you don’t want people to comment on that.
Bottom line young man - I am totally good with our band and color guard and every individual therein. God bless us every one. May you be as self-reflective as you preach.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ChicagoTiger85
White males accounted for 69.38% of suicide deaths in 2019.

I’ve learned in this thread that perhaps a fair number were driven to their demise by cross-dressing Clemson flag twirlers - assuming COVID was attributed for all deaths 2020-2021.

I want no part of such so I’m heading to bed. Good luck to you fellas. Don’t drop the soap.
 
We’re not talking about legalities. We’re talking about how Clemson ought to be represented, and how alumni ought to feel about certain representations. My suspicion is that considerations of legalities entered into the decision to let him dress as a woman on the flag team, though.
I’m all good with it
 
I’m going to guess your kids don’t feel as strongly as you do. And I could list quite a few fellow alums who denounce your desire to impose your gender ideology on everyone else, in addition to the ideology itself (which you still haven’t explained how it makes believing that men can only be men, and women can only be women, bigoted).
I don’t seek to impose any gender ideology on anyone - why do you postulate that on me?
 
I am an alumnus - class of 87 - and my son is class of ‘19 and my oldest daughter is a senior and my youngest is a sophomore. I and my kids denounce the close- mindedness of you and others in this thread

no offense, but if you have raised your daughters to be “horrified” when discussing opposing viewpoints, then you have done them a huge disservice and need to work on being a better father.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT