ADVERTISEMENT

Unregulated growth is very dangerous.

Upstate growth unreal but can’t see we are headed where this group is ( water no an issue)
Infrastructure isn’t there for some development
I agree direction needed but often it is the existing neighbors calling out for regulations ( which are needed) but often using false data to keep growth away from them
 
  • Like
Reactions: appalachiatiger
Upstate growth unreal but can’t see we are headed where this group is ( water no an issue)
Infrastructure isn’t there for some development
I agree direction needed but often it is the existing neighbors calling out for regulations ( which are needed) but often using false data to keep growth away from them
Everyone wants economic growth, nobody wants it close to them
 
At some point, no matter what the topic or issue, science and math becomes a limitation unless there is some incredible offset or regeneration.

Mother Earth can only flex and absorb to some critical factor, minor to the major, and then what?

(It will be labelled a “political battle” but it’s “all resources eventually have a cap battle”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: appalachiatiger
Like how much water is available in Greenville co?

I assume Anderson, Pickens and Oconee Cos. would be fine.

But Atlanta is fighting South Carolina for the lakes because the growth on the other side of the lakes trump upstate South Carolina.

Can the electrical grid handle 110 on one side for the population and say minus 5 on the other side?

Just seems each county can say we can handle a population of 10 million but that it's.

And there has been a lot of towns who haven't changed a bit doing just fine.

Those guys that try to scare you telling you your town will become a ghost town if you don't rapid develop are lying to you to make a profit.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT