ADVERTISEMENT

Someone help me out with the freak out over the steel/aluminum deal?

But this hurts American consumers who the price will be passed along to (assuming they stay in business)
Honest question... What has Trump did so far that has hurt your (or America's) wallet?

I'll hang up & listen...
 
Yeah.. the fact that china puts a 25% tariff on autos from the US and our tariff is 5% seems completely sane to me...Europe has tons of tariffs on US products. Trump did it to get some attention to "real trade practices."

Oh, and the people that are saying it will be a 50% increase to steel need to do the math along with the guys spouting off about autos.

Maybe we should just let them make cheap cars with cheap steel and aluminum in China and then we can tax it 5%.

Bingo. I don't understand why no one talks about this. When you compare the rates on our tariffs versus what the rest of the world has on our products it's crazy. China is 3 and 4x. Even Canada and Mexico. That's why he wants to renegotiate our trade deals. Free trade works when all parties play by the rules, which is not what we have now.
 
Signed a tax bill written by a bunch of republicans that forgot what the word conservative means and basically makes them no better than democrats at putting this country into enormousness amounts of debt?

We have a spending problem ie entitlements. Our corporate tax rates were/are much higher than the rest of the developed world. Why should productive citizens be forced to foot the bill? Tax cuts are already finding their way into back into people's pockets. The one's who are actually contributing. Last I checked that's one of the main tenants of conservatism.
 
We have a spending problem ie entitlements. Our corporate tax rates were/are much higher than the rest of the developed world. Why should productive citizens be forced to foot the bill? Tax cuts are already finding their way into back into people's pockets. The one's who are actually contributing. Last I checked that's one of the main tenants of conservatism.
you are right, but nothing is being done to address spending by either party
 
Im referencing the Reuters article I linked on page 1. Zero chance they are the only ones.

No, absolutely not. But do you think our government won’t be able to buy as much steel as they won’t at anytime? It’s not like domestic steel is failing..it just doesn’t have the comparative advantage other countries do. Also, a lot of other countries would gladly cash in on the US needing their steel in a time of war.

I mean, we even traded food to Russia in exchange for aluminum (that we used to make bombers to kill Russians) during the Cold War.
 
I'll explain it like you're 5.

We lose $5 on the trade of steel, but make $10 on the back end when the companies pay their taxes via increased revenue.
You approach economics like you're 5. You're not considering broader impacts. Look up the broken window fallacy.

I encourage anyone looking to get a quick crash course on economics to read Thomas Sowell's Basic Economics.
 
You approach economics like you're 5. You're not considering broader impacts. Look up the broken window fallacy.

I encourage anyone looking to get a quick crash course on economics to read Thomas Sowell's Basic Economics.
I do economics for a living.
 
We are doing something... we need inflation so the dollars we are saving are worthless.. welcome to 1920’s Germany

Inflation cuts both ways. Hate to be retiring today looking at higher long term inflation rates with just a 401k and an underfunded social security system. Cat food or tuna fish?
 
We have a spending problem ie entitlements. Our corporate tax rates were/are much higher than the rest of the developed world. Why should productive citizens be forced to foot the bill? Tax cuts are already finding their way into back into people's pockets. The one's who are actually contributing. Last I checked that's one of the main tenants of conservatism.
Into people's pockets? Only if you acknowledge that this is a loan that is going to come due one day.

An unfunded tax cut that drives even more debt represents a core tenant of conservatism? Absolutely ridiculous.

We as productive citizens should all be advocating for our representatives to stop spending money they don't have. Want to lower corporate tax rates? Cut the entitlements, cut the military spending. Hell you could come up with a decent tax cut strictly from ending the F-35 failure. Don't say you want to do it. Do it. Don't pass it off until later. Don't kick the can down the road. If you aren't willing to cut spending, you shouldn't get to cut taxes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1Clemson and MBRO
Inflation cuts both ways. Hate to be retiring today looking at higher long term inflation rates with just a 401k and an underfunded social security system. Cat food or tuna fish?

Inflation is devastating for those who have not saved. If you have hard assets it is not near as big a deal. It hurts the young without assets and the poor whether they be young or old.
 
Trump stated he was going to put America first and stop letting other countries, especially China be the beneficiary of these outrageous trade deals.

He may be just flexing his businessman muscle here and using this as a bigger play somewhere else. I, for one, hope he goes through with it.

If you hope Trump "goes through with it", well, guess what? You and Trump are basically acknowledging you both know ZERO about how trade works, especially when trade wars begin via tariffs and currency "valuation". The good 'ole US of A is in no bargaining position, at all. For an American President to spout nonsense about trade such as, "trade wars are good, and easy to win" proves, without a single doubt, we are dealing with a certified economic lunatic.

The current format, in layman's terms consists of this, we continually consume huge amounts of foreign produced goods on credit. If some moron (our President) wants to dramatically start increasing domestic prices while obtaining a VERY short term trade "advantage", then this is the perfect recipe for this trade "cake". There are no "winners" in currency devaluation and tariff wars, only losers. All of these actions will only usher in lower living standards, higher inflation, possible war, etc.. much quicker than if the President had just left things alone.
 
I just find this whole thing hilarious.

Republican response:
Porn Star--meh
Tariffs--what is a free market?
Freedom--we take the guns first, without due process--hahaha...

If Obama did this, Republicans response:
Porn Star--impeachment, payoff--investigate every single thing, etc etc etc
Tariffs--this is killing freedom, killing GDP, the end of the economy
Freedom--Obama is taking all your guns, destroying the constitution-hanging by a thread, revolt, impeach...

My moderate response:
Porn Star--dont care really, did he violate any laws--that I'd like to know, is he being bribed??
Tariffs-stupid policy if it isn't targeted and strategic (hint: Bush and Obama did the same thing but w/Obama it was just 9 countries with different levels of tariff based on the degree of dumping), not the end of the economy but the investor class won't like it at all...
Freedom: Yeah due process is important but the 2nd amendment isn't totally absolute just like the 1st amendment. All about striking a balance between individual rights and public safety.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rychek4
I just find this whole thing hilarious.

Republican response:
Porn Star--meh
Tariffs--what is a free market?
Freedom--we take the guns first, without due process--hahaha...

If Obama did this, Republicans response:
Porn Star--impeachment, payoff--investigate every single thing, etc etc etc
Tariffs--this is killing freedom, killing GDP, the end of the economy
Freedom--Obama is taking all your guns, destroying the constitution-hanging by a thread, revolt, impeach...

My moderate response:
Porn Star--dont care really, did he violate any laws--that I'd like to know, is he being bribed??
Tariffs-stupid policy if it isn't targeted and strategic (hint: Bush and Obama did the same thing but w/Obama it was just 9 countries with different levels of tariff based on the degree of dumping), not the end of the economy but the investor class won't like it at all...
Freedom: Yeah due process is important but the 2nd amendment isn't totally absolute just like the 1st amendment. All about striking a balance between individual rights and public safety.

The only issue with this analogy is there’s are more republicans in congress against the tariffs than in favor. Republicans on TI might be different. I’m definitely not in favor.
 
The only issue with this analogy is there’s are more republicans in congress against the tariffs than in favor. Republicans on TI might be different. I’m definitely not in favor.
I think this just highlights how fractured the Republican party is.
 
I think this just highlights how fractured the Republican party is.

I think it has a lot to do with the anti-globalist have not had a party represent them in half a century. And along comes a candidate who speaks their language. And wins the Republican Party. Next thing, a bunch of private union members and anti NAFTA Republicans led by Pat Robertson join forces and you have fracture.
 
The only issue with this analogy is there’s are more republicans in congress against the tariffs than in favor. Republicans on TI might be different. I’m definitely not in favor.


Very true. I'm thinking of some folks on here, but really the hard core Trump supporters (probably 30% of the country?? maybe that is too high?). It is interesting that the one area that Republicans have spoken out with some force is with regards to free trade. Morality--we will tolerate it if we are in power, but free trade is where it goes from tolerating the circus as an ends justify means deal to--wait a second, I thought this was all rhetoric to attract voters in the midwest.

Interesting times...
 
ADVERTISEMENT