ADVERTISEMENT

Observations and thoughts after rewatching the Clemson Scar game from last year.

catchandrelease

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,230
8,258
113
Their punter was the MVP of the game. Scar players are punks. Turnovers hurt us more than theirs hurt them. Our secondary play was terrible. Rattler had over 300 yards passing, and he is not really that good. They had WR's wide open all day. They actually had more passing yards than we had rushing yards and we had a lot of rushing yards. And to hell with we did not run the ball enough. If you can't pass, it is hard to have a running game.

We got outplayed in the second half. Scar players are punks. I did not realize Breese was so limited in the game. Scar had less than 100 yards rushing in the game. Scar players are punks. Our defense did not have a good day.

Thoughts. If we had won the game, would we have Riley as our OC this year? And if having Riley is more important too Clemson's future than if we beat scar last year? Enquiring minds would like to know.
It would not surprise me at all if we destroy scar in Cootlumbia this year.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Member-Only Message Boards

  • Exclusive coverage of Rivals Camp Series

  • Exclusive Highlights and Recruiting Interviews

  • Breaking Recruiting News

Log in or subscribe today