ADVERTISEMENT

Will the SCOTUS

reverse the unprecedented decision removing former President Donald Trump from that state’s ballot?
We don't know yet because it's unprecedented that an insurrectionist president would attack our own government over a seditious lie. They probably won't but they should.
 
We don't know yet because it's unprecedented that an insurrectionist president would attack our own government over a seditious lie. They probably won't but they should.
Why wouldn't they if what you are accusing, is the truth?
 
Why wouldn't they if what you are accusing, is the truth?
Like I said, because what Trump has done is unprecedented in our history and something never imagined by our founders. Who would ever think our own President would be able to fool millions of feeble-minded Americans into believing the election was stolen and enrage them enough to attack our own government?
 
There is no taxation without representation. The country falls if he is not on the ballot. It's that simple.

SCOTUS won't let it get that far though, because the constitution demands that he have ballot access.

Election interference.
 
Like I said, because what Trump has done is unprecedented in our history and something never imagined by our founders. Who would ever think our own President would be able to fool millions of feeble-minded Americans into believing the election was stolen and enrage them enough to attack our own government?
I see.
When was he convicted of insurrection?
 
I see.
When was he convicted of insurrection?
Have you read the amendment? If you have, you'd know it doesn't require a conviction. That's not what the Supreme Court will be adjudicating either. They'll decide whether it applies to a president since the language is vague.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nytigerfan
There is no taxation without representation. The country falls if he is not on the ballot. It's that simple.

SCOTUS won't let it get that far though, because the constitution demands that he have ballot access.

Election interference.
As a Trumper you know all about interfering with a free and fair election, so tell me, if Biden loses and refuses to accept the results and plots to overturn the election by lying like a dog, removing Garland and replacing him with a lackey, developing a fake elector scheme, pressures election officials to find non-existent votes, pressures Kamala into not accepting the results and overruns Congress with far-left thugs, do you think he should get off scot-free and face no consequences?
 
  • Like
Reactions: flotiger
Like I said, because what Trump has done is unprecedented in our history and something never imagined by our founders. Who would ever think our own President would be able to fool millions of feeble-minded Americans into believing the election was stolen and enrage them enough to attack our own government?
Actually, our founders did envision this which is why they put the electoral college in place and didn’t build in direct election of senators.

Also, they emphasized separation of powers and created a fairly weak executive branch, which are things Trump wants to undo.
 
Actually, our founders did envision this which is why they put the electoral college in place and didn’t build in direct election of senators.

Also, they emphasized separation of powers and created a fairly weak executive branch, which are things Trump wants to undo.
They may have envisioned a demagogue like him but they intended impeachment to be the remedy. I don't believe they envisioned a leader escaping impeachment twice with no consequences and a feckless party hellbent on re-electing him again.

Now that impeachment is off the table, the 14th is all we have, but the language is so vague, we aren't sure it applies to him. If it doesn't, it seems the founders didn't have the imagination to account for a populist who manages to escape all the guardrails they put in place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flotiger
As a Trumper you know all about interfering with a free and fair election, so tell me, if Biden loses and refuses to accept the results and plots to overturn the election by lying like a dog, removing Garland and replacing him with a lackey, developing a fake elector scheme, pressures election officials to find non-existent votes, pressures Kamala into not accepting the results and overruns Congress with far-left thugs, do you think he should get off scot-free and face no consequences?

Joe couldn't fall out of a wet paper bag. We aren't worried about him plotting anything.
 
Joe couldn't fall out of a wet paper bag. We aren't worried about him plotting anything.
Yet you blame him for orchestrating the most sophisticated election fraud scheme in our nation's history, so thoroughly perfect that we don't have the name of one single participant three years later.

But let's just admit what we all know - this diversion from the question is an admission that you know Trump should be paying a price for his crimes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nytigerfan
Do you ever read what you type?
As a Trumper you know all about interfering with a free and fair election, so tell me, if Biden loses and refuses to accept the results and plots to overturn the election by lying like a dog, removing Garland and replacing him with a lackey, developing a fake elector scheme, pressures election officials to find non-existent votes, pressures Kamala into not accepting the results and overruns Congress with far-left thugs, do you think he should get off scot-free and face no consequences?

They may have envisioned a demagogue like him but they intended impeachment to be the remedy. I don't believe they envisioned a leader escaping impeachment twice with no consequences and a feckless party hellbent on re-electing him again.

Now that impeachment is off the table, the 14th is all we have, but the language is so vague, we aren't sure it applies to him. If it doesn't, it seems the founders didn't have the imagination to account for a populist who manages to escape all the guardrails they put in place.
Not a Trumper, just fascinated by how he lives in peoples head and how they will do ANYTHING to keep him from his right to run for president! I will likely not vote for him to represent the party.

So now you're backtracking and bringing impeachment into the conversation. LMAO on escaping. We all know who has escaped impeachment so far.

"Impeachment is off the table, the 14th is all we have." WTF are you serious? AGAIN, you pin heads will do and try ANYTHING!
This is the only reason I come on here and enjoy busting your balls. You are infatuated with one man!
It's truly Hillary Larious!
 
Do you ever read what you type?



Not a Trumper, just fascinated by how he lives in peoples head and how they will do ANYTHING to keep him from his right to run for president! I will likely not vote for him to represent the party.

So now you're backtracking and bringing impeachment into the conversation. LMAO on escaping. We all know who has escaped impeachment so far.

"Impeachment is off the table, the 14th is all we have." WTF are you serious? AGAIN, you pin heads will do and try ANYTHING!
This is the only reason I come on here and enjoy busting your balls. You are infatuated with one man!
It's truly Hillary Larious!
What would be your remedy for an insurrectionist president who lied through his teeth, caused the death of five people, caused the injuries to 150 policemen and millions of dollars of damages to our own Capitol(over a lie), when Republicans are afraid their careers will be over if they do the right thing and impeach him? Are you saying he should get a free pass? All that is a no biggie?
 
Who would be this president you speak of that was charged with these things?

How about a president who has failed to uphold his duty to protect American borders and be a Commander in Chief? Those are 2 things our current president has not upheld!
This is by far a more impeachable argument.
 
Who would be this president you speak of that was charged with these things?

How about a president who has failed to uphold his duty to protect American borders and be a Commander in Chief? Those are 2 things our current president has not upheld!
This is by far a more impeachable argument.
If you don't even know that the president was charged for these things, what makes you think you know enough to say there will be an "unveiling" of the truth? That's right, you are a very low information voter who thinks they know it all and couldn't care less about the crimes of the most corrupt politician in American history because you love how he hates people you don't like, so you want him to get away with everything.

And we know this because instead of answering the question, you tried to change the subject. But just remember, if he isn't held accountable for his lawlessness, I say Biden should just go ahead and throw him in jail and claim that he's already won the 2024 election before it starts. After all, why not if there are no consequences? Or does that ONLY apply to Trump?

Trump was charged with four felony counts: conspiracy to defraud the U.S. (18 U.S. Code § 371), conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding (18 U.S. Code § 1512), obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding (18 U.S. Code § 1512) and conspiracy against rights (18 U.S. Code § 24
 
source.gif
And there it is folks, in all its UGLY glory!
source.gif
 
Last edited:
George Twinkie Conway.

He is going to cry so hard when he finds out the president does have immunity. Lol, fat loser
If he has immunity, Joe should call off the election now and declare himself king and send Trump directly to Leavenworth, because immunity would then apply to Joe as well.

You've lost your mind if you think they'll rule in favor of Trump on that claim.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT