Never Forget
- Thread starter TigerRagRob
- Start date
"We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced Priestap's decision to open Crossfire Hurricane. The evidence also showed that FBI officials responsible for and involved in the case opening decisions were unanimous in their belief that, together with the July 2016 release by Wikileaks of hacked DNC emails, the Papadopoulos statement described in the FFG information reflected the Russian government's potential next step to interfere with the 2016 U.S. elections. These FBI officials were similarly unanimous in their belief that the FFG information represented a threat to national security that warranted further investigation by the FBI. Witnesses told us that they did not 349 recall observing during these discussions any instances or indications of improper motivations or political bias on the part of the participants."
Loading…
www.justice.gov
You link a 2019 document that was produced for a Blue Congress. Real investigation has proven otherwise. Get with the times.
FBI wrongly told its agents Trump-Russia collusion claims had come from DOJ, bombshell document reveals
FBI agents probing since-debunked claims of a secret back channel between Donald Trump and a Russian bank believed that the allegations had originated with the Department of Justice.
nypost.com
Desperate times call for desperate measures.You link a 2019 document that was produced for a Blue Congress. Real investigation has proven otherwise. Get with the times.
FBI wrongly told its agents Trump-Russia collusion claims had come from DOJ, bombshell document reveals
FBI agents probing since-debunked claims of a secret back channel between Donald Trump and a Russian bank believed that the allegations had originated with the Department of Justice.
This NYPost(lol) article from 2022 doesn't change what Durham said in his report. Please show me where he states the investigation was the result of political bias?You link a 2019 document that was produced for a Blue Congress. Real investigation has proven otherwise. Get with the times.
FBI wrongly told its agents Trump-Russia collusion claims had come from DOJ, bombshell document reveals
FBI agents probing since-debunked claims of a secret back channel between Donald Trump and a Russian bank believed that the allegations had originated with the Department of Justice.
Do do realize that that was a quote from the Durham Report, not a reference to whatever article you are talking about. That's Durham's own words... Look at them again:You link a 2019 document that was produced for a Blue Congress. Real investigation has proven otherwise. Get with the times.
FBI wrongly told its agents Trump-Russia collusion claims had come from DOJ, bombshell document reveals
FBI agents probing since-debunked claims of a secret back channel between Donald Trump and a Russian bank believed that the allegations had originated with the Department of Justice.
We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced Priestap's decision to open Crossfire Hurricane.
Again, Durham's OWN WORDs.
Not political to open it, but political to keep it open unnecessarily and against the agencies own rules.
That's fair, and you can critique that. But Durham is a lawyer... A US attorney for many years before being tapped for this investigation. Now he can CLAIM that the FBI didn't follow policy. He can CLAIM that it was politically kept open. That's fine. That's just a claim by an outsider who has never served as a Federal Agent or a Federal Judge and has no special expertise in either job. And remember, I Judge signed off on this as required by Federal Law.
But again. Durham was assigned to investigate and charge people that broke the law. And he came up empty.
he didn’t come up empty. The system is rigged so there was no prosecution. Laws were certainly broken.
Uh...no. He came up EMPTY. NADA. NOTHING. This was the "Crime of the Century". Trump himself called it that and Durham was the hand picked guy to put folks in jail for it. He had a grand jury to charge people and the option (which he took twice) to bring people to trial. You talking about Durham's report reminds me of this:
