ADVERTISEMENT

Nick Saban gets it

Still trying to figure out Schumer's strategy here:
  • Clear stigma of legislative failure after BBB was reduced, then killed
  • Bringing federal election bill to the floor that will surely be killed
  • Forcing purple state senators to vote on a change to the filibuster, which is unpopular in most states, and has been opposed in the past even by Biden and Schumer
  • Likely losing that vote as well, making it a really bad, really public losing streak while Biden enjoys a ~40% approval rating

What's the strategy here @iceheart08 ?
He also wanted to shame Manchin and Sinema by forcing them to record their votes for posterity.
 
The only bill I have paid attention to is the GA bill. It makes it legal for everyone to vote by mail without justification. I believe you simply have to request a ballot.

That's actually probably a left of center approach. Most on the right probably want to limit it more. I don't really care. A reasonable approach should be to prove who you are, request a certified ballot, complete the ballot and either mail it in or drop it off to a secure location. I don't think we should mass-mail ballots or allow people to print them out themselves. And I believe that is what the GA bill does.

Would you agree that approach is completely logical and the GA bill got it right?

As far as drop box restrictions, can't you, um, mail a mail-in ballot?

Who allows people to print ballots themselves?

But also, I am a strong advocate for statewide vote by mail schemes. We have one in Colorado, it's incredibly effective at broadening access to the ballot box.

Making people request an absentee ballot every cycle is a barrier that accomplishes no real policy goal. What's the reason for this? States clean up their voting rolls already and it just isn't the case that a whole bunch of people are receiving ballots that are for others and voting using them. That's not happening, so why are we devising policy solution for a problem that's not real?

People should be able to vote easily and securely. Drop boxes help facilitate that. What's the problem with drop boxes that are monitored? In Colorado, overwhelmingly, people use drop boxes to return their ballots. It's easy and secure. Again, why are we making it harder to vote for no benefit?
 
You're kidding right? Trump's unqualified mega-donor that he appointed to Postmaster General just in time to slow the mail down before the election?

FAKE NEWS related to any slowing down of the mail. Besides the dirty dems used trucks to transport tens of thousands of ballots across state lines among a lot of other dirty shit they pulled between 11/3 and 11/10.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
Who allows people to print ballots themselves?

But also, I am a strong advocate for statewide vote by mail schemes. We have one in Colorado, it's incredibly effective at broadening access to the ballot box.

Making people request an absentee ballot every cycle is a barrier that accomplishes no real policy goal. What's the reason for this? States clean up their voting rolls already and it just isn't the case that a whole bunch of people are receiving ballots that are for others and voting using them. That's not happening, so why are we devising policy solution for a problem that's not real?

People should be able to vote easily and securely. Drop boxes help facilitate that. What's the problem with drop boxes that are monitored? In Colorado, overwhelmingly, people use drop boxes to return their ballots. It's easy and secure. Again, why are we making it harder to vote for no benefit?
Thats according to you. There are a hell of a lot of others that said rampant cheating occurred in your beloved state.
 
FAKE NEWS related to any slowing down of the mail. Besides the dirty dems used trucks to transport tens of thousands of ballots across state lines among a lot of other dirty shit they pulled between 11/3 and 11/10.
Where is your proof? You know a grainy picture of a truck on the GWP with a caption alleging fraud is not proof right Mr. Growls? How do you explain all these thousands of illegal votes all across the country that you've been breathlessly bellowing about for the last year and a half? Thousands of people would have to be in cahoots to pull off this fantasy heist with nobody slipping up for a second. Surely SOMEONE would blow the whistle right? Surely SOMEONE would step forward to claim the big rewards that have been offered for proof of voter fraud right?

I know you'll go down swinging with these moronic allegations but you just look stupid when after all this time, you can't even give us one name of any of these thousands of conspirators. I mean us Dems are pretty smart but we're not cotdamn wizards!

Get a friggin life PLEEZ!
 
  • Like
Reactions: nytigerfan
Who allows people to print ballots themselves?

But also, I am a strong advocate for statewide vote by mail schemes. We have one in Colorado, it's incredibly effective at broadening access to the ballot box.

