ADVERTISEMENT

Who killed Seth Rich?

Wet work by Democratic operatives working the Russian. Collusion fraud against Trump
Covering tracks as Seth Rich loaded hard drive details from Dem HQ onto external drive and was using it to blackmail Hillary and Dems
 
Wet work by Democratic operatives working the Russian. Collusion fraud against Trump
Covering tracks as Seth Rich loaded hard drive details from Dem HQ onto external drive and was using it to blackmail Hillary and Dems
That’s not what the US court system had to say about it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: tallulahtiger30319
We do know that it is highly unlikely it was just a "Robbery". If I recall correctly, none of his stuff was taken.

There are multiple documents under seal for years. Why? If it was just a robbery, why would anything related to Seth Rich need to be under seal?

They probably want to let time go by and then just sweep it under the rug. Just like the JFK assassination.

I'm guessing the conspiracy theorist run up the score with this one.
 
They won't. They will kick the can down the road. They have probably already scrubbed anything on there anyway. They have had it for what, 10 years now?
Agree. Unfortunately they will find a way to hold it back.
 
That’s because they have lost so many lawsuits for lying they are being forced to tell the truth.

Now you and the merry band of idiots go elsewhere to satisfy your confirmation bias.
Ironically, they fired the last truth teller they had and that was the straw that broke their back.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73 and AugTig
Ironically, they fired the last truth teller they had and that was the straw that broke their back.

Lol. You clearly have not read Tucker’s texts about Trump while he was at Fox.

In private text messages Jan. 4, 2021, Carlson said he was done with Trump and his unfounded claims of a rigged election.

“We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights. I truly can’t wait,” he texted an unidentified person.

“I hate him passionately. ... I can’t handle much more of this,” he added.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
Lol. You clearly have not read Tucker’s texts about Trump while he was at Fox.

In private text messages Jan. 4, 2021, Carlson said he was done with Trump and his unfounded claims of a rigged election.

“We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights. I truly can’t wait,” he texted an unidentified person.

“I hate him passionately. ... I can’t handle much more of this,” he added.
People are allowed to change their opinions, correct?

You once hated someone, but more information came out and you now like them. Happens pretty much every day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
People are allowed to change their opinions, correct?

You once hated someone, but more information came out and you now like them. Happens pretty much every day.

Nope. Tucker had been fawning over trump for years on air by that point. He just got caught "being honest" in private texts.

His defense was not that he changed his mind. His defense of the texts was that he was pissed because an attorney from the trump campaign had sent him "evidence" that dead people had voted for biden in GA, a story he ran with on air. The next day, local ATL reporters went out and interviewed the supposedly dead people, and found them alive and well.

Tucket, trump, and you, all looked the fool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
Nope. Tucker had been fawning over trump for years on air by that point. He just got caught "being honest" in private texts.

His defense was not that he changed his mind. His defense of the texts was that he was pissed because an attorney from the trump campaign had sent him "evidence" that dead people had voted for biden in GA, a story he ran with on air. The next day, local ATL reporters went out and interviewed the supposedly dead people, and found them alive and well.

Tucket, trump, and you, all looked the fool.
Now do the other media outlets. Shall we play the Rachel Maddow Russian Collusion clip?

 
Last edited:
Now do the other media outlets. Shall we play the Rachel Maddow Russian Collusion clip?


RMDS - Rachel Maddow Derangement Syndrome

You said tucker was the only honest fox news personality.

I proved, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that he is not honest at all.

You brought up rachel maddow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
People are allowed to change their opinions, correct?

You once hated someone, but more information came out and you now like them. Happens pretty much every day.
Seriously? So you are saying that Tucker Carlsen didn't support and advocate for Trump all the time on his show before that text was sent and then just "Changed his mind" and now likes and supports Trump?

Come on man. Tucker Carlsen has an agenda and a view of how the world should be. Nothing wrong with that. Historically, he cherry picked facts that supported that world view and put them on his show. Again, nothing wrong with that... that's why he's a political Commentator (like Rachael Maddow) and not a news person.

Unfortunately, people do think he's a newsman or "truth teller" to use the words in this thread. He is not. He is a political commentator. That doesn't mean he's wrong (or right). It means he's pushing his own agenda, regardless of right or wrong an important difference.
 
Now do the other media outlets. Shall we play the Rachel Maddow Russian Collusion clip?

Absolutely. Maddow is no better than Hannity or Carlsen... She is a political commentator who cherry picks facts to support her world view. Just like Carlsen, people think she's a newswoman. She is not any more than he is.

The interesting part here is that your request is a reasonable one... and I responded in a reasonable manner. But I don't think you are honest in your request. That's just the plain old truth on Maddow. She's not always right (or wrong), but she always is pushing that world view. You could have put Lemon and Cuomo right in there with her from CNN.

So putting your request right back at you... Can you do the FoxNews folks (Hannity and Tucker) or the Newsmax folks? I'm guessing not.
 
People are allowed to change their opinions, correct?

You once hated someone, but more information came out and you now like them. Happens pretty much every day.
Sorry but his private opinion is the honest one, but he knew he needed to change his public opinion for career purposes. And as long as his fake opinion is pro-Trump, you couldn't give a rip. Sad
 
Now do the other media outlets. Shall we play the Rachel Maddow Russian Collusion clip?

Shall we show you the threatening Trump post, calling MSNBC illegal? I guess you MAGAs will have to back away from those freedumb of speech/weaponization of government narratives now that he wants to do worse than anything that happened with twitter.

 
RMDS - Rachel Maddow Derangement Syndrome

You said tucker was the only honest fox news personality.

I proved, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that he is not honest at all.

You brought up rachel maddow.
It's not dishonest to change your opinion. You proved absolutely nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
It's not dishonest to change your opinion. You proved absolutely nothing.
I think the point is that he NEVER changed his opinion (at least not that we know of). Tucker was a Trump supporter on his show since Trump decided to run for President and since that text was made public and Tucker moved his show to X, he's STILL been a Trump supporter on his show. That public support on Tucker's show NEVER changed from day one.

The point here is that what Tucker was doing in public on his show, seems at odds with what Tucker was saying privately in his texts to his coworkers.

Maybe Tucker was lying on his show and he hated Trump the whole time. Maybe Tucker was lying to his coworker by texting that he hated Trump and couldn't wait for Trump to be irrelevant. I have no idea. But both those things can't be true, because publicly Tucker has always had good things to say about Trump.
 
It's not dishonest to change your opinion. You proved absolutely nothing.

"tucker love trump. tucker change mind and text friend then change mind back and love trump another time." - olefastball

I wont waste any more of my time arguing about what constitutes dishonesty with a dishonest, subhuman d-bag who welches on his bets like yourself.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: WapPride and dpic73
Absolutely. Maddow is no better than Hannity or Carlsen... She is a political commentator who cherry picks facts to support her world view. Just like Carlsen, people think she's a newswoman. She is not any more than he is.

The interesting part here is that your request is a reasonable one... and I responded in a reasonable manner. But I don't think you are honest in your request. That's just the plain old truth on Maddow. She's not always right (or wrong), but she always is pushing that world view. You could have put Lemon and Cuomo right in there with her from CNN.

So putting your request right back at you... Can you do the FoxNews folks (Hannity and Tucker) or the Newsmax folks? I'm guessing not.
I know you're making a point, and I'm on same page with you.

But I like to point out that if we list a week's worth of commentary quotes from Maddow, Hannty, and from Carlsen when he was on Fox, and then fact check them against truth, out of context statements, missing words and sentences in the quotes they serve up, you'll see a decided difference between them. I did some of this once before when I had nothing better to do.

Just saying that there's a difference with two of them when compared to the third in the reality and facts data. One is leaning toward a political belief, and the other are just liars and propagandists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
I know you're making a point, and I'm on same page with you.

But I like to point out that if we list a week's worth of commentary quotes from Maddow, Hannty, and from Carlsen when he was on Fox, and then fact check them against truth, out of context statements, missing words and sentences in the quotes they serve up, you'll see a decided difference between them. I did some of this once before when I had nothing better to do.

Just saying that there's a difference with two of them when compared to the third in the reality and facts data. One is leaning toward a political belief, and the other are just liars and propagandists.


That ugly dude Maddow is a liar, probably a deep state mouth piece. He wishes he could be 1/100 as successful as Tucker
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT