ADVERTISEMENT

When Hunter Biden is Indicted and Joe Biden Pardons Him and Seals All the Records What Do You Guys Think Will Happen

Wild West Baby as its likely to happen
You think? Maybe Trump shouldn't have set a precedent by pardoning all the criminals that did his bidding. It doesn't get more wild west or swampy than that. But my guess is Joe won't intervene. He could have stopped the investigation when he was sworn in but kept the U.S. Attorney in Delaware who was heading up the investigation.
 
You mean like the time Trump pardoned his former campaign manager after he admitted to, among other things, not registering as a foreign agent acting on behalf of the the former pro-Russian president of Ukraine? I wonder where said ex-president of Ukraine currently resides.
 
You think? Maybe Trump shouldn't have set a precedent by pardoning all the criminals that did his bidding. It doesn't get more wild west or swampy than that. But my guess is Joe won't intervene. He could have stopped the investigation when he was sworn in but kept the U.S. Attorney in Delaware who was heading up the investigation.

Have no clue but I am really curious about how this is going to go down

I think Garland may have him do a plea deal with probation and no tome served and seal the records

Garland will try to keep it from Joe having to do anytjhing as that will haunt Joe if he does
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
You think? Maybe Trump shouldn't have set a precedent by pardoning all the criminals that did his bidding. It doesn't get more wild west or swampy than that. But my guess is Joe won't intervene. He could have stopped the investigation when he was sworn in but kept the U.S. Attorney in Delaware who was heading up the investigation.
You mean like the time Trump pardoned his former campaign manager after he admitted to, among other things, not registering as a foreign agent acting on behalf of the the former pro-Russian president of Ukraine? I wonder where said ex-president of Ukraine currently resides.
But Trump!!! But Trump!!! But Trump!!!. Only pardons in history were by Trump.
 
But Trump!!! But Trump!!! But Trump!!!. Only pardons in history were by Trump.
That's what happens when you try to implicate our current president for being corrupt, without proof, while supporting the most corrupt politician in American history. I'm just saying, maybe you should slow your roll before you get too excited.
 
You think? Maybe Trump shouldn't have set a precedent by pardoning all the criminals that did his bidding. It doesn't get more wild west or swampy than that. But my guess is Joe won't intervene. He could have stopped the investigation when he was sworn in but kept the U.S. Attorney in Delaware who was heading up the investigation.
You mean like the time Trump pardoned his former campaign manager after he admitted to, among other things, not registering as a foreign agent acting on behalf of the the former pro-Russian president of Ukraine? I wonder where said ex-president of Ukraine currently resides.

Ooooh ooooooh I love whAtABouTisMS
 
That's what happens when you try to implicate our current president for being corrupt, without proof, while supporting the most corrupt politician in American history. I'm just saying, maybe you should slow your roll before you get too excited.
Seriously?? “ I’m just saying”…. You are a hypocrite.
 
You think? Maybe Trump shouldn't have set a precedent by pardoning all the criminals that did his bidding. It doesn't get more wild west or swampy than that. But my guess is Joe won't intervene. He could have stopped the investigation when he was sworn in but kept the U.S. Attorney in Delaware who was heading up the investigation.
So the FBI and the DOJ just chose not to pursue it for years despite countless issues and concerns (even from Congress/govt agencies, financial institutions etc ) dating back to when Joe was VP? If you think Joe hasn't held this out of court/public view for as long as he can, you're not from earth.

The only reason this is coming to the surface now are the FBI whistleblowers coming out and the growing possibility of a Republican return to power. It's a preemptive effort to charge him with a lighter tax crime so he avoids serious charges of corruption, fraud and international business crimes which carry potential felony status and prison sentences.

He's no less guilty, if not more guilty of abusing the system than the man you hate the most.
 
So the FBI and the DOJ just chose not to pursue it for years despite countless issues and concerns (even from Congress/govt agencies, financial institutions etc ) dating back to when Joe was VP? If you think Joe hasn't held this out of court/public view for as long as he can, you're not from earth.

The only reason this is coming to the surface now are the FBI whistleblowers coming out and the growing possibility of a Republican return to power. It's a preemptive effort to charge him with a lighter tax crime so he avoids serious charges of corruption, fraud and international business crimes which carry potential felony status and prison sentences.

He's no less guilty, if not more guilty of abusing the system than the man you hate the most.
Then I won't vote for him...oh wait. What part of we don't care about Hunter Biden do you not get? He certainly didn't grift more off his dad's name than other president's relatives, but if he's guilty, lock him up. But we know you don't really care either, because your real interest lies in the hope that it implcates his dad. I think you'll be highly disappointed.

 
Again, don't care if Hunter Biden goes to jail. BUT... and this is just my opinion (with no legal expertise AT ALL). Hunter's Laptop was apparently dropped off at a Pawn Shop to be fixed and he left it there. The owner tried to return it... failed... and was going to sell it. No problems here so far. THEN he found what was on it, and called Rudy to come get it. Rudy had it for a couple of days then turned it in.

IMHO, any defense lawyer is going to eat that raw. All he/she has to do is establish reasonable doubt in ONE jury member that MAYBE the pawn shop owner or Rudy altered that laptop for political reasons. I'm doubting a guilty verdict here even if the info on the laptop is 100% Hunters.

Again, not saying he isn't guilty, but just doubting that what's on that laptop is going to do it given the chain of events.
 
So the FBI and the DOJ just chose not to pursue it for years despite countless issues and concerns (even from Congress/govt agencies, financial institutions etc ) dating back to when Joe was VP? If you think Joe hasn't held this out of court/public view for as long as he can, you're not from earth.

The only reason this is coming to the surface now are the FBI whistleblowers coming out and the growing possibility of a Republican return to power. It's a preemptive effort to charge him with a lighter tax crime so he avoids serious charges of corruption, fraud and international business crimes which carry potential felony status and prison sentences.

He's no less guilty, if not more guilty of abusing the system than the man you hate the most.

it’s amazing all the evidence that your personal investigation has dug up here.
 
Lolz......hi pot, I'm kettle

When hunter Biden is arrested who is going to be your new boogeyman?

hillary. Out.
hunter. Out.

I am guessing the new Kaiser Soze will be Nancy Pelosi’s husband.

What say you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
Then I won't vote for him...oh wait. What part of we don't care about Hunter Biden do you not get? He certainly didn't grift more off his dad's name than other president's relatives, but if he's guilty, lock him up. But we know you don't really care either, because your real interest lies in the hope that it implcates his dad. I think you'll be highly disappointed.

So even though Joe B lied to you during his campaign and said he had no idea about his business dealings, you're still here saying Joe has no involvement despite it being proven he did know?

Got it
 
So even though Joe B lied to you during his campaign and said he had no idea about his business dealings, you're still here saying Joe has no involvement despite it being proven he did know?

Got it
I don't know what Joe knew or didn't know, but I do believe he's tried to put distance between himself and his son's business dealings - to what extent, I don't know. I also don't trust the sources that claim he was complicit. I also don't believe he benefitted financially from any of his son's deals but would that be a criminal offense if he did? Here's the thing I can't understand - what value would there be in it for you if he was criminally charged? He can't be prosecuted while he's still in office and he won't run again so where's the payoff for you MAGAs? Just so you can say, oh look, your candidate did something bad too? Pfft, apples to oranges
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT