Watch 2000 Mules this weekend only on X
- Thread starter TigerGrowls
- Start date
"The premise of the film was that thousands (at one point, they claim at least 54,000 people) were employed by unnamed nonprofit groups in key swing states to repeatedly ferry ballots to drop boxes, a process known as ballot harvesting. They claimed that each of these individuals, who D’Souza dubbed “mules,” may have visited ten or more drop boxes in a day and were paid $10 for each delivery.
It was an interesting story. The evidence, however, was sorely lacking. Take all those millions of minutes of video they claimed to review. During the course of the 90-minute film, they showed about a half dozen security video clips of supposed mules, dropping off an average of four or five ballots each. In each case, they claimed the individual was committing a crime.
Turns out, that’s not at all clear. In fact, as Reuters has reported, law enforcement officials in Georgia were able to identify at least one of the supposed mules included in the movie because a license plate was visible on his car. When contacted, the individual said he was delivering ballots for his family members, which is perfectly legal in Georgia. When law enforcement contacted election officials, they were able to confirm that the ballots for that individual’s family all showed up in the drop box in question on that date.
Far more troubling is the fact that, in all of that video footage, D’Souza’s film can’t show any individual at any drop box more than once. Remember, the claim is that these people were running back and forth ferrying ballots from unnamed nonprofit groups to drop boxes, multiple times a day. And, at least in Georgia, the drop boxes were all subject to video surveillance. So, why is there no footage of any one of their supposed mules at more than one drop box? Not one instance? It’s a massive hole in their concocted theory, but D’Souza clearly hopes his viewers won’t notice.
I could fill this entire page with similar examples, but let’s also consider the distinction between D’Souza’s film and actual journalism. It’s worth noting that D’Souza includes no interviews with any election officials, who might have been able to provide context to the so-called “evidence” he provides in his film. Nor does he include interviews with anyone representing the unnamed nonprofits that supposedly engaged in the scheme.
It was an interesting story. The evidence, however, was sorely lacking. Take all those millions of minutes of video they claimed to review. During the course of the 90-minute film, they showed about a half dozen security video clips of supposed mules, dropping off an average of four or five ballots each. In each case, they claimed the individual was committing a crime.
Turns out, that’s not at all clear. In fact, as Reuters has reported, law enforcement officials in Georgia were able to identify at least one of the supposed mules included in the movie because a license plate was visible on his car. When contacted, the individual said he was delivering ballots for his family members, which is perfectly legal in Georgia. When law enforcement contacted election officials, they were able to confirm that the ballots for that individual’s family all showed up in the drop box in question on that date.
Far more troubling is the fact that, in all of that video footage, D’Souza’s film can’t show any individual at any drop box more than once. Remember, the claim is that these people were running back and forth ferrying ballots from unnamed nonprofit groups to drop boxes, multiple times a day. And, at least in Georgia, the drop boxes were all subject to video surveillance. So, why is there no footage of any one of their supposed mules at more than one drop box? Not one instance? It’s a massive hole in their concocted theory, but D’Souza clearly hopes his viewers won’t notice.
I could fill this entire page with similar examples, but let’s also consider the distinction between D’Souza’s film and actual journalism. It’s worth noting that D’Souza includes no interviews with any election officials, who might have been able to provide context to the so-called “evidence” he provides in his film. Nor does he include interviews with anyone representing the unnamed nonprofits that supposedly engaged in the scheme.
“2000 Mules” is a minefield of gaping holes - The Timberjay
One of the first things to keep in mind when considering the credibility of the Dinesh D’Souza film, 2000 Mules, which made its way to Ely this past weekend, is that it makes no attempt to get …
www.timberjay.com
Go ahead and admit that you haven’t watched it.
Props to you for finding obscure websites, twitter accounts, memes etc to back up your opinions.
Props to you for finding obscure websites, twitter accounts, memes etc to back up your opinions.
It's called saving time my little special needs waterboy, who will believe a ginger mint is a usb drive, a ballot carrier is a suitcase, a lie is the truth and Donald Trump is Jesus. A guy who believes every word from the laughably yellow journalism from the Gateway Pundit. Respectfully, if you're going to participate in a conversation, bring some facts or STFU.
I was anticipating that response. I guess you don’t have enough time since you post garbage all day on this board. Of course you didn’t watch it. Respectfully, you should watch it before you comment. Very similar to your bs stance on what our kids are being indoctrinated with in schools. You have no skin in the game which makes you irrelevant. You are entitled to your opinions so carry on. 🤦♂️
Just remember, you don't have to be a little rock slinging dick from the sidelines, but if you choose to, you deserve what you get.
You sure did own me though with your word soup of a paragraph with four non-related thoughts.
I wasn’t trying to but I did. Of course you have no relevant response. Carry on
Like trying to tell children that Santa Claus and Easter Bunny don't exist.
Why not? Drop boxes have been used for years with no evidence of fraud or damaged votes related to their use. They are made with hardened materials, affixed to the ground and normally monitored by video surveillance. There are normally bi-partisan teams in each state that collect ballots from the drop boxes and take them directly to secure election facilities, following chain-of-custody protocols. You don't trust them only because you were told not to by loud voices on the Right that needed an excuse for their losses in 2020, not because they were found to be a major cause of fraud. Even if 2000 Mules were true (it's not), that doesn't mean those votes themselves were fraudulent. That film is propaganda being peddled to influence legislators to make it harder to vote, because the Right knows that the more people who vote, the better chance they lose.
Translation: "my feelings are more important than facts because mommy told me I am special."
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
Biden admin spends $40 billion on electric car charges.- Latest: southerncaltiger
-
-
-
-
