ADVERTISEMENT

Pollster: It's Curious How Biden Underperformed Hillary Clinton In Every City...Except These Four.

TigerGrowls

Woodrush
Gold Member
Dec 21, 2001
30,466
20,850
113
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...yes-i-think-this-election-was-stolen-n2579970

Matt Vespa
|
@mvespa1
|
Posted: Nov 14, 2020 8:45 PM

ecdebb69-02a6-4822-b537-8a0afa6bf8c9.jpg


Source: AP Photo/Andrew Harnik
Until all the votes are counted and all the allegations of voter fraud are investigated, I think it’s too early to declare a winner in the 2020 race. You keep fighting. For now, the legal challenges are hitting snags in the courts. Still, President Trump should keep fighting to the end. We have dead people voting. We have allegations of ballots being illegally backdated. Everything should be looked at right now.

Was this election stolen? Well, millions feel that way. The turnout numbers are odd in some states, like Wisconsin, which hit 89 percent. Now, is that figure impossible? No. Wall Street Journal’s Kimberley Strassel did the math, but it’s highly improbable given the turnout rates in the surrounding areas. It would require 900,000 people showing up for same-day registrations. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was blunter last Sunday, when he said, “I think he would have to do a lot to convince Republicans that this is anything except a left-wing power grab, financed by people like George Soros, deeply laid in at the local level, and, frankly, I think that it is a corrupt, stolen election.” He was commenting on Biden’s call for unity. Yet, he also gave a hat-tip to someone we have written about here: Democracy Institute’s Patrick Basham.

“We believe these people are thieves, we believe the big city machines are corrupt,” the former House Speaker said. “Interestingly Patrick Basham, who's the most accurate pollster, he's British, wrote in a British newspaper...that this clearly was a stolen election, that it is impossible to imagine that Biden outran Obama in some of these states.”
Indeed, Basham quoted Joseph Stalin’s remarks about elections, where the Soviet dictator mentioned something about how it’s not important who votes but how they are counted, which appears to ring “eerily true” with this race. Basham has more in his piece in the Sunday Express, where he first highlighted how his data was again on the money regarding Democratic turnout, the shy Trump vote, and how the president’s law and order approach prevented catastrophic bleeding with suburban women voters. Suburban white women and urban black males were the shy Trump voters of this year. The president drew 10 million new supporters in 2020. He also took aim at the 2020 pollsters as a whole this cycle as well.
“If you count the ballot fraud, most pollsters clearly failed. If you don’t include the fraudulent ballots, most pollsters failed on a spectacular scale,” wrote Basham. Yet, here’s where things get fishy in the 2020 race which he mentions at the end of his column. He cites Richard Baris of Big Data Poll who noted something funny about Biden's numbers in the cities, how it lagged behind Clinton's numbers, but shot off to the moon in these four cities. Just take a look at the states in which these cities are located as well:
Recommended
Here's How Small the House Democratic Majority Will Be Next Year. Have That Advil Ready, Nancy
Matt Vespa
How curious that, as Baris notes, “Trump won the largest non-white vote share for a Republican presidential candidate in 60 years. Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton in every major metro area around the country, save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia.”
Robert Barnes, the foremost election analyst, observes in these “big cities in swing states run by Democrats…the vote even exceeded the number of registered voters.”
Trump’s victories in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin were on target until, in the middle of the night, counting was arbitrarily halted. Miraculously, several hundred thousand votes – all for Biden – were mysteriously ‘found’; Trump’s real leads subsequently vanished.
The protracted, eventual outcome will determine the contemporary relevance of Stalin’s observation. No matter who wins, most pollsters already have lost their credibility and influence.
Trump is still very much in 'Hail Mary' territory regarding pulling this out, but it’s no longer about this election. It’s about the next one. If Democrats can get away with these shenanigans this year, do you think they’ll stop?
I think you all know the answer to that question. You all know the kind of left-wing scum we’re dealing with here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 92TigerME
ev·i·dence
/ˈevədəns/
noun
  1. the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
I'll use it in a sentence for you.

Trump has no evidence of any widespread election tampering.
 
Why don't you try to find something from a reputable source? Like the election groups in these states. There are PLENTY of them that are Republican. Maybe some courtroom findings where this stuff is put before a judge. Hell, I'd take some FoxNews (their news anchors... not Trump butt sniffer Hannety) Guys, I know that you aren't going to believe this, BUT:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.


  • Overall, we rate Townhall Right Biased and Questionable based on consistent one-sided reporting that always favors the right and numerous failed fact checks.
 
Lolololol

Biden outperformed Hillary in almost every major metro area in the country.

From the UBER LIBERAL national review.


Are you telling me that one of Tigergrowl's sources that he claims are doing good work would publish something that's not only total BULLSHIT, but so easily refutable. I am SURE that is news to him. In the interest of fairness... Here's the media fact check on the National Review. Yep, It's a baston of Hillary/Biden loving snowflakes alright...

RIGHT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

  • Overall, we rate the National Review Right Biased based on story selection that always favors the right and Mostly Factual in reporting due to a few misleading claims and occasional use of poor sources and one failed fact check.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
Everyone knows what happened in Detroit, Philadelphia, Milwaukie and Atlanta.

They filled in ballots for Biden with no signatures. It was a massive scam.

Also, just in.



 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Everyone knows what happened in Detroit, Philadelphia, Milwaukie and Atlanta.

They filled in ballots for Biden with no signatures. It was a massive scam.

Also, just in.





Not gonna have much to talk about when this has already been certified. Isn't Trump 0-24 in court cases? You would think with all of this obvious fraud happening they'd be able to win some court cases.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT