ADVERTISEMENT

Ranked Choice Voting

iceheart08

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Sep 2, 2005
14,125
23,647
113
Party Primarys are broken. can we agree on that? are Jungle primaries then RCV general elections the solution (the alaska Model)?

 
  • Like
Reactions: nytigerfan
Party Primarys are broken. can we agree on that? are Jungle primaries then RCV general elections the solution (the alaska Model)?

I honestly don't understand any objections to Ranked Choice voting.

I think our current primary voting favors the extremes on both sides.

For example with Bernie Sanders. If only 30% of Dem's agree with him (which means 15% of total voters), but the more moderate or centric dems are still in the primary, Bernie wins a lot of primary votes, despite being the last choice of the other 70% of Dems who were more even split amongst the various other more centric options. So Bernie is competitive despite the majority of Dems not agreeing with his policies, but the people that do ONLY vote for him. The 70% probably have lots of crossover policies and people just vote on who they like, agree with the most, have the best hair, etc.
 
I honestly don't understand any objections to Ranked Choice voting.

I think our current primary voting favors the extremes on both sides.

For example with Bernie Sanders. If only 30% of Dem's agree with him (which means 15% of total voters), but the more moderate or centric dems are still in the primary, Bernie wins a lot of primary votes, despite being the last choice of the other 70% of Dems who were more even split amongst the various other more centric options. So Bernie is competitive despite the majority of Dems not agreeing with his policies, but the people that do ONLY vote for him. The 70% probably have lots of crossover policies and people just vote on who they like, agree with the most, have the best hair, etc.

the opposition is from the parties and those benefiting from the status quo.
 
I honestly don't understand any objections to Ranked Choice voting.

I think our current primary voting favors the extremes on both sides.

For example with Bernie Sanders. If only 30% of Dem's agree with him (which means 15% of total voters), but the more moderate or centric dems are still in the primary, Bernie wins a lot of primary votes, despite being the last choice of the other 70% of Dems who were more even split amongst the various other more centric options. So Bernie is competitive despite the majority of Dems not agreeing with his policies, but the people that do ONLY vote for him. The 70% probably have lots of crossover policies and people just vote on who they like, agree with the most, have the best hair, etc.
Yeah ranked choice makes a lot of sense and would absolutely result in more moderate politicians holding office. It’s effectively a way for the US to create a 3rd party without actually creating a 3rd party.
 
  • Love
Reactions: UrHuckleberry
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT