Imagine an actual self made billionaire in office vs a fake billionaire game show host or a lifelong politician.
He's not paying " his fair share" .Imagine an actual self made billionaire in office vs a fake billionaire game show host or a lifelong politician.
Mark “not worried about inflation” Cuban?Imagine an actual self made billionaire in office vs a fake billionaire game show host or a lifelong politician.
Canada just raised their top tax rate to 66%. Wonder if he would approve?He's not paying " his fair share" .
He's not paying " his fair share" .
Canada just raised their top tax rate to 66%. Wonder if he would approve?
He just sold the Mavs for a huge profit. Geez!$288,000,000 paid in taxes in one year. That is $287,999,000 more than your poor, worthless ass will pay in your lifetime.
Link?
Looks like the top federal rate is 33%. Provinces add another 12-21% to the top rate though. Still the highest combined marginal rate is about 54%, or 10% higher than my combined marginal rate in South Carolina.
Not sure how you get to 66% though.
Income tax rates for individuals - Canada.ca
Information on income tax rates in Canada including federal rates and those rates specific to provinces and territories.www.canada.ca
News came out late yesterday afternoon. And it is capital gains tax, which maxes out around 28% here in the USA I think? (Short term Capital Gain + Obamacare tax = roughly 28% i think)
"Under the new measure, people realizing capital tax gains of more than C$250,000 ($180,804) will pay tax on the excess at a rate of 66.7%, up from 50% at present. Similarly, all capital gains realised by companies and trusts will be taxed at 66.7%."
I'm curious if our resident lefites would supports a 66% capital gains rate here in the US?Yikes! That is completely ridiculous. And to think, all to pay for socialist dreams like single payer healthcare. In my other thread, Canada’s healthcare system was shown to be quite poor, resulting in lower healthcare access then most other advanced countries.
Yes, for Trump voters only.I'm curious if our resident lefites would supports a 66% capital gains rate here in the US?
@dpic73
@nytigerfan
CriminalNews came out late yesterday afternoon. And it is capital gains tax, which maxes out around 28% here in the USA I think? (Short term Capital Gain + Obamacare tax = roughly 28% i think)
"Under the new measure, people realizing capital tax gains of more than C$250,000 ($180,804) will pay tax on the excess at a rate of 66.7%, up from 50% at present. Similarly, all capital gains realised by companies and trusts will be taxed at 66.7%."
A 66% effective rate on earnings over $180k? Absolutely not.I'm curious if our resident lefites would supports a 66% capital gains rate here in the US?
@dpic73
@nytigerfan
For what reason? So it can be wasted into the governmental black hole?A 66% effective rate on earnings over $180k? Absolutely not.
A 66% effective rate on earnings over $5mm/year? Yes, I have no issue with that.
A 66% effective rate on earnings over $180k? Absolutely not.
A 66% effective rate on earnings over $5mm/year? Yes, I have no issue with that.
I don't believe the government is efficient in their use of tax funds, but I do believe it is our duty as Americans to pay them. I think that an effective rate of 50% (which was their old figure) was sufficient, but honestly losing another $.16 of every dollar over $5mm to the taxman isn't going to upset me too much. At that point it's all just marginal.For what reason? So it can be wasted into the governmental black hole?
I suspect it's a product of the way I was raised. I come from a very upper class household, but my parents always instilled in me the concept that it's your duty to help those out who can't help themselves. If such a policy was enacted in the US, i'd be interested in seeing the allocation split between federal/state for the 66%, as I believe more value would come from state/local getting a larger share than federal.Why? Just from a fairness standpoint, it's simply wrong to have such a punitive tax on anyone.
I don't believe the government is efficient in their use of tax funds, but I do believe it is our duty as Americans to pay them. I think that an effective rate of 50% (which was their old figure) was sufficient, but honestly losing another $.16 of every dollar over $5mm to the taxman isn't going to upset me too much. At that point it's all just marginal.
I suspect it's a product of the way I was raised. I come from a very upper class household, but my parents always instilled in me the concept that it's your duty to help those out who can't help themselves. If such a policy was enacted in the US, i'd be interested in seeing the allocation split between federal/state for the 66%, as I believe more value would come from state/local getting a larger share than federal.
Don't get me wrong, I think the tax system is a catastrophe, and the gov't suffers from far too much inefficiency, bloat, and uncontrolled spending. I, unlike what seems to be 90% of the posters on the RT, don't have an issue with entitlements, though. Even if there are people abusing the system (which is undeniable), I take solace in knowing that there are people getting the help they need from my tax dollars.
Fairness isn't something I really care about. It's not fair that I grew up in a stable household in an affluent area with no worry about where my dinner was going to come from that night unlike so many others. It's not fair that I was able to focus on academics instead of working multiple jobs in HS so I could get a full ride to Clemson, unlike so many others. Those advantages gave me a leg up on so many other people, so if I have to pay a little bit more taxes because of it then I'll do it.
I wouldn't expect you to understand it. You've shown that you have the processing power of a goldfish.*Doesn't believe the government is efficient.
*Thinks the tax system is a catastrophe
*The Gov suffers from bloat, inefficiency and uncontrolled spending.
- Is OK with a 66 taxrate.
Make it make sense.
0/10I wouldn't expect you to understand it. You've shown that you have the processing power of a goldfish.
*Doesn't believe the government is efficient.
*Thinks the tax system is a catastrophe
*The Gov suffers from bloat, inefficiency and uncontrolled spending.
- Is OK with a 66 taxrate.
Make it make sense.
0/10
I run circles around you all day.
Moderate is 66% tax rate? Make it make sense!What it means is that he is a moderate, not an extremist like yourself.
Moderates know that the government is not perfect, and we would like to see modest reforms. You on the other hand, only see the extremes. You want to burn it all down, with no alternatives in place.
If catturd posts one story about someone taking advantage of the food stamps program, you want to burn it down. Moderates look at all of the good the program also does, and we want common sense reforms.
But when you see MTG borrowing hundreds of thousands of dollars from PPP loans while she is serving in congress and not paying it back, you will defend her all day.
Moderate is 66% tax rate? Make it make sense!
**No person should pay back their ppp loan. You are a fvcking idiot if you paid back your PPP loan.
I don't believe the government is efficient in their use of tax funds, but I do believe it is our duty as Americans to pay them. I think that an effective rate of 50% (which was their old figure) was sufficient, but honestly losing another $.16 of every dollar over $5mm to the taxman isn't going to upset me too much. At that point it's all just marginal.
I suspect it's a product of the way I was raised. I come from a very upper class household, but my parents always instilled in me the concept that it's your duty to help those out who can't help themselves. If such a policy was enacted in the US, i'd be interested in seeing the allocation split between federal/state for the 66%, as I believe more value would come from state/local getting a larger share than federal.
Don't get me wrong, I think the tax system is a catastrophe, and the gov't suffers from far too much inefficiency, bloat, and uncontrolled spending. I, unlike what seems to be 90% of the posters on the RT, don't have an issue with entitlements, though. Even if there are people abusing the system (which is undeniable), I take solace in knowing that there are people getting the help they need from my tax dollars.
Fairness isn't something I really care about. It's not fair that I grew up in a stable household in an affluent area with no worry about where my dinner was going to come from that night unlike so many others. It's not fair that I was able to focus on academics instead of working multiple jobs in HS so I could get a full ride to Clemson, unlike so many others. Those advantages gave me a leg up on so many other people, so if I have to pay a little bit more taxes because of it then I'll do it.
That is my point.There were a lot of people who lied their asses off to get PPP loans, they should absolutely pay them back.
That is my point.
If you paid back your PPP loan, the only thing you were doing is funding fraudsters. You were a fvcking idiot if you repaid your PPP loan. Not one person should have paid back their PPP loan.
The whole purpose of the PPP loan was to get cash into the hands of the people. The government desperately wanted you to have that money at the time. Pick a million other reasons to dislike MTG but that ain't one.
No argument here wrt charitable giving, but that's also why i stipulated local/state would be more beneficial than federal. My local tax money going to road improvement, public school funding (which shouldn't be based on local taxes, but that's a discussion for another day), high speed infrastructure, municipal LEO/firemen, etc I find to be more beneficial.I understand your perspective, but that is a very personal viewpoint. One better reflected in terms of voluntary charitable giving, not mandatory confiscation of someone’s earnings.
I'm not a fvcking idiot.Given what I know about your own lack of honor, I am not surprised by this take.
Serious question. How much more to you give to the treasury dept now above what you have to? If you truly feel like increased taxes are fair, why do you not already give what you think is fair?I don't believe the government is efficient in their use of tax funds, but I do believe it is our duty as Americans to pay them. I think that an effective rate of 50% (which was their old figure) was sufficient, but honestly losing another $.16 of every dollar over $5mm to the taxman isn't going to upset me too much. At that point it's all just marginal.
I suspect it's a product of the way I was raised. I come from a very upper class household, but my parents always instilled in me the concept that it's your duty to help those out who can't help themselves. If such a policy was enacted in the US, i'd be interested in seeing the allocation split between federal/state for the 66%, as I believe more value would come from state/local getting a larger share than federal.
Don't get me wrong, I think the tax system is a catastrophe, and the gov't suffers from far too much inefficiency, bloat, and uncontrolled spending. I, unlike what seems to be 90% of the posters on the RT, don't have an issue with entitlements, though. Even if there are people abusing the system (which is undeniable), I take solace in knowing that there are people getting the help they need from my tax dollars.
Fairness isn't something I really care about. It's not fair that I grew up in a stable household in an affluent area with no worry about where my dinner was going to come from that night unlike so many others. It's not fair that I was able to focus on academics instead of working multiple jobs in HS so I could get a full ride to Clemson, unlike so many others. Those advantages gave me a leg up on so many other people, so if I have to pay a little bit more taxes because of it then I'll do it.
This is a bad argument. You should reread my post because you clearly didn’t understand it. The whole “well why don’t you voluntarily pay more money!!” argument is something I’d expect from a child. I also never said it’s “fair” for others to pay higher amounts. That was a statement scotchtiger made that I was addressing.Serious question. How much more to you give to the treasury dept now above what you have to? If you truly feel like increased taxes are fair, why do you not already give what you think is fair?
This is what just baffles me whenever I hear a politician or voter support the govt taking more of our $$ from us in the name of fairness or duty. Have you just been willingly ignoring that duty or fairness all this time and are just waiting until someone(the govt) makes you fulfill that duty? It's such a disingenuous argument. You should already be giving whatever you think is "fair".
I can at least respect this take while not totally agreeing with it and I come from a very poor family. You explained your position and the reasoning behind it though in a believable way.I don't believe the government is efficient in their use of tax funds, but I do believe it is our duty as Americans to pay them. I think that an effective rate of 50% (which was their old figure) was sufficient, but honestly losing another $.16 of every dollar over $5mm to the taxman isn't going to upset me too much. At that point it's all just marginal.
I suspect it's a product of the way I was raised. I come from a very upper class household, but my parents always instilled in me the concept that it's your duty to help those out who can't help themselves. If such a policy was enacted in the US, i'd be interested in seeing the allocation split between federal/state for the 66%, as I believe more value would come from state/local getting a larger share than federal.
Don't get me wrong, I think the tax system is a catastrophe, and the gov't suffers from far too much inefficiency, bloat, and uncontrolled spending. I, unlike what seems to be 90% of the posters on the RT, don't have an issue with entitlements, though. Even if there are people abusing the system (which is undeniable), I take solace in knowing that there are people getting the help they need from my tax dollars.
Fairness isn't something I really care about. It's not fair that I grew up in a stable household in an affluent area with no worry about where my dinner was going to come from that night unlike so many others. It's not fair that I was able to focus on academics instead of working multiple jobs in HS so I could get a full ride to Clemson, unlike so many others. Those advantages gave me a leg up on so many other people, so if I have to pay a little bit more taxes because of it then I'll do it.
Mark "DEI" Cuban... ugh.Imagine an actual self made billionaire in office vs a fake billionaire game show host or a lifelong politician.
I’ve had Canadian friends for 30 years. They hate their healthcare system.Yikes! That is completely ridiculous. And to think, all to pay for socialist dreams like single payer healthcare. In my other thread, Canada’s healthcare system was shown to be quite poor, resulting in lower healthcare access then most other advanced countries.
Mark "DEI" Cuban... ugh.
It’s funny how the outrage around DEI and Woke is always from people who have no idea what these two terms mean.Mark Cuban = Successful Businessman
dumpy donny trump = failed businessman, many times over
It’s funny how the outrage around DEI and Woke is always from people who have no idea what these two terms mean.
That’s it. It’s their identity. It goes beyond team sports and actually defines who they are since they aren’t smart enough to think independently.Me watch fox news. me repeat what me see on fox news.
I don't believe the government is efficient in their use of tax funds, but I do believe it is our duty as Americans to pay them. I think that an effective rate of 50% (which was their old figure) was sufficient, but honestly losing another $.16 of every dollar over $5mm to the taxman isn't going to upset me too much. At that point it's all just marginal.
I suspect it's a product of the way I was raised. I come from a very upper class household, but my parents always instilled in me the concept that it's your duty to help those out who can't help themselves. If such a policy was enacted in the US, i'd be interested in seeing the allocation split between federal/state for the 66%, as I believe more value would come from state/local getting a larger share than federal.
Don't get me wrong, I think the tax system is a catastrophe, and the gov't suffers from far too much inefficiency, bloat, and uncontrolled spending. I, unlike what seems to be 90% of the posters on the RT, don't have an issue with entitlements, though. Even if there are people abusing the system (which is undeniable), I take solace in knowing that there are people getting the help they need from my tax dollars.
Fairness isn't something I really care about. It's not fair that I grew up in a stable household in an affluent area with no worry about where my dinner was going to come from that night unlike so many others. It's not fair that I was able to focus on academics instead of working multiple jobs in HS so I could get a full ride to Clemson, unlike so many others. Those advantages gave me a leg up on so many other people, so if I have to pay a little bit more taxes because of it then I'll do it.