ADVERTISEMENT

I found this article on brain function of conspiracy theorists really interesting...

so now we have "science" based on researching an ambiguous and undefined quality that unqualified people arbitrarily assign to people?

what science is there around a historically pejorative term that has an ambiguous meaning and is arbitrarily assigned? it's a term who's use in modern culture stems from being popularized by the cia in the 60's to dismiss skepticism about the warren commission. how about "the science" sit this one out? the people who decided gender isn't an indisputable truth expressed in an individual's biological makeup, but a limitless menu of options one can decide to be at any given moment, don't need to be involved in drawing conclusions on anything for a while.

it's not like there isn't already a continual procession of embarrassments for "the science" as one thing after another they labeled a conspiracy theory during covid turns out to be true.
 
Conspiracy theorists are running up the score at this point.

Epstein didn't kill himself.
Seth Rich wasn't murdered in a robbery
Cheese Pizza is a code for Child Porn
Hollywood is full of Pedo's
Trump didn't collude with Russia

Honestly i got too much shit to do to list the rest, but its a blowout.
 
The real study needs to be performed on half-cocked dimwits who refuse to acknowledge reality and double down when they’re wrong

Lookin’ at you OP
 
Conspiracy theorists are running up the score at this point.

Epstein didn't kill himself.
Seth Rich wasn't murdered in a robbery
Cheese Pizza is a code for Child Porn
Hollywood is full of Pedo's
Trump didn't collude with Russia

Honestly i got too much shit to do to list the rest, but its a blowout.
Think about all the people who 15-20-30 years ago yakked it up when someone would discuss the possibility of alien life… You know the routine, “mUh ConSpiRaCY tHeoRy”, “wHeREz yORe tIN foIL hAt”, etc. Those same dipshits are now wholly convinced they exist and will scoff in the same way if you say you’re skeptical. I know many, and they all display the same voting habits and ingest the same propaganda without the slightest bit of discernment
 
so now we have "science" based on researching an ambiguous and undefined quality that unqualified people arbitrarily assign to people?

what science is there around a historically pejorative term that has an ambiguous meaning and is arbitrarily assigned? it's a term who's use in modern culture stems from being popularized by the cia in the 60's to dismiss skepticism about the warren commission. how about "the science" sit this one out? the people who decided gender isn't an indisputable truth expressed in an individual's biological makeup, but a limitless menu of options one can decide to be at any given moment, don't need to be involved in drawing conclusions on anything for a while.

it's not like there isn't already a continual procession of embarrassments for "the science" as one thing after another they labeled a conspiracy theory during covid turns out to be true.
I like you. You are funny!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT