ADVERTISEMENT

UPDATE: Democrats in Arizona Won’t Post $1 Million Bond So Election Audit Continues

TigerGrowls

TigerGrowls

Woodrush
Gold Member
Dec 21, 2001
30,247
20,615
113
Dirty dems trying to stop an independent audit of the maricopa county vote.....WHY??? Well......the cheap skates didnt want to pay up as of yet, so the audit continues.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING - HUGE UPDATE IN AZ: Democrats in Arizona Won't Post $1 Million Bond So Election Audit Continues | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

The Democrats won’t post a $1 million bond and so the Arizona audit will go on.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING – HUGE UPDATE IN AZ: Democrats in Arizona Won’t Post $1 Million Bond So Election Audit Continues​

By Joe Hoft
Published April 23, 2021 at 4:37pm
Arizona-Audit-Cameras.jpg

The Democrats won’t post a $1 million bond and so the Arizona audit will go on.​

The Arizona Mirror reports this evening:

A brief weekend pause in the Arizona Senate’s election audit that a judge ordered on Friday won’t happen because the Arizona Democratic Party declined to put up a $1 million bond that the judge requested to cover any expenses that the Senate wrongfully incurs due to the halt.
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Christopher Coury ruled that the audit must halt from 5 p.m. Friday to noon on Monday. But that order was contingent on the Arizona Democratic Party, which brought the lawsuit seeking to block the audit, posting a $1 million bond to cover any expenses that the Senate wrongfully incurs due to the delay. The Senate’s lease of Veterans Memorial Coliseum, where the audit is being conducted, ends on May 14.
Click to expand...

The Mirror also reported:
Roopali Desai, the Democrats’ attorney, said the party won’t put up the bond. That means the audit will continue uninterrupted.

Nonetheless, the audit will still have to comply with several other orders Coury issued during a hearing on Friday. The judge ordered the Senate and its audit team to comply with all laws governing the right to a secret ballot and the confidentiality of voter registration data. He also ordered that the auditors use only red pens on the audit floor, an issue that came up after an Arizona Republic reporter who’s working as a volunteer observer noted that the auditors were using blue pens, which could irrevocably harm ballots…
…Attorney Kory Langhofer, who represents the Senate, argued that the lawsuit should be barred by lawmakers’ legislative immunity from being served with lawsuits during the legislative session. He also argued that the Democratic Party and Gallardo lack standing to sue, and that the lawsuit violates the separation of powers between the legislative and judicial branches.
Click to expand...
Earlier today we reported that the audit had been stalled:
www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING: Judge Orders TEMPORARY HALT to Arizona Forensic Ballot Audit Until Monday after Democrats File Suit to Shut Down Process | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

An Arizona judge paused the recount for Maricopa County until Monday.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com

Counting will continue over the weekend. You can view the work at azaudit.org.​

 
  • Like
Reactions: 92TigerME
I saw that the "auditors" had placed blue pens on the tables, which are strictly prohibited in audits because they can be read by the ballot scanners.

So my question is: Did they do this because they are inept and unaware of proper auditing policies, or because they are trying to manufacture the alleged fraud that they are searching for?

It's one of those two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clemben
Cyber Ninja is run by an avowed Trump worshipping conspiracy theorist - Doug Logan. I'm sure the results of this human theater will be totally legit. If nothing else maybe we'll at least get some more awesome christian terrorist attacks.

Edit - also, Cyber Ninja has exactly, literally, zero experience conducting an election audit.
 
i can tell you what the outcome of the audit will be with astounding accuracy. ready?







GWP will report major fraud in the AZ election. It will later be revealed that their major fraud claim is based on someone at GWP not being able to do simple math. we will all laugh and you will be on to the next fake news story that has you completely owned.
 
TigerGrowls said:
Just keep talking shit guys. The audit is in process. We shall see.
Click to expand...

You didn't answer my question. Did they use blue pens because they are unaware of basic auditing procedure, or because they are trying to mark the ballots themselves to create the appearance of fraud?

Do you have another plausible reason?
 
clemsontiger02 said:
You didn't answer my question. Did they use blue pens because they are unaware of basic auditing procedure, or because they are trying to mark the ballots themselves to create the appearance of fraud?

Do you have another plausible reason?
Click to expand...

I am not running the audit. Just watching for results, so I have no comment on it other than I strongly feel that the group running the audit will get it done correctly if allowed to by the courts.
 
TigerGrowls said:
I am not running the audit. Just watching for results, so I have no comment on it other than I strongly feel that the group running the audit will get it done correctly if allowed to by the courts.
Click to expand...

So you are willing to fully ignore that an obviously-biased firm with no experience auditing elections began the process with a major mistake. And they also promised full transparency, but are now fighting in court to keep the process secret.

But you don't have any comment on that because you are "not running the audit". Right. Because not being directly involved with these things has really kept you from sharing your thoughts on them.

What a joke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WapPride, dpic73 and clemben
TigerGrowls said:
I am not running the audit. Just watching for results, so I have no comment on it other than I strongly feel that the group running the audit will get it done correctly if allowed to by the courts.
Click to expand...
Uh huh. Strong feelings...

This is such a gross overreach from the state legislature. The SOS Republican has run multiple audits already.

This is political theatre at best. At worst, it is trying to steal an election.

Serious question--would you be ok with Dem states now or in the future having their legislatures seize power over recounting ballots? Is this a recipe for stable democracy? Grant that legislature the authority to pick a partisan body to oversee the counting--keep out or strictly limit any nonpartisan viewers, get caught on tape actually screwing up??

Everything that actually didn't happen in the vote count in Nov.--scary ballots under the table!!--that Repubs whined about is actually happening here...you can't make this stuff up.

And just like here--it doesn't need to be based on any evidence shown in court--just the FEELINGS of voters and state legislatures.

Goodbye rule of law--hello Republican hurt feelings and doing whatever it takes to appoint an undemocratically elected leader--DESPOT TRUMP (as in--you want a king and to overthrow democracy).
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73 and clemsontiger02
clemsontiger02 said:
So you are willing to fully ignore that an obviously-biased firm with no experience auditing elections began the process with a major mistake. And they also promised full transparency, but are now fighting in court to keep the process secret.

But you don't have any comment on that because you are "not running the audit". Right. Because not being directly involved with these things has really kept you from sharing your thoughts on them.

What a joke.
Click to expand...

Highly biased lib opinion of yours, but you are entitled to it. This audit is going to begin the process of blowing the scam that was the presidential election out of the water. Its coming...count on it.
 
TigerGrowls said:
Highly biased lib opinion of yours, but you are entitled to it. This audit is going to begin the process of blowing the scam that was the presidential election out of the water. Its coming...count on it.
Click to expand...

Ok. I look forward to your outrage on them restricting observers. I mean, unless you only take firm positions on things when it benefits your chosen team.

And by the way, If there was a reasonable answer to the question about the blue pens other than "It was a mistake" or "They are trying to mark ballots themselves", you and the Hoft brothers would already be trying to spin it. But there isn't. They were either completely unaware of a basic auditing procedure or they are trying to cheat. You choose. Not commenting because you are "not running the audit" is a weak cop-out because you simply have no other possible answer then the choices you were given.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
clemsontiger02 said:
Ok. I look forward to your outrage on them restricting observers. I mean, unless you only take firm positions on things when it benefits your chosen team.

And by the way, If there was a reasonable answer to the question about the blue pens other than "It was a mistake" or "They are trying to mark ballots themselves", you and the Hoft brothers would already be trying to spin it. But there isn't. They were either completely unaware of a basic auditing procedure or they are trying to cheat. You choose. Not commenting because you are "not running the audit" is a weak cop-out because you simply have no other possible answer then the choices you were given.
Click to expand...

Man....some folks getting nervous. I love it! Get used to it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: iceheart08
TigerGrowls said:
Man....some folks getting nervous. I love it! Get used to it.
Click to expand...

Haha! Again you ignore the question because you can't bear to give a response that could possibly shed your "team" in a negative light. And that's so freaking sad.

You have seen me give credit to Trump - a person I despise - on numerous occasions. You have also seen me criticize Biden and the Democrats. It's because I can call things like I see them.

But for you Trumpers, "owning the libs" is paramount to everything else. You literally can't bring yourself to assess a situation honestly, less you admit that your side isn't completely perfect.

Either you believe that they put blue pens out in an effort to cheat, or it was a mistake. Why do YOU, a person who we have already established is "not running the audit", think they did that?

Are you going to answer, or are you going to try another deflection?
 
clemsontiger02 said:
Haha! Again you ignore the question because you can't bear to give a response that could possibly shed your "team" in a negative light. And that's so freaking sad.

You have seen me give credit to Trump - a person I despise - on numerous occasions. You have also seen me criticize Biden and the Democrats. It's because I can call things like I see them.

But for you Trumpers, "owning the libs" is paramount to everything else. You literally can't bring yourself to assess a situation honestly, less you admit that your side isn't completely perfect.

Either you believe that they put blue pens out in an effort to cheat, or it was a mistake. Why do YOU, a person who we have already established is "not running the audit", think they did that?

Are you going to answer, or are you going to try another deflection?
Click to expand...

Blue pens is a non issue. Dems and lib run media are desperately trying to drum up any little factoids they can find to throw the legitimacy of the audit in doubt. Thats my answer. Good honest people running this audit.
 
TigerGrowls said:
Blue pens is a non issue. Dems and lib run media are desperately trying to drum up any little factoids they can find to throw the legitimacy of the audit in doubt. Thats my answer. Good honest people running this audit.
Click to expand...

Right. People in charge of the audit not understanding basic auditing procedure is a non-issue. Deflect away.

Have a good one.
 
clemsontiger02 said:
Right. People in charge of the audit not understanding basic auditing procedure is a non-issue. Deflect away.

Have a good one.
Click to expand...
www.azcentral.com

Blue ink, black ink, red ink: Why ink color matters when handling Arizona ballots

Black, blue and red ink all play significant roles in ensuring ballot integrity in Arizona elections.
www.azcentral.com

Red ink. This is used during hand counts, as well as any signatures from election day inspectors.

As noted above, red is basically a safeguard against any slip of a pen marking a ballot.

"If there were to be any inadvertent stray mark, it wouldn't be counted," Gilbertson said.

When Republic reporter Jen Fifield pointed out the blue-ink pen issue to Doug Logan of Cyber Ninjas, the firm doing the election audit, he at first said blue pens were acceptable because the machines only could read black ink. He later questioned his response and said he would look further into the matter. The blue pens were switched out for green pens before any real ballots were taken out of the boxes.
 
TigerGrowls said:
When Republic reporter Jen Fifield pointed out the blue-ink pen issue to Doug Logan of Cyber Ninjas, the firm doing the election audit, he at first said blue pens were acceptable because the machines only could read black ink. He later questioned his response and said he would look further into the matter. The blue pens were switched out for green pens before any real ballots were taken out of the boxes.
Click to expand...

LOL. You just confirmed that Doug Logan and his Cyber Ninjas did not know that blue ink was unacceptable, and had to be told as much by a reporter before switching them. Thank you so much for proving my point!
 
clemsontiger02 said:
LOL. You just confirmed that Doug Logan and his Cyber Ninjas did not know that blue ink was unacceptable, and had to be told as much by a reporter before switching them. Thank you so much for proving my point!
Click to expand...

It doesnt mean shit. Cyber ninjas is going to be using technology first and foremost on this audit. The idea of them manually inspecting all ballots and marking them is way overblown.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: clemsontiger02
clemsontiger02 said:
So you are willing to fully ignore that an obviously-biased firm with no experience auditing elections began the process with a major mistake. And they also promised full transparency, but are now fighting in court to keep the process secret.

But you don't have any comment on that because you are "not running the audit". Right. Because not being directly involved with these things has really kept you from sharing your thoughts on them.

What a joke.
Click to expand...
He wants a racist dictator to be in charge no matter what. Fully radicalized Christian nationalist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

TigerGrowls

Urgent Message from Elon Musk

Replies
0
Views
439
House Of Politics & Off-Topics
TigerGrowls
TigerGrowls
Cris_Ard

Why this could be the most consequential election in college sports history

Replies
0
Views
858
House Of Politics & Off-Topics
Cris_Ard
Cris_Ard
TigerGrowls

Woman Who Sent Photo of Young Girl’s Mutilated Body To 2020 GOP Election Official and Threatened The Life of Her 14-Yr-Old Daughter, sentenced

Replies
1
Views
699
House Of Politics & Off-Topics
TigerGrowls
TigerGrowls
TigerGrowls

Kari Lake announces ballot chasing operation in Arizona, plans to go to SCOTUS with election case

Replies
9
Views
522
House Of Politics & Off-Topics
dpic73
dpic73
Cris_Ard

Here's where things stand with the new NCAA proposal

Replies
4
Views
771
The West Zone
TigerLion06
TigerLion06
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back