NWO Committee of 300 members, “The Clinton’s”Anybody know?
That’s not what the US court system had to say about it.Wet work by Democratic operatives working the Russian. Collusion fraud against Trump
Covering tracks as Seth Rich loaded hard drive details from Dem HQ onto external drive and was using it to blackmail Hillary and Dems
Anybody know?
That’s not what the US court system had to say about it.
A QAnon conspiracy theorist has a "source" y'all. Believe her!
I bet you are vaccinated and triple boosted.A QAnon conspiracy theorist has a "source" y'all. Believe her!
It's true and I died suddenly so I'm typing from beyond through a Ouija board. Just ask Ann Vandersteel -she knows all because she has sources.I bet you are vaccinated and triple boosted.
he's no Ben CarsonI bet you are vaccinated and triple boosted.
They won't. They will kick the can down the road. They have probably already scrubbed anything on there anyway. They have had it for what, 10 years now?
Agree. Unfortunately they will find a way to hold it back.They won't. They will kick the can down the road. They have probably already scrubbed anything on there anyway. They have had it for what, 10 years now?
Agree. Unfortunately they will find a way to hold it back.
LOL Fox. No one watches that garbage anymore.Haven't you and your ilk tormented these people enough already?
![]()
Fox News Settles With Seth Rich's Parents For False Story Claiming Clinton Leaks
Fox News settles with parents of a slain Democratic staffer over a retracted 2017 story reporting he had shared party emails with Wikileaks. Fox also suggested Democrats were linked to his death.www.npr.org
LOL Fox. No one watches that garbage anymore.
Ironically, they fired the last truth teller they had and that was the straw that broke their back.That’s because they have lost so many lawsuits for lying they are being forced to tell the truth.
Now you and the merry band of idiots go elsewhere to satisfy your confirmation bias.
Ironically, they fired the last truth teller they had and that was the straw that broke their back.
People are allowed to change their opinions, correct?Lol. You clearly have not read Tucker’s texts about Trump while he was at Fox.
In private text messages Jan. 4, 2021, Carlson said he was done with Trump and his unfounded claims of a rigged election.
“We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights. I truly can’t wait,” he texted an unidentified person.
“I hate him passionately. ... I can’t handle much more of this,” he added.
People are allowed to change their opinions, correct?
You once hated someone, but more information came out and you now like them. Happens pretty much every day.
Now do the other media outlets. Shall we play the Rachel Maddow Russian Collusion clip?Nope. Tucker had been fawning over trump for years on air by that point. He just got caught "being honest" in private texts.
His defense was not that he changed his mind. His defense of the texts was that he was pissed because an attorney from the trump campaign had sent him "evidence" that dead people had voted for biden in GA, a story he ran with on air. The next day, local ATL reporters went out and interviewed the supposedly dead people, and found them alive and well.
Tucket, trump, and you, all looked the fool.
Now do the other media outlets. Shall we play the Rachel Maddow Russian Collusion clip?
Seriously? So you are saying that Tucker Carlsen didn't support and advocate for Trump all the time on his show before that text was sent and then just "Changed his mind" and now likes and supports Trump?People are allowed to change their opinions, correct?
You once hated someone, but more information came out and you now like them. Happens pretty much every day.
Absolutely. Maddow is no better than Hannity or Carlsen... She is a political commentator who cherry picks facts to support her world view. Just like Carlsen, people think she's a newswoman. She is not any more than he is.Now do the other media outlets. Shall we play the Rachel Maddow Russian Collusion clip?
Sorry but his private opinion is the honest one, but he knew he needed to change his public opinion for career purposes. And as long as his fake opinion is pro-Trump, you couldn't give a rip. SadPeople are allowed to change their opinions, correct?
You once hated someone, but more information came out and you now like them. Happens pretty much every day.
Shall we show you the threatening Trump post, calling MSNBC illegal? I guess you MAGAs will have to back away from those freedumb of speech/weaponization of government narratives now that he wants to do worse than anything that happened with twitter.Now do the other media outlets. Shall we play the Rachel Maddow Russian Collusion clip?
It's not dishonest to change your opinion. You proved absolutely nothing.RMDS - Rachel Maddow Derangement Syndrome
You said tucker was the only honest fox news personality.
I proved, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that he is not honest at all.
You brought up rachel maddow.
I think the point is that he NEVER changed his opinion (at least not that we know of). Tucker was a Trump supporter on his show since Trump decided to run for President and since that text was made public and Tucker moved his show to X, he's STILL been a Trump supporter on his show. That public support on Tucker's show NEVER changed from day one.It's not dishonest to change your opinion. You proved absolutely nothing.
It's not dishonest to change your opinion. You proved absolutely nothing.
"tucker love trump. tucker change mind and text friend then change mind back and love trump another time." - olefastball
I wont waste any more of my time arguing about what constitutes dishonesty with a dishonest, subhuman d-bag who welches on his bets like yourself.
I know you're making a point, and I'm on same page with you.Absolutely. Maddow is no better than Hannity or Carlsen... She is a political commentator who cherry picks facts to support her world view. Just like Carlsen, people think she's a newswoman. She is not any more than he is.
The interesting part here is that your request is a reasonable one... and I responded in a reasonable manner. But I don't think you are honest in your request. That's just the plain old truth on Maddow. She's not always right (or wrong), but she always is pushing that world view. You could have put Lemon and Cuomo right in there with her from CNN.
So putting your request right back at you... Can you do the FoxNews folks (Hannity and Tucker) or the Newsmax folks? I'm guessing not.
I know you're making a point, and I'm on same page with you.
But I like to point out that if we list a week's worth of commentary quotes from Maddow, Hannty, and from Carlsen when he was on Fox, and then fact check them against truth, out of context statements, missing words and sentences in the quotes they serve up, you'll see a decided difference between them. I did some of this once before when I had nothing better to do.
Just saying that there's a difference with two of them when compared to the third in the reality and facts data. One is leaning toward a political belief, and the other are just liars and propagandists.