ADVERTISEMENT

The Parliamentary Motive Behind the J6 Fedsurrection**Great Read**

TigerGrowls

Woodrush
Gold Member
Dec 21, 2001
20,849
12,117
113
Now we talking. This makes sense. Logical and concise.

Many more facts in this article but here is a highlight.
♦ Q3: What was so important to refuse this motion and the subsequent votes to suspend the electoral certification?
A: It was important to remove that process entirely and continue the fraud and certify the fraud with no detractors on record. This effectively gives no standing for a SCOTUS ruling appeal! Understand this. If those two motions, even just one had successfully been voted EVEN IF THE MOTIONS were DENIED IN VOTE, this gives those who presented them with STANDING FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL ARGUMENT BEFORE SCOTUS.


The people that perpetrated this abomination on our nation were very calculated and planned in what they did.



March 12, 2023 | Sundance | 1,588 Comments
The Ring of Truth – “I am too well accustomed to the taking of evidence not to detect the ring of truth.” 1908, Edith Wharton
Much has been made of the events of January 6, 2021, and with the latest broadcast of CCTV video from inside the Capitol Hill complex, more questions have been raised.
Within the questions: the FBI and government apparatus had advanced knowledge of the scale of the J6 mall assembly yet doing nothing? Why were the Capitol Hill police never informed of the FBI concerns? Why didn’t House Speaker Nancy Pelosi secure the Capitol Hill complex, and why did she deny the request by President Trump to call up the national guard for security support? Why did the FBI have agent provocateurs in the crowd, seemingly stimulating rage within a peaceful crowd to enter the Capitol building? There have always been these nagging questions around ‘why’?

Long time CTH reader “Regitiger” has spent a great deal of time reviewing the entire process, looking at the granular timeline and then overlaying the bigger picture of the constitutional and parliamentary process itself. What follows below is a brilliant analysis of the federal government motive to create a J6 crisis that permitted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to trigger an emergency session and avoid the 2020 election certification challenges.
Those congressional floor challenges, known and anticipated well in advance of the morning of January 6, 2021, would have formed a legal and constitutional basis for ‘standing’ in judicial challenges that would have eventually reached the Supreme Court. The certification during “emergency session” eliminated the problem for Washington DC.
Regitiger explains below, only edited by me for clarity and context:
I think most, not all, but a large number of people, are totally missing what happened; and why this happened on Jan 6th. I am going to try my best to outline the events that day, blast past the commonly held assumptions and get right down to the core corruption.
I will present this as a series of questions and answers.

♦ Q1: How do you prevent congress from delaying the certification of state electoral votes?
A: It requires a crisis. A crisis that creates an “emergency” …An “emergency” that invokes special house rules.
FACTS: Remember carefully, focus please. Just moments, literally 3 minutes before two representatives issued a vote for motions to suspend the certification, the House members were “informed” by capitol police and other “agents” that a protest was about to breach the chambers. It was at this time that key people: Pence, Pelosi, Schumer, Mcconnell can be seen being walked out and escorted from the chamber. This effectively halted the Entire Chamber Process.
♦ Q2: Why was it necessary to halt the chamber process?
A: The crisis was created to eliminate the motion challenges to halt the certification and to begin voting to look into voting irregularities and fraud
FACTS: The two motions were completely legal and constitutional under at least two constitutionally recognized procedures… procedures that would REQUIRE the house to pause the certification and then vote to determine whether the motions of suspend could move forward.
♦ Q3: What was so important to refuse this motion and the subsequent votes to suspend the electoral certification?
A: It was important to remove that process entirely and continue the fraud and certify the fraud with no detractors on record. This effectively gives no standing for a SCOTUS ruling appeal! Understand this. If those two motions, even just one had successfully been voted EVEN IF THE MOTIONS were DENIED IN VOTE, this gives those who presented them with STANDING FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL ARGUMENT BEFORE SCOTUS.
♦ Q4: Could this have been done some other way other than creating a crisis/protest?
A: Unlikely. In order to prevent those two motions, requires that speaker of the house, minority leaders, and the president of the congress (vice president of the United States: Pence), to NOT BE PRESENT IN THE CHAMBERS.
Once the capitol police and other “law enforcements agents” informed the speaker and these three other individuals, Pelosi UNILATERALLY UNDER EMERGENCY RULES, suspended the business of the congress. This protest was necessary. The crisis was created because there is no other way to suspend the business of certification UNILATERALLY. By creating a crisis invokes emergency procedures. No other circumstances other than war or mass simultaneous explosive diarrhea can create such unilateral speaker delivered suspension of the certification.
♦ Q5: Why did the motions, once that the speaker RECONVENED congress, move forward back again to the floor for votes? Why were members disallowed to even consider putting forward ANY motions to the floor in when the chamber business was reopened?
A: The Speaker initiated the NEW sessions under special emergency rules. These rules abandon and make it clear that the ONLY purpose of the new session was to EXPEDITE the certification and dismiss all prior regular session procedural rules. This is why those two motions to table votes to consider a debate and pause to the certifications of state vote electors never happened later that evening when the house business was reconvened!
♦ Q6: Other than new rules, emergency rules, what other peculiar things occurred when the speaker reconvened?
A: Members were allowed to “vote” in proxy, remotely, not being present. You can use your imagination about what conditions were placed on ALL members during this time to prevent anyone from “getting out of line”.
Also clearly, it was at THIS NEW SESSION that VP Pence, President of Congress, would also have no ability to even consider pausing the electoral certification, because there were no motions of disagreements on the matter. So, in a technical legal claim, he is correct that he had no constitutional authority to address any issues of fraud or doubts about electoral irregularities. But this completely dismisses the FACT that congress created rules in this crisis/emergency that never allowed them to be floored!
Understand what happened in Jan 6, 2021. Don’t get hung up on Viking impostors, stolen Pelosi computers, podium heists, and complicit capitol police. Understand the process and what happened and what WAS NOT ALLOWED TO HAPPEN.
This was a coup….it was a very organized and carefully planned coup. VP Pence without a doubt as well as most members of the house were quite aware of how the certification was going to be MANAGED. It would require new rules to prevent the debate clause from occurring! New rules that ONLY AN EMERGENCY CRISIS COULD CREATE! So, they created an emergency.
•NOTED: I understand why many people have great interest in debunking the j6 event. I get that. I think it is important to dissect and examine the events of that day but please, step back and understand WHY these things happened. Examine the chain of events in congress. Why those two motions that would have at least paused the certification THAT WOULD GIVE VP PENCE THE CONSTITUTIONALLY RECOGNIZED POWER TO MOVE TO SUSPEND THE ELECTORAL CERTIFICATION AND THEN EXAMINE THE IRREGULARITIES AND CLAIMS OF FRAUD!
At the very center of this coup stands Mike Pence, the same individual who also spoiled President Trump’s first opportunities in the earlies hours of his Presidency just 4 years prior, when he created and facilitated the removal of Lt General Michael Flynn. I will not spend much time on this thread explaining why Lt Gen Flynn was so important to President Trump and why the IC was so afraid he would have advisory power to the President. That I will leave for another day, another time. But understand this clearly: MIKE PENCE WAS AND IS WORKING FOR THE MOST CORRUPT CRIMINAL TREASONOUS PEOPLE IN GOVERNMENT.
•PRO TIP: If you really want to get a true understanding of this matter videos of protesters walking in the capitol is not going to address them. Actual video and timeline records of events and the specific actions taken by the speaker just moments before TWO MAJOR ELECTORAL ALTERING MOTIONS WERE ABOUT TO BE FLOORED.
This crisis was developed just in time with a precise coordination to prevent those two motions to be entered into the chamber record. The two motions do not exist. The emergency powers established in the new session made sure they never could be entered. The emergency powers could never happen without a crisis.
God Bless America!”
[link]


Note from Author: “I started this effort years ago. To date, no one and I mean no one has replied. It’s as if everyone that can expose it that has a larger platform is either disinterested, or suspiciously withdrawn from the issue. I made several comments about this over the years right here at CTH, on article threads that are relevant to the topic.
I was watching the certification live that day. I recorded it ALL on every channel. I was doing this because no matter what happened that day, I KNEW IT WOULD BE A PROFOUND AND SIGNIFICANT EVENT TO REMEMBER. I never in my wildest imagination (and I have a pretty vivid imagination, always have), expected to see the unmistakable perfectly timed “coincidences” that occurred.
One member raises a motion (with another in waiting for his turn) those two motions were well known and advertised. These were motions to vote for a pause in the certification to examine electoral vote fraud and irregularities. I can’t speak to the veracity and substance of those motions. They were never allowed to even be floored. it was at that exact moment that the house chambers were suspended and 4 of the key members, Pence, Pelosi, Schumer and McConnell were escorted OUT right after initiating the end of the session.
Effectively, this resulted in that motion never being floored at all. Then, when reconvened under special emergency rules, inexplicably those two motions (and perhaps more – we will never know – or will we?) were not even attempted to be motioned. That was not just peculiar to me.
It all started to make more sense when I did some study on constitutional law AND THE HISTORY of specific special authorities given to president of the congress, Pence in this case. Not only did he have the authority and power to suspend the certification, but the duty to address the motion in the same sense that it becomes vital to the debate clause.
There really is no higher significance of weight given to the debate clause than the certification of the votes. This was more than odd to me the way that the media and pence framed their narrative: Pence would not have the constitutional power to suspend certification. Then it hit me, like the obvious clue that was there all the time. He was right. But the reason he is right, is because there WAS NO MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO CAUSE HIM TO SUSPEND!
Understanding this, happened for me about 4 or 5 months after this Jan 6 day. I took me this long to examine the facts, look at the video again, compare it to the arguments made by several leading constitutional academics, and again, inexplicably even some that I respect seemed to dodge that central reality. The motions were never allowed to be floored in the re-convened house rules later that evening. Most would not even venture to address the exotically coincidence that the moment those two members would stand to place the motion before the house, that the House Speaker Pelosi AND Pence ended the session, effectively blocking the motions from being heard in normal house rules.
It’s been a journey for me. A journey that was initiated because I am just a simple but curious person. Perhaps even to a point where I get obsessive in those efforts. Many days and nights combing over the details. praying and trying to make sense of what makes little sense. With over 6 states having serious well known and obvious defects in the voting process, some more credible to believe – some less, but one would not expect the house would be so deliberate in marching past the motions that were definitely going to be present to slow this process down and take the time to get it right. Even IF the claims never reached an intersection that would change the outcome.
There are two possibilities: Millions of people, against all the odds, hitting all-time records even past Obama and Clinton, voted for a naval gazing ambulatory pathological racist moron. And chose Joe Malarkey as their leader. Or this was a coup, a conspiracy, and a treasonous manipulation regime change because President Trump could not be controlled by the deep state and globalists who OWN AND OPERATE WASHINGTON DC.
BOTH POSSIBILITIES ARE TERRIFYING.
The only way for THE PEOPLE to gain power in this country is to force the transfer of it. If truth isn’t the fuel and vehicle, we will just be replacing deck chairs and hitting the next series of expected ice bergs.
Knowing the truth is not enough; however, it is truth that makes it a righteous cause.
God Bless America!”
~ Regitiger

Sundance provides an addendum in support:
Julie Kelly – […] Just as the first wave of protesters breached the building shortly after 2 p.m., congressional Republicans were poised to present evidence of rampant voting fraud in the 2020 presidential election. Ten incumbent and four newly-elected Republican senators planned to work with their House colleagues to demand the formation of an audit commission to investigate election “irregularities” in the 2020 election. Absent an audit, the group of senators, including Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) pledged to reject the Electoral College results from the disputed states.
The Hail Mary effort was doomed to fail; yet the American people would have heard hours of debate related to provable election fraud over the course of the day.
And no one opposed the effort more than ex-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).
During a conference call on December 31, 2020, McConnell urged his Republican Senate colleagues to abandon plans to object to the certification, insisting his vote to certify the 2020 election results would be “the most consequential I have ever cast” in his 36-year Senate career.
From the Senate floor on the afternoon of January 6, McConnell gave a dramatic speech warning of the dire consequences to the country should Republicans succeed in delaying the vote. He downplayed examples of voting fraud and even mocked the fact that Trump-appointed judges rejected election lawsuits.
“The voters, the courts, and the States have all spoken,” McConnell insisted. “If we overrule them, it would damage our Republic forever. If this election were overturned by mere allegations from the losing side, our democracy would enter a death spiral.”
Roughly six hours later, McConnell got his way. Cowed by the crowd of largely peaceful Americans allowed into the building by Capitol police, most Republican senators backed off the audit proposal. McConnell, echoing hyperbolic talking points about an “insurrection” seeded earlier in the day by Democratic lawmakers and the news media, gloated. “They tried to disrupt our democracy,” he declared on the Senate floor after Congress reconvened around 8 p.m. “This failed attempt to obstruct Congress, this failed insurrection, only underscores how crucial the task before us is for our Republic.”
Congress officially certified the Electoral College results early the next day. (read more)


 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TigerRagRob
At the very center of this coup stands Mike Pence, the same individual who also spoiled President Trump’s first opportunities in the earlies hours of his Presidency just 4 years prior, when he created and facilitated the removal of Lt General Michael Flynn. I will not spend much time on this thread explaining why Lt Gen Flynn was so important to President Trump and why the IC was so afraid he would have advisory power to the President. That I will leave for another day, another time. But understand this clearly: MIKE PENCE WAS AND IS WORKING FOR THE MOST CORRUPT CRIMINAL TREASONOUS PEOPLE IN GOVERNMENT.

•PRO TIP: If you really want to get a true understanding of this matter videos of protesters walking in the capitol is not going to address them. Actual video and timeline records of events and the specific actions taken by the speaker just moments before TWO MAJOR ELECTORAL ALTERING MOTIONS WERE ABOUT TO BE FLOORED.

This crisis was developed just in time with a precise coordination to prevent those two motions to be entered into the chamber record. The two motions do not exist. The emergency powers established in the new session made sure they never could be entered. The emergency powers could never happen without a crisis.


God Bless America!”
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerRagRob
♦ Q5: Why did the motions, once that the speaker RECONVENED congress, move forward back again to the floor for votes? Why were members disallowed to even consider putting forward ANY motions to the floor in when the chamber business was reopened?
A: The Speaker initiated the NEW sessions under special emergency rules. These rules abandon and make it clear that the ONLY purpose of the new session was to EXPEDITE the certification and dismiss all prior regular session procedural rules. This is why those two motions to table votes to consider a debate and pause to the certifications of state vote electors never happened later that evening when the house business was reconvened!

Yeah...this is bullshit. Shocker. But it's what one may expect from the ramblings of an anonymous internet user.

The original objections to Arizona did continue after the session was reconvened, and another state - Pennsylvania - was objected-to later.

Facts matter.


They began with a debate over a challenge to Arizona's results. But after pro-Trump extremists brought violence and chaos to the Capitol, both chambers were forced into an emergency recess while the building was locked down.

When lawmakers reconvened hours later, a number of Senate Republicans abandoned their plan to cast objections.

Only six senators, all Republicans, sustained the Arizona objection.

House members also objected in the cases of Georgia, Michigan and Nevada, but no senator joined in the objection, thereby preventing debate.

The only other state disputed with support from both chambers was Pennsylvania; 138 House members, all Republicans, supported the objection, as did seven senators: Cruz, R-Texas; Hawley, R-Mo.; Hyde Smith, R-Miss.; Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo.; Marshall, R-Kan.; Tuberville, R-Ala.; and Rick Scott, R-Fla.
 
Yeah...this is bullshit. Shocker. But it's what one may expect from the ramblings of an anonymous internet user.

The original objections to Arizona did continue after the session was reconvened, and another state - Pennsylvania - was objected-to later.

Facts matter.


They began with a debate over a challenge to Arizona's results. But after pro-Trump extremists brought violence and chaos to the Capitol, both chambers were forced into an emergency recess while the building was locked down.

When lawmakers reconvened hours later, a number of Senate Republicans abandoned their plan to cast objections.

Only six senators, all Republicans, sustained the Arizona objection.

House members also objected in the cases of Georgia, Michigan and Nevada, but no senator joined in the objection, thereby preventing debate.

The only other state disputed with support from both chambers was Pennsylvania; 138 House members, all Republicans, supported the objection, as did seven senators: Cruz, R-Texas; Hawley, R-Mo.; Hyde Smith, R-Miss.; Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo.; Marshall, R-Kan.; Tuberville, R-Ala.; and Rick Scott, R-Fla.
Conflation my friend. Read the article the Q&A specifically and tell me whats a falsehood. This is related to the November 2020 election and then J6 and why it occurred only. Nothing to do with Arizona.
 
Conflation my friend. Read the article the Q&A specifically and tell me whats a falsehood. This is related to the November 2020 election and then J6 and why it occurred only. Nothing to do with Arizona.

Arizona is the state that was being objected-to when the proceedings were halted. Arizona is the state that continued to be objected-to after the proceedings were reconvened. Other states were also objected-to after the session reconvened.

Since those are known facts, how do you explain this line:

Why were members disallowed to even consider putting forward ANY motions to the floor in when the chamber business was reopened?
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
Arizona is the state that was being objected-to when the proceedings were halted. Arizona is the state that continued to be objected-to after the proceedings were reconvened. Other states were also objected-to after the session reconvened.

Since those are known facts, how do you explain this line:

Why were members disallowed to even consider putting forward ANY motions to the floor in when the chamber business was reopened?
They were going to contest the national presidential election results with AZ being one of the states in particular that was part of it so I will give you that. Just read the Q&A and tell me where hes full of shit with specifics.
 
They were going to contest the national presidential election results with AZ being one of the states in particular that was part of it so I will give you that. Just read the Q&A and tell me where hes full of shit with specifics.

True or False: Members were disallowed to even consider putting forward ANY motions to the floor when the chamber business was reopened
 
True or False: Members were disallowed to even consider putting forward ANY motions to the floor when the chamber business was reopened
None of the challenges were heard because Pelosi declared it an emergency session. This worked in the favor of the establishment as it basically stopped any court challenges due to a legal lack of standing.
 
None of the challenges were heard because Pelosi declared it an emergency session. This worked in the favor of the establishment as it basically stopped any court challenges due to a legal lack of standing.

Please answer the simple, two-choice question and stop side-stepping.

True or False: Members were disallowed to even consider putting forward ANY motions to the floor when the chamber business was reopened
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
Dude, you are wasting your time. OP will never accept the results of the 2020 election, never. For over 2 years, he's put out BS article after BS article. NONE of which prove fraud or any real reason to think Donald Trump won... Still not sure how anyone can think that a President with < 40% approval rating can somehow "win in a landslide".

Forget the details of the article above. You are correct of course. But look at the bigger picture. What OP is saying basically is that Mike Pence.: A man HAND PICKED by Trump. A man who stood with him for 4 years and backed everything Trump did and said. A man that has been a conservative Republican for decades when Trump was LITERALLY self identifying as a New York Liberal Democrat. That guy decided to stab Trump in the back and put Joe Biden in the White House.

If that's not crazy enough... Look at the other LIFELONG Republicans that OP thinks did the same thing.... Mitt Romney, the Governor/Lt Governor/Sec of State in Georgia, Liz Cheney, Robert Mueller... the list goes on and on. ANY one of these folks is many, many times more trustworthy than Trump, but somehow ALL of them are traitors? No proof required... they disagreed with Trump, so they MUST be criminals. REALLY?

And don't get me wrong. With the exception of Mueller (who wasn't very political) I don't like the politics of most of the above people and REALLY don't like Pence.
 
Dude, you are wasting your time. OP will never accept the results of the 2020 election, never. For over 2 years, he's put out BS article after BS article. NONE of which prove fraud or any real reason to think Donald Trump won... Still not sure how anyone can think that a President with < 40% approval rating can somehow "win in a landslide".

Forget the details of the article above. You are correct of course. But look at the bigger picture. What OP is saying basically is that Mike Pence.: A man HAND PICKED by Trump. A man who stood with him for 4 years and backed everything Trump did and said. A man that has been a conservative Republican for decades when Trump was LITERALLY self identifying as a New York Liberal Democrat. That guy decided to stab Trump in the back and put Joe Biden in the White House.

If that's not crazy enough... Look at the other LIFELONG Republicans that OP thinks did the same thing.... Mitt Romney, the Governor/Lt Governor/Sec of State in Georgia, Liz Cheney, Robert Mueller... the list goes on and on. ANY one of these folks is many, many times more trustworthy than Trump, but somehow ALL of them are traitors? No proof required... they disagreed with Trump, so they MUST be criminals. REALLY?

And don't get me wrong. With the exception of Mueller (who wasn't very political) I don't like the politics of most of the above people and REALLY don't like Pence.
 
LOOK OUT!! If this actually goes public, OP will be in here posting TGP articles about Dem/Commie Aliens and how they are out to GET Trump too by shooting Trump ballots with lasers and beaming down Biden ballots made in China... NO WONDER there wasn't any bamboo found on the ballots... the transporter removed it all by keeping it in the pattern buffer. Damn those space hippies!!!



Come now to Eden... Yeah Brother!!!
 
Please answer the simple, two-choice question and stop side-stepping.

True or False: Members were disallowed to even consider putting forward ANY motions to the floor when the chamber business was reopened
True. Now you answer.
 
Dude, you are wasting your time. OP will never accept the results of the 2020 election, never. For over 2 years, he's put out BS article after BS article. NONE of which prove fraud or any real reason to think Donald Trump won... Still not sure how anyone can think that a President with < 40% approval rating can somehow "win in a landslide".

Forget the details of the article above. You are correct of course. But look at the bigger picture. What OP is saying basically is that Mike Pence.: A man HAND PICKED by Trump. A man who stood with him for 4 years and backed everything Trump did and said. A man that has been a conservative Republican for decades when Trump was LITERALLY self identifying as a New York Liberal Democrat. That guy decided to stab Trump in the back and put Joe Biden in the White House.

If that's not crazy enough... Look at the other LIFELONG Republicans that OP thinks did the same thing.... Mitt Romney, the Governor/Lt Governor/Sec of State in Georgia, Liz Cheney, Robert Mueller... the list goes on and on. ANY one of these folks is many, many times more trustworthy than Trump, but somehow ALL of them are traitors? No proof required... they disagreed with Trump, so they MUST be criminals. REALLY?

And don't get me wrong. With the exception of Mueller (who wasn't very political) I don't like the politics of most of the above people and REALLY don't like Pence.
This is the same shit you been spouting for 2 years. Refute the q&a in the article if you are capable and know something.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: hopefultiger13
True. Now you answer.

And...we're done. Zero interest in continuing this if you can't acknowledge plain facts. Motions to object were clearly made by both House and Senate members after the session was reconvened. You literally asked me to find the falsehood in the q&a, and I did.

Also, how does one disallow someone to consider something? That's some power that Pelosi wielded.

Have a good night!
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
And...we're done. Zero interest in continuing this if you can't acknowledge plain facts. Motions to object were clearly made by both House and Senate members after the session was reconvened. You literally asked me to find the falsehood in the q&a, and I did.

Also, how does one disallow someone to consider something? That's some power that Pelosi wielded.

Have a good night!
Prove that the motions were voted on. Jump down off your high horse while you are at it too.

Motions may have been requested but were denied due to emergency session rules put in place. Don't try to play word games.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
And...we're done. Zero interest in continuing this if you can't acknowledge plain facts. Motions to object were clearly made by both House and Senate members after the session was reconvened. You literally asked me to find the falsehood in the q&a, and I did.

Also, how does one disallow someone to consider something? That's some power that Pelosi wielded.

Have a good night!
This is the one you are referring to. Please provide any video and/or written evidence that challenges to the certification were heard and considered. I am open to changing my opinion if you can show me something. I remember that day and being pissed that they just skipped any consideration of challenging the results after the capitol was breached.

Q5: Why did the motions, once that the speaker RECONVENED congress, move forward back again to the floor for votes? Why were members disallowed to even consider putting forward ANY motions to the floor in when the chamber business was reopened?

A: The Speaker initiated the NEW sessions under special emergency rules. These rules abandon and make it clear that the ONLY purpose of the new session was to EXPEDITE the certification and dismiss all prior regular session procedural rules. This is why those two motions to table votes to consider a debate and pause to the certifications of state vote electors never happened later that evening when the house business was reconvened!
 
This is the same shit you been spouting for 2 years. Refute the q&a in the article if you are capable and know something.
Yep... Same thing I been saying for two years, b/c YOU have been posting the same BS articles since the election. Day after day, you post some wild BS article that never amounts to a damn thing. Seized servers in Europe that show that votes were changed... Suitcases of Biden Ballots in Ga, Republican observers barred from viewing election counting in Pennsylvania, Cyber not Ninjas were going to blow the fraud in Arizona out of the water (wardaddies I think you called them), remember Durham investigating the "crime of the century"? Wasn't it just a couple of weeks ago that you told us Joe Biden had removed his tax returns from the internet?

So yeah... I'm continuing to point out that the articles you post are crap and will never amount to a damn thing b/c at some point you have to actually PROVE the crap you are saying. So at the risk of repeating myself again for the umpteenth time in the last two years...

Yep, here's yet another article in a seemingly never ending stream of articles that you've posted that's LONG on conspiracy theory and short of actual facts. And yet again, I ask you to get back with us when this article amounts to something. I wonder how many times I've asked that. I've no idea. I DO KNOW how many times you've actually gotten back with us though...
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
Yep... Same thing I been saying for two years, b/c YOU have been posting the same BS articles since the election. Day after day, you post some wild BS article that never amounts to a damn thing. Seized servers in Europe that show that votes were changed... Suitcases of Biden Ballots in Ga, Republican observers barred from viewing election counting in Pennsylvania, Cyber not Ninjas were going to blow the fraud in Arizona out of the water (wardaddies I think you called them), remember Durham investigating the "crime of the century"? Wasn't it just a couple of weeks ago that you told us Joe Biden had removed his tax returns from the internet?

So yeah... I'm continuing to point out that the articles you post are crap and will never amount to a damn thing b/c at some point you have to actually PROVE the crap you are saying. So at the risk of repeating myself again for the umpteenth time in the last two years...

Yep, here's yet another article in a seemingly never ending stream of articles that you've posted that's LONG on conspiracy theory and short of actual facts. And yet again, I ask you to get back with us when this article amounts to something. I wonder how many times I've asked that. I've no idea. I DO KNOW how many times you've actually gotten back with us though...
Your entire attitude and belief on this subject is BS in my opinion so there. For the record i would bet you are not even reading what I post. I think your mind is closed, brainwashed and addled with mary jane.
 
I am still waiting for a respectful and open discussion on the happenings of the election and J6, but all I get are kill the messenger posts and other BS that do not actually provide a respectful and sincere back and forth on an important topic.
 
I am still waiting for a respectful and open discussion on the happenings of the election and J6, but all I get are kill the messenger posts and other BS that do not actually provide a respectful and sincere back and forth on an important topic.
I'll play
Respectfully, Donald lost in a landslide so there was no reason for Jan. 6th. If you care about America, you'd drop this crap....respectfully.
 
I'll play
Respectfully, Donald lost in a landslide so there was no reason for Jan. 6th. If you care about America, you'd drop this crap....respectfully.
This is not a discussion but is a statement of an opinion that we already know about.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT