NGO's instructing illegals how to vote for Biden
- Thread starter TigerGrowls
- Start date
@TigerGrowls - you need to tell you comrades at the Troll Farm that they are getting sloppy. This stuff is too easy.
Told yall so. CONFIRMED to even be occurring in SC.
CONFIRMED: Federal Government Giving Voter Registration Forms to Non-Citizen Refugees
www.thegatewaypundit.com
The federal government is giving voter registration forms to non-citizen ‘refugees.’
According to South Carolina state representative and congressional candidate Adam Morgan, the federal government is including voter registration forms in packets at the Social Security Office in Spartanburg, South Carolina.
“Is the Federal Gov giving voter registration forms to non-citizens?” Adam Morgan said on X.
“Yes, at least in SC. A refugee sent us this form that was given to her in a packet at the Social Security Office in Spartanburg. She asked “Why are they giving these to non-citizens?”” he said.
CONFIRMED: Federal Government Giving Voter Registration Forms to Non-Citizen Refugees
CONFIRMED: Federal Government Giving Voter Registration Forms to Non-Citizen Refugees | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
The federal government is giving voter registration forms to non-citizen ‘refugees.’ According to South Carolina state representative and congressional candidate Adam Morgan, the federal government is including voter registration forms in packets at the Social Security Office in Spartanburg...
www.thegatewaypundit.com
The federal government is giving voter registration forms to non-citizen ‘refugees.’
According to South Carolina state representative and congressional candidate Adam Morgan, the federal government is including voter registration forms in packets at the Social Security Office in Spartanburg, South Carolina.
“Is the Federal Gov giving voter registration forms to non-citizens?” Adam Morgan said on X.
“Yes, at least in SC. A refugee sent us this form that was given to her in a packet at the Social Security Office in Spartanburg. She asked “Why are they giving these to non-citizens?”” he said.
Good stuff!
BREAKING: After bombshell revelations from South Carolina State Rep Adam Morgan that non-citizens were being given voter registration forms by various agencies, the state legislature has now passed a constitutional amendment prohibiting non-citizens from ever voting
"Many said this was a non-issue. Then we discovered state agencies sending voter registration forms to non-citizens. These non issues keep turning out to be major issues" - @RepAdamMorgan
We need more warriors like this fighting for election integrity. South Carolina is a red state and can only stay that way if Republicans root out all election fraud. Democrats never win by campaigning on policy, they just cheat
BREAKING: After bombshell revelations from South Carolina State Rep Adam Morgan that non-citizens were being given voter registration forms by various agencies, the state legislature has now passed a constitutional amendment prohibiting non-citizens from ever voting
"Many said this was a non-issue. Then we discovered state agencies sending voter registration forms to non-citizens. These non issues keep turning out to be major issues" - @RepAdamMorgan
We need more warriors like this fighting for election integrity. South Carolina is a red state and can only stay that way if Republicans root out all election fraud. Democrats never win by campaigning on policy, they just cheat
"Decades-old federal law requires that anyone receiving government aid be offered an opportunity to register to vote — regardless of their legal status. But that doesn’t mean non-citizens can actually register, said election agency spokesman John Michael Catalano.
“The very first question you have to answer on a voter registration application is, ‘Are you a US citizen?’ and the very last thing you see before you sign an application is that any fraudulent registration is a crime,” Catalano told the SC Daily Gazette on Wednesday.
And the agency doesn’t simply rely on applicants being truthful, he said.
The auditing process includes checking voter data against a Department of Homeland Security database, he said, pointing to a review of records from 2020 to 2023 that found zero instances of a non-citizen voting in South Carolina."
Freedom Caucus posts on social media prompt threatening calls to SC election agency • SC Daily Gazette
SC Election Commission gets threatening phone calls after legislator suggests on social media that noncitizens are being registered to vote.
scdailygazette.com
So between me and Growls, the one who exposes his lies is the communist? 😅
Be careful before I instigate the abolition of your property you doddering ol' lunatic!
WTF???? Anyone here connected with the state legislature that can comment on this?
Breaking: SC House Speaker @murrellsmith , with massive GOP majorities, rules @RepAdamMorgan's amendment to the budget to prevent agencies from sending out voter forms to non-citizens as "non germane" to the budget. This effectively kills the effort. Why is germaneness never a problem for their priorities, and why is preventing non citizens from voting, after it was discovered that SC health agency was sending out such forms to non citizens, not THEIR priority? @SCFreedomCaucus
Breaking: SC House Speaker @murrellsmith , with massive GOP majorities, rules @RepAdamMorgan's amendment to the budget to prevent agencies from sending out voter forms to non-citizens as "non germane" to the budget. This effectively kills the effort. Why is germaneness never a problem for their priorities, and why is preventing non citizens from voting, after it was discovered that SC health agency was sending out such forms to non citizens, not THEIR priority? @SCFreedomCaucus
You LYING POS - we already put this to bed - they were NOT voter registration forms
"Decades-old federal law requires that anyone receiving government aid be offered an opportunity to register to vote — regardless of their legal status. But that doesn’t mean non-citizens can actually register, said election agency spokesman John Michael Catalano.
“The very first question you have to answer on a voter registration application is, ‘Are you a US citizen?’ and the very last thing you see before you sign an application is that any fraudulent registration is a crime,” Catalano told the SC Daily Gazette on Wednesday.
And the agency doesn’t simply rely on applicants being truthful, he said.
The auditing process includes checking voter data against a Department of Homeland Security database, he said, pointing to a review of records from 2020 to 2023 that found zero instances of a non-citizen voting in South Carolina."
Freedom Caucus posts on social media prompt threatening calls to SC election agency • SC Daily Gazette
SC Election Commission gets threatening phone calls after legislator suggests on social media that noncitizens are being registered to vote.
scdailygazette.com
The first question on a voter registration form asks if you are a citizen....do you see that question here?
Dpic...come back to the light.You LYING POS - we already put this to bed - they were NOT voter registration forms
"Decades-old federal law requires that anyone receiving government aid be offered an opportunity to register to vote — regardless of their legal status. But that doesn’t mean non-citizens can actually register, said election agency spokesman John Michael Catalano.
“The very first question you have to answer on a voter registration application is, ‘Are you a US citizen?’ and the very last thing you see before you sign an application is that any fraudulent registration is a crime,” Catalano told the SC Daily Gazette on Wednesday.
And the agency doesn’t simply rely on applicants being truthful, he said.
The auditing process includes checking voter data against a Department of Homeland Security database, he said, pointing to a review of records from 2020 to 2023 that found zero instances of a non-citizen voting in South Carolina."
Freedom Caucus posts on social media prompt threatening calls to SC election agency • SC Daily Gazette
SC Election Commission gets threatening phone calls after legislator suggests on social media that noncitizens are being registered to vote.
The first question on a voter registration form asks if you are a citizen....do you see that question here?
Immigrants are not getting Social Security numbers at the U.S. border
Lara Logan, a former Fox Nation host, recently claimed that U.S. Border Patrol agents are distributing Social Security numbers to immigrants at the border.
apnews.com
Comment on what? That the state legislature can't pass a law that explicitly contradicts federal law?
Quit trying to deny this reality meatheads.
Illegal Aliens can register to vote in federal elections, just by checking a box and signing a form. No proof of citizenship is required.
Congressional Democrats insist that the SAVE Act—which requires proof of citizenship to establish eligibility to vote in federal elections—is unnecessary because federal law (18 USC § 611) already prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections.
Those making this argument ignore a glaring problem: the government officials who register voters and conduct federal elections aren’t allowed to require proof of citizenship.
It’s therefore shockingly easy for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, leaving our elections dangerously vulnerable to foreign interference.
Anyone—even an illegal alien or other non-citizen—can register to vote in federal elections, just by checking a box and signing a form.
This is all on the honor system. No proof of citizenship is required.
It’s not just that state officials—who are responsible for federal voter registration and elections in our country—*don’t* verify citizenship in this context; it’s that the Supreme Court has told them that they’re not allowed to do so.
In Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, 570 U.S. 1 (2013), the Court held that the National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA,” known as the “Motor Voter” law) prohibits states from requiring proof of citizenship when processing federal voter-registration forms.
The SAVE Act would fix this gaping loophole by requiring anyone registering to vote in federal elections to provide proof of citizenship.
It would also require states to review existing federal voter-registration files and remove all non-citizens.
Remember: every state except South Carolina issues driver’s licenses to non-citizens, and 19 states issue them to illegal aliens.
This, coupled with the Motor Voter law and the Supreme Court’s ruling, makes it shockingly easy for aliens—legal and illegal—to vote in federal elections, even though they’re prohibited from doing so.
Considering that there are now nearly 30 million non-citizens in the U.S., including about 12 million who have entered illegally since the last presidential election, we desperately need the SAVE Act.
While Democrats are already mocking the SAVE Act, they don’t dispute that non-citizens shouldn’t vote in federal elections.
Rather, they insist that there’s no need for the bill because non-citizens—being prohibited by law from voting in federal elections—categorically *do not* vote in such elections.
That argument fails for one simple reason: it implausibly assumes universal compliance with a law that has become breathtakingly easy (and correspondingly tempting) to violate.
