Got a very small bit of what he richly deserves. Hopefully a lot more on the way. Schitty is branded now.
We have you on record and that is safe to say. If Trump does not go to jail then you will have to change your handle before this is all over to escape the shit that will be heaped.Trump is going to jail.
If I didn't know better, I'd believe you don't think he should be convicted of these crimes that are a threat to our national security. But that can't be true since you're in the party of law and order.Trump ain’t going to jail. If the case was in NYC or DC he would go to jail. The jury pool in Miami will not convict him.
Yes they will, but at least you admit a Maga jury pool has far less respect for the rule of law.Trump ain’t going to jail. If the case was in NYC or DC he would go to jail. The jury pool in Miami will not convict him.
Disagree. I have faith in our jury system by and large. Not that they get it right 100% of the time, but mostly they do. I believe that a jury with some Trump supporters in it can come to a just decision. Likewise, I think a jury with some Trump haters in it can do likewise. The whole point is to set your personal feelings aside, look at the evidence, and make a fair decision that everyone on the jury can agree with.Trump ain’t going to jail. If the case was in NYC or DC he would go to jail. The jury pool in Miami will not convict him.
My God! Schifty got Durham to straight up admit that Russia hacked Hillary's servers at Trump's request, and that it benefitted the Trump campaign. Dude's a wizard...no wonder Marjorie Taylor and the other magas have such a hard on for him.
I watched and listened to the exact exchange I'm talking about. I'm going to assume that you didn't. Is that correct?Please tell me that you don’t really believe what you just wrote
I gave you more credit than that
Guess I will have to reappraise as that is so funny and bizarre you think that actually occurred
“The whole point is to set your personal feelings aside, look at the evidence, and make a fair decision that everyone on the jury can agree with.”Disagree. I have faith in our jury system by and large. Not that they get it right 100% of the time, but mostly they do. I believe that a jury with some Trump supporters in it can come to a just decision. Likewise, I think a jury with some Trump haters in it can do likewise. The whole point is to set your personal feelings aside, look at the evidence, and make a fair decision that everyone on the jury can agree with.
That's funny because past Republican AGs who've looked at the evidence say it's a slam dunk. Maybe you're just talking about the Pubs with no integrity, like yourself?“The whole point is to set your personal feelings aside, look at the evidence, and make a fair decision that everyone on the jury can agree with.”
Do you think the juries in NYC or DC would do this? A political indictment will be met with a political verdict. No Republican who has been paying attention would vote to convict Trump. You only need 1 out of 12.
Okay, fine, so Bill Barr was Trump's personal choice for Attorney General. And I'll give you that the Attorney General is the highest ranking law enforcement official in the U.S. But after that, your argument is just textbook, baseless, woke, bud light communism.That's funny because past Republican AGs who've looked at the evidence say it's a slam dunk. Maybe you're just talking about the Pubs with no integrity, like yourself?
Unfortunately there's moreOkay, fine, so Bill Barr was Trump's personal choice for Attorney General. And I'll give you that the Attorney General is the highest ranking law enforcement official in the U.S. But after that, your argument is just textbook, baseless, woke, bud light communism.
Let's challenge ourselves by trying to find one who doesn't think this.Unfortunately there's more
Opinion: As a former AG, I know why Trump’s defenders are wrong
Opinion by Alberto Gonzales
We can add other, former Trump officials as wellLet's challenge ourselves by trying to find one who doesn't think this.
At this point, it's a matter of saving face for the Republicans who think their reputations are salvageable. Once these debates start up, and they keep getting asked hard questions about Trump's crimes, they're going to start jumping ship. They just can't all do it at once because that would be an admission that they've all been on the wrong side of this the entire time. They have to let their constituents come to terms with it all first. This is the way they turn on Trump without having to worry about being primaried.We can add other, former Trump officials as well
'Devastating': Current and former officials shocked over military secrets found at Mar-a-Lago
The material in the former president’s possession include information on U.S. nuclear programs, according to an indictment.www.politico.com
I am fully convinced that there are pools of leftists in DC and NYC that are registered as repubs that they can stack a jury with if/ when they want to.“The whole point is to set your personal feelings aside, look at the evidence, and make a fair decision that everyone on the jury can agree with.”
Do you think the juries in NYC or DC would do this? A political indictment will be met with a political verdict. No Republican who has been paying attention would vote to convict Trump. You only need 1 out of 12.
We should all be afraid if you have a lick of sense. Do you think he has a good record in personnel management? What do you think he cares about more - competency or ass kissing?I am fully convinced that there are pools of leftists in DC and NYC that are registered as repubs that they can stack a jury with if/ when they want to.
People in DC also may be afraid that Trump puts them out of a job if he gets reelected by mass firing of the career activists up there making out like bandits.