Well there is fraud going on. In a Dekalb County, Georgia, there was an election race for a local office between 3 candidates using the Dominion machines. It turned out that two had failed to get over 50%, and the third (a woman named Long?) had failed to get 29%. So the two leaders were set for a runoff. Something just didn't add up, so the woman (Long) asked for a hand ballet count. As it turned out, the woman (Long) had several precincts where she did not even get one vote, and even in her own precinct where she lived she had no votes. When they did the hand ballot count it turned out that the Dominion machine software had taken votes away from her and given it to the guy who had the highest percentage (%). When they did the hand count, not only did she (Long) win, but she did so by a large margin, and the guy who originally had the most votes, ended up in third. So the woman (Long), had enough to win outright, with no need for a runoff. Things like this have been found in various places.
In Arizona they had some big issues with the ESS and Dominion machines. And a whistle blower came forward with what she had heard in a Democratic election officials meeting on how the had a algorithm installed in those machines to inject 35,000 votes for each candidate. They knew that they could inject 1,000 fraudulent votes at a time without being detected, and experts have gone back and found the times on a graph when these were injected into the machine just as the whistle blower said. And, not only was this done where it is now noticed, it was done at the same time (1,000 injected votes) over each candidate, up ballot, and down ballot, again at the exact same time, by both the ESS and Dominion machines. These spikes were noticed over the period of the Election Day. The computer/cyber expert says that without a doubt (100%), this was an algorithm programed into the software program. The algorithm worked at keeping it within a parameter (guardrails), not allowing the spikes to exceed above or below a limit. Each time segment descended by exact percentage measurements, i.e., 72%, then 71%, then 70%, then 69%, etc...etc...The math experts and computer experts said this was an impossibility, especially if this was done by a person, as there was no way to keep 500,000 votes in Pima County (or Maricopa County? I forgot which one was on the report?) arranged to keep these voting percentages in the structured descending order.
Personally, I think we are soon going to see the top blown off this 2020 election thing, as I hear there is another major whistle blower possibly coming forward. But I do wish they would investigate the ballots pulled out from under the table and run through the machine 4 and 5 times in Fulton County, Georgia, on election night, after everyone was told to go home, because counting was shut down for the night. At the exact same time when this camera was on the people in that room, they were able to detect a major spike of thousands of votes when this was supposed to be paused until the next morning. I wonder why the FBI and Department of Justice haven't talked to those people in that room???
news.yahoo.com
heathercoxrichardson.substack.com