Some say that non-citizens wouldn’t dare register to vote in federal elections, as doing so is illegal and could adversely affect their present or future immigration status.
Even if this assumption were correct with regard to many (or even most) non-citizens in the U.S., that still wouldn’t disprove the need for the SAVE Act.
If even a tiny percentage of America’s 30 million non-citizens were to vote, they could change the outcome of a close federal election.
And, as noted by the @I_A_Project, it’s odd for the left to insist so vehemently that illegal aliens don’t vote, given that congressional Democrats have inserted language “to waive inadmissibility for illegal voting in all [their] amnesty bills.”
Democrats can’t have it both ways; they can’t (1) credibly say that illegal aliens don’t vote in federal elections, and then (2) expect us to forget their own proposals, which assume the opposite is true.
In any event, and regardless of how many (or few) non-citizens may have voted in the past, why not take steps to prevent it from happening in the future?
The sanctity of your vote is at stake.
Now more than ever, we need to make sure that our elections are fair, lawfully conducted, and free of foreign influence.
To do that, it’s imperative that Congress pass the SAVE Act.
If you agree, please like and share this post—and ask your members of Congress to
Illegal Aliens can register to vote in federal elections, just by checking a box and signing a form. No proof of citizenship is required.
Congressional Democrats insist that the SAVE Act—which requires proof of citizenship to establish eligibility to vote in federal elections—is unnecessary because federal law (18 USC § 611) already prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections.
Those making this argument ignore a glaring problem: the government officials who register voters and conduct federal elections aren’t allowed to require proof of citizenship.
It’s therefore shockingly easy for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, leaving our elections dangerously vulnerable to foreign interference.
Anyone—even an illegal alien or other non-citizen—can register to vote in federal elections, just by checking a box and signing a form.
This is all on the honor system. No proof of citizenship is required.
It’s not just that state officials—who are responsible for federal voter registration and elections in our country—*don’t* verify citizenship in this context; it’s that the Supreme Court has told them that they’re not allowed to do so.
In Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, 570 U.S. 1 (2013), the Court held that the National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA,” known as the “Motor Voter” law) prohibits states from requiring proof of citizenship when processing federal voter-registration forms.
The SAVE Act would fix this gaping loophole by requiring anyone registering to vote in federal elections to provide proof of citizenship.
It would also require states to review existing federal voter-registration files and remove all non-citizens.
Remember: every state except South Carolina issues driver’s licenses to non-citizens, and 19 states issue them to illegal aliens.
This, coupled with the Motor Voter law and the Supreme Court’s ruling, makes it shockingly easy for aliens—legal and illegal—to vote in federal elections, even though they’re prohibited from doing so.
Considering that there are now nearly 30 million non-citizens in the U.S., including about 12 million who have entered illegally since the last presidential election, we desperately need the SAVE Act.
While Democrats are already mocking the SAVE Act, they don’t dispute that non-citizens shouldn’t vote in federal elections.
Rather, they insist that there’s no need for the bill because non-citizens—being prohibited by law from voting in federal elections—categorically *do not* vote in such elections.
That argument fails for one simple reason: it implausibly assumes universal compliance with a law that has become breathtakingly easy (and correspondingly tempting) to violate.
Some say that non-citizens wouldn’t dare register to vote in federal elections, as doing so is illegal and could adversely affect their present or future immigration status.
Even if this assumption were correct with regard to many (or even most) non-citizens in the U.S., that still wouldn’t disprove the need for the SAVE Act.
If even a tiny percentage of America’s 30 million non-citizens were to vote, they could change the outcome of a close federal election.
And, as noted by the @I_A_Project, it’s odd for the left to insist so vehemently that illegal aliens don’t vote, given that congressional Democrats have inserted language “to waive inadmissibility for illegal voting in all [their] amnesty bills.”
Democrats can’t have it both ways; they can’t (1) credibly say that illegal aliens don’t vote in federal elections, and then (2) expect us to forget their own proposals, which assume the opposite is true.
In any event, and regardless of how many (or few) non-citizens may have voted in the past, why not take steps to prevent it from happening in the future?
The sanctity of your vote is at stake.
Now more than ever, we need to make sure that our elections are fair, lawfully conducted, and free of foreign influence.
To do that, it’s imperative that Congress pass the SAVE Act.
If you agree, please like and share this post—and ask your members of Congress to
The only thing I certainly disagree with is the 30 million number. The MSM told us for around 25 years that there were 11 million. Where they came up with 11 I don't know, but people kept coming in and the 11 million number remained the same.
I personally think the number is much closer to 50 million than 30 million.
