You don’t think there’s any chance they were “encouraged” by some “protesters” from a certain agency that shouldn’t have been there? You think there’s a 0% chance that had an impact? I’d say that’s the main reason I’m wary of the way they portray these stories. They’re overly complicated, they don’t give you all the information, supposedly the investigators even withheld information from the public. The point is there’s no clear evidence that the feds didn’t incite this and perhaps we should look into that. The reaction from the feds when asked about how many agents and were they actively engaged in riling up the public is not good. Furthermore there’s been protests in other cities with no violence where property is being trespassed. And if there would have been protestors killed in MN or Ferguson it would be treated completely differently, even more so if feds were involved. I think wanting a clear picture is reasonable, I’m distrustful of the government here.