You think? Maybe Trump shouldn't have set a precedent by pardoning all the criminals that did his bidding. It doesn't get more wild west or swampy than that. But my guess is Joe won't intervene. He could have stopped the investigation when he was sworn in but kept the U.S. Attorney in Delaware who was heading up the investigation.Wild West Baby as its likely to happen
You think? Maybe Trump shouldn't have set a precedent by pardoning all the criminals that did his bidding. It doesn't get more wild west or swampy than that. But my guess is Joe won't intervene. He could have stopped the investigation when he was sworn in but kept the U.S. Attorney in Delaware who was heading up the investigation.
You think? Maybe Trump shouldn't have set a precedent by pardoning all the criminals that did his bidding. It doesn't get more wild west or swampy than that. But my guess is Joe won't intervene. He could have stopped the investigation when he was sworn in but kept the U.S. Attorney in Delaware who was heading up the investigation.
But Trump!!! But Trump!!! But Trump!!!. Only pardons in history were by Trump.You mean like the time Trump pardoned his former campaign manager after he admitted to, among other things, not registering as a foreign agent acting on behalf of the the former pro-Russian president of Ukraine? I wonder where said ex-president of Ukraine currently resides.
That's what happens when you try to implicate our current president for being corrupt, without proof, while supporting the most corrupt politician in American history. I'm just saying, maybe you should slow your roll before you get too excited.But Trump!!! But Trump!!! But Trump!!!. Only pardons in history were by Trump.
You think? Maybe Trump shouldn't have set a precedent by pardoning all the criminals that did his bidding. It doesn't get more wild west or swampy than that. But my guess is Joe won't intervene. He could have stopped the investigation when he was sworn in but kept the U.S. Attorney in Delaware who was heading up the investigation.
You mean like the time Trump pardoned his former campaign manager after he admitted to, among other things, not registering as a foreign agent acting on behalf of the the former pro-Russian president of Ukraine? I wonder where said ex-president of Ukraine currently resides.
The DA handling the case is a Trump appointee that Biden could have removed from office and didn’t.
Seriously?? “ I’m just saying”…. You are a hypocrite.That's what happens when you try to implicate our current president for being corrupt, without proof, while supporting the most corrupt politician in American history. I'm just saying, maybe you should slow your roll before you get too excited.
We know. You use them all the timeOoooh ooooooh I love whAtABouTisMS
Maybe, but I’m not the one who cries about them then turns around and uses them all the time like the rest of you bitch-made powderpuffsWe know. You use them all the time
So the FBI and the DOJ just chose not to pursue it for years despite countless issues and concerns (even from Congress/govt agencies, financial institutions etc ) dating back to when Joe was VP? If you think Joe hasn't held this out of court/public view for as long as he can, you're not from earth.You think? Maybe Trump shouldn't have set a precedent by pardoning all the criminals that did his bidding. It doesn't get more wild west or swampy than that. But my guess is Joe won't intervene. He could have stopped the investigation when he was sworn in but kept the U.S. Attorney in Delaware who was heading up the investigation.
Outstanding explanationSeriously?? “ I’m just saying”…. You are a hypocrite.
Then I won't vote for him...oh wait. What part of we don't care about Hunter Biden do you not get? He certainly didn't grift more off his dad's name than other president's relatives, but if he's guilty, lock him up. But we know you don't really care either, because your real interest lies in the hope that it implcates his dad. I think you'll be highly disappointed.So the FBI and the DOJ just chose not to pursue it for years despite countless issues and concerns (even from Congress/govt agencies, financial institutions etc ) dating back to when Joe was VP? If you think Joe hasn't held this out of court/public view for as long as he can, you're not from earth.
The only reason this is coming to the surface now are the FBI whistleblowers coming out and the growing possibility of a Republican return to power. It's a preemptive effort to charge him with a lighter tax crime so he avoids serious charges of corruption, fraud and international business crimes which carry potential felony status and prison sentences.
He's no less guilty, if not more guilty of abusing the system than the man you hate the most.
So the FBI and the DOJ just chose not to pursue it for years despite countless issues and concerns (even from Congress/govt agencies, financial institutions etc ) dating back to when Joe was VP? If you think Joe hasn't held this out of court/public view for as long as he can, you're not from earth.
The only reason this is coming to the surface now are the FBI whistleblowers coming out and the growing possibility of a Republican return to power. It's a preemptive effort to charge him with a lighter tax crime so he avoids serious charges of corruption, fraud and international business crimes which carry potential felony status and prison sentences.
He's no less guilty, if not more guilty of abusing the system than the man you hate the most.
Lolz......hi pot, I'm kettleit’s amazing all the evidence that your personal investigation has dug up here.
Lolz......hi pot, I'm kettle
So even though Joe B lied to you during his campaign and said he had no idea about his business dealings, you're still here saying Joe has no involvement despite it being proven he did know?Then I won't vote for him...oh wait. What part of we don't care about Hunter Biden do you not get? He certainly didn't grift more off his dad's name than other president's relatives, but if he's guilty, lock him up. But we know you don't really care either, because your real interest lies in the hope that it implcates his dad. I think you'll be highly disappointed.
![]()
U.S. House panel probes Saudi business with Kushner's firm
A U.S. House of Representatives committee said on Thursday that it was investigating the Saudi Arabian government's $2 billion investment with a firm of Jared Kushner, the son-in-law of former President Donald Trump.www.reuters.com
I don't know what Joe knew or didn't know, but I do believe he's tried to put distance between himself and his son's business dealings - to what extent, I don't know. I also don't trust the sources that claim he was complicit. I also don't believe he benefitted financially from any of his son's deals but would that be a criminal offense if he did? Here's the thing I can't understand - what value would there be in it for you if he was criminally charged? He can't be prosecuted while he's still in office and he won't run again so where's the payoff for you MAGAs? Just so you can say, oh look, your candidate did something bad too? Pfft, apples to orangesSo even though Joe B lied to you during his campaign and said he had no idea about his business dealings, you're still here saying Joe has no involvement despite it being proven he did know?
Got it
Right, you cry about them then use them. I can see the clear differenceMaybe, but I’m not the one who cries about them then turns around and uses them all the time like the rest of you bitch-made powderpuffs
I did and there was no hypocrisyMaybe you should reread your post
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Right, you cry about them then use them. I can see the clear difference