Pennsylvania House Report Shows Over 200,000 Erroneous Votes in Presidential Election

[TigerGrowls]

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/penns...000-erroneous-votes-in-presidential-election/

The fix is in.

Published 1 hour ago on Dec 28, 2020 By Shane Trejo

A report from Pennsylvania House Republicans has indicated that there were over 200,000 erroneous votes cast during the 2020 presidential election.


Trending: Dr. Anthony Fauci Admits He Has Been Deliberately Lying to the American Public Throughout COVID-19 Pandemic
“A group of state lawmakers performing extensive analysis of election data today revealed troubling discrepancies between the numbers of total votes counted and total number of voters who voted in the 2020 General Election, and as a result are questioning how the results of the presidential election could possibly have been certified by Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar and Governor Tom Wolf,” the Pennsylvania House Republicans wrote in a letter.
“These findings are in addition to prior concerns regarding actions by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Secretary, and others impacting the conduct of the election,” they added.
The analysis from the Pennsylvania House Republicans shows that there were 6,962,607 ballots cast while there were only 6,760,230 individuals who voted. They performed this analysis by comparing Department of State data with records from the DoS/SURE system.
“The difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting, together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race, adds up to an alarming discrepancy of 170,830 votes, which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between the two major candidates for President of the United States,” they wrote.
Big League Politics reported on how Democrat officials in Pennsylvania bragged about how President Trump could not win the state shortly before the election steal took place:

Pennsylvania attorney general Josh Shapiro is boasting that President Donald Trump can no longer win the state because of unprecedented measures Democrats have put into place to sway the election.
“If all the votes are added up in PA, Trump is going to lose. That’s why he’s working overtime to subtract as many votes as possible from this process,” Shapiro wrote in a tweet.
“For the record, he’s 0-6 against us in court. We’ve protected voting rights. Now, ignore the noise—vote!” he added…
Shapiro made the comments in response to Trump’s remarks at a massive Pennsylvania rally on Sunday.
“You wait and very bad things can happen with ballots,” Trump said.
“November 3rd is going to come and go and we’re not gonna know and you’re gonna have bedlam in our country,” the president added.
Big League Politics has reported on how the Democrat vote steal in Pennsylvania is especially blatant, after the state supreme court allowed Democrats to count mail-in votes that are submitted for many days after election day.

The vote steal is the worst crime in U.S. history, and the massive cover-up is something straight out of the Orwellian Nightmare.

 

[clemsontiger02]

Rinse and repeat. Right, OP? Can't wait to see the next "game changer" that you fall for.

 

[hopefultiger13]

A quick question here. How many "Gamechangers", "Smoking Guns" , "Bombshells", <insert spin word here> has OP brought up over the past 4 years and especially since the election? How many times has he told us that THIS would change everything? And how many times has he been right? I'd say that his win record is about the same as Trump and his legal team... about 1-59.

So once again, we ask ourselves about the above "proof". It's been damn near two months since the election. We keep hearing about this "evidence" and yet when Trump's legal team gets in front of a judge of ANY political leaning, the case gets laughed out of court.

I'd suggest that the answer is this: When folks are in front of the cameras and are doing hearings... they can say whatever they want. The truth doesn't matter. BUT if you testify in court, you'd best have your ducks in a row. Lawyers can't lie to the judge they can get disbarred for that. Witnesses can't either. That's perjury. Big difference...

So if the Penn State Republicans have "found" this "evidence", why haven't they done anything with it? It's been two months. The answer is that they can cry, piss, and moan all they want (not unlike OP), and sound like they are supporting Trump. BUT the shit gets REAL fast when you are under oath. THAT'S why all these folks aren't going to court, because they got NOTHING.

Ah yes.. let's not forget OP's sources which we should continue to heap scorn on:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate Big League Politics Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies as well as numerous failed fact checks.