ADVERTISEMENT

JEROME CORSI: Obama Went After General Flynn Because He Was a Risk of Indicting Him and Hillary for High Crimes and Misdemeanors

TigerGrowls

Woodrush
Gold Member
Dec 21, 2001
20,825
12,108
113
Very nice write up on what happened. Pence was part of this from the start. Benedict Pence.


By Joe Hoft Feb. 23, 2023 2:32 pm
iu

As Trump’s National Security Advisor, General Flynn Would Have Pursued Obama and Hillary for “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” Over Illegally Supplying Weapons to Terrorists in Libya and Syria

Guest post by Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D.
This article is the first of a series of articles explaining why President Obama enlisted the federal government’s national security and justice agencies to make sure Lt. General Michael Flynn never served as President Trump’s national security advisor. In September 2011, Flynn was promoted to Lieutenant General and assigned as assistant director of national intelligence in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI). On April 17, 2012, President Barack Obama nominated Flynn to be the 18th director of DIA. On April 30, 2014, President Obama forced Flynn to retire because Flynn had collected sufficient intelligence on Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to charge Obama and Clinton with high crimes and misdemeanors. The premise of this article series is that as Trump’s national security director in the White House, Flynn would have pursued President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” over their illegal, clandestine supplying of weapons to terrorists in Libya. This series of articles draws on reporting Jerome Corsi previously published in World Net Daily [WND.com] in 2011-2015, when he worked at WND.com as a senior staff reporter.

Why did Barack Obama turn against Muammar Gaddafi?
The answer may be deceptively simple: The moment that Gaddafi became inconvenient to al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, Gaddafi became inconvenient to Obama.
In 2011, Gaddafi stood in the way of the al-Qaeda splinter group militia and the Muslim Brotherhood’s plan in Libya to advance the Arab Spring in North Africa by removing Muammar Qaddafi from power. This first article explains that President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton engineered an illegal, covert operation to run weapons to the al-Qaeda splinter militia groups and the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya. By so doing, Obama and Clinton succeed in converting Libya into a Sharia Law-driven Islamic terrorist state. After Qaddafi was deposed, Stevens was appointed U.S. ambassador to Libya. As U.S. ambassador, Stevens’s job shifted from overseeing the Obama-Clinton covert gun-running to Libya to supervising the shipment of arms from Libya to Syria to arm the rebels fighting Assad, some of whom ultimately become al-Nusra in Syria and some become ISIS.
As Trump’s national security advisor, General Flynn could have accessed the classified documentary evidence required to charge Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton with having engaged in “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” over their covert gun-running to al-Qaeda splinter militia groups and the Muslim Brother in Libya, as well as their clandestine gun-running to ISIS in Syria.
******
Part 1
Secretary Hillary Clinton Sent Christopher Stevens to Enter Libya Clandestinely in 2011
President Obama Abandoned Gaddafi and Sided with al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood-Affiliated Muslim Rebels in Libya in 2011

On April 5, 2011, during the height of the Arab Spring, then-Special Envoy J. Christopher Stevens, a career U.S. diplomat, arrived in Benghazi, Libya, clandestinely aboard a Greek cargo ship. The ship carried a dozen American diplomats with enough guards, vehicles, and equipment “to set up a diplomatic beachhead in the middle of an armed rebellion,” as the New York Times reported on September 12, 2012. According to the State Department Accountability Review Board, ten State Department Diplomatic Security agents accompanied Stevens to Benghazi, the center of the Libyan rebellion against Muammar Qaddafi. The rebels fighting Qaddafi had renamed the plaza in Benghazi “Freedom Square.” Stevens initially stayed in Benghazi at the Tibesti Hotel. On June 1, 2011, a car bomb exploded outside the Tibesti Hotel, and a credible threat against Stevens forced him to move into the CIA Annex in Benghazi (where he died in the terrorist attack on September 11, 2012). Stevens’s stated goal in landing in Benghazi in 2011 was to represent the Obama administration supporting the rebels trying to oust Gaddafi from his position as head of state. This trip to Libya was not Stevens’s first tour of duty in Libya. From 2007 to 2009, he served as the deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli. Stevens’s actual goal was to assist Clinton in the illegal, clandestine State Department efforts to smuggle weapons into Libya to help al-Qaeda-related radical Islamic rebels overthrow Gaddafi.
Yet, only a year before Stevens returned to Libya in a cargo ship, in April 2010, Qaddafi had given a speech calling Obama a “friend” who was a blessing to the Muslim world. “Gaddafi was eloquent in his praise of Obama in this speech delivered on the 24th anniversary of President Reagan’s air raid on Gaddafi’s bunker in Tripoli. “Now ruling America is a black man from our continent, an African from Arab descent, from Muslim descent, and this is something we never imagined – that from Reagan we would get to Barack Obama,” Gaddafi said. “He is someone I consider a friend. He knows he is a son of Africa.”
What General Flynn had to know, Gaddafi had close and long-standing economic ties to Obama and those close to Obama. Among the Obama associates Gaddafi supported financially were: Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s pastor who became famous in the 2008 presidential election for his statements cursing America; Louis Farrakhan, the head of the Nation of Islam [NOI, “Black Muslims”]; and Raila Odinga, a fellow Luo tribesman who, as a communist, served as a former prime minister of Kenya. In 2006, Obama, as a U.S. senator from Illinois, visited Kenya and campaigned with Odinga and his Orange Democratic Movement [ODM]. The ODM derived its name from Victor Yushchenko’s State Department-supported “Orange Revolution” in Ukraine.
The truth is that Stevens and the State Department would never have landed in Benghazi in 2011 if Obama did not want Gaddafi toppled. From 1980 to 2006, the U.S. did not have an open embassy in Libya, although diplomatic relations were never formally severed. When Stevens arrived clandestinely in Libya in April 2011, he was not there as an official representative of the U.S. government.
In this Part 1, let’s review the history of how close Obama indeed was with Qaddafi, going back to Obama’s time in Chicago as a struggling want-to-be politician.
Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Farrakhan visit Qaddafi in Libya
In 1984, Wright accompanied Farrakhan to Libya, where they met with Muammar Qaddafi. In his book In the Name of Elijah Muhammad: Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam, theology professor Mattias Gardell commented on the relationship between Libya and the Nation of Islam (pages 205-206). “Qaddafi has for many years been the Nation’s most prominent supporter in the Islamic heartland and regularly has assisted the Nation of Islam whenever the need has arisen,” he wrote.
Farrakhan found a great affinity with the revolutionary Islamic socialism professed by Qaddafi. Gardell affirmed this: “The mutual sympathy and appreciation between the Nation of Islam and the Libyan leadership began as a continuation of the friendly relationship that, to the annoyance of the CIA, was established between Elijah Muhammad and Qaddafi’s first mentor, Gamal Abdel Nassar.” Elijah Muhammad was the black separatist, self-proclaimed “Minister of Islam,” who headed the NOI from 1934 until he died in 1975. In 1972, in a second tour of the Muslim world, Elijah Muhammad, and a personal delegation that included boxer Muhammad Ali, visited Libya and met with Qaddafi.
In 1972, Libya provided an interest-free, never-repaid loan of $3 million, permitting the Nation of Islam to buy and renovate a Greek Orthodox Church on Chicago’s South Side into Mosque Maryam, which became the Chicago-based Nation of Islam’s national headquarters. In 1985, Gaddafi gave Farrakhan a $5 million interest-free, never-repaid loan to start an economic program to aid blacks in America. On the occasion of Gaddafi’s first visit to the United States in 2009, here to address the 64th opening session of the United Nations, Farrakhan was still thanking Gaddafi for the additional $5 million Gaddafi donated to the Nation of Islam’s “economic development” programs. Gaddafi also provided the funding for Farrakhan’s international trips before and immediately after the Million Man March in 1991, a Nation of Islam event attended by both Wright and Obama.
In a 1995 interview with “Chicago Reader,” Obama acknowledged that he took time off from his first political campaign, for the Illinois state senate, to participate in Louis Farrakhan’s Black Muslim-organized Million Man March in Washington, D.C. When the 1995 “Chicago Reader article surfaced, Obama supporters predictably tried to distance Obama from the Million Man March, arguing that Obama had attended the event as an observer, not a participant. Still, Obama’s reaction at the time was enthusiastic. “What I saw was a powerful demonstration of an impulse and need for African-American men to come together to recognize each other and affirm our rightful place in the society,” he told the Chicago Reader. “There was a profound sense that African-American men were ready to make a commitment to bring about change in our communities and lives.”
Gaddafi funds Odinga
In 2007, after he lost the Kenyan presidential election to Mwai Kibaki, Raila Odinga alleged election fraud cost him the election. Odinga’s allegation led to a wave of tribal violence in which the Luo tribe of which Obama and Odinga are members killed some 1,200 Kikuyu, the majority tribe in Kenya, of which Mwai Kibaki is a member, and displaced another estimated 350,000 to 500,000 who fled their homes to save their lives. In a horrifying incident following the election, at least 50 people, including women and children, were killed by an angry Luo mob. The mob forced Kikuyu Christians into an Assemblies of God Pentecostal church in Eldoret, a small village about 185 miles northwest of Nairobi, setting fire to the church and hacking to death with machetes any of the Christians who tried to escape the flames. Former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, then U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and then U.S. Senator Barack Obama intervened. The three calmed the tribal violence by negotiating an extra-constitutional arrangement in which Kibaki, as president of Kenya, would be co-head of state, with Odinga, who Annan, Rice, and Obama elevated to the newly created position of Kenyan prime minister.
Obama funds Gaddafi
A public address delivered by Gaddafi on June 11, 2008, scheduled to mark the 22nd anniversary of Reagan’s 1986 air raid, suggests Gaddafi may have found a way to contribute financially to then-Senator Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. As translated by the Middle East Research Institute, or MEMRI, here is what Gaddafi said:
“There are elections in America now. Along came a black citizen of Kenyan African origins, a Muslim, who had studied in an Islamic school in Indonesia. His name is Obama. All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man. They welcomed him and prayed for him and his success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate campaign contributions to enable him to win the American presidency.”
Gaddafi did not elaborate on this claim to specify if or how “the Islamic world” may have contributed to Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. Still, the implication is certainly there that “the Islamic world” did contribute to Obama’s 2008 presidential election campaign, and Obama appears to have reciprocated by funding Gaddafi. In 2010, Obama earmarked $400,000 of taxpayer funds for two Libyan charities: Gaddafi International Charity and Development Foundation, run by Gaddafi’s son, and Wa Attassimou, run by Gaddafi’s daughter Aicha, as reported by author Camie Davis writing in the American Thinker.
What did Gaddafi do with these funds? Gaddafi International Charity and Development Foundation bankrolled the “Amalthea,” the Moldovan-flagged Greek-registered cargo ship carrying 15 pro-Palestinian activists and 2,000 tons of food and medicine that tried to run the Israeli blockade in July 2010. After two days of brinkmanship, the Egyptian ship ended the crisis by sailing for the Egyptian port of El-Arish after the Israelis threatened to intercept the vessel forcibly to prevent it from reaching the Gaza coastline. Former Weather Underground bomber Bill Ayers and his radical wife Bernardine Dohrn masterminded the Gaza flotilla campaign, of which the voyage of the Amalthea was the first effort. Ayers and Dohrn helped to organize the Free Gaza Movement, a coalition of leftist groups that included Jody Evans, the leader of the radical activist group.
Obama’s “Friend” Gaddafi Becomes Hated Enemy
In March 2011, Obama and Clinton joined a multi-nation NATO-led coalition that began a military intervention in bombing Gaddafi’s forces to support the radical rebels seeking to oust Gaddafi from power. Gaddafi must have been surprised to see Obama turn on him. On March 19, 2011, Gaddafi sent a letter to Obama, calling Obama “our son.” In the letter, Gaddafi implored Obama to withdraw from the NATO-led military intervention seeking to overthrow him. “Terror conducted by al-Qaeda gangs that have been armed in some cities, and by force refused to allow people to go back to their normal life and carry on with exercising their social people’s power as usual,” Qaddafi explained. “Libya should be left to Libyans with the African union frame.”
On Oct. 20, 2011, after the video of Gaddafi being killed brutally was shown worldwide, Obama appeared in the Rose Garden to announce, “The dark shadow of tyranny has been lifted.” Remarkably, few in the mainstream media bothered to examine what happened to change a seemingly close relationship between Obama and Gaddafi at a Group of Eight summit meeting in 2009. There, Obama reached out to Gaddafi, becoming the first U.S. president to shake hands with Gaddafi, the man Reagan had denounced as a “mad dog.”
The dramatic shift in U.S. policy toward Libya occurred when Obama decided to side with the “Responsibility to Protect” [R2P] that Samantha Power, then on Obama’s National Security Council, concocted as an excuse to enter wars to “protect” innocent civilians. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice, Obama’s UN ambassador from [2009-2013], convinced Obama to work with NATO (particularly France) to trigger a crisis in Libya to remove Gaddafi from power.
The Obama administration changed sides by supporting Resolution 1973, adopted on March 17, 2011, establishing the basis for multi-national military intervention to end the Libyan “civil war.” The UN-imposed “no-fly zone” in Libya quickly deteriorated into NATO bombing, which destabilized Libya. The Obama administration supported the radical al-Qaeda militia in the Benghazi region [Ansar al-Sharia] seeking to depose Qaddafi (who had dispatched the Libyan military to attack radical Islamic terrorists active in the Benghazi region). The divide between Obama and Qaddafi became clearest in March 2011, when American spy satellites showed Qaddafi’s military moving toward Benghazi, then the eastern stronghold of Libya’s rebel forces. On radio and television, Qaddafi said, “There will be no mercy.” He promised to hunt the rebels down “alley by alley, house by house, room by room.”
Throughout the 2011 Libyan civil war, Clinton schemed to covertly arm the al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated rebels, who were openly flying the black flag of Islamic jihad.
In 2020, Jerome Corsi published Coup d’État: Exposing Deep State Treason, from which much of this article was drawn. In 2019, he published Silent No More: How I Became a Political Prisoner of Mueller’s “Witch Hunt,” explaining how the Mueller prosecutors confronted Dr. Corsi for over two months for hours at a time in a closed conference room with no windows. Dr. Corsi effectively ended the Mueller “Russian Collusion” investigation when he refused to take the Mueller prosecutors’ plea deal, alleging he had lied to the FBI. The FBI never indicted Dr. Corsi—further proof the Mueller prosecutors were the ones telling the lies.
 

JEROME CORSI: Obama Went After General Flynn Because He Was a Risk of Indicting Him and Hillary for High Crimes and Misdemeanors (PART 2)​

By Joe Hoft Feb. 24, 2023 3:10 pm
Flynn-and-Trump-600x449.jpg

The Marc Turi Criminal Indictment Exposed the Obama Administration’s Illegal, Covert Gun-Running Operation to Libya
Guest post by Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D.
This article is the second of a series of articles explaining why President Obama enlisted the federal government’s national security and justice agencies to make sure Lt. General Michael Flynn never served as President Trump’s national security advisor. In September 2011, Flynn was promoted to Lieutenant General and assigned as assistant director of national intelligence in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI). On April 17, 2012, President Barack Obama nominated Flynn to be the 18th director of DIA. On April 30, 2014, President Obama forced Flynn to retire because Flynn had collected sufficient intelligence on Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to charge Obama and Clinton with high crimes and misdemeanors. The premise of this article series is that as Trump’s national security director in the White House, Flynn would have pursued President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” over their illegal, clandestine supplying of weapons to terrorists in Libya. This series of articles draws on reporting Jerome Corsi previously published in World Net Daily [WND.com] from 2011-2015 when he worked at WND.com as a senior staff reporter.

(Here is a link to the first article in this series.)
Why did Barack Obama turn against Muammar Gaddafi?
The answer may be deceptively simple: The moment that Gaddafi became inconvenient to al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, Gaddafi became inconvenient to Obama.
In 2011, Gaddafi stood in the way of the al-Qaeda splinter group militia and the Muslim Brotherhood’s plan in Libya to advance the Arab Spring in North Africa by removing Muammar Qaddafi from power. The first article explained that President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton engineered an illegal, covert operation to run weapons to the al-Qaeda splinter militia groups and the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya. So, Obama and Clinton succeeded in converting Libya into a Sharia Law-driven Islamic terrorist state. After Qaddafi was deposed, Stevens was appointed U.S. ambassador to Libya. As U.S. ambassador, Stevens’s job shifted from overseeing the Obama-Clinton covert gun-running to Libya to supervising the shipment of arms from Libya to Syria to arm the rebels fighting Assad, some of whom ultimately become al-Nusra in Syria and some become ISIS. This second article examines the Marc Turi indictment. This case leaves no doubt Hillary Clinton was the chief architect of the Obama administration’s illegal, covert gun-running operation to Libya and subsequently to Syria.
As Trump’s national security advisor, General Flynn could have accessed the classified documentary evidence required to charge Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton with having engaged in “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” over their covert gun-running to al-Qaeda splinter militia groups and the Muslim Brother in Libya, as well as their clandestine gun-running to ISIS in Syria.
******
Part 2

On Dec. 5, 2012, New York Times reporters James Risen, Mark Mazetti, and Michael Schmidt published an article entitled “U.S.-Approved Arms for Libya Rebels Fell into Jihadis’ Hands.” The article stated: “The Obama administration secretly gave its blessing to Libyan rebels from Qatar last year, but American officials later grew alarmed as evidence grew that Qatar was turning some of the weapons over to Islamic militants, according to United States officials and foreign diplomats.” This New York Times article implicated Marc Turi as the arms dealer who architected the 2011-2012 weapons shipments to Libya:
The case of Marc Turi, the American arms merchant who had sought to provide weapons to Libya, demonstrates other challenges the United States faced in dealing with Libya. A dealer who lives in both Arizona and Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates, Mr. Turi sells small arms to buyers in the Middle East and Africa, relying primarily on suppliers of Russian-designated weapons in Eastern Europe.
In March 2011, just as the Libyan civil war was intensifying, Mr. Turi realized that Libya could be a lucrative new market, and applied to the State Department for a license to provide weapons to the rebels there, according to emails and other documents he has provided. (American citizens are required to obtain United States approval for any international arms sales.)
The New York Times article explained that Turi emailed Christopher Stevens, “then the special representative to the Libyan rebel alliance.” The newspaper reported that Stevens said he would “share” Turi’s proposal with colleagues in Washington, according to emails Turi provided. Turi’s application for a license was rejected in late March 2011. Undeterred, Turi applied again, this time for a shipment of arms worth more than $200 million to Qatar. Two months later, the Department of Homeland Security raided Turi’s home near Phoenix.
In 2014, the Department of Justice indicted Turi on four felony counts: two of arms dealing in violation of the Arms Export Control Act and two of lying to the State Department in official applications. Pre-trial court filings by Turi’s defense counsel, Jean-Jacques Cabou of the law firm Perkins Coie LLP, made clear Turi intended to plead not guilty. Cabou felt he could prove that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton entrapped Turi in her 2011 covert, illegal plan to ship weapons to al-Qaeda-affiliated militia groups in Libya. The DOJ prosecution of Turi was unusual in that DOJ did not allege in its indictment that Turi ever actually sent any weapons to the Libyan “rebels.” Instead, DOJ charged Turi with lying on an export-license application, alleging he hid his intent to ship weapons and ammunition to Libya in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 170.
Count 1 of the DOJ indictment against Turi, filed in U.S. District Court, District of Arizona, on February 11, 2014, read:
On or about March 29, 2011, in the District of Arizona and elsewhere, Marc Turi and Turi Defense Group, in an application for a license to broker weapons, did willfully and knowingly make and cause to be made an untrue material statement and omitted a material fact required to be stated therein by listing the Government of Qatar as the end user of certain USML [United States Munitions List} items, when, in fact, Marc Turi and Turi Defense Group knew then that the actual intended end user of the listed USML items were individuals in Libya.
The USML included defense- and space-related items and technology, including weapons that fell under the import/export jurisdiction of the State Department under the Arms Export Control Act of 1976 [22 U.S.C. 2778 and 2797(4)]
In a defense brief filed with the district court on Aug. 11, 2014, Cabou noted: “The central allegation here is that Defendants made false statements in an attempt to transship arms through Qatar and/or the United Arab Emirates to Libya. The government does not contend otherwise.” In the following sentence, written in bold type, Cabou telegraphed a key defense argument, “But, public documents reveal that arms were in fact transshipped though Qatar and the United Arab Emirates to Libya, and that the U.S. Government may have provided support for those transactions.”
Cabou continued:
This information comes from such reputable sources as the United Nations Security Council, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Reuters, and Senator [John] McCain’s own mouth. Given that the then-Ranking Member of the Senate Armed Services Committee [McCain] has publicly stated that the United States assisted in shipping arms to Libya, Defendants are certainly reasonable in believing the same. And if the United States did take such actions, any documents or other evidence relating to those actions are surely relevant to Defendants’ defense that they reasonably believed they had U.S. Government authority to broker nearly identical transactions. Defendants do not know what evidence does or does not exist on this front, but they are entitled to know.
The Marc Turi trial record established that DOJ utilized the Classified Information Procedures Act [CIFA, 18 U.S.C. App. 3 § 2] in an attempt to restrict releasing of various documents to the defense, effectively limiting the scope of defense discovery regarding the involvement of the Clinton State Department and Obama White House in arms shipments to Libya. The discovery reached an impasse when the government refused to produce any information requested by the defense in the CIFA conference held on Sept. 3, 2014. The government argued that the information requested by the defense regarding the Clinton State Department and the White House’s involvement in shipping arms to Libya was “not related to the conduct alleged in the indictment.”
In a motion to compel discovery filed with the district court on Sept. 22, 2014, defense counsel Cabou argued the government documents requested at the CIFA conference were central to the defense. Cabou wrote:
At its core, the Indictment alleges that Defendants, a State Department licensed arms dealer and its president [of Turi Defense Group] who have previously worked for the U.S. government through the Central Intelligence Agency, lied in an effort to arrange for the eventual transport of $267 million worth of weapons into Libya in 2011. It alleges that they intended to transport this extraordinary quantity of weapons with the assistance of foreign governments. It alleges that they intended to transport the weapons on dozens of airplanes into NATO-restricted airspace without NATO approval or detection. It alleges that they did so unilaterally. In other words, it alleges that they did so without any knowledge or involvement of the United States Government. Nonsense.
Cabou asserted the government’s “story defies common sense and ignores basic realities and the facts.” In the next paragraph, Cabou made clear the defense at trial would expose Hillary Clinton’s role in the Obama White House decision to transport weapons to the al-Qaida-affiliated militia in Libya in 2011 via a third-party country like Qatar. Clinton’s goal was to disguise the reality the weapons shipment was U.S. organized and delivered, in open defiance of United Nations Resolution 170 and a NATO-imposed arms embargo in effect at the time.
Cabou wrote:
In particular, Defendants intend to vigorously pursue a public authority defense, already noticed in this case, and premised on certain facts including, but not limited to, that: (1) Defendants had previously worked with the U.S. Government, including the CIA, on covert weapons transactions, (2) those transactions bore substantial similarities to the ones here, (3) Defendants either actually had public authority for the actions at issue here or reasonably believed that they had authority based on that prior relationship, (4) the United States did in fact covertly arm the Libyan rebels using a plan remarkably similar to the one at issue here, (5) the United States frequently assists in the covert transportation of arms, and (6) the manner and means by which the United States typically conducts such operations are identical to what actually happened in this case.
On Sept. 22, 2014, the District Court issued an order granting the defendant’s motion to compel the government to release the long list of internal government documents the defense requested. The documents to be released included other evidence “relating to instances in which the United States assisted or considered assisting in the covert transportation, provision, acquisition, transfer, or transport of Defense Articles to or from any person, entity, group of people, quasi-governmental entity, or government within the territory of Qatar and/or the United Arab Emirates within the timeframe of 2010 to the date of this request.”
On October 20, 2015, John Solomon and Jeffrey Scott Shapiro reported in the Washington Times on newly disclosed memos recovered in the burned-out compound in Benghazi in the aftermath of the attack that killed Ambassador Stevens on Sept. 11, 2011. The memos proved diplomats at the Benghazi compound were tracking several covert State Department-authorized weapons shipments. The State Department intended one of these secret weapons shipments to be for the Transitional National Council, the Libyan movement seeking to oust Gadhafi. The Washington Times reported that an end-use certificate from the State Department’s office of trade defense controls proved Dolarian Capital Inc. of Fresno, California, had been licensed to ship a weapons cache to Libya. The weapons cache included rocket launchers, grenade launchers, 7,000 machine guns, and 8 million rounds of ammunition. The newspaper reported that Dolarian Capital was a U.S. arms merchant working with U.S. intelligence. In 2011, the State Department approved Dolarian Capital to ship weapons to Libya via Kuwait, only to have the State Department inexplicably revoke the license before Dolarian Capital had sent the weapons.
On June 29, 2015, Catherine Herridge and Pamela Brown reported on Fox Business an interview they had conducted with Turi. “In the spring of 2011, Turi says his high-level contacts, both inside and outside of the US government, encouraged him to explore options to arm the Libyan opposition as they tried to overthrow the Libyan dictator Moammar Qaddafi,” Herridge and Browne reported. “Turi said, ‘That’s where I came up with this “zero footprint’ Arab supply chain whereby our foreign ally supplies another Arab country,’” Herridge and Browne continued. “In this case, the US would supply conventional weapons to a US ally—Qatar, who would, in turn, supply them to Libya, as a kind of workaround.” Herridge and Brown quoted Turi saying: “‘If you want to limit the exposure to the US government, you simply outsource it to your allies. The partners-—the Qataris and the Emiratis —did exactly what they were contracted to do.” Herridge and Brown concluded the article by noting that Turi told Fox Business that he never supplied any weapons to Qatar. He said the covert U.S. government program covertly running guns to the Libyan rebels was in the hands of the U.S. government and the State Department’s Bureau of Political and Military Affairs. Andrew Shapiro, a key Clinton aide, managed the State Department’s Bureau of Political and Military Affairs and was responsible for overseeing the export control process at the State Department.
On October 3, 2016, DOJ attorneys filed a motion in federal court in Phoenix to drop the case against Marc Turi. On October 4, 2016, Kenneth Pl Vogel and Josh Gerstein filed a story in Politico.com that asserted the following about the DOJ decision to dismiss the Turi indictment:
The deal averts a trial that threatened to cast additional scrutiny on Hillary Clinton’s private emails as Secretary of State, and to expose reported Central Intelligence Agency attempts to arm rebels fighting Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.
In his first interview after the DOJ dropped the indictment against him, Marc Turi told Fox News that DOJ abruptly dropped the case to avoid public disclosure of the weapons program that was designed to force the ouster of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi during the 2011 Arab Spring. “I would say, 100 percent, I was victimized … to somehow discredit me, to throw me under the bus, to do whatever it took to protect their next presidential candidate,” Turi told then-Fox News chief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge.
Roger Aronoff, a founding member of the Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi [CCB] and the Editor of Accuracy in Media, reported on July 31, 2014, on the Turi indictment. Aronoff argued that Clare Lopez, a CCB member who served as a career operations officer with the CIA and yet today serves as vice president for research at the Washington-based Center for Security Policy, might be right. Lopez claimed that in 2011, Hillary Clinton’s State Department was orchestrating its own gun-running operation to supply the Libyan rebels. She also claimed that arms dealer Marc Turi was set up to take the fall for these illicit arms deals. “We have ample evidence the Libyan gun-running operation was a White House operation and that the State Department under Hillary Clinton ran the show,” Lopez told WND.
“The key point is that Marc Turi, despite receiving written approval from the U.S. government to broker weapons to Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, never actually went through any weapons purchases or shipments to Qatar, to the UAE, or Libya,” Lopez stressed. But what is clear is that the guns were shipped. We concluded in the Citizens’ Commission Interim Report in April 2014 that Hillary Clinton’s State Department was shipping the guns to Libya,” she continued. “Marc Turi was set up and framed for something he didn’t do, while others, who actually did collaborate with Qatar and the UAE to deliver the weapons under U.S. and NATO protection and supervision, are not only not prosecuted like Marc Turi, they’re not even mentioned.”
In March 2011, as the U.S. and European bombing of Libya began, the Obama administration rejected an offer by Muammar Qadhafi to engage in negotiations to abdicate as president of Libya. On March 21, 2011, in the early stages of the Libyan Islamic rebellion, Rear Admiral (Ret.) Chuck Kubic began to email and telephone contact between Tripoli and AFRICOM in Stuttgart, Germany, to broker an offer by Gadhafi to engage in talks with the United States under a white flag of truce, according to testimony Kubic provided the Citizens Commission on Benghazi. “Muammar Qaddafi expressed his willingness to abdicate shortly after the beginning of the 2011 Libyan revolt, but the U.S. ignored his calls for a truce, which led to extensive loss of life (including four Americans), chaos, and detrimental outcomes for U.S. national security objectives across the region,” the Interim Report of the Citizens Commission on Benghazi concluded. “He even pulled his forces back from several Libyan cities as a sign of good faith.”
The Interim Report detailed the precise chain of communications with the U.S. government involved in pursuing the possibility Gadhafi might abdicate, obviating the need for the U.S. to join with NATO to back the Al Qaeda-affiliated militia seeking to depose Gadhafi in an armed rebellion. “Rear Admiral Kubic telephoned LTC Brian Linvill, the U.S. AFRICOM point of contact for all military matters regarding the Libyan situation, to advise him of Qaddafi’s desire to enter into military-to-military discussions,” the Interim Report continued. “General Carter Ham was advised immediately on 21 March 2011 of these communications and conveyed them up his chain of command to the Pentagon.” The Obama administration, however, expressed no apparent interest in pursuing the possibility Gaddafi might step down from power in Libya. “After two days of back-and-forth with the Libyans, however, General Ham had received no positive affirmation of consent from Washington, D.C. to pursue Qaddafi’s offer,” the Interim Report continued.
Kubic explained:
I don’t know if the decision came from the White House or Hillary Clinton at the State Department. But the advice AFRICOM gave me was to leave everything alone and stand down. An authoritative source told me in the U.S. government that an intelligence memorandum on the negotiations went to President Obama in its raw form. This memorandum was the document that gave the actual intelligence on the al-Qaida elements that were part of the Libyan revolution. All these negotiations happened from March 19-22, 2011. The intelligence document given to the president was dated March 24, 2011. On March 29, 2011, President Obama signed the intelligence finding, authorizing the United States to arm the rebels.
Confirming Admiral Kubic’s timeline, Reuters reported on Wednesday, March 30, 2011, that President Obama “has signed a secret order authorizing covert U.S. government support for rebel forces seeking to oust Libyan leader Muammar Gadhafi, government officials told Reuters on Wednesday.” Reuters further reported that the “presidential finding” signed by Obama was “a principal form of presidential directive used to authorize secret operations by the Central Intelligence Agency,” noting the signing of the presidential finding was a “necessary legal step” before the CIA could proceed.
“One of the most astounding parts of this whole thing is that Gadhafi had destroyed his stash of Weapons of Mass Destruction [WMDs] and was providing us with a steady stream of intelligence on al-Qaida movements in Libya,” Kevin Shipp told the author when reporting for WND.com. Kevin Shipp, a member of the Citizens Commission on Benghazi and a former CIA agent who spent 17 years with the CIA counterintelligence, counterterrorism, human intelligence operations, and internal security, as well as a program manager of the Department of State, Diplomatic Security, Anti-Terrorism Assistance global police training program. “Gadhafi was collaborating with us as an ally, so for the Obama administration, the White House national security team, and the State Department to break off contact with Gadhafi was amazing, especially when he was asking to step down and seek asylum.”
Shipp expressed his continued amazement that the Obama administration stood by while Libyan rebel forces aligned with al-Qaida not only toppled Gaddafi but also killed him. “It amounted to a de facto, third-party assassination committed ultimately by the United States, if you ask my opinion,” he concluded. “Why would we destabilize Libya when the leader tried to be our ally? This question is huge, and it suggests a pattern of Obama and his national security advisors to support Islamic rebel movements, including supporting the Free Syrian Army, over what could be a more stable solution.” Shipp speculated on why the Obama administration began covering up the truth about Benghazi. “The Obama administration was terrified that the American public would learn the CIA and Hillary Clinton’s State Department were running guns secretly into Libya before Gadhafi was deposed. Obama and Clinton did not want the American public to know that weapons bound for Libya wound up in the hands of al-Qaida in Syria,” he said. “Obama’s covert gun-running activity in Libya and Syria would be traitorous, in my opinion, if the facts ever came out to the American public.”
“Barack Obama supported the Muslim Brotherhood in the Arab Spring that eventually turned into supporting al-Qaida,” Lt. Col. Dennis Haney, USAF (Ret.), told the author when reporting for WND.com. Haney was also a member of the Citizens Commission on Benghazi. He had served as a U.S. Air Force jet fighter aircraft combat-experienced Electronic Warfare Officer with 22 years of experience as an Electronic Combat technical expert, attached for three years to the 52nd Tactical Fighter Wing Staff in Spangdahlem AB, Germany.
On the Citizens Commission on Benghazi, Haney played a crucial role in coordinating with the Global Response Staff [GRS] contractors that were present defending the CIA Annex at Benghazi during the terrorist attack that took the life of Christopher Stevens. “President Obama is a Muslim sympathizer,” Haney continued. “He wanted the Arab Spring to break forth across northern Africa, even if it meant destabilizing countries like Egypt and Libya by deposing Mubarak in Egypt and Gadhafi in Libya. Gadhafi had given up trying to fight America and was willing to open up his munitions inventory to U.S. inspection.”
Returning to the central theme, Obama and his coup d’état co-conspirators could not afford to risk allowing Lieutenant General Flynn to serve as President Trump’s national security advisor in the White House. As a former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency in the Obama administration, Flynn would have been able to gather the internal classified documents that could prove to the American people the Obama administration’s treasonous gun-running operations in Libya and Syria.
In 2020, Jerome Corsi published Coup d’État: Exposing Deep State Treason, from which much of this article was drawn. In 2019, he published Silent No More: How I Became a Political Prisoner of Mueller’s “Witch Hunt,” explaining how the Mueller prosecutors confronted Dr. Corsi for over two months for hours at a time in a closed conference room with no windows. Dr. Corsi effectively ended the Mueller “Russian Collusion” investigation when he refused to take the Mueller prosecutors’ plea deal, alleging he had lied to the FBI. The FBI never indicted Dr. Corsi—further proof the Mueller prosecutors were the ones telling the lies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clemson Goat

JEROME CORSI: Obama Went After General Flynn Because He Was a Risk of Indicting Him and Hillary for High Crimes and Misdemeanors (PART 3)​

By Joe Hoft Feb. 25, 2023 7:45 pm
Flynn-and-Trump-600x449.jpg

How Secretary Hillary Clinton Engineered the Obama Administration’s Illegal, Covert Diversion of Weapons from al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood Terrorists in Libya to ISIS in Syria
Guest post by Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D.
This article is the third of a series of articles explaining why President Obama enlisted the federal government’s national security and justice agencies to make sure Lt. General Michael Flynn never served as President Trump’s national security advisor. In September 2011, Flynn was promoted to Lieutenant General and assigned as assistant director of national intelligence in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI). On April 17, 2012, President Barack Obama nominated Flynn to be the 18th director of DIA. On April 30, 2014, President Obama forced Flynn to retire because Flynn had collected sufficient intelligence on Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to charge Obama and Clinton with high crimes and misdemeanors. The premise of this article series is that as Trump’s national security director in the White House, Flynn would have pursued President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” over their illegal, clandestine supplying of weapons to terrorists in Libya. This series of articles draws on reporting Jerome Corsi previously published in World Net Daily [WND.com] from 2011-2015 when he worked at WND.com as a senior staff reporter.

Why did Barack Obama turn against Muammar Gaddafi?
The answer may be deceptively simple: The moment that Gaddafi became inconvenient to al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, Gaddafi became inconvenient to Obama.
In 2011, Gaddafi stood in the way of the al-Qaeda splinter group militia and the Muslim Brotherhood’s plan in Libya to advance the Arab Spring in North Africa by removing Muammar Qaddafi from power. The first article explained that President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton engineered an illegal, covert operation to run weapons to the al-Qaeda splinter militia groups and the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya. So, Obama and Clinton succeeded in converting Libya into a Sharia Law-driven Islamic terrorist state. After Qaddafi was deposed, Stevens was appointed U.S. ambassador to Libya. As U.S. ambassador, Stevens’s job shifted from overseeing the Obama-Clinton covert gun-running to Libya to supervising the shipment of arms from Libya to Syria to arm the rebels fighting Assad, some of whom ultimately become al-Nusra in Syria and some become ISIS. The second article examined the Marc Turi indictment. This case leaves no doubt Hillary Clinton was the chief architect of the Obama administration’s illegal, covert gun-running operation to Libya and subsequently to Syria. This third article examines the illegal, covert gun-running operation President Obama and Secretary Clinton organized, diverting weapons from Libya to Syria to support ISIS.
As Trump’s national security advisor, General Flynn could have accessed the classified documentary evidence required to charge Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton with having engaged in “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” over their covert gun-running to al-Qaeda splinter militia groups and the Muslim Brother in Libya, as well as their clandestine gun-running to ISIS in Syria.
******
Part 3

Documents released by Judicial Watch and separately by Wikileaks from 2015-2017 provided evidence the Obama administration implemented a policy suggested by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2011 to arm the Free Syria Army rebels in Syria. Clinton’s goal was to topple the regime of Bashar al-Assad, complementing a strategy Clinton and Obama had already begun implementing to switch sides to support Al-Qaida and Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated in Libya to topple Gadhafi. These documents back up Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan made on December 27, 2016, that U.S.-led coalition forces had “supported” ISIS.
On May 18, 2015, Judicial Watch released more than 100 pages of previously classified “Secret” documents from the Department of Defense [DOD] and the Department of State that contain the first official documentation that the Obama administration knew that weapons were being shipped from the Port of Benghazi to rebel troops in Syria. Among the documents made public, Judicial Watch published a Defense Intelligence Agency [DIA} report written in August 2012 (the same time the U.S. monitored weapons flows from Libya to Syria) that said al-Qaeda and other extremist Muslim groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood-led the opposition in Syria.
In an interview with Democracy Now’s Juan González on July 25, 2016, Assange explained that the thousands of documents released by Wikileaks into the “Clinton Email Archive” contain some 1,700 emails that connect Clinton to Al Qaida and ISIS in both Libya and Syria. Assange stated that these emails prove Secretary of State Hillary Clinton implemented an Obama administration policy of supplying weapons to ISIS in Syria.
“So, those Hillary Clinton emails, they connect together with the cables that we have published of Hillary Clinton, creating a rich picture of how Hillary Clinton performs in office, but, more broadly, how the U.S. Department of State operates,” Assange explained in the interview. “So, for example, the disastrous, absolutely disastrous intervention in Libya, the destruction of the Gaddafi government, which led to the occupation of ISIS of large segments of that country, weapons flows going over to Syria, being pushed by Hillary Clinton, into jihadists within Syria, including ISIS, that’s there in those emails.”
In an email dated Aug. 17, 2014, released by Wikileaks, Clinton suggested to John Podesta, after she was no longer secretary of state, the following: “At the same time, we should return to plans to provide the FSA [Free Syria Army], with some group of moderate forces, with equipment that will allow them to deal with a weakened ISIL, and stepped up operations against the Syrian regime.”
In an article published by National Review on Oct. 12, 2016, Andrew C. McCarthy, a senior policy fellow at the National Review Institute, tied this statement to the Obama administration’s plans to equip Syrian fighters, specifically either the Free Syrian Army or “other moderate forces” to U.S.-led operation in coordination with Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey to steer weapons to Syria, “ostensibly to fight both Assad and ISIS.” McCarthy noted, however, that Clinton’s 2014 memo to Podesta asserts the Saudi and Qatari governments both support ISIS and other “radical Sunni groups.”
On August 30, 2016, the New York Times released an audio recording of remarks then-Secretary of State John Kerry made to a small group of Syrian civilians behind closed doors. In these remarks, Kerry admitted the Obama administration not only hoped ISIS would depose the regime of Assad al-Bashar in Syria but also gave arms to the jihadist army and its allies to carry out the task.
In 2011, Obama and Clinton engaged in a policy shift, deciding to implement regime change events toppling the governments of Gadhafi in Libya and Assad in Syria, even if it meant arming radical Islamic terrorist groups that traced back to al-Qaida and the Muslim Brotherhood. On June 20, 2011, Clinton’s longtime adviser Sidney Blumenthal sent a confidential email to Clinton at the State Department that included \ an article published by David W. Lesch, a professor of Middle Eastern history at Trinity University in San Antonio. In his opinion piece, Lesch argued a regime change strategy could be effected in Syria if the U.S. could find opposition groups in Syria capable of establishing “a Benghazi-like refuge from which to launch a rebellion and to which aid can be sent.”
In a subsequent confidential email dated July 24, 2012, Blumenthal further advised Clinton that the “growing success of the rebel forces of the Free Syria Army, FSA,” inspired him to believe the Assad regime was increasingly vulnerable to being toppled. In an email dated Feb. 24, 2012, Blumenthal characterized the FSA as “loosely organized and uncoordinated,” noting it was “for the most part, local militias, many of them civilian based, that are simply calling themselves the FSA to appear to be part of a whole.” Blumenthal continued in that email to comment the armed resistance to Assad “is not well funded or well armed.”
On Feb. 28, 2012, Jacob Sullivan, a State Department senior policy advisor to Secretary Clinton, forwarded to Clinton an opinion piece published in the New York Times by foreign correspondent Roger Cohen. In the opinion piece, Cohen made the link suggesting the strategy Obama and Clinton had used to topple Gadhafi in Libya should be used to topple Assad in Syria. “As the Bosnian war showed, the basis for any settlement must be a rough equality of forces. So I say step up the efforts, already quietly ongoing, to get weapons to the Free Syrian Army. Train those forces, just as the rebels were trained in Libya,” Cohen wrote. Payback time has come around: The United States warned Assad about allowing Al Qaeda fighters to transit Syria to Iraq. Now matériel and special forces with the ability to train a ragtag army can transit Iraq — and other neighboring states — into Syria.” Then, on Sept. 18, 2012, one week after the disastrous Benghazi 9/11 terror attack, Blumenthal, in a confidential memo to Clinton. In the memo, Blumenthal alerted Clinton to the possibility of an FSA military victory taking over Damascus. He noted that this possibility had caused Assad’s wife and close relatives to urge Assad to flee Syria to avoid “the fate of Assad’s former ally Muammar al Qaddafi of Libya, who was captured and killed by rebel forces while attempting to flee his home territory in Sirte.”
In 2013, then-Senator John Kerry joined forces with Senator John McCain to represent the Free Syria Army, or FSA, as “moderates” among the rebel forces. In testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on September 3, 2013, Kerry cited Elizabeth O’Bagy. Kerry argued that the war in Syria is “not being waged entirely or even predominately by dangerous Islamists and al-Qaida die-hards.” Instead, “moderate opposition forces—a collection of groups known as the Free Syria Army” are leading the struggle. At that time, O’Bagy was a 26-year-old graduate student currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Arab studies and political science at Georgetown University, who was working on a dissertation on woman’s militancy. On August 30, 2013, O’Bagy published an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal entitled “On the Front Lines of Syria’s Civil War,” which ran with a tagline, “The conventional wisdom – that jihadists are running the rebellion [in Syria] – is not what I’ve witnessed on the ground.” On September 27, 2013, reporter Sarah Hurtubise writing in the Daily Caller, revealed that McCain had hired O’Bagy as a legislative assistant, ignoring that she had been fired from the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW) for fabricating her Ph.D. In a statement issued after Kerry’s testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the ISW issued a statement: “The Institute for the Study of War has learned and confirmed that, contrary to her representations, Ms. Elizabeth O’Bagy does not in fact have a Ph.D. degree from Georgetown University. ISW has accordingly terminated Ms. O’Bagy’s employment, effective immediately.”
Before ISW fired her, O’Bagy worked as a senior research analyst and leader of the ISW Syrian team. In that capacity, O’Bagy authored for the ISW a March 2013 report entitled “The Free Syrian Army,” in which she argued:
The opposition movement in Syria has been fragmented from its inception, a direct reflection of Syria’s social complexity and the decentralized grassroots of the uprising. This condition has plagued Syria’s armed opposition since peaceful protestors took up arms and began forming rebel groups under the umbrella of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) in the summer of 2001.
In 2013, O’Bagy also worked as the political director of the Washington-based Syrian Emergency Task Force, or SETF. This group encouraged Americans to send money to buy weapons for the Free Syria Group. O’Bagy played a central role in organizing McCain’s controversial trip to Syria in May 2013. On May 27, 2013, the Los Angeles Times reported that O’Bagy, in her capacity as political director for the Syrian Emergency Task Force, said had given the newspaper a telephone interview from Turkey. In the interview, O’Bagy explained that McCain’s office approached the task force two weeks earlier to ask if the Syrian Emergency Task Force could arrange for him to meet with Syrian rebel leaders in Syria. O’Bagy, who accompanied McCain on the Senator’s May trip to the Middle East, followed through, arranging for McCain to meet operatives of the Free Syrian Army who had ties to ISIS. McCain met with FSA commanders in two meetings in Gaziantep, Turkey. One meeting was about a half mile inside the Syrian border at the Bab Salameh border crossing, where McCain talked with the Asifat al-Shamal, identified as the FSA’s Northern Storm Brigade. In the other meeting, McCain met with Gen. Salim Idriss, the leader of the Supreme Military Council of the Free Syrian Army. Idriss asked McCain to urge the United States to give heavy weapons to the FSA, set up a no-fly zone in Syria, and conduct military air attacks on Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Returning to the central theme, Obama and his coup d’état co-conspirators could not afford to risk allowing Lieutenant General Flynn to serve as President Trump’s national security advisor in the White House. As a former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency in the Obama administration, Flynn would have been able to gather the internal classified documents that could prove to the American people the Obama administration’s treasonous gun-running operations in Libya and Syria.
In 2020, Jerome Corsi published Coup d’État: Exposing Deep State Treason, from which much of this article was drawn. In 2019, he published Silent No More: How I Became a Political Prisoner of Mueller’s “Witch Hunt,” explaining how the Mueller prosecutors confronted Dr. Corsi for over two months for hours at a time in a closed conference room with no windows. Dr. Corsi effectively ended the Mueller “Russian Collusion” investigation when he refused to take the Mueller prosecutors’ plea deal, alleging he had lied to the FBI. The FBI never indicted Dr. Corsi—further proof the Mueller prosecutors were the ones telling the lies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clemson Goat
The mental gymnastics it takes to write that garbage is mind-blowing. How would one read that and think, " seems completely logical". Jesus it's sad.
Yep... Another thing that tickles me is that the folks saying this stuff are all about what a bad ass patriot Flynn is. Yet here are Obama and Hillary smacking him down b/c he might be a risk to them. And they DID smack him down according to the above.

And apparently he learned his lesson, b/c Obama and Hillary haven't been accused by Flynn of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors". So we are to believe that a freaking Lt General in the US Army was so scared of Obama and Hillary that they basically bitch slapped him and kicked sand in his face and he basically just let them? I don't like Flynn, but even I don't believe THAT.

But as time goes on, the BS about the Deep State gets more and more crazy. I mean, who ISN'T Deep State now?
 
Yep... Another thing that tickles me is that the folks saying this stuff are all about what a bad ass patriot Flynn is. Yet here are Obama and Hillary smacking him down b/c he might be a risk to them. And they DID smack him down according to the above.

And apparently he learned his lesson, b/c Obama and Hillary haven't been accused by Flynn of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors". So we are to believe that a freaking Lt General in the US Army was so scared of Obama and Hillary that they basically bitch slapped him and kicked sand in his face and he basically just let them? I don't like Flynn, but even I don't believe THAT.

But as time goes on, the BS about the Deep State gets more and more crazy. I mean, who ISN'T Deep State now?

What's the most laughable to me is this reinvention of DJT as some great patriot and champion of the poor and downtrodden who is here to save them from the deep dark evil government.

It's just crazy that they don't understand that DJT existed prior to the Apprentice and has always been a narcissistic asshole who takes advantage of the poor and the exact people they think he is there to help. Trump hates people like @TigerGrowls and they worship them. It's the wildest shit.
 
Last edited:
You do realize he admitted that he lied right?
No I do not. He was set up in a trap by FBI agents asking specific questions in a certain order in an attempt to make him perjure himself without even meaning to. The whole thing was a scam but you and the other libs here are too simple to deal with dishonesty and conspiracy in the real world.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016 and dpic73
No I do not. He was set up in a trap by FBI agents asking specific questions in a certain order in an attempt to make him perjure himself without even meaning to. The whole thing was a scam but you and the other libs here are too simple to deal with dishonesty and conspiracy in the real world.

Good lord you are a joke ... You either admit he lied, or admit Donald is a moron who fired him for no cause. One of the two is correct.
 
Good lord you are a joke ... You either admit he lied, or admit Donald is a moron who fired him for no cause. One of the two is correct.
Benedict Pence helped the CIA/FBI get rid of Flynn. It was a setup and thats why Flynn is suing them. I fully expect his lawsuit to fail because its all rigged.

Wash your potty mouth out. All you want to do is insult and you have no ideas. All you got is to watch msm and regurgitate it.
 
Benedict Pence helped the CIA/FBI get rid of Flynn. It was a setup and thats why Flynn is suing them. I fully expect his lawsuit to fail because its all rigged.

Wash your potty mouth out. All you want to do is insult and you have no ideas. All you got is to watch msm and regurgitate it.
It's amazing that you can't even hear yourself. You have attached yourself to a guy that spent his ENTIRE life being a low life, lying douchebag and identifying as a New York Liberal Democrat and you are willing to believe this liar over people with much more integrity.

Seriously, which is more likely... I lying shady businessman and his associates are lying... Or the entire country apparently is "rigged"?
 
What's the most laughable to me is this reinvention of DJT as some great patriot and champion of the poor and downtrodden who is here to save them from the deep dark evil government.

It's just crazy that they don't understand that DJT existed prior to the Apprentice and has always been a narcissistic asshole who takes advantage of the poor and the exact people they think he is there to help. Trump hates people like @TigerGrowls and they worship them. It's the wildest shit.
Yep... As I just posted above. OP believes that an 80 year old lying shady businessman is suddenly telling the truth and all of a sudden EVERYONE else... all the government agencies... local politicians around the country... the diplomatic corps.... local election officials... the CDC, the NIH, the American Medical Association...hell, even the National Hurricane Center are all lying to "get" Trump. Going back over the last few years... Who ISN'T Deep State?
 
Yep... As I just posted above. OP believes that an 80 year old lying shady businessman is suddenly telling the truth and all of a sudden EVERYONE else... all the government agencies... local politicians around the country... the diplomatic corps.... local election officials... the CDC, the NIH, the American Medical Association...hell, even the National Hurricane Center are all lying to "get" Trump. Going back over the last few years... Who ISN'T Deep State?

I'm of two minds about it.

1: He has been so poisoned by the garbage media he consumes like the GWP who feeds this echo chamber narrative, and he truly doesn't know or hasn't ever checked into the actual history of DJT.

Or


2: He has to know it's garbage at this point, I just think he's decided that this is the hill he's going to die on.
 
No I do not. He was set up in a trap by FBI agents asking specific questions in a certain order in an attempt to make him perjure himself without even meaning to. The whole thing was a scam but you and the other libs here are too simple to deal with dishonesty and conspiracy in the real world.
 
Benedict Pence helped the CIA/FBI get rid of Flynn. It was a setup and thats why Flynn is suing them. I fully expect his lawsuit to fail because its all rigged.

Wash your potty mouth out. All you want to do is insult and you have no ideas. All you got is to watch msm and regurgitate it.
is that better than reading obviously fake news and running to your message board thinking we give a fvck about it?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT