ADVERTISEMENT

Tucker Carlson Questions Sham 1/6 Committee’s Sudden Acknowledgement and Defense of Ray Epps: “It’s Clear the DOJ Had a Role in Jan 6th”

TigerGrowls

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Dec 21, 2001
19,956
11,718
113

By Julian Conradson
Published January 11, 2022 at 10:18pm
Screenshot_20220111-220400_Twitter-913x479.jpg

The left’s charade is falling to pieces.
After an absolutely explosive day of Senate testimony on Capitol Hill, Tucker Carlson came out on his nightly show and delivered a knockout blow to the corrupt DC Swamp, slamming the DOJ for its “clear role” in the January 6th “Fedsurrection” and calling out Pelosi’s sham 1/6 commission for their sudden defense of suspected-Fed and notorious 1/6 catalyst Ray Epps
“It’s been clear for a while now that the department of justice probably had some role in the events of January 6th – it’s obvious. And after hearings on Capitol Hill today it became even clearer.”
During his latest must-watch segment, Carlson highlighted Senator Ted Cruz’s pointed exchange with FBI National Security Branch Executive Assistant Director Jill Sanborn, blasting her for refusing to answer several simple, straightforward questions about the Government’s involvement in 1/6.
TRENDING: "Premeditated Manslaughter of Millions of People Coordinated at the Highest Levels" - Naomi Wolf and Dr. Malone Respond to Project Veritas BOMBSHELL (VIDEO)
The shocking lack of answers all but served as a confirmation that federal agents were actively participating in the events on 1/6.
Sanborn cannot even answer Cruz when he asks point-blank if any Federal agents “committed any crimes of violence,” which – as Carlson correctly points out – is something that should be easily deniable.
Her weak answer was just not good enough, and according to Carlson, Sanborn should be forced to answer the question immediately.
“Cruz asked, quote: ‘did any FBI agents or FBI informants commit crimes of violence on January 6th?’ The obvious answer is ‘are you kidding? Come on now, of course the FBI isn’t secretly committing crimes of violence – that’s insane! we are a federal law enforcement agency, we’re not the Tonton Macoute. Next question please.’
That’s what Jill Sanborn should have said, but that’s not what she said. instead she replied, quote: ‘I can’t answer that.’
But of Course Jill Sanborn can answer that – and she should be forced to answer that immediately – no sources or methods would be revealed, just answer the question – did they participate in violence or not? why is that hard?
It tells you alot.”
After calling out Sanborn, Carlson also torched Assistant US Attorney General Matt Olson for his equally pathetic testimony from earlier in the day. Despite acknowledging Ray Epps’ existence, Olson refused to provide any information whatsoever about him when he was being questioned by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR).
“I simply don’t have any information at all about that individual,” Olson responded.
Once again, not nearly a good enough answer for Carlson, who sarcastically added, “They really expect you to believe that. So, the DOJ knows nothing about Ray Epps – the guy on the most wanted list – Right…”
Almost immediately after the trainwreck Senate hearings, the corrupt 1/6 commission shamelessly attempted to run damage control by tweeting out an odd acknowledgment of Ray Epps that claimed they had interviewed the suspected-fed back in November 2021.
But, if the Democrats had already interviewed this guy and cleared him of all suspicions, then why in the heck would they wait this long to announce it? and conveniently on the day when two top law enforcement officials were forced to address Epps for the first time under oath?
Something’s not adding up here. As Carlson points out, there are several questions that now need an answer.
“That’s absurdly false, and as if to underscore how absurdly false it is, within a short time [after the testimony] Democrats on the January 6th committee released a statement claiming that – actually – they had already interviewed Ray Epps, and anyone who still has questions about his behavior on January 5th or 6th is a dangerous conspiracy theorist.
When exactly, and under what circumstances did the committee talk to Ray Epps? Supposedly this interview was conducted in secret this last November. If that is true – we don’t know that it is, but let’s say that it is – Then why did the committee wait months to tell us today in a tweet? When the committee got its hands on Mark Meadows’ text messages, we seem to remember they leaked those to the media within hours.
And by the way was this Ray Epps interview conducted under oath? Did Democrats subpoena his electronic communications, as they did with Meadows and so many others? Will the information that Epps revealed to the committee be made availible to the January 6th defendants who are now awaiting trial? Can their lawyers see a transscript of this interview? – Can we see a transcript of this interview?
If not, why not?”
What’s so odd about the Democrat’s acknowledgment of Epps is that they have completely flipped the script when describing his actions on 1/6, with cry-baby RINO Rep. Adam Kinzinger even calling him ‘just a protest attendee’ earlier today.
That’s some glowing PR for a man who led the charge into the Capitol grounds, sparking the ‘worst insurrection in US history.’
In a stunning flip-flop, Democrats have changed their tune completely, going from not even acknowledging Epps’ existence – to downright protecting him against their own narrative in just 24 short hours.
According to Carlson:
“[Epps] He wasn’t just someone who was there – he was maybe the central figure there. And yet Democrats, for reasons that aren’t at all clear, suddenly seem highly protective of Ray Epps. They don’t want you to criticize him.
Adam Kinzinger described Ray Epps today as, quote: ‘nothing but a January 6th protest attendee.’ – Really? nothing but an attendee? He is of course the opposite of that. Of everyone there, Ray Epps is the one you should be maddest at – if you are the democratic party – and yet they’re telling you he was just an attendee – not an insurrectionist, not a terrorist – just an attendee.”
BOOM.
Watch:
 
party of personal responsibility looks for another scapegoat for their actions. stop the press.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flotiger

By Julian Conradson
Published January 11, 2022 at 10:18pm
Screenshot_20220111-220400_Twitter-913x479.jpg

The left’s charade is falling to pieces.
After an absolutely explosive day of Senate testimony on Capitol Hill, Tucker Carlson came out on his nightly show and delivered a knockout blow to the corrupt DC Swamp, slamming the DOJ for its “clear role” in the January 6th “Fedsurrection” and calling out Pelosi’s sham 1/6 commission for their sudden defense of suspected-Fed and notorious 1/6 catalyst Ray Epps

During his latest must-watch segment, Carlson highlighted Senator Ted Cruz’s pointed exchange with FBI National Security Branch Executive Assistant Director Jill Sanborn, blasting her for refusing to answer several simple, straightforward questions about the Government’s involvement in 1/6.
TRENDING: "Premeditated Manslaughter of Millions of People Coordinated at the Highest Levels" - Naomi Wolf and Dr. Malone Respond to Project Veritas BOMBSHELL (VIDEO)
The shocking lack of answers all but served as a confirmation that federal agents were actively participating in the events on 1/6.
Sanborn cannot even answer Cruz when he asks point-blank if any Federal agents “committed any crimes of violence,” which – as Carlson correctly points out – is something that should be easily deniable.
Her weak answer was just not good enough, and according to Carlson, Sanborn should be forced to answer the question immediately.

After calling out Sanborn, Carlson also torched Assistant US Attorney General Matt Olson for his equally pathetic testimony from earlier in the day. Despite acknowledging Ray Epps’ existence, Olson refused to provide any information whatsoever about him when he was being questioned by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR).
“I simply don’t have any information at all about that individual,” Olson responded.
Once again, not nearly a good enough answer for Carlson, who sarcastically added, “They really expect you to believe that. So, the DOJ knows nothing about Ray Epps – the guy on the most wanted list – Right…”
Almost immediately after the trainwreck Senate hearings, the corrupt 1/6 commission shamelessly attempted to run damage control by tweeting out an odd acknowledgment of Ray Epps that claimed they had interviewed the suspected-fed back in November 2021.
But, if the Democrats had already interviewed this guy and cleared him of all suspicions, then why in the heck would they wait this long to announce it? and conveniently on the day when two top law enforcement officials were forced to address Epps for the first time under oath?
Something’s not adding up here. As Carlson points out, there are several questions that now need an answer.


What’s so odd about the Democrat’s acknowledgment of Epps is that they have completely flipped the script when describing his actions on 1/6, with cry-baby RINO Rep. Adam Kinzinger even calling him ‘just a protest attendee’ earlier today.
That’s some glowing PR for a man who led the charge into the Capitol grounds, sparking the ‘worst insurrection in US history.’
In a stunning flip-flop, Democrats have changed their tune completely, going from not even acknowledging Epps’ existence – to downright protecting him against their own narrative in just 24 short hours.
According to Carlson:

BOOM.
Watch:

So Trump's DOJ had a hand in the insurrection? And this is good news for you?
 




"The narrative on Jan. 6 has been that it’s first antifa, or patriots who love their country, maybe crisis actors, def false flag operatives, or now FBI agents," Kinzinger wrote. "Take your pick. Truth is they were rioters incited by lies. And RAY is no fed. Just another misled man."

 




"The narrative on Jan. 6 has been that it’s first antifa, or patriots who love their country, maybe crisis actors, def false flag operatives, or now FBI agents," Kinzinger wrote. "Take your pick. Truth is they were rioters incited by lies. And RAY is no fed. Just another misled man."

Not buying a bit of your propaganda.
 
I'll use your usual argument. "So you are discounting what he said or think he's joking, crazy or what?"
Lying plain and simple otherwise why is Epps not incarcerated under the Capitol?
 
Lying plain and simple otherwise why is Epps not incarcerated under the Capitol?
Because he didn't break any laws? You do realize he was a former chapter President of the Oath Keepers right? Why would they give him a pass if he was known to be in a militia, unless they couldn't find a reason to charge him? He admitted to the committee under oath that he was indeed a misled Trumper.

 
Last edited:
Because he didn't break any laws? You do realize he was a former chapter President of the Oath Keepers right? Why would they give him a pass if he was known to be in a militia?

Inciting a riot is guaranteed to break some laws, but even with that the fact that he didnt enter the capitol is more proof that he is undercover fbi. The guy was a ringleader.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
Inciting a riot is guaranteed to break some laws, but even with that the fact that he didnt enter the capitol is more proof that he is undercover fbi. The guy was a ringleader.
giphy.gif


The problem is, there is NO EVIDENCE that he was FBI. The only reason you believe that is because he was on the Most Wanted List and then taken off. However, if he was in fact one that incited the riot, he may yet still be charged, but he is NOT FBI.
 
Last edited:
Inciting a riot is guaranteed to break some laws, but even with that the fact that he didnt enter the capitol is more proof that he is undercover fbi. The guy was a ringleader.

Do you even hear yourself? For a year your argument has been that "most MAGA people there were peaceful protesters outside", the "troublemakers were ANTIFA", the people "who went in the building were just on a stroll in the capitol", and of course "Trump did not break any laws by telling people to go to the capitol".

Now you have pivoted to " there was an undercover DOJ deep state operative there who knew not to enter the building because that would have been a high crime" and "he tricked MAGA patriots into entering the building and talked them into beating the shit out of policemen" and by the way "inciting a riot is a crime - unless you are my lord and savior Trump of course."

You are definitely a troll.
 
Inciting a riot is guaranteed to break some laws, but even with that the fact that he didnt enter the capitol is more proof that he is undercover fbi. The guy was a ringleader.
Dude, you remind me of the internet version of a flat earth guy. Just for a second, THINK about all the people/groups you accuse of being Deep State/going against Trump? Life long Republicans and Conservatives. All Democrats, the intelligence services, the diplomatic services, the FBI, Trump's own AG and the entire DOJ, the National Hurricane Center, Trump's own cyber security guy. Local elections officials across the country...Mitch McConnel (a guy that was championing conservative causes for decades when Trump was LITERALLY a self identifying as a liberal Democrat from NY) The US AG from lower GA that Trump picked to find the corruption in Ga. How many Generals that have spend decades serving this country? The list just goes on and on. At this point who ISN'T Deep State? (Pro tip: Deep State simply means any person who doesn't agree with Trump. If you don't swallow everything he puts in your mouth, you are Deep State... not to be confused with the similar term... Deep Throat)

Again, just ask yourself. Which is more likely? All these Americans that have spent their lives in service to the US suddenly betraying all that to "get Trump" OR maybe, just MAYBE a shady, lying businessman is continuing to be a shady lying businessman.
 
Last edited:
Dude, you remind me of the internet version of a flat earth guy. Just for a second, THINK about all the people/groups you accuse of being Deep State/going against Trump? Life long Republicans and Conservatives. All Democrats, the intelligence services, the diplomatic services, the FBI, Trump's own AG and the entire DOJ, the National Hurricane Center, Trump's own cyber security guy. Local elections officials across the country...Mitch McConnel (a guy that was championing conservative causes for decades when Trump was LITERALLY a self identifying as a liberal Democrat from NY) The US AG from lower GA that Trump picked to find the corruption in Ga. How many Generals that have spend decades serving this country? The list just goes on and on. At this point who ISN'T Deep State?

Again, just ask yourself. Which is more likely? All these Americans that have spent their lives in service to the US suddenly betraying all that to "get Trump" OR maybe, just MAYBE a shady, lying businessman is continuing to be a shady lying businessman.
*shady lying failed businessman. i mean, let's give the guy his due.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nytigerfan
*shady lying failed businessman. i mean, let's give the guy his due.
Nah... Granted he inherited $250 million from his dad and managed to lose it all several times, but bankruptcy laws favor the "haves" for sure. Still, the guy has a lots of money and lives a great lifestyle.
 
Wow, DOJ has gotten serious!

"The Justice Department has unsealed a major indictment charging the leader of the Oath Keepers militia group along with multiple other members with seditious conspiracy related to their alleged coordination in advance of the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol."

 
  • Like
Reactions: nytigerfan
Do you even hear yourself? For a year your argument has been that "most MAGA people there were peaceful protesters outside", the "troublemakers were ANTIFA", the people "who went in the building were just on a stroll in the capitol", and of course "Trump did not break any laws by telling people to go to the capitol".

Now you have pivoted to " there was an undercover DOJ deep state operative there who knew not to enter the building because that would have been a high crime" and "he tricked MAGA patriots into entering the building and talked them into beating the shit out of policemen" and by the way "inciting a riot is a crime - unless you are my lord and savior Trump of course."

You are definitely a troll.
No Trump supporters beat up policemen dude. You are not very smart. Antifa and govt operatives orchestrated the whole thing and none of them are in jail. They have little old ladies, Soccer moms, college students and fathers with wives and kids sitting in the DC gulag with no rights at this time and not the ones that committed the crimes including the officer that shot unarmed babbit in cold blood.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016 and dpic73
Wow, DOJ has gotten serious!

"The Justice Department has unsealed a major indictment charging the leader of the Oath Keepers militia group along with multiple other members with seditious conspiracy related to their alleged coordination in advance of the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol."

I will be paying attention. Lets see if they actually have a case or not.
 
No Trump supporters beat up policemen dude. You are not very smart. Antifa and govt operatives orchestrated the whole thing and none of them are in jail. They have little old ladies, Soccer moms, college students and fathers with wives and kids sitting in the DC gulag with no rights at this time and not the ones that committed the crimes including the officer that shot unarmed babbit in cold blood.

Is this real life? Nobody can be as pathetic as you.
 
ADVERTISEMENT