Making people request an absentee ballot every cycle is a barrier that accomplishes no real policy goal. What's the reason for this? States clean up their voting rolls already and it just isn't the case that a whole bunch of people are receiving ballots that are for others and voting using them. That's not happening, so why are we devising policy solution for a problem that's not real?

People should be able to vote easily and securely. Drop boxes help facilitate that. What's the problem with drop boxes that are monitored? In Colorado, overwhelmingly, people use drop boxes to return their ballots. It's easy and secure. Again, why are we making it harder to vote for no benefit?

Isn't printing the new rule, or proposed rule in CA?

A couple of things on all of this...

Remember that the constitution gives states the authority on this matter. We can wax on about what we "want" or "think" everyone should do, but the document that created the greatest country in the history of the world tells us who gets to decide. A reasonable person could suggest that people who do not pay net positive taxes shouldn't be allowed to cast a ballot that will lead to money being forcibly taken from another citizen and reallocated to themselves. But, we allow it because the constitution allows it.

The democrats are trying to change that document - and our system of government - in two ways: deciding voting policy at the federal level and removing the 60 vote threshold to pass legislation in the senate.

The shift in mail in balloting... As I have mentioned, I haven't followed all of these state bills. The only one I am familiar with is GA. Relative to non-pandemic elections, have these bills expanded or contracted mail-in voting? My understanding is that the GA bill expanded it.

That's a good thing, right?
 
Suppose it’s worth noting that a bipartisan majority rejected abolishing the filibuster, preserving the constitution’s legislative rules. So all of the discussion ITT is moot.

I am pretty sure than both Manchin and Sinema have stated publicly that they support the voter rights legislation, just not abolishing the filibuster. So the voting rights discussion in this thread are very legitimate. Let's also remember that democratic senators represent 40MM more AMERICANS than republicans do.

The democrats are trying to protect our elections at a Federal level. The republicans are trying - and have already succeeded - at changing elections and suppressing votes at the state level. Just look at the article I posted in this thread - Lincoln County in GA tossed dems off the country election commission, then shut down 6 of 7 polling locations in a county with very little public transportation. The justification? COVID. Yikes.

And you keep saying that GA has expanded mail in voting. THAT IS NOT TRUE.

In 2005, the year that Republicans gained control of state government after decades of Democratic domination, HB 244 was a 59-page bill that contained nearly 70 revisions of state election code, including two major changes: adding a photo ID requirement for in-person voting and allowing Georgians to vote by mail without an excuse, and without an ID.

Fast forward to 2021: There has been no evidence of widespread fraud with absentee-by-mail voting and, until the 2018 governor’s race, the relative few voters that used absentee ballots skewed older, whiter and more Republican.

A record number of Georgians participated in the November general election thanks in part to expanded voting rules and procedures pushed by Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Demographic changes and a surge in automatic voter registrations have shifted statewide politics to razor-thin margins, and Democrats took advantage of no-excuse absentee voting to flip the state’s electoral votes and both U.S. Senate seats.


In other words... No excuse - No ID absentee ballots were OK when it was old white people using them. Now that minorities are using them, not so much.
 
I am pretty sure than both Manchin and Sinema have stated publicly that they support the voter rights legislation, just not abolishing the filibuster. So the voting rights discussion in this thread are very legitimate. Let's also remember that democratic senators represent 40MM more AMERICANS than republicans do.

The democrats are trying to protect our elections at a Federal level. The republicans are trying - and have already succeeded - at changing elections and suppressing votes at the state level. Just look at the article I posted in this thread - Lincoln County in GA tossed dems off the country election commission, then shut down 6 of 7 polling locations in a county with very little public transportation. The justification? COVID. Yikes.

And you keep saying that GA has expanded mail in voting. THAT IS NOT TRUE.

In 2005, the year that Republicans gained control of state government after decades of Democratic domination, HB 244 was a 59-page bill that contained nearly 70 revisions of state election code, including two major changes: adding a photo ID requirement for in-person voting and allowing Georgians to vote by mail without an excuse, and without an ID.

Fast forward to 2021: There has been no evidence of widespread fraud with absentee-by-mail voting and, until the 2018 governor’s race, the relative few voters that used absentee ballots skewed older, whiter and more Republican.

A record number of Georgians participated in the November general election thanks in part to expanded voting rules and procedures pushed by Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Demographic changes and a surge in automatic voter registrations have shifted statewide politics to razor-thin margins, and Democrats took advantage of no-excuse absentee voting to flip the state’s electoral votes and both U.S. Senate seats.


In other words... No excuse - No ID absentee ballots were OK when it was old white people using them. Now that minorities are using them, not so much.
You are worried about Lincoln County? LOL!! What about Fulton and Dekalb County and the highway robbery that occurred? What about the ballot harvesting all over the state that occurred? There is video evidence and an official investigation finally occurring now. What about the total lack of signature verification on the mass mail in votes? Cry me a fricking bucket of tears with the weak stuff you just threw out...LOL!!
 
  • Wow
Reactions: DW4_2016
You are worried about Lincoln County? LOL!! What about Fulton and Dekalb County and the highway robbery that occurred? What about the ballot harvesting all over the state that occurred? There is video evidence and an official investigation finally occurring now. What about the total lack of signature verification on the mass mail in votes? Cry me a fricking bucket of tears with the weak stuff you just threw out...LOL!!

Thank you for illustrating the problem so perfectly.

@scotchtiger - see what is happening here? tigergrowls - a GA resident and avatar for the current republican party - is not even denying the voter suppression currently happening in Lincoln County. He is using election lies that have been audited and disproven multiple times to justify the voter suppression.

Once you Trumpublicans failed to falsely overturn the last election, you immediately pivoted to focusing on how you could steal the next one.
 
Thank you for illustrating the problem so perfectly.

@scotchtiger - see what is happening here? tigergrowls - a GA resident and avatar for the current republican party - is not even denying the voter suppression currently happening in Lincoln County. He is using election lies that have been audited and disproven multiple times to justify the voter suppression.

Once you Trumpublicans failed to falsely overturn the last election, you immediately pivoted to focusing on how you could steal the next one.
I did not deny or confirm Lincoln County.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: DW4_2016
I am pretty sure than both Manchin and Sinema have stated publicly that they support the voter rights legislation, just not abolishing the filibuster. So the voting rights discussion in this thread are very legitimate. Let's also remember that democratic senators represent 40MM more AMERICANS than republicans do.

The democrats are trying to protect our elections at a Federal level. The republicans are trying - and have already succeeded - at changing elections and suppressing votes at the state level. Just look at the article I posted in this thread - Lincoln County in GA tossed dems off the country election commission, then shut down 6 of 7 polling locations in a county with very little public transportation. The justification? COVID. Yikes.

And you keep saying that GA has expanded mail in voting. THAT IS NOT TRUE.

In 2005, the year that Republicans gained control of state government after decades of Democratic domination, HB 244 was a 59-page bill that contained nearly 70 revisions of state election code, including two major changes: adding a photo ID requirement for in-person voting and allowing Georgians to vote by mail without an excuse, and without an ID.

Fast forward to 2021: There has been no evidence of widespread fraud with absentee-by-mail voting and, until the 2018 governor’s race, the relative few voters that used absentee ballots skewed older, whiter and more Republican.

A record number of Georgians participated in the November general election thanks in part to expanded voting rules and procedures pushed by Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Demographic changes and a surge in automatic voter registrations have shifted statewide politics to razor-thin margins, and Democrats took advantage of no-excuse absentee voting to flip the state’s electoral votes and both U.S. Senate seats.


In other words... No excuse - No ID absentee ballots were OK when it was old white people using them. Now that minorities are using them, not so much.

Don't know enough about the Lincoln Co situation, but doesn't seem great on the surface. Those folks can still vote by mail with no excuse though, right?

Didn't know the GA history, thanks for sharing. So the bill simply added a very easy to achieve identification requirement to no-excuse mail voting. A requirement that seems to align with the democrat proposed federal legislation (ex. utility bill). I'm assuming - since the two pieces of legislation seem to be in agreement - that you and the democrat party agree with the GA bill's identification requirements?
 
Remember that the constitution gives states the authority on this matter. We can wax on about what we "want" or "think" everyone should do, but the document that created the greatest country in the history of the world tells us who gets to decide. A reasonable person could suggest that people who do not pay net positive taxes shouldn't be allowed to cast a ballot that will lead to money being forcibly taken from another citizen and reallocated to themselves. But, we allow it because the constitution allows it.

The democrats are trying to change that document - and our system of government - in two ways: deciding voting policy at the federal level and removing the 60 vote threshold to pass legislation in the senate.


"Republicans say they oppose the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act because it is an attempt on the part of Democrats to win elections in the future by “nationalizing” them, taking away the right of states to arrange their laws as they wish. Voting rights legislation is a “partisan power grab,” Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH) insists.

In fact, there is no constitutional ground for opposing the idea of Congress weighing in on federal elections. The U.S. Constitution establishes that “[t]he Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations.”

There is no historical reason to oppose the idea of voting rights legislation, either. Indeed, Congress weighed in on voting pretty dramatically in 1870, when it amended the Constitution itself for the fifteenth time to guarantee that “[t]he right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” In that same amendment, it provided that “[t]he Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.”

Also...

"In his speech in Harlem, Truman explained that “t is the duty of the State and local government to prevent such tragedies.” But, as he said in 1947, the federal government must “show the way.” We need not only “protection of the people against the Government, but protection of the people by the Government.”

Truman’s conversion came in the very early years of the Civil Rights Movement, which would soon become an intellectual, social, economic, and political movement conceived of and carried on by Black and Brown people and their allies in ways he could not have imagined in the 1940s.

But Truman laid a foundation for what came later. He recognized that a one-party state is not a democracy, that it enables the worst of us to torture and kill while the rest live in fear, and that “[t]he Constitutional guarantees of individual liberties and of equal protection under the laws clearly place on the Federal Government the duty to act when state or local authorities abridge or fail to protect these Constitutional rights.”

That was true in 1946, and it is just as true today."
 
Last edited:
  • Sad
Reactions: DW4_2016
You are worried about Lincoln County? LOL!! What about Fulton and Dekalb County and the highway robbery that occurred? What about the ballot harvesting all over the state that occurred? There is video evidence and an official investigation finally occurring now. What about the total lack of signature verification on the mass mail in votes? Cry me a fricking bucket of tears with the weak stuff you just threw out...LOL!!
Sigh


 
  • Wow
Reactions: DW4_2016
Don't know enough about the Lincoln Co situation, but doesn't seem great on the surface. Those folks can still vote by mail with no excuse though, right?

Didn't know the GA history, thanks for sharing. So the bill simply added a very easy to achieve identification requirement to no-excuse mail voting. A requirement that seems to align with the democrat proposed federal legislation (ex. utility bill). I'm assuming - since the two pieces of legislation seem to be in agreement - that you and the democrat party agree with the GA bill's identification requirements?

So the bill simply added a very easy to achieve identification requirement to no-excuse mail voting.

Really? So lets take Lincoln County as an example. I looked it up, and in addition to having now one polling location, it also has one DMV. SO again, not exactly easy for someone without a license to go and get a picture ID. Not sure if you have been to a DMV recently, but if you can get there it aint exactly easy to do anything there.

So lets just call this what it is. Republicans are trying to make it harder for people to vote that likely wont vote for them. Can you really deny that statement at this point?
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: DW4_2016 and dpic73
So the bill simply added a very easy to achieve identification requirement to no-excuse mail voting.

Really? So lets take Lincoln County as an example. I looked it up, and in addition to having now one polling location, it also has one DMV. SO again, not exactly easy for someone without a license to go and get a picture ID. Not sure if you have been to a DMV recently, but if you can get there it aint exactly easy to do anything there.

So lets just call this what it is. Republicans are trying to make it harder for people to vote that likely wont vote for them. Can you really deny that statement at this point?

Will reply more thoroughly later. They don't need to go to a DMV. They can also use a utility bill, or even simply state their DOB and last 4 of their SSN. Literally zero effort to do the latter. It's wild that anyone sees that as a barrier, and amazing how incompetent you must think these people are.
 
Last edited:
how about we fix existing real issues first and then work on the made up fantasy land problems you read about on fox news and GWP?
"Real issues?" What real issues are there. If you are an American citizen, not a felon, have registered to vote....you can vote. Pretty friggin' easy. If you are too stupid to figure out how to vote.....you shouldn't be voting anyway.
 
Will reply more thoroughly later. They don't need to go to a DMV. They can also use a utility bill, or even simply state their DOB and last 4 of their SSN. Literally zero effort to do the latter. It's wild that anyone sees that as a barrier, and amazing how incompetent you must think these people are.

I think your information is wrong. At the very least they have to provide a voter ID card to vote. This is from the GA SOS website:

WHAT IDS ARE ACCEPTABLE?​

  • Any valid state or federal government issued photo ID, including a free ID Card issued by your county registrar's office or the Georgia Department of Driver Services (DDS)
  • A Georgia Driver's License, even if expired
  • Valid employee photo ID from any branch, department, agency, or entity of the U.S. Government, Georgia, or any county, municipality, board, authority or other entity of this state
  • Valid U.S. passport ID
  • Valid U.S. military photo ID
  • Valid tribal photo ID
Bring one of these six forms of identification to vote.

GEORGIA'S VOTER IDENTIFICATION CARD​

If you do not have one of the six acceptable forms of photo ID, the State of Georgia offers a free ID Card. An ID card can be issued at any county registrar's office or Department of Driver Services Office free of charge.

To receive a voter identification card, the voter must provide:

  • A photo identity document or approved non-photo identity document that includes full legal name and date of birth
  • Documentation showing the voter's date of birth
  • Evidence that the applicant is a registered voter
  • Documentation showing the applicant's name and residential address
 
Sigh


That was not a legitimate audit and thats already been long conclusively established. That audit was like asking the fox who ate the chickens.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: nytigerfan
I think your information is wrong. At the very least they have to provide a voter ID card to vote. This is from the GA SOS website:

WHAT IDS ARE ACCEPTABLE?​

  • Any valid state or federal government issued photo ID, including a free ID Card issued by your county registrar's office or the Georgia Department of Driver Services (DDS)
  • A Georgia Driver's License, even if expired
  • Valid employee photo ID from any branch, department, agency, or entity of the U.S. Government, Georgia, or any county, municipality, board, authority or other entity of this state
  • Valid U.S. passport ID
  • Valid U.S. military photo ID
  • Valid tribal photo ID
Bring one of these six forms of identification to vote.

GEORGIA'S VOTER IDENTIFICATION CARD​

If you do not have one of the six acceptable forms of photo ID, the State of Georgia offers a free ID Card. An ID card can be issued at any county registrar's office or Department of Driver Services Office free of charge.

To receive a voter identification card, the voter must provide:

  • A photo identity document or approved non-photo identity document that includes full legal name and date of birth
  • Documentation showing the voter's date of birth
  • Evidence that the applicant is a registered voter
  • Documentation showing the applicant's name and residential address
This is just a little part of what we are dealing with in Fulton County alone. This chick is like the State AG in NY who is seen on video before she was even elected guaranteeing to find any crime possible committed by Donald Trump.

We all know this is a joke btw. The call from Trump to Raffenspuke is public knowledge. This is like when they tried to perpetrate impeachment number 2.

 
I think your information is wrong. At the very least they have to provide a voter ID card to vote. This is from the GA SOS website:

WHAT IDS ARE ACCEPTABLE?​

  • Any valid state or federal government issued photo ID, including a free ID Card issued by your county registrar's office or the Georgia Department of Driver Services (DDS)
  • A Georgia Driver's License, even if expired
  • Valid employee photo ID from any branch, department, agency, or entity of the U.S. Government, Georgia, or any county, municipality, board, authority or other entity of this state
  • Valid U.S. passport ID
  • Valid U.S. military photo ID
  • Valid tribal photo ID
Bring one of these six forms of identification to vote.

GEORGIA'S VOTER IDENTIFICATION CARD​

If you do not have one of the six acceptable forms of photo ID, the State of Georgia offers a free ID Card. An ID card can be issued at any county registrar's office or Department of Driver Services Office free of charge.

To receive a voter identification card, the voter must provide:

  • A photo identity document or approved non-photo identity document that includes full legal name and date of birth
  • Documentation showing the voter's date of birth
  • Evidence that the applicant is a registered voter
  • Documentation showing the applicant's name and residential address

I’m certainly no expert, but here’s what I see:
  • There was already an ID requirement in GA. This bill just extended it to absentee voting.
  • Strait from the article below: When a voter returns an absentee ballot, he or she can also provide the last four digits of their Social Security number in place of an ID number.
  • https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/georgia-voting-law-9-facts/#app
  • Keep in mind, picture IDs are completely free and also a completely reasonable requirement for something like voting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
I’m certainly no expert, but here’s what I see:
  • There was already an ID requirement in GA. This bill just extended it to absentee voting.
  • Strait from the article below: When a voter returns an absentee ballot, he or she can also provide the last four digits of their Social Security number in place of an ID number.
  • https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/georgia-voting-law-9-facts/#app
  • Keep in mind, picture IDs are completely free and also a completely reasonable requirement for something like voting.

What I posted was directly from the GA SOS website. But it doesnt really matter.

If you are naive enough to believe that after the shellacking they just took that republicans are really trying to expand voting and make it easier for minorities to vote... yikes.
 
FAKE NEWS related to any slowing down of the mail. Besides the dirty dems used trucks to transport tens of thousands of ballots across state lines among a lot of other dirty shit they pulled between 11/3 and 11/10.
So the bill simply added a very easy to achieve identification requirement to no-excuse mail voting.

Really? So lets take Lincoln County as an example. I looked it up, and in addition to having now one polling location, it also has one DMV. SO again, not exactly easy for someone without a license to go and get a picture ID. Not sure if you have been to a DMV recently, but if you can get there it aint exactly easy to do anything there.

So lets just call this what it is. Republicans are trying to make it harder for people to vote that likely wont vote for them. Can you really deny that statement at this point?
So the bill simply added a very easy to achieve identification requirement to no-excuse mail voting.
Really? So lets take Lincoln County as an example. I looked it up, and in addition to having now one polling location, it also has one DMV. SO again, not exactly easy for someone without a license to go and get a picture ID. Not sure if you have been to a DMV recently, but if you can get there it aint exactly easy to do anything there.

So lets just call this what it is. Republicans are trying to make it harder for people to vote that likely wont vote for them. Can you really deny that statement at this point?
Poor example by choosing Lincoln County. You should look at the the total population 18+ years of age and compare to the number who voted in 2020. Also, President Trump had 68% of the vote. If you choose to do some research, you will see that this goes against your argument.
 
"Real issues?" What real issues are there. If you are an American citizen, not a felon, have registered to vote....you can vote. Pretty friggin' easy. If you are too stupid to figure out how to vote.....you shouldn't be voting anyway.
The disputed ballots in 2020 represent just 0.15% of Biden's victory margin in the contested states.

.15% of the victory margin let alone the actual electorate.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Cocks are Number 1
What I posted was directly from the GA SOS website. But it doesnt really matter.

If you are naive enough to believe that after the shellacking they just took that republicans are really trying to expand voting and make it easier for minorities to vote... yikes.

I didn’t say they were trying to make it easier for minorities to vote. It’s already easy.
 
I didn’t say they were trying to make it easier for minorities to vote. It’s already easy.

fact. If we make voting too easy for our citizens, republicans lose. Times are a changing. There is nothing less democratic than making it hard for your citizens to vote. Sad!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Cocks are Number 1
fact. If we make voting too easy for our citizens, republicans lose. Times are a changing. There is nothing less democratic than making it hard for your citizens to vote. Sad!

Tell us exactly how we need to make it easier for people to vote Einstein if you have the nads to come up with some story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dmk
fact. If we make voting too easy for our citizens, republicans lose. Times are a changing. There is nothing less democratic than making it hard for your citizens to vote. Sad!

But again, we’re not making it hard for citizens to vote. That’s the whole crux of your position and it’s not true. It’s very very easy to vote.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT