ADVERTISEMENT

Nazi Enthusiast Harlan Crowe Bought Clarence Thomas

okclem

Woodrush
Gold Member
Apr 2, 2007
26,863
54,933
113
47
Greenville, SC
Hundreds of thousands of dollars in secret payments from far right mega donor to far right SC justice Thomas.
 
Last edited:
Hundreds of thousands of dollars in secret payments from liberal mega donor to liberal SC justice.

To be consistent I think giving her big dollars from George Soros is perfectly fine as the other 8 SCJ get the money along with hundreds if not thousands of elected government, appointed officials and the rest of the swamp in Washington and there is very little if anything I can do about it except join the corruption party oops I mean corruption parties of Democrats and Republicans

Both stink it up
 
  • Wow
Reactions: DW4_2016
To be consistent I think giving her big dollars from George Soros is perfectly fine as the other 8 SCJ get the money along with hundreds if not thousands of elected government, appointed officials and the rest of the swamp in Washington and there is very little if anything I can do about it except join the corruption party oops I mean corruption parties of Democrats and Republicans

Both stink it up
Well I'll be...
 
To be consistent I think giving her big dollars from George Soros is perfectly fine as the other 8 SCJ get the money along with hundreds if not thousands of elected government, appointed officials and the rest of the swamp in Washington and there is very little if anything I can do about it except join the corruption party oops I mean corruption parties of Democrats and Republicans

Both stink it up
You can absolutely do something. Stop voting for them.
 
lol "nazi enthusiast"...what an idiot. surprising that people so appalled by impropriety they allege would so liberally spew such an egregious lie. i guess he's also a "communism enthusiast", a "constitutional republic enthusiast", an "america enthusiast", an "art enthusiast", an "exploration enthusiast" etc...or...maybe he's just really into historical artifacts and history in general? it must be tough when the truth is so wildly incongruent with the narrative.

the obsession with clarence thomas is comical. you want to claim the nature of reporting for the supreme court is insufficient to prevent potential abuses? have that conversation. the problem with that is, it would include every justice. quite evidently, honest discourse isn't the goal. that's because it's not about principle or any genuine concern for the court, it's just a deceitful attempt to fulfill a deranged obsession with one individual on it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